AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1023
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 201 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:32goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 08:18Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 02:02One of these days you’ll get something right.
## Context of the E. Jean Carroll Case
E. Jean Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. She filed a civil lawsuit in November 2022 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed claims beyond the statute of limitations. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York’s narrow penal law definition) and defamation for calling her claims a “hoax” and “con job.” Trump was ordered to pay $2 million for battery and $3 million for defamation. A separate defamation lawsuit resulted in an $83.3 million award in January 2024. Both verdicts are under appeal.
Poor GooseLook how desperate you are to defend a proven sexual abuser of women. He lost the appeal btw.
Your double standards on this are fantastic to watch.
”castrate them” unless you worship them then it’s okay because it’s only sexual assault.I thought you said it was rape? Do you ever get anything right?
Poor Goose, so clueless.
Yeh because sexually abusing women is way more acceptable?
Hilarious that your defence is “he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abuses them”.
Hilarious that your defence is “he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abuses them”.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 08:18Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 02:02One of these days you’ll get something right.
## Context of the E. Jean Carroll Case
E. Jean Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. She filed a civil lawsuit in November 2022 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed claims beyond the statute of limitations. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York’s narrow penal law definition) and defamation for calling her claims a “hoax” and “con job.” Trump was ordered to pay $2 million for battery and $3 million for defamation. A separate defamation lawsuit resulted in an $83.3 million award in January 2024. Both verdicts are under appeal.
Poor GooseLook how desperate you are to defend a proven sexual abuser of women. He lost the appeal btw.
Your double standards on this are fantastic to watch.
”castrate them” unless you worship them then it’s okay because it’s only sexual assault.
I thought you said it was rape? Do you ever get anything right?
Poor Goose, so clueless.
Poor Goose, so clueless.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 02:02One of these days you’ll get something right.
## Context of the E. Jean Carroll Case
E. Jean Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. She filed a civil lawsuit in November 2022 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed claims beyond the statute of limitations. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York’s narrow penal law definition) and defamation for calling her claims a “hoax” and “con job.” Trump was ordered to pay $2 million for battery and $3 million for defamation. A separate defamation lawsuit resulted in an $83.3 million award in January 2024. Both verdicts are under appeal.
Poor Goose
Look how desperate you are to defend a proven sexual abuser of women. He lost the appeal btw.
Your double standards on this are fantastic to watch.
”castrate them” unless you worship them then it’s okay because it’s only sexual assault.
Your double standards on this are fantastic to watch.
”castrate them” unless you worship them then it’s okay because it’s only sexual assault.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One of these days you’ll get something right.
## Context of the E. Jean Carroll Case
E. Jean Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. She filed a civil lawsuit in November 2022 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed claims beyond the statute of limitations. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York’s narrow penal law definition) and defamation for calling her claims a “hoax” and “con job.” Trump was ordered to pay $2 million for battery and $3 million for defamation. A separate defamation lawsuit resulted in an $83.3 million award in January 2024. Both verdicts are under appeal.
Poor Goose
## Context of the E. Jean Carroll Case
E. Jean Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. She filed a civil lawsuit in November 2022 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed claims beyond the statute of limitations. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York’s narrow penal law definition) and defamation for calling her claims a “hoax” and “con job.” Trump was ordered to pay $2 million for battery and $3 million for defamation. A separate defamation lawsuit resulted in an $83.3 million award in January 2024. Both verdicts are under appeal.
Poor Goose
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Absolutely not, he’s making America great again and bringing Peace to the world. I know you war mongering Globalists hate him but nobody believes a word you say about anything, not even your fake lawfare bullshit.
But we all know just how gullible you are, don’t we.
But we all know just how gullible you are, don’t we.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
So do you want rapists like Trump castrated or not?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Go argue with someone else you bore!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Deranged how? You saying he’s not a rapist?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:00Now you’re just making stuff up.
You get proper salty when someone insults Trump.
Not salty at all, just pointing out your TDS again.
Funny how you keep trying to avoid the subject.
Funny how you keep trying to avoid the subject.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Now you’re just making stuff up.
You get proper salty when someone insults Trump.
You get proper salty when someone insults Trump.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Starmer is a terrible PM, I don’t support him and haven’t supported him in any way. But even if he was amazing, but was a proven rapist - I’d never support him.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Oh that’s right I forgot you’re not disappointed at all the kids being abused are you. You’re only disappointed when people try to do something to stop it.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Well Trumps getting the criminals out at least. I think you should target your disappointment at Starmer don’t you?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
It’s what happens when you vote for a proper leader and not blindly worship a rapist.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6639
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3822 times
- Been liked: 2006 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 19:59One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 03:38Were you celebrating 4th of July with your rapist president?OSD you still calling white people “Gammons?”
That's a disgusting racist term. Plus it tastes like shit.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
One Sunny Day" wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 03:38Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 17:17goose wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 16:12yes your're taking on more debt.
the deficit will grow even larger because of this bill. GDP would have to grow something like 50% to get close to break even. lets not pretend that's gonna happen.
outside of the Whitehouse, everybody agrees that the deficit will grown because of this - the consensus is something around $650bn every year.
lets be clear on this, you don't think that businesses have an idea of what goods or raw materials they will be purchasing between now and the end of the year? remember the things you're imported have to be created and then shipped across the world.WOW 50% now that’s a big number. You must have a huge arsehole to pull a number that big out of it.
Im done, you’re too stupid to take serious.
Happy 4th!Were you celebrating 4th of July with your rapist president?
OSD you still calling white people “Gammons?”
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6639
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3822 times
- Been liked: 2006 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Last I heard she's getting the Headline slot for All Points East.
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2398
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 86 times
- Been liked: 513 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Now this Palestinian Action mob have been classified as a terror organisation will their leader, Huda Ammori, be locked up or will she still have a platform of hate?
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 523
- Has liked: 312 times
- Been liked: 122 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 17:17goose wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 16:12Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 15:45Because we’re taking on more debt goose.
No, they don’t know how much will be imported or exported yet because trade agreements haven’t been confirmed yet.
Here’s an estimate for you that isn’t used in your numbers. Apparently as of June 25th the US has received 75,000 applications for Trumps Gold Visa card. At $5 mill a piece that brings in $325 Billion.
Who’s to say that number doesn’t double? Then what?yes your're taking on more debt.
the deficit will grow even larger because of this bill. GDP would have to grow something like 50% to get close to break even. lets not pretend that's gonna happen.
outside of the Whitehouse, everybody agrees that the deficit will grown because of this - the consensus is something around $650bn every year.
lets be clear on this, you don't think that businesses have an idea of what goods or raw materials they will be purchasing between now and the end of the year? remember the things you're imported have to be created and then shipped across the world.WOW 50% now that’s a big number. You must have a huge arsehole to pull a number that big out of it.
Im done, you’re too stupid to take serious.
Happy 4th!
Were you celebrating 4th of July with your rapist president?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 17:17goose wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 16:12Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 15:45Because we’re taking on more debt goose.
No, they don’t know how much will be imported or exported yet because trade agreements haven’t been confirmed yet.
Here’s an estimate for you that isn’t used in your numbers. Apparently as of June 25th the US has received 75,000 applications for Trumps Gold Visa card. At $5 mill a piece that brings in $325 Billion.
Who’s to say that number doesn’t double? Then what?yes your're taking on more debt.
the deficit will grow even larger because of this bill. GDP would have to grow something like 50% to get close to break even. lets not pretend that's gonna happen.
outside of the Whitehouse, everybody agrees that the deficit will grown because of this - the consensus is something around $650bn every year.
lets be clear on this, you don't think that businesses have an idea of what goods or raw materials they will be purchasing between now and the end of the year? remember the things you're imported have to be created and then shipped across the world.WOW 50% now that’s a big number. You must have a huge arsehole to pull a number that big out of it.
Im done, you’re too stupid to take serious.
Happy 4th!
Not really.
GDP would have to increase over 3%pts to cover it off. Simple maths.
I see when faced with the reality of the numbers you resort to insults then run off.
GDP would have to increase over 3%pts to cover it off. Simple maths.
I see when faced with the reality of the numbers you resort to insults then run off.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 16:12Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 15:45goose wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 15:10How would they know?
They know what the US imports form each country and the level of tariff by country. That's an easy one to work out.
They have many many examples of tax cuts throughout the years and the impact - Trumps tax cuts in 2017 is a great benchmark.
simple question for you, if this isn't going to increase the deficit - why do you need to increase the debt ceiling?Because we’re taking on more debt goose.
No, they don’t know how much will be imported or exported yet because trade agreements haven’t been confirmed yet.
Here’s an estimate for you that isn’t used in your numbers. Apparently as of June 25th the US has received 75,000 applications for Trumps Gold Visa card. At $5 mill a piece that brings in $325 Billion.
Who’s to say that number doesn’t double? Then what?yes your're taking on more debt.
the deficit will grow even larger because of this bill. GDP would have to grow something like 50% to get close to break even. lets not pretend that's gonna happen.
outside of the Whitehouse, everybody agrees that the deficit will grown because of this - the consensus is something around $650bn every year.
lets be clear on this, you don't think that businesses have an idea of what goods or raw materials they will be purchasing between now and the end of the year? remember the things you're imported have to be created and then shipped across the world.
WOW 50% now that’s a big number. You must have a huge arsehole to pull a number that big out of it.
Im done, you’re too stupid to take serious.
Happy 4th!
Im done, you’re too stupid to take serious.
Happy 4th!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 15:45goose wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 15:10Nutsin wrote: ↑04 Jul 2025, 14:52I disagree with both, how the fuck do these fearmongerers know either, tax cuts sour growth and we have no idea how much the Tariffs will be yet and how much they will bring in and what the trade agreements are gonna look like.
So tell me how the fuck would they know?
All they are doing is guessing and using and grossly underestimating any increase in revenue these bring.
But you keep lapping it up like a good little retard why don’t you.
Those of us with half a brain will continue to be long and strong with our investments and cash in while you watch and miss a Golden opportunity to cash in.
Good god what a fuckwit!How would they know?
They know what the US imports form each country and the level of tariff by country. That's an easy one to work out.
They have many many examples of tax cuts throughout the years and the impact - Trumps tax cuts in 2017 is a great benchmark.
simple question for you, if this isn't going to increase the deficit - why do you need to increase the debt ceiling?Because we’re taking on more debt goose.
No, they don’t know how much will be imported or exported yet because trade agreements haven’t been confirmed yet.
Here’s an estimate for you that isn’t used in your numbers. Apparently as of June 25th the US has received 75,000 applications for Trumps Gold Visa card. At $5 mill a piece that brings in $325 Billion.
Who’s to say that number doesn’t double? Then what?
yes your're taking on more debt.
the deficit will grow even larger because of this bill. GDP would have to grow something like 50% to get close to break even. lets not pretend that's gonna happen.
outside of the Whitehouse, everybody agrees that the deficit will grown because of this - the consensus is something around $650bn every year.
lets be clear on this, you don't think that businesses have an idea of what goods or raw materials they will be purchasing between now and the end of the year? remember the things you're imported have to be created and then shipped across the world.
the deficit will grow even larger because of this bill. GDP would have to grow something like 50% to get close to break even. lets not pretend that's gonna happen.
outside of the Whitehouse, everybody agrees that the deficit will grown because of this - the consensus is something around $650bn every year.
lets be clear on this, you don't think that businesses have an idea of what goods or raw materials they will be purchasing between now and the end of the year? remember the things you're imported have to be created and then shipped across the world.
