Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Lopetegui (sacked 8.1.2025)

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
maverick180
Posts: 177
Old WHO Number: 21515
Been liked: 1 time

Lopetegui (sacked 8.1.2025)

Post maverick180 »

I was thoroughly looking forward to the start of this season

Was also prepared that things might take some time and wasn't expecting miracles over night What I didn't expect was a manager who after spending 6 weeks with the total dross he'd been left by Moyes would deem them fit to start in a premier league game And low and behold all of them played absolute shit

We're now 1 game in and none of our new players are any closer to bedding in or learning anything from their new team mates cos they barely spent a second on the pitch, half of them not at all I think it's gonna take somewhere between 6-10 games before we see the team anyone with an ounce of sense would play cos this bloke can't identify shit when he see's it I thought we was handed a miracle at half time when we went in level and low and behold he changed nothing I'm sure people are gonna make excuses for him and say it's too early to judge

But from what I've just seen today, this cսnt is David Moyes in a mission impossible mask
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Vexed »

 
Fullkrug a passenger?

You clearly didn’t watch the game.
 
 
Homesick Nic was just as shit as anyone else yesterday. I hope he fucks off back to Germany WHERE it seems his poor little achy heart yearns to eat curry wurst out of his big hairy mother's cսnt.

Oh well done you scored another meaningless fucking consolation goal nobody gives a fuck about, have a fucking slow clap you shit toothed bricklayer masquerading as a professional footballer looking prick. May as well stick a lamppost in their box and just ping balls at it. Better yet a fucking swingball set so at least some cսnt can derive even the lowest level of enjoyment out of a trip to watch West Ham, rather than watch this shovel faced speng standing around offering fuck all. 

Yeah great fucking game, brilliant yeah, we scored a goal BRILLIANT, FUCKING LOPPY IN, FULKRUG FOR FUCKING HAMMER OF THE YEAR, cսnt IS BRILLIANT AINT HE? . 

The absolute worst signing. Wurst signing HAHAHAHAHAHABABABABABABABABBBBHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHABABAH. Funny innit. What a great performance we put in, only 4-1. Brilliant progress. Better than 5-0 innit yeah brilliant, serve me up some more 4-1 losses I fuckin love em. Prideless cunts. 

Fuck off. 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 3356
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 1813 times
Been liked: 885 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Massive Attack »

It was the 1st time I've seen him play well for us after his 10th appearance and 4th start of the season. Hopefully he can keep that level up now. He needs to for the massive outlay.
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 1231
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 217 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Mad Ferret »

I wouldn’t mind more passengers who score goals.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post twoleftfeet »

WHUFCUSA wrote: 05 Jan 2025, 15:43 We will lose the next three games. We actually played well at times yesterday, but it was the Leicester game all over again. Kudus wants to score on his own, Soucek missed a good chance. Fullkrug is a passenger. No leadership at allwhich is why there is no fight
Fullkrug a passenger?

You clearly didn’t watch the game.
WHUFCUSA
Posts: 3
Has liked: 1 time

Re: Lopetegui

Post WHUFCUSA »

We will lose the next three games. We actually played well at times yesterday, but it was the Leicester game all over again. Kudus wants to score on his own, Soucek missed a good chance. Fullkrug is a passenger. No leadership at allwhich is why there is no fight
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Hammer and Pickle »

Sir Alf

Do you think media spin will be enough to shield Sullivan from the fallout of a relegation battle and player walkout?
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Sir Alf »

Sullivan will be working hard on the propaganda effort now rather than admit to being wrong.

Steidten is going to appear as the problem once, as I expect, we sink into the relegation conversation over the next 6 weeks.  

Then he will use his media friends to finally throw Lop under the bus.  All this is part of his smoke screen tactic to deflect blame and most fans will buy into what the media, web sites churn out. 
User avatar
Hammer and Pickle
Posts: 4006
Old WHO Number: 211190
Has liked: 99 times
Been liked: 133 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Hammer and Pickle »

scott_d wrote: 05 Jan 2025, 14:41 The question for me is, now that we are half way through the season, are we better off giving Lopetegui until the summer in the hope that the style of play will eventually bring results or do we get rid of him now and trust that Sullivan will find the right man for the job.

That's the real question because Sullivan isn't going anywhere.
I’m no fan of the school of thought that it has to get worse before it gets better but, in this case, we’re only going to get rid of the cause, which we are agreed is Sullivan, when he completely humiliates himself and is forced to cut his losses and sell up. So, unfortunately, the quickest way to that is, I guess, sticking with the blinking clown. Nobody in their right mind is coming to this smoking hulk anyway.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3085
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Lee Trundle »

Swiss will be on here bleating after we get thumped by Villa, most likely.
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Sir Alf »

With Bowen out for 2 months plus a few weeks getting back to speed, there is every chance we will get pulled into the relegation equation. Wolves and Ipswich both improving and Everton good defensively, Palace getting better.

Its the Avram season all over again. Sullivan’s ego and little man syndrome will mean he cannot bear admitting he was wrong with the appointment and he will involve himself in transfers that will be all wrong and not address the weaknesses.

Its looking ominous even tho we sit 7 points above the zone. We just concede for fun and that never ends well
scott_d
Posts: 574
Location: Essex
Old WHO Number: 11453
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 101 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post scott_d »

The question for me is, now that we are half way through the season, are we better off giving Lopetegui until the summer in the hope that the style of play will eventually bring results or do we get rid of him now and trust that Sullivan will find the right man for the job.

That's the real question because Sullivan isn't going anywhere.
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Sir Alf »

Ipswich looking well organised. Mckenna their coach has adjusted his tactics to play on the break and they are getting better results. 

Without Bowen I see us sliding fown further
Russ of the BML
Posts: 1059
Old WHO Number: 14551
Has liked: 327 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Russ of the BML »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 05 Jan 2025, 12:57 Didn’t see the match yesterday, due to work. But caught up on highlights etc. Can’t say I’m remotely surprised by the result.

Having not seen the full 90 minutes, I won’t wang on about yet another thrashing. But we are still shipping far too many goals.

Was there anything in it that offered a glimmer of hope?
The only glimmer of hope is that we could have been 2-0 up before City got going. 

The only other glimmer of hope is that they didn't thrash us - We gifted them four goals basically. I realise that may make me sound like a nutcase. But why I see it as a glimmer of hope is that, if we cut out those mistakes, we may fair better. 

Its scraping the barrel yes, but the bottom of the barrel is all I really have left. 
only1billybonds
Posts: 1890
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post only1billybonds »

Southbank.

You are being to kind. If you disregard cup football then we will have the record of winning NOTHING in our entire history. Absolutely laughable to dismiss cup games.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post southbankbornnbred »

But cup games are first-class matches, Swiss. Or do you not count cups? If not, West Ham would have a (major) trophyless history.

I’m not one for defending Grant (or Lopetegui, for that matter). But if you don’t accept cup games as wins, then we’ve achieved very little as a club, historically.

 
Swiss.
Posts: 1192
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 178 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Swiss. »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 05 Jan 2025, 13:32
Snodders' Beard" wrote: 05 Jan 2025, 13:18

Lop The Flop currently has a lower win percentage than Avram Grant...
Should be a shot in the arm for his supporters.

He's fucking dreadful.
Only if you include the 8 wins out of 10 in the cups. In the PL Grant is like 20%. But Lee you will believe anything written on the side of a bus even if ts not true. Thick cսnt easily conned . 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3085
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Lee Trundle »

Snodders' Beard" wrote: 05 Jan 2025, 13:18

Lop The Flop currently has a lower win percentage than Avram Grant...
Should be a shot in the arm for his supporters.

He's fucking dreadful.
User avatar
Snodders' Beard
Posts: 45
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 12 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Snodders' Beard »



Lop The Flop currently has a lower win percentage than Avram Grant...
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 985
Has liked: 276 times
Been liked: 422 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Far Cough UKunt »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 05 Jan 2025, 12:57 Didn’t see the match yesterday, due to work. But caught up on highlights etc. Can’t say I’m remotely surprised by the result.

Having not seen the full 90 minutes, I won’t wang on about yet another thrashing. But we are still shipping far too many goals.

Was there anything in it that offered a glimmer of hope?
Their four goals flattered them, City are really shit....not a shite as us though.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post southbankbornnbred »

Didn’t see the match yesterday, due to work. But caught up on highlights etc. Can’t say I’m remotely surprised by the result.

Having not seen the full 90 minutes, I won’t wang on about yet another thrashing. But we are still shipping far too many goals.

Was there anything in it that offered a glimmer of hope?
onsideman
Posts: 1138
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post onsideman »

Oi, Lop...

If Cresswell isn't able to step up as second choice left back then why give him a new contract? That's on you.

If you hold out for Rodriguez and Soler and realise half way through the season that they don't improve you, that's on you.

If you continue to play a desperately out of form Paqueta and stand by and watch as he repeatedly concedes possession and fails to ever track back, that's on you.

If you insist on signing - and spunk a third of your budget on - Kilman before realising he's a run of the mill centre back, that's on you.

If you play multiple players out of position rather than play with shape and balance,  that's on you.

If you fail to take advantage of having the least disruptive injury record in the division over the first 4 months of the season, that's on you

And if you still don't know your best team after more than half a season, that's on you
northbankboy68
Posts: 271
Old WHO Number: 17239
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post northbankboy68 »

Only the bottom 2 clubs have a worse goal difference than us!
Sir Alf
Posts: 2147
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 32 times
Been liked: 313 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Sir Alf »

Yeah not clear am I Mike, 🥴 Im referring to the first 18 -24 months of Moyes tenure. You are correct tho, the last season Moyes team was a sieve too. I think Moyes was attempting to get us to keep the ball more but it failed. Moyes was aware of fan unrest and need for more entertaining style but just didntbknow how.  

But my poorly explained point is that Lop needs to get more balance and get the team better organised and compact without the backs and midfield jumping out to try and press or overload the opposition because we dont have the players for it.  A blend of the low block Moyes strengths with more build up and passing thru teams. Forest have the balance but also possess a more athletic midfield with the likes of Gibbs White. All their players work their socks off tho and believe in what they are doing. Moyes did in thise first 2 years have the players onside with what we were doing and Lop sems to have totally failed in that respect. Players just dont look like they are giving everything. 


 
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post Takashi Miike »

Alf, again you're gaslighting. How were we more compact/solid with Moyes when we lost twenty league games two years ago, and conceded 74 league goals last season? 
John Coffey
Posts: 198
Has liked: 217 times
Been liked: 44 times

Re: Lopetegui

Post John Coffey »

Russ of the BML" wrote: 05 Jan 2025, 09:39 Its all so very predictable. Lope's time in charge is like looking out to sea and predicting the weather. Its easy. 

For anyone who reads my two pennies worth, I said weeks back that there has not been one player that's improved under Lope and week after week we look just as dumb and confused as we did in his first games in charge. And I predicted, rather easily, that we won't see any improvement because the players do not like him, understand him or want to play for him. The same problems still exist that existed at the very start of the season. Lope has done nothing to change it. 

I predicted we would not beat Bournemouth and Brighton. Did not have a clue what we would do a Soton (good result but questionable performance). And so it came to pass. I said we would get beat comfortably by Liverpool and predicted 6. I said we would get beat comfortably by City and predicted 5-0 which almost came to pass. I also said in the week we would get beat comfortably by Villa in the cup and predicted 3-0. This doesn't make me some specialist or some clever bastard. Quite frankly, we are so poor a fucking child could predict we would get beat. And that, I am afraid, is the legacy of a coach that is obviously totally out of his depth. 

The only positive from yesterday is that we should've been 1 up and the most blinkered West Ham fans would argue 2-0 up. But then we revert to type. 

The problem, that I also called in the week, is that Liverpool and City were free hits. Lope has reduced expectations to such a low level, people do not even expect us to get nil. He is not going to be sacked after losing to Liverpool and City. I also said that I doubt he will get sacked if we get beat by Villa in the cup. Lope is riding a wave of unbelievable goodwill from Sulli. But it is not genuine goodwill. It is goodwill shadowed by a fear of being proven wrong. The egomaniac will tell all that he doesn't like to sack managers, but deep down, it is not liking to be made to look a fool. 

So my prediction is beaten 3-0 by Villa. Then we move into two huge games at home to Fulham and Palace. Sadly, I predict we get beat by Fulham, but Sullivan will then have no choice but to jettison Lope. But if we do, against all odds, turn up and beat Fulham Lope will go into the Palace game...... Then, who know's?
Spot on Russ. Lopetegui is still in a job because sacking him makes Sullivan look stupid, as it was evident right from the start that HE appointed the wrong man, despite his technical director  wanting someone else. 
But also as you said, he won’t be sacked due to us being thrashed by the likes of the scouse and City or even by Villa in the Cup. 
The other consideration of waiting until Fulham or Palace is that the transfer window will be well under way, and we then only have one more match (Villa away) before it closes.
Does Sullivan allow Lopetegui any signings without knowing if he will still be here come 1st February? Our business, if any, could be a guide as to how Sullivan will proceed with Lopetegui. IF there’s money available but Sullivan wants a new manager, surely now is the time to make the change and let the  new manager have this window too? 
I’ll stick my old neck out and say that we’re stuck with Lopetegui now for the season. Sullivan has messed up royally and won’t lose face by admitting it publicly. 
Post Reply