AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Iran v Israel
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Iran v Israel
Israel struck Iran last night.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
Re: Iran v Israel
Success is what you say it is, they're already saying it was a report mistakenly released by a low-level staffer... fake news, stand down.
Link: Iran strikes nuclear sites - pentagon report
Link: Iran strikes nuclear sites - pentagon report
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3363
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1817 times
- Been liked: 888 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Oh I don't questio for the motive for doing so, well aware of all that. It was more the point you think they're just waiting it out before snuffing Ayatollah which I found an interesting point.
I personally don't think that's part of the game plan and if anything their hope is that the Iranian people have the balls to try and topple him themselves.
If none of that happens then the status quote under the Ayatollah is about as preferable as it can be, without going in to yet another unpredictable forever war. Considering they have fuck all nuclear capabilites for a very long time (if that is now the case which seems highly likely) and heavily depleted arms/air defence as it's proven with Israel coming and going as they please through Iran's air space, Iran can't achieve much now.
I think the rest is now, rightly, over to the Iranian people..
Next stop, Putin in the Ukraine/Russia War which is arguably more important now.. (which I suspect will also get resolved under Trump).
I personally don't think that's part of the game plan and if anything their hope is that the Iranian people have the balls to try and topple him themselves.
If none of that happens then the status quote under the Ayatollah is about as preferable as it can be, without going in to yet another unpredictable forever war. Considering they have fuck all nuclear capabilites for a very long time (if that is now the case which seems highly likely) and heavily depleted arms/air defence as it's proven with Israel coming and going as they please through Iran's air space, Iran can't achieve much now.
I think the rest is now, rightly, over to the Iranian people..
Next stop, Putin in the Ukraine/Russia War which is arguably more important now.. (which I suspect will also get resolved under Trump).
Re: Iran v Israel
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑24 Jun 2025, 19:38Hmm, you reckon that's part of the thinking and that maybe 1 day we'll find out he's just took him out? Clever shit if that was part of the thinking.
probably Israel's Mossad will take him out, there's a lot of opposition to the Islamist regime in Iran, over half the population hate the hierarchy (some put it at 70% want change), people live under constant threat from the authorities, imo, no better than ISIS, it's what happens after... so far in Syria it's regime change has been good but, they'll have to deal with the ISIS problem in the future, good luck with that lil' nugget.
there will be no peace in the middle-east until it's sorted one way or other... Iran or Israel cannot co-exist as it is.
there will be no peace in the middle-east until it's sorted one way or other... Iran or Israel cannot co-exist as it is.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3363
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1817 times
- Been liked: 888 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Hmm, you reckon that's part of the thinking and that maybe 1 day we'll find out he's just took him out? Clever shit if that was part of the thinking.
Re: Iran v Israel
he would've been seen as a war-monger if he carried on supporting Israel at this time, what he did the other day (if it worked?) was genius, he got involved for a specific reason and said that was it, in the meantime he hinted that regime change was preferable. The breathing space will also allow the US to replenish Israel's weaponry... one can hope that the beardy-one feels safe to leave his bunker to conduct Friday-Prayers in the next few weeks, it'll be interesting.
Re: Iran v Israel
OK_Guy wrote: ↑24 Jun 2025, 19:15Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jun 2025, 17:41 The best part is watching the liberals falling all over themselves to try and come up With a narrative.
They’d rather live in a world where Iran, a terrorist state has a nuke to terrorize us all with.
Can Only imagine what would have happened if cackling Kamala was in charge.
Thank goodness for Trump!
Now he is on his way to make sure NATO members pay their dues.
MAGA!
Where winners win!
the truce between Israel & Iran is only temporary, it will last whilst the NATO natter over cost convenes. There would be nothing worse for Trump to be seen as a war-monger, it goes against his rhetoric as a peace-negotiator, he's a salesman at the end of the day and there's arms-deals to be done, everything else can wait... about a week after the end of the NATO convention expect it all to kick off again, one of Iran's proxies (or Iran itself) will fire a missel at Israel and that will enable Israel to retaliate... listen to Trump, background noise is that regime change is the only way to achieve lasting peace, the job is not done, it's smoke 'n mirrors time.
Not an outlandish claim, I can see it happening.
Not sure about Trump being seen as a war monger though.
peace through strength seems to work.
Not sure about Trump being seen as a war monger though.
peace through strength seems to work.
Re: Iran v Israel
Nutsin wrote: ↑24 Jun 2025, 17:41 The best part is watching the liberals falling all over themselves to try and come up With a narrative.
They’d rather live in a world where Iran, a terrorist state has a nuke to terrorize us all with.
Can Only imagine what would have happened if cackling Kamala was in charge.
Thank goodness for Trump!
Now he is on his way to make sure NATO members pay their dues.
MAGA!
Where winners win!
the truce between Israel & Iran is only temporary, it will last whilst the NATO natter over cost convenes. There would be nothing worse for Trump to be seen as a war-monger, it goes against his rhetoric as a peace-negotiator, he's a salesman at the end of the day and there's arms-deals to be done, everything else can wait... about a week after the end of the NATO convention expect it all to kick off again, one of Iran's proxies (or Iran itself) will fire a missile at Israel and that will enable Israel to retaliate... listen to Trump, background noise is that regime change is the only way to achieve lasting peace, the job is not done, it's smoke 'n mirrors time.
Re: Iran v Israel
The best part is watching the liberals falling all over themselves to try and come up With a narrative.
They’d rather live in a world where Iran, a terrorist state has a nuke to terrorize us all with.
Can Only imagine what would have happened if cackling Kamala was in charge.
Thank goodness for Trump!
Now he is on his way to make sure NATO members pay their dues.
MAGA!
Where winners win!
They’d rather live in a world where Iran, a terrorist state has a nuke to terrorize us all with.
Can Only imagine what would have happened if cackling Kamala was in charge.
Thank goodness for Trump!
Now he is on his way to make sure NATO members pay their dues.
MAGA!
Where winners win!
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3363
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1817 times
- Been liked: 888 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Meanwhile over at Gaza..
As suspected it's been Hamas causing the issues between the Gazans getting Aid and being killed by them. Sooner trust Kemps observations than those terrorist wankers who the weirdo left and luvvies would prefer to lap up their propaganda like moronic thickos. GENOcide my arse.
As suspected it's been Hamas causing the issues between the Gazans getting Aid and being killed by them. Sooner trust Kemps observations than those terrorist wankers who the weirdo left and luvvies would prefer to lap up their propaganda like moronic thickos. GENOcide my arse.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3363
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1817 times
- Been liked: 888 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Trump has never been a warmonger, no matter how much the MSM and the left try to paint him out to be one. When he does rarely act, it's always targetted and swift.
The only way that'll change is if someone pushes him in to one then he won't be afraid to take them head on which would be the wrong move for the Ayatollah.
The only way that'll change is if someone pushes him in to one then he won't be afraid to take them head on which would be the wrong move for the Ayatollah.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3089
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 443 times
Re: Iran v Israel
WHU(Exeter) wrote: ↑24 Jun 2025, 14:07 Seems Trump is now unhappy with Israel and Iran for breaking the ceasefire.
I was in two minds about Trump, but beginning more to think that he does actually want peaceful resolutions rather than more wars.
When promoting the ceasefire though, perhaps someone could’ve mentioned to him that Israel have broken their ceasefire with the Lebanon over 50 times, whilst Lebanon have broken it zero.
I wonder how this one will pan out?
I think he's quite keen to be seen as someone who wasn't a warmonger.
However, Trump's always had a hard-on for going in on Iran. Given the way they've acted, I'd probably be the same.
However, Trump's always had a hard-on for going in on Iran. Given the way they've acted, I'd probably be the same.
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1316
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 76 times
- Been liked: 128 times
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1316
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 76 times
- Been liked: 128 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Seems Trump is now unhappy with Israel and Iran for breaking the ceasefire.
I was in two minds about Trump, but beginning more to think that he does actually want peaceful resolutions rather than more wars.
When promoting the ceasefire though, perhaps someone could’ve mentioned to him that Israel have broken their ceasefire with the Lebanon over 50 times, whilst Lebanon have broken it zero.
I wonder how this one will pan out?
I was in two minds about Trump, but beginning more to think that he does actually want peaceful resolutions rather than more wars.
When promoting the ceasefire though, perhaps someone could’ve mentioned to him that Israel have broken their ceasefire with the Lebanon over 50 times, whilst Lebanon have broken it zero.
I wonder how this one will pan out?
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3089
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 443 times
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3363
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1817 times
- Been liked: 888 times
Re: Iran v Israel
OK_Guy wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 14:56Swiss. wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 13:07Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 03:35 If I was Donald Id blow all the a..r..a.b.s and s nack bars into the eternal realm of noncery
No wonder Hollywood love the cuntsSo you think Iran is full of Arab terrorists?Iran is Persian and not Arab, the attack on the church was by ISIS (they kill Christians for fun & virgins), I daresay it has nothing to do with Iran, more a warning to Syria which had large ISIS encampments.
The whole region could go up Shia v Sunni, btw ISIS is Sunni.
Yes I know Persians are Ayran. In fact the craddle of the Indo European people including us. I just wanted to test some of the ignorant cretins on here referring to them as Arabs.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3969
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 396 times
Re: Iran v Israel
WHU(Exeter) wrote: ↑24 Jun 2025, 12:37 There was already a deal in place, whereas Iran was abiding by levels set by the US, Britain, Germany and others. Those levels were being verified by the IAEA and at the time the levels were being kept in check (according to the IAEA).
As evil as the Iranian regime might be, it was not them who reneged on that deal and Britain and Germany expressed their disappointment when the US tore it up.
Maybe any diplomatic efforts should be left to Britain?
Maybe Flat-Beer Kier can convince Iran to house all the illegals while we organise processing their applications to come and work ponce & live in the UK.
Two birds, one stoning.
Two birds, one stoning.
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1316
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 76 times
- Been liked: 128 times
Re: Iran v Israel
There was already a deal in place, whereas Iran was abiding by levels set by the US, Britain, Germany and others. Those levels were being verified by the IAEA and at the time the levels were being kept in check (according to the IAEA).
As evil as the Iranian regime might be, it was not them who reneged on that deal and Britain and Germany expressed their disappointment when the US tore it up.
Maybe any diplomatic efforts should be left to Britain?
As evil as the Iranian regime might be, it was not them who reneged on that deal and Britain and Germany expressed their disappointment when the US tore it up.
Maybe any diplomatic efforts should be left to Britain?
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3363
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1817 times
- Been liked: 888 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Israel now claim Iran has violated ceasefire agreement but Iran are saying, nah man you're chatting shit innit... And so it goes on. 
Trump did his bit flawlessly trying to make amends and destroy a lot of their nuclear capabilites, so it's out of his hands if a ceasefire has been broken and it causes them to go on.
In a way, if it has been broken, a part of me thinks it might just be for the best for it to escalate so they can take this Iran cսnt and his cronies out once and for all.
This is the Middle East, what did anyone honestly expect.
Trump did his bit flawlessly trying to make amends and destroy a lot of their nuclear capabilites, so it's out of his hands if a ceasefire has been broken and it causes them to go on.
In a way, if it has been broken, a part of me thinks it might just be for the best for it to escalate so they can take this Iran cսnt and his cronies out once and for all.
This is the Middle East, what did anyone honestly expect.
-
- Posts: 420
- Has liked: 51 times
- Been liked: 168 times
Re: Iran v Israel
if you can see the trucks on satellite surveillance you can see where they went on satellite surveillance. They didn't just disappear into thin air.
There is always the risk enough survived below ground and that in time they could get back to it, but for now all seems positive. The best hope is that the Ayatollah is sent into Martyrdom to see the 100 Virgins awaiting him and sane heads take over.
There is always the risk enough survived below ground and that in time they could get back to it, but for now all seems positive. The best hope is that the Ayatollah is sent into Martyrdom to see the 100 Virgins awaiting him and sane heads take over.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3363
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1817 times
- Been liked: 888 times
Re: Iran v Israel
All seems far too straightforward, especially when it comes to the middle east. Something seems off, although if that is it then Trump (and Israel) have played yet another blinder just like back in his 1st term taking out their General Soleimani.
I'm uneasy with all this uranium knocking about and the Iranian Government suspending the IAEA from future visits...
I'm uneasy with all this uranium knocking about and the Iranian Government suspending the IAEA from future visits...
Re: Iran v Israel
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 23:36 Right, what's he up too..![]()
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrum ... 4153569653
An apparent ceasefire.
If It holds which it probably will you’ll have to give Trump a massive well done there!
world is a safer place. Gotta expect the Iranians to capitulate now on US inspections.
If It holds which it probably will you’ll have to give Trump a massive well done there!
world is a safer place. Gotta expect the Iranians to capitulate now on US inspections.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3363
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1817 times
- Been liked: 888 times