Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Squad Building for 25/26

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 932
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 247 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post southbankbornnbred »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 16 Feb 2025, 10:14
Sir Alf" wrote: 16 Feb 2025, 09:44 Good summary Nutsin. Potter reverted to a back 4 and got central midfield wrong relying on the slowest double pivot central midfield in the Premiership. A back 3 seems a better fit but also when Paqueta dropped deeper we had 3 in the central mid and stopped Brentford having so much space to run into when they countered. As u say, Paqueta has to play deeper with the game ahead of him.

Not writing Potter off yet but he has to learn we cannot  play a 2 person central midfield of Alvarez and Soucek and that Mavro in a 4 man back 4 us going to be risky. Hopefully wont see either mistakes repeated?  Main other thing we need is Ferguson and Todibo to get and stay fit
Yeah, interesting summaries, Alf and Nutsin.

I also think it’s far too early to judge Potter. These are not his players and there’s just no way he’d have signed most of them. I’m not saying he’ll rip it up at West Ham (who knows), but his teams don’t generally look like us right now.

This old, slow and tired squad has a LOT of problems. But by far the biggest problem I can see is in central defence.

Nutsin summed it up nicely: “Mavrapanos still getting in the side as a starter makes you wonder just how good he must show at practice all week because on match day he is always one of the worse players on the field.”

Its not that Mavrapanos is any good - he’s fucking terrible. A mistake waiting to happen. It’s just that we don’t have any depth, and the other centre halves are also woeful - or injury prone.

We’ve spent (or agreed to spend) a small  fortune on some absolute dross. Kilman is the worst £40m footballer I’ve ever seen. He has the turning circle of an oil tanker and regularly gets destroyed for pace over ten yards - let alone 20+. It means we can’t really play, or get, high up the pitch quickly enough. So he forces us to play a way that Potter probably doesn’t want. Absolute waste of that huge outlay. Slow, off the pace mentally, and too easily exposed because of it. His saving grace is that he doesn’t really make “mistakes” like Mavrapanos - and he is a battler. It’s just that his physical attributes are poor for the modern Premier League, where opponents are often athletes more than footballers.

Mavrapanos was in excess of £20m. We've agreed to spend £34m on Todibo, who is a good player but injury prone - and clearly nursing his way through the season. And we spent £30m on Aguerd who started well, deteriorated under Moyes and then got loaned out by a hopeless manager who had no idea what he was doing.

Thats £125m worth of “talent” and we’re catastrophically poor at the back.

Fixing that will take some doing. Who, for example, will want to sign Kilman at his fee/wages - unless it’s a move like a return to Wolves for half the money?

Moyes and Lopetegui royally lumped us in it.
I also have to say that Sullivan - and the departed (and largely over-rated) Steidten should hang his head in shame over the Kilman deal. How a chairman and technical director could let a new manager sign somebody so obviously limited for £40m and then put him on astronomical wages and a seven-year contract, is beyond me.

Club chairman rightly and wrongly get blamed for a lot of things - some within their control, some not. But that Kilman deal was akin to falling asleep at the wheel.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Manuel »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 15:03 I've got more of an issue with his £100k a week, 7 year contract.

He'll be difficult to shift.
 
 
If he can improve his game he could still be OK for the next few years and we won't need to shift him, I don't think he's that far off, but yea he won the lottery.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2303
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 404 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post El Scorchio »

Yup. Why is he ever going to want to leave? He hit the jackpot at West Ham. He'll never play for England, he'll never make anywhere near as much money at another club as he is here after how it's gone this season. No English club with proper European aspirations is ever going to want him because he's not good enough. He's far too 'English' in playing style to be able to play abroad. We'd have to basically freeze him out and pray that playing week in week out and having pride with a massive pay cut is more important to him than coasting, playing in the reserves and collecting massive paycheques.

Maybe some idiot Saudi is willing to pay him. But I doubt it.
Last edited by El Scorchio on 17 Feb 2025, 15:15, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3086
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Lee Trundle »

If you're asking a team to pay £20m for him, then they have to match the stupid contract we've given him.

You're asking a club to pay out over £50m.

There's only 1 Sullivan stupid enough to do that.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3086
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Lee Trundle »

I've got more of an issue with his £100k a week, 7 year contract.

He'll be difficult to shift.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Manuel »

scott_d wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 12:42 If we bought Kilman for 20-25m would we be more satisfied?


 
Yes, I think that is really where the issues lies, 20 mil OK, but we have paid approx 20 mil ott which is a joke. On his day he can be competent at this level, but never a 40 mil CB. I was skeptical straightaway that a CB who has never had a sniff of an England cap could be valued at 40 mil.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2303
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 404 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post El Scorchio »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 12:47 Ironically the price what we paid for him seems to be giving people excuses to continue with him.  I think they actually believe there is a £40m tucked away there somewhere.

If we can somehow get £20/25m for him then I think it could be spent more wisely.

Plus we'd be saving £30m on getting his wages off our books.


 
Yup, it was an insane signing we are never going to recoup anything from. Brought a bang average player at absolute peak cost. He'll never be worth anything like that again and the long term outlay is eyewatering for such an average PL player. Lop's legacy signing. At least most of the others can be got rid of far easier and cheaper. What on earth did he see in him to be worth that much? Wolves must still be laughing at us.

I think cutting our losses is smart so he doesn't become an expensive millstone for years to come. We can get a younger player for less than half the price who will be just as adequate and also maybe have a lick of pace on him as well without too much bother, I reckon, if we look in the right places. i.e. not Sullivan's filofax. 
scott_d
Posts: 574
Location: Essex
Old WHO Number: 11453
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 101 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post scott_d »

Takashi Miike" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 13:42
Mad Ferret" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 13:30
, wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 13:13 Come on Potter, improve our defending.
It's almost as though we need a defensively solid manager to sort it out. A shame that a very good one just went to Everton.
22/23 - 20 League defeats
23/24 - Conceding almost two goals a game in the league

that cսnt couldn't have been further away from being defensively solid
The defensively solid David Moyes who conceded 74 goals last season.
The only teams who conceded more goals were Luton, Burnley, Sheffield United who all got relegated.
scott_d
Posts: 574
Location: Essex
Old WHO Number: 11453
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 101 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post scott_d »

Rossal wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 12:57 "If we bought Kilman for 20-25m would we be more satisfied?"


Yes, considerably as we would probably have signed Duran instead of Fullkrug with the extra £15m 

I get the point playing alongside the 3 mentioned is tough. But remember start of the season, first 5 games or so Kilman was superb......people were saying great signing......not reached those heights since which is the issue. 
I'm not buying that. 
There is no suggestion we would have ever wanted to pay what Villa were asking for considering he was an relatively unproven 19 year old with an apparent attitude problem.
Whether it would have worked or not is also up for debate.

The fact that Kilman looked good in his first few games worries me though.  How many times have we seen this?  JWP looked great when he first came in but tailed off quite quickly.

There is clearly an issue at West Ham which could be suited to the way we've played under Moyes and then Loppy but if Potter can fix that I'd like to think you'll see a few of the players turn their form around.  At least that is what we are hoping he can do.

dealcanvey
Posts: 343
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 36 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post dealcanvey »

Not a fan of 3 cbs but I think that is what we need to be playing for the remainder of the season.

We are just far too open and our midfield is so slow.
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 1231
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 217 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Mad Ferret »

To be fair to Kilman, it must be fucking hard work playing alongside the Elgin Marble.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3086
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Lee Trundle »

He played that pass to Bowen against Palace on the 24th August 2024.

Have we seen one similar since?
Rossal
Posts: 624
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Rossal »

"If we bought Kilman for 20-25m would we be more satisfied?"


Yes, considerably as we would probably have signed Duran instead of Fullkrug with the extra £15m 

I get the point playing alongside the 3 mentioned is tough. But remember start of the season, first 5 games or so Kilman was superb......people were saying great signing......not reached those heights since which is the issue. 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3086
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Lee Trundle »

Ironically the price what we paid for him seems to be giving people excuses to continue with him.  I think they actually believe there is a £40m tucked away there somewhere.

If we can somehow get £20/25m for him then I think it could be spent more wisely.

Plus we'd be saving £30m on getting his wages off our books.

 
scott_d
Posts: 574
Location: Essex
Old WHO Number: 11453
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 101 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post scott_d »

If we bought Kilman for 20-25m would we be more satisfied?

If we sold him for 20-25m, would we be able to find a much better replacement?

It will be interesting to see if Todibo comes in now that he has recovered from injury, and also to see if he can form a partnership with Kilman.

Some would say that Kilman is a part of the problem considering our defense is so leaky, but our back 4 changes pretty much every week.  Are there many central defenders that would look amazing if they were alongside the likes of Mav, Cresswell, Coufal ?
Rossal
Posts: 624
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Rossal »

I agree with Trunds, we had our pants pulled down for £40m and a 7 year contract was mental. If we can recoup 25m i'd cash in 

Todibo Aguerd Casey and at least one maybe 2 more would be my picks next season 

Obviously sell Dinos, is that Mayers close to first team? The clip going round the other week in the win against Man Utd was certainly impressive. 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3086
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Lee Trundle »

If a central defender has to play in a 3, because he's not good enough to play in a 2, then I wouldn't be looking to keep him, especially for the next 6/7 years.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Takashi Miike »

Rossal wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 11:52
Takashi Miike" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 11:24 Kilman, even with Coufal/Cresswell either side of him, has shown he works ok in a three but is often terrible in a two
To be fair when we signed him I remember Wolves fans saying exactly that 
I'm not saying I like him, but I think the same may apply to Mavro. He's just not disciplined enough for a back four. I think him & Kilman either side of Todibo would be worth a try, and AWB/Scarles wide
Rossal
Posts: 624
Old WHO Number: 270755
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 59 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Rossal »

Takashi Miike" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 11:24 Kilman, even with Coufal/Cresswell either side of him, has shown he works ok in a three but is often terrible in a two
To be fair when we signed him I remember Wolves fans saying exactly that 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3086
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Lee Trundle »

I'm not saying he's shit.  I'm just saying he's not good enough to be one of our first XI central defenders for the next 7 years on his salary.  So we should look to offload him, as soon as we can.

That's my point.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Takashi Miike »

Kilman, even with Coufal/Cresswell either side of him, has shown he works ok in a three but is often terrible in a two
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post stubbo-admin »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 10:53
stubbo-admin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 10:46
Lee Trundle" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 09:26
Yet he's been a mainstay in the 4th worst defence in the league.
And yet he's also been a mainstay in the Wolves defence over many seasons that were nothing like this bad, or as bad as us last season.  So was that also a function of his inability or does that not count?

The guy is a good defender in a dysfunctional team.
We've grossly overpaid for a bang average lower half of the table central defender, stubbo.  That's the way I see it.

I'm kinda in the same boat as Jaan.  If we can get anything for him in the summer, then I'd bite whoever's hand off, to get that 7 year contract off our books.
I'm not for a minute saying he's exceptional, but he does have some exceptional attributes.

He's very good on the ball, one of the best at carrying the ball out of defence and being press resistant, and very good at tackling dribblers.

Not for a minute saying I'd have dropped 40m on him, or given him 7 years, but he's not shit is the point.  I expect if you can get a functional set of players around and in front of him, he'll be excellent for us for a number of years to come.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 2034
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 89 times
Been liked: 228 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post fraser »

Yeah he's bang average, but also always fit so probably explains why he's a mainstay. 

Dinos was better Saturday 
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3086
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Lee Trundle »

stubbo-admin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 10:46
Lee Trundle" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 09:26
stubbo wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 09:14
I genuinely don't think Kilman is 'bad'.

He's currently this season ranked:

6th for tackling dribblers successfully
9th for Blocks
7th for Clearances
4th for take ons coming out of defence
7th for Aerials won
Yet he's been a mainstay in the 4th worst defence in the league.
And yet he's also been a mainstay in the Wolves defence over many seasons that were nothing like this bad, or as bad as us last season.  So was that also a function of his inability or does that not count?

The guy is a good defender in a dysfunctional team.
We've grossly overpaid for a bang average lower half of the table central defender, stubbo.  That's the way I see it.

I'm kinda in the same boat as Jaan.  If we can get anything for him in the summer, then I'd bite whoever's hand off, to get that 7 year contract off our books.
User avatar
stubbo-admin
Posts: 956
Old WHO Number: 12009
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post stubbo-admin »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 09:26
stubbo wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 09:14
I genuinely don't think Kilman is 'bad'.

He's currently this season ranked:

6th for tackling dribblers successfully
9th for Blocks
7th for Clearances
4th for take ons coming out of defence
7th for Aerials won
Yet he's been a mainstay in the 4th worst defence in the league.
And yet he's also been a mainstay in the Wolves defence over many seasons that were nothing like this bad, or as bad as us last season.  So was that also a function of his inability or does that not count?

The guy is a good defender in a dysfunctional team.
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1022
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 201 times

Re: Graham Potter

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 09:26
stubbo wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 09:14
I genuinely don't think Kilman is 'bad'.

He's currently this season ranked:

6th for tackling dribblers successfully
9th for Blocks
7th for Clearances
4th for take ons coming out of defence
7th for Aerials won
Yet he's been a mainstay in the 4th worst defence in the league.
This. If he isn’t sold in the summer, our problems in defence will stay next season too.
Post Reply