Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 828
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 140 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Leavemyarcelona
Posts: 1139
Old WHO Number: 311212
Has liked: 1165 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Leavemyarcelona »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 17:54 Liz Truss (champion of free speech) has sent Starmer a cease and desist letter to stop saying she crashed the economy. It's ruining her reputation, apparently. The lack of self awareness in this woman is staggering. Maybe she should contact her local MP for help.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 76352.html
Left wing independant? 😂😂
Mr Anon
Posts: 698
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 171 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

Nurse Ratched" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 20:13 Mr Anon has Yolk Derangement Syndrome.
I respect the grudge, you hard yolked freak!
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1076
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 568 times
Been liked: 507 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Mr Anon has Yolk Derangement Syndrome.
Mr Anon
Posts: 698
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 171 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

Cabbige Savage" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 18:19
Mr Anon" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 18:05
only1billybonds wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 17:51 Mr anon.

You seem to be suffering from TDS, why not wait til he's actually in office and then judge him. Looking for reasons to slate him two weeks before he starts work is a bit silly.
 
i'm not looking for reasons he's giving them out freely, not sure why it's relevant he hasn't started yet, his rhetoric is signposting what sort of president he wants to be.
Your man Biden signposted he had fucking dementia in 2020 the poor old cսnt 
your dementia seems to be advancing too since you're posting out of character on your alt account.  😉

PS you know its possible to dislike Biden and Trump right? what is it about American politics that makes people convinced you have to like one side and hate the other??
User avatar
Cabbige Savage
Posts: 259
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Cabbige Savage »

Mr Anon" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 18:05
only1billybonds wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 17:51 Mr anon.

You seem to be suffering from TDS, why not wait til he's actually in office and then judge him. Looking for reasons to slate him two weeks before he starts work is a bit silly.
 
i'm not looking for reasons he's giving them out freely, not sure why it's relevant he hasn't started yet, his rhetoric is signposting what sort of president he wants to be.
Your man Biden signposted he had fucking dementia in 2020 the poor old cսnt 
User avatar
Cabbige Savage
Posts: 259
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Cabbige Savage »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 17:54 Liz Truss (champion of free speech) has sent Starmer a cease and desist letter to stop saying she crashed the economy. It's ruining her reputation, apparently. The lack of self awareness in this woman is staggering. Maybe she should contact her local MP for help.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 76352.html
oops

Image
Mr Anon
Posts: 698
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 171 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

only1billybonds wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 17:51 Mr anon.

You seem to be suffering from TDS, why not wait til he's actually in office and then judge him. Looking for reasons to slate him two weeks before he starts work is a bit silly.
 
 
i'm not looking for reasons he's giving them out freely, not sure why it's relevant he hasn't started yet, his rhetoric is signposting what sort of president he wants to be.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2224
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 490 times
Been liked: 743 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Listen to a proper economist, you'll hear the real story. Fast forward to the interview.


https://www.podbean.com/ea/dir-hrqqj-232d2843
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 497
Has liked: 299 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

Liz Truss (champion of free speech) has sent Starmer a cease and desist letter to stop saying she crashed the economy. It's ruining her reputation, apparently. The lack of self awareness in this woman is staggering. Maybe she should contact her local MP for help.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 76352.html
only1billybonds
Posts: 2224
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 490 times
Been liked: 743 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Mr anon.

You seem to be suffering from TDS, why not wait til he's actually in office and then judge him. Looking for reasons to slate him two weeks before he starts work is a bit silly.
User avatar
Cabbige Savage
Posts: 259
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Cabbige Savage »

Mr Anon" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 17:34
Cabbige Savage" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 16:50
Mr Anon" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 16:05 what do the Trump supporters that state how he's a peace advocate, no wars in his term etc think about him saying he doesn't rule out using force to take Panama Canal and Greenland?
oh no he declared war on Panama and Greenland.
When did the wars start?
where did I say war had started
so no war?
Mr Anon
Posts: 698
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 171 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

only1billybonds wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 16:42 Saying he doesn't rule out using force and actually using force are two entirely different things.
Think you may need a bigger stick to CLUMP him with.
 

Not sure what the benefit is in pissing off your best allies, only really benefits Putin. funny that
Mr Anon
Posts: 698
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 171 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

Cabbige Savage" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 16:50
Mr Anon" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 16:05 what do the Trump supporters that state how he's a peace advocate, no wars in his term etc think about him saying he doesn't rule out using force to take Panama Canal and Greenland?
oh no he declared war on Panama and Greenland.
When did the wars start?
where did I say war had started
User avatar
Cabbige Savage
Posts: 259
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Cabbige Savage »

Mr Anon" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 16:05 what do the Trump supporters that state how he's a peace advocate, no wars in his term etc think about him saying he doesn't rule out using force to take Panama Canal and Greenland?
oh no he declared war on Panama and Greenland.
When did the wars start?
only1billybonds
Posts: 2224
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 490 times
Been liked: 743 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Saying he doesn't rule out using force and actually using force are two entirely different things.
Think you may need a bigger stick to CLUMP him with.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3718
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 713 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

His supporters won't care too much about that.

It's the things like paying $4 for a loaf of bread that concerns them the most.
Mr Anon
Posts: 698
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 145 times
Been liked: 171 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

what do the Trump supporters that state how he's a peace advocate, no wars in his term etc think about him saying he doesn't rule out using force to take Panama Canal and Greenland?
only1billybonds
Posts: 2224
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 490 times
Been liked: 743 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/0 ... _reg_first


Bit of an uncomfortable read in parts, infuriating in others.
Massive Attack
Posts: 5554
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3243 times
Been liked: 1606 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

WHU(Exeter) wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 11:20 Have listened to a lot of programmes on the radio, and with some of those in both the police and social services, who tried to raise the issues and get something done about it were silenced and in some cases forced to leave their jobs. So the ones who did actually try to prevent it all happening further, in quite a few cases got in trouble, damaged their careers, or lost their jobs completely. What a beyond sad state of affairs, particularly given the crimes involved.

Noticeable also how on all of the BBC radio programmes about this, the presenters keep trotting out the “people seem to have forgotten about the victims”, “it’s become political”, “agenda driven”, blah, blah, blah.

I’d suggest that people have NOT “forgotten about the victims” at all and very much the opposite. The ‘people’ for the large part know that for a victim of any crime, 
They're just gaslighting cunts trying to spin a load of old deflecting bollocks. We see through it though..  👀 

The cheek of the tossers to say we should focus on the victims when most of them 2 bob cunts wouldn't in the first place! Disgusting parasites.
User avatar
Cabbige Savage
Posts: 259
Has liked: 267 times
Been liked: 285 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Cabbige Savage »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 09 Dec 2024, 09:19 There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
My firend tell me you prefer poor slavic girl over poor sub Saharan girl.

​​​​​​Is bad times yes. 
Swiss.
Posts: 1726
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 257 times
Been liked: 316 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Swiss. »

I can't wait to see all these countries just queing up to sign trade agreements with us post Brexit. In fact besides the cut and paste deals we have done from our previous existing EU deals I think there has been one significant one with Australia which apparently is screwing up our framers.

Canada, US where are they? 

Ah the benefits of Brexit....not. 

 
User avatar
WHU(Exeter)
Posts: 1434
Old WHO Number: 13669
Has liked: 117 times
Been liked: 197 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post WHU(Exeter) »

Have listened to a lot of programmes on the radio, and with some of those in both the police and social services, who tried to raise the issues and get something done about it were silenced and in some cases forced to leave their jobs. So the ones who did actually try to prevent it all happening further, in quite a few cases got in trouble, damaged their careers, or lost their jobs completely. What a beyond sad state of affairs, particularly given the crimes involved.

Noticeable also how on all of the BBC radio programmes about this, the presenters keep trotting out the “people seem to have forgotten about the victims”, “it’s become political”, “agenda driven”, blah, blah, blah.

I’d suggest that people have NOT “forgotten about the victims” at all and very much the opposite. The ‘people’ for the large part know that for a victim of any crime, it’s paramount that those who committed the crimes are brought to proper and full justice, and that applies equally to those who were in responsible positions, who could have stopped it, but chose for whatever reasons not to, and to allow it to continue for years.

Those people HAVE to be named and made accountable, THAT will help the victims, not all, but some even and they absolutely deserve that. Also naming the people involved and the positions they are in will assist in the process of ensuring that nothing like this happens again, because this is not the Victorian age, (not that it would be ‘acceptable’ even then), but the 2000s.

A modern civilised society should NEVER accept the systematic abuse of the vulnerable as has happened, and the enablers should be called out and shamed straight away, every single time.
Massive Attack
Posts: 5554
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3243 times
Been liked: 1606 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: 09 Jan 2025, 01:05
Massive Attack" wrote: 07 Jan 2025, 02:08
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: 07 Jan 2025, 02:02
Champion didn't and still doesn't  do nearly enough.
She talks the talk but does fuck all in reality.
Strong enough to call it out nationally when no other cսnt would in Politics way back in 2017.
 
She knew the FULL SCALE of what was going on .and imo she didn't do enough, and still doesn't .
where is she now?...still has it's nose in the trough
STRAW was home secretary and MP for Blackburn .
I've e-mailed both over the yrs with no actual replies.
Just generic bs.
My local MP masquerades as a Tory...he's a liberal

We're heading for a war  in our land  ...and it will be  bloody.

Agree with all that, still doesn't alter the fact both Oliver and Champion were banging on about this year's ago when most the establishment were burying their heads in the sands not acknowledging it, or possibly worse in Starmers case seemingly covering it up if that was what was going on. Like you I also want to see a proper inquiry.
Post Reply