Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply

What will the result be:

Potter's Payback : West Ham Win
10
22%
Respect the point : Battling Draw
13
28%
Maresca Mastery : Defeat
16
35%
Battered at the Bridge : Thrashed
7
15%
 
Total votes: 46

User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

WHUFC Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post stubbo-admin »


Match Centre:


Odds:
West Ham: 15/2
Draw: 5/2
Chelsea: 37/100

Pre-Match Press Conference:
Official Press Conference

Tactical Preview: 
Analytics United

Watch-along:
Hammers Chat Watchalong

Streams:

SportHD 

(With all live streams be mindful they can carry viruses etc.  Don't click on any ads and use a VPN).
  

threesixty
Posts: 674
Old WHO Number: 14819
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 135 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post threesixty »

twoleftfeet wrote: 03 Feb 2025, 22:49 Was Maresca at the match? Apparently we sat with 10 players behind the ball and Chelsea deserved their win!

Thats definitely not the game I watched.
 
 
That annoyed me. People's interpretation of a game is so warped. Low block football kinda means you make no attempt to keep or progress the ball, the minute you lose it you get back into your low block and stay there. Thats not what we were doing.

We kept it tight and were a bit more conservative.

Our goal came from pressing them and they made a mistake, not from some counter attack. 
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post twoleftfeet »

Was Maresca at the match? Apparently we sat with 10 players behind the ball and Chelsea deserved their win!

Thats definitely not the game I watched.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post twoleftfeet »

threesixty wrote: 03 Feb 2025, 22:32 I cant remember who on the site was saying the U21 coaches at West Ham think Guilherme is gash and is shit in training...

lol.. people do talk some shit on here!

 
Probably C & B or the Bobby Moore stand, most people believe the shit they come out with.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post goose »

First couple of minutes Guilherme looked lost. After that he looked strong & positive and like he might make something happen.

Id much rather see him brought on than Ings who offers absolutely fuck all.
threesixty
Posts: 674
Old WHO Number: 14819
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 135 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post threesixty »

I cant remember who on the site was saying the U21 coaches at West Ham think Guilherme is gash and is shit in training...

lol.. people do talk some shit on here!
 
Nutsin
Posts: 2238
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 105 times
Been liked: 191 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post Nutsin »

Took a lucky deflection for them to get the winner.


overall I’m happy with the performance, we were competitive which is refreshing although the commentators were all Chelsea which was annoying.

I can see the vast improvement in our performances which is the most important thing. 
Chelsea were over the moon they ponced a result in the end which says a lot.

Amyway, onwards and upwards!

COYI’s
Ron Eff
Posts: 515
Old WHO Number: 229621
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 112 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post Ron Eff »

only1billybonds wrote: 03 Feb 2025, 22:08 The decision not to award a foul on Bowen was ridiculous. It's basically saying that foul play is OK as long as it's not in the final 2/3's of the field. A foul is a fucking foul regardless of where it's committed.
 
 
Agree. I would accept it if its five minutes back but not when the foul basically kick started the move for their goal. It’s a completely flawed system when it is decided at discretion. What sort of bollocks is that?
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post twoleftfeet »

What’s the chances of Summerville, Todibo, Paqueta and Alvarez all being fit for the next game?

Add those 4 plus Ferguson and that’s a decent first XI with some quality on the bench.
User avatar
HammerFan43
Posts: 38
Location: Hampshire
Old WHO Number: 15082
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post HammerFan43 »

Just one word - Robbed.
WHUDeano
Posts: 76
Old WHO Number: 17551
Been liked: 43 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post WHUDeano »

As soon as they started making changes in the 50th, it was obvious either their manager was shitting himself and making crazy decisions in a panic or we were in big trouble as we had nothing on the bench to counter it. 

I’m impressed with potter, he’s a step up on Moyes, just a shame we wasted money on players from Steidten & Lopetegui that aren’t good enough for the premier league. We have many players not good enough for Potters game - Areola, Kilman, Mavros, Solar, Kudus, and that’s even before including the likes of Coufal, Creswell & Ings. 

First and foremost, Kudus needs moving on at the end of the season, someone will pay £60m (Man Utd may pay £80m) and we can reinvest. Guilherme looked lively in his natural position though. 

all in all, massively frustrated by that, feels like we may have a very good manager now, but he has his hands tied behind his back due to other people’s mistakes. 

 
User avatar
kylay
Posts: 494
Old WHO Number: 232751
Has liked: 47 times
Been liked: 80 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post kylay »

Iron Duke" wrote: 03 Feb 2025, 22:03 Overall, a decent performance. It wasn’t just a plucky, backs to the wall performance. We offered a lot going forward but just lacked the final composed ball. Their first goal came from a foul on Bowen and the second was a lucky deflection. Referee was very poor. 
 
 
Agree with with all of this. The gulf in quality was too great though. We have one of the kids starting and 3 senior players on the bench. Going in the right direction but as others have pointed out, it will all depend on badly needed replacements that never seem to arrive.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 1849
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post twoleftfeet »

Gutted.

I thought we were excellent and how the fuck the foul on Bowen wasn’t given was beyond me.

I thought we had some great performances especially from Bowen and Irving.

Potter now has 2 weeks on the training field to keep working with the team and I’m very confident about our future.
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 966
Old WHO Number: 251573
Has liked: 83 times
Been liked: 240 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post Iron Duke »

They make up these VAR decisions as they go along. 
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post Takashi Miike »

positives tonight - cresswell and coufal even without legs look better than mavros, soler was great and didn't stop running, the two shielding the back three were solid, kudus worked very hard, the young brazilian kid had great vision and bowen was a constant threat

only negative was mavros giving the ball straight to the keeper when we had great possession late on, can't fault anything else
Last edited by Takashi Miike on 03 Feb 2025, 22:11, edited 1 time in total.
only1billybonds
Posts: 1890
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 348 times
Been liked: 457 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post only1billybonds »

The decision not to award a foul on Bowen was ridiculous. It's basically saying that foul play is OK as long as it's not in the final 2/3's of the field. A foul is a fucking foul regardless of where it's committed.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post stubbo-admin »

For an 18 year old kid, Guillherme needs to be backed to come good. Looks no worse than Scarles or Orford....and he's basically their equivalent and should have the same expectations. Not his fault he cost a lot of money.

Maybe we need the funds, but we'd be stupid to sell him IMO.  
User avatar
ragingbull
Posts: 345
Old WHO Number: 210831
Has liked: 109 times
Been liked: 50 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post ragingbull »

Nothing to lose i think we should give  Guilherme more minutes i think there is a player in there.
onsideman
Posts: 1138
Old WHO Number: 16825
Has liked: 158 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post onsideman »

The remarkable thing about Mavropanos is that Steidten thought we should buy him... and Moyes thought we should play him... and Lopetegui thought we should keep him. Turns out you can fool most of the people most of the time
User avatar
Keep dreaming
Posts: 1138
Location: here and there, mostly here
Old WHO Number: 225644
Has liked: 372 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post Keep dreaming »

Potter is taking us in the right direction.
Unfortunately, we have a shitload of bench warmers ready to be replaced.
4 years of bad management is hurting the club
 
Ron Eff
Posts: 515
Old WHO Number: 229621
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 112 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post Ron Eff »

Tough one to take. Quite how the first goal is allowed to stand is beyond me, and the game has swing on that. Cannot understand how the ref misses the foul and then how the VAR having agreed it is a foul deems it not material to the goal using his discretion is madness. It’s cheating to favour certain clubs, has to be. I say that because if it’s the other way around, I’d bet that gets disallowed. 

That aside, once again, it’s night and day from Lopetegui. Organised, but still dangerous on the break and playing decent football. Bowen is just exceptional. So good. 

Actually thought Guilherme looked ok. 
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 966
Old WHO Number: 251573
Has liked: 83 times
Been liked: 240 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post Iron Duke »

Overall, a decent performance. It wasn’t just a plucky, backs to the wall performance. We offered a lot going forward but just lacked the final composed ball. Their first goal came from a foul on Bowen and the second was a lucky deflection. Referee was very poor. 
collyrob
Posts: 409
Old WHO Number: 226068
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post collyrob »

We knew all window we were signing Ferguson. Why couldn’t we just get it over the line yesterday so he’d be available to play tonight. It’s infuriating we drag our heels every January window 
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1444
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 175 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post Mex Martillo »

Happy with that.
When is Kudus going to us more than some fine entertainment of footballing skills?
zico
Posts: 4071
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 257 times
Been liked: 165 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post zico »

Done out of at least a point by the officials. The pathetic Attwell then letting Chelsea take ages over corners, free kicks and goal kicks without penalty. A lot of positives though, certainly didn't lie down with a patched up team. Thought Irvine was excellent and considering they get a lot of stick thought Cress and Coufal did ok. Like what I'm seeing from Potter but he needs backing or we will end up seeing Bowen doing a Declan.
User avatar
RootsRadical
Posts: 781
Old WHO Number: 321614
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 99 times

Re: Chelsea vs West Ham Utd | Official Predictions & Match Thread

Post RootsRadical »

Kudus MOTM on TS!

Worked really hard.
Post Reply