Russell Brand

[Ladysmith]

I hope the club denounce any link or association with this so called celebrity fan.

Absolute wrongun!

 

[Nurse Ratched]

It is not wrong - it is UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) and that is used on most servers.

No. UTC has aligned itself with the WHO time zone.

[zebthecat]

It is not wrong - it is UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) and that is used on most servers.

[Mr Anon]

Good to see the WHO clock is wrong again, it's tradition

[F 129 Row66]

I have always found that people trying to look "cool," always make themselves look a cսnt

[Nurse Ratched]

Summoned to court to defend himself against a rape charge and he chose to dress like this.

It looks like he attacked himself in the back of the car on the way there.

Arf!

[Far Cough UKunt]

Scruffy fucking cսnt

[Massive Attack]

Summoned to court to defend himself against a rape charge and he chose to dress like this.

It looks like he attacked himself in the back of the car on the way there.

[Mike Oxsaw]

Summoned to court to defend himself against a rape charge and he chose to dress like this.


 

The Mickey Mouser clearly had first dabs from the CPS court wardrobe.

[wils]

Summoned to court to defend himself against a rape charge and he chose to dress like this.

[Mike Oxsaw]

Not defending him or stabbing him repeatedly with a pitchfork here, but if a woman freely consents to do something when pissed which she would never do when sober, who is responsible?

I'm not saying (any of) these women were under the influence at the time either, before you start turning your pitchforks on me - even if some of the alleged abuse occurred in the workplace, alcohol ot other substances could be involved.

I've often woken up next to a "fuck!-did-I-drink-that-much-last-night?" minger, accepted I got it wrong and we went our separate ways. I've no doubt several women felt the same way waking up next to me over the years.

Non-consensual sex IS wrong (and illegal) in most of the west (although there are a few imported cultures within which a marriage is regarded as blanket consent); the issue is, "When does initial, freely given consent become non-consent?".

I've often woken up next to a "fuck!-did-I-drink-that-much-last-night?" minger, accepted I got it wrong and we went our separate ways. I've no doubt several women felt the same way waking up next to me over the years.

Thought you only went with brasses
Are you really that minging that they have to be pissed to go with you 

Awww, look at joyo, the fat, ginger slap head, desperately trying to deflect.
You and thinking clearly don't belong on the same planet, sunshine.

[Monsieur merde de cheval]

So he's banged to tights in your world ?
I skimmed  over your perfectly constructed bollocks with APLOMB..

That's OK. There are many shorter and simpler posts available which I am sure will be much more to your taste.

I wouldn't bother replying to this weird cսnt, he spams up every thread with pointless drivel. Probably a smack head.

I'm a Brummie dustman actually 

[Gank]

Her final words are "I'm so disappointed". Not really most people's choice of words if they've just been raped, is
it?

Perhaps he was rubbish?

I'm not much of a lover myself, but I am a SUPERB rapist.

[Hammer I am]

Her final words are "I'm so disappointed". Not really most people's choice of words if they've just been raped, is
it?

Perhaps he was rubbish?

[Jean-Luc Paul Goddard]

In the end that text is basically listening in on the middle of a conversation without knowing what's gone on before or after. You can read whatever you want into that text, and there really isn't any evidence for what you read into it. 

What?!  It's pretty obvious to me what went on.  She said no, he ignored her protestation and fucked her without a condom.

The question is whether she said no to sex altogether (as Mr Anon implied), or no to sex without a condom. Her words are "When a girl says NO it means NO...When I say condom that doesn't mean it's optional." Her final words are "I'm so disappointed". Not really most people's choice of words if they've just been raped, is it?

[Gank]

In the end that text is basically listening in on the middle of a conversation without knowing what's gone on before or after. You can read whatever you want into that text, and there really isn't any evidence for what you read into it. 

What?!  It's pretty obvious to me what went on.  She said no, he ignored her protestation and fucked her without a condom.

That isn't obvious at all. She probably thought he had one on.

[Alfs]

In the end that text is basically listening in on the middle of a conversation without knowing what's gone on before or after. You can read whatever you want into that text, and there really isn't any evidence for what you read into it. 

What?!  It's pretty obvious to me what went on.  She said no, he ignored her protestation and fucked her without a condom.

[Gank]

Of the East End fanny-rats, I much prefer Jim Davidson over Russell Brand.

[Jean-Luc Paul Goddard]

I would agree if it wasn't for her saying 'the last time" so the no condom thing related to that, the rest wold imply it happened again.in  a different case entirely 

In the end that text is basically listening in on the middle of a conversation without knowing what's gone on before or after. You can read whatever you want into that text, and there really isn't any evidence for what you read into it. 

[XKhammer]

Not defending him or stabbing him repeatedly with a pitchfork here, but if a woman freely consents to do something when pissed which she would never do when sober, who is responsible?

I'm not saying (any of) these women were under the influence at the time either, before you start turning your pitchforks on me - even if some of the alleged abuse occurred in the workplace, alcohol ot other substances could be involved.

I've often woken up next to a "fuck!-did-I-drink-that-much-last-night?" minger, accepted I got it wrong and we went our separate ways. I've no doubt several women felt the same way waking up next to me over the years.

Non-consensual sex IS wrong (and illegal) in most of the west (although there are a few imported cultures within which a marriage is regarded as blanket consent); the issue is, "When does initial, freely given consent become non-consent?".

I've often woken up next to a "fuck!-did-I-drink-that-much-last-night?" minger, accepted I got it wrong and we went our separate ways. I've no doubt several women felt the same way waking up next to me over the years.

Thought you only went with brasses
Are you really that minging that they have to be pissed to go with you 

[Mr Anon]

I assume that anyone defending him hasn't read the public record texts where a clearly upset woman tells him he want too far, he scared her, and when a woman says no it means no, his response was to apologise and make it up to her with "love and kindness"

What you wrote, and the part of that tweet that was visible made it look really bad. Then I clicked the link and read the whole thing, where it's clear that she's not talking about him forcing himself on her. It reads like she consented to sex but that she wanted him to use a condom and he didn't. So she was (rightly) scared of catching a STD.

I would agree if it wasn't for her saying 'the last time" so the no condom thing related to that, the rest wold imply it happened again.in  a different case entirely 

[Manuel]

The key common element to all of these types of story whether it be alleged criminal activity or even ‘just’ being a sex pest, is coercion.

The story over and over again is of the powerful ‘star’ who uses their position to manipulate those less powerful 

So he's banged to tights in your world ?
I skimmed  over your perfectly constructed bollocks with APLOMB..

That's OK. There are many shorter and simpler posts available which I am sure will be much more to your taste.

I wouldn't bother replying to this weird cսnt, he spams up every thread with pointless drivel. Probably a smack head.

[Bungo]

The key common element to all of these types of story whether it be alleged criminal activity or even ‘just’ being a sex pest, is coercion.

The story over and over again is of the powerful ‘star’ who uses their position to manipulate those less powerful 

So he's banged to tights in your world ?
I skimmed  over your perfectly constructed bollocks with APLOMB..

That's OK. There are many shorter and simpler posts available which I am sure will be much more to your taste.

[Monsieur merde de cheval]

The key common element to all of these types of story whether it be alleged criminal activity or even ‘just’ being a sex pest, is coercion.

The story over and over again is of the powerful ‘star’ who uses their position to manipulate those less powerful who are often rightly worried about how standing-up for themselves will affect both their current and future employment.

Few are permanently employed, most going from one freelance job to another, without any of the HR protections that permanent employment affords. This is clearly why it takes so long for many of the allegations to emerge. How the victims behave in these circumstances should really not be judged as if they had truly free and logical choice as their decisions are influenced by factors other than simple right or wrong.

Any consent given should only be viewed as real consent if not given under coercion.

So he's banged to tights in your world ?
I skimmed  over your perfectly constructed bollocks with APLOMB..

[Monsieur merde de cheval]

Raving leftie turned injun?
guilty as charged .

This country is heading into the abyss ..

[Monsieur merde de cheval]

The key common element to all of these types of story whether it be alleged criminal activity or even ‘just’ being a sex pest, is coercion.

The story over and over again is of the powerful ‘star’ who uses their position to manipulate those less powerful who are often rightly worried about how standing-up for themselves will affect both their current and future employment.

Few are permanently employed, most going from one freelance job to another, without any of the HR protections that permanent employment affords. This is clearly why it takes so long for many of the allegations to emerge. How the victims behave in these circumstances should really not be judged as if they had truly free and logical choice as their decisions are influenced by factors other than simple right or wrong.

Any consent given should only be viewed as real consent if not given under coercion.

Do me a favour .
You're viewing it through your fat bastard /walnut lens