AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 716
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 22 times
- Been liked: 91 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 4858
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 2769 times
- Been liked: 1362 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
only1billybonds wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 19:17 Headline on BBC news site:
"UK and France have duty to 'firmly' tackle illegal immigration Macron tells Parliament"
Did this granny shagging cսnt manage to keep a straight face whilst saying that?
Fucking despise the irresponsible pig. He has the deaths of migrants (last count 147 deaths), as well as putting so many lives at risk of drowning on his hands for pathetically resisting making any serious effort to stop them crossing. On that moral issue alone he should be held accountable and vilified and yet what do us British saps do? Give him untold cash for the privilege to carry on ignoring them because they're still so fucking sea salty over Brexit. Fucking pathetic and oh so very French. A gutless Nation with little backbone with poor moral values.
Don't know how he can live with himself for allowing his ideological and pathological views on politics to cloud his judgement on ignoring saving lives, whilst we do our utmost to save and protect migrants at a huge cost both financially and socially to us.
It was summed up recently when our Border Force asked for some assistance from them as some of the migrant boats were struggling and their response back to our BF was can we make sure we return their poxy life rafts because they are so fucking tight, instead of their response being to help unconditionally first.
And what do we do? Roll out the red carpet and all the trimmings for the ponce, only to continue soon after with his disgusting ignorance to the crisis.
-
- Posts: 618
- Location: UK
- Old WHO Number: 20994
- Has liked: 31 times
- Been liked: 28 times
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2119
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 445 times
- Been liked: 641 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Headline on BBC news site:
"UK and France have duty to 'firmly' tackle illegal immigration Macron tells Parliament"
Did this granny shagging cսnt manage to keep a straight face whilst saying that?
"UK and France have duty to 'firmly' tackle illegal immigration Macron tells Parliament"
Did this granny shagging cսnt manage to keep a straight face whilst saying that?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 16:45Westham67 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 16:31Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 11:03 Is that you with the black turtleneck, Pickled? 3rd from the left?
Defjam on the left with a balaclava on... rocking the BUMBAG.
Nothing wrong with a fanny pack.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3550
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 625 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Westham67 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 16:31Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 11:03 Is that you with the black turtleneck, Pickled? 3rd from the left?
Defjam on the left with a balaclava on
... rocking the BUMBAG.
-
- Posts: 618
- Location: UK
- Old WHO Number: 20994
- Has liked: 31 times
- Been liked: 28 times
- Contact:
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 11:03 Is that you with the black turtleneck, Pickled? 3rd from the left?
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3550
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 625 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Is that you with the black turtleneck, Pickled? 3rd from the left?
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 4858
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 2769 times
- Been liked: 1362 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I see the Left are now blaming Trump for the freakish flash flooding in Texas that took so many lives. Trump derangement syndrome is one truly sick demented illness in the world.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 18:28Oh it was only sexual assault not rape.
oh oh it was a kangaroo court.
lol
proven sexual abuser of women. Upheld via appeal as well. And you can’t even bring yourself to criticise him. Defending a known sexual predator.
Perhaps if the Dems weren’t so obviously out to get Trump their Kangaroo court would be a bit more believable. They pulled similar bollocks at the Kavanaugh hearings. It’s in their play book.
Saying that,
The latest news on the Epstein files is bollocks. Bondi and Patel are full of shit. This doesn’t sit well with me, this is the sort of bollocks the Dems would and have pulled.
This is a cover up.
Saying that,
The latest news on the Epstein files is bollocks. Bondi and Patel are full of shit. This doesn’t sit well with me, this is the sort of bollocks the Dems would and have pulled.
This is a cover up.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 17:41Not true, I already told you it was a kangaroo court. Or do you not know what that means ffs?
Oh it was only sexual assault not rape.
oh oh it was a kangaroo court.
lol
proven sexual abuser of women. Upheld via appeal as well. And you can’t even bring yourself to criticise him. Defending a known sexual predator.
oh oh it was a kangaroo court.
lol
proven sexual abuser of women. Upheld via appeal as well. And you can’t even bring yourself to criticise him. Defending a known sexual predator.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 17:32If that was proven and not just some conspiracy theory I’d call him a sick cսnt.
difference is that you know Trump sexually abused women and you defend it. So who’s the sick cսnt?
Not true, I already told you it was a kangaroo court. Or do you not know what that means ffs?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 17:26goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 17:24Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 17:20I like the idea of protecting British kids from the scourge of immigration and Islam.
Ban all Pakistani men and Halal they’re inhumane.
Trump has banned people from certain fucked up countries from entering the USA to protect the US people. It’s common sense. Which is why I like him, he has a backbone and puts America first.
Deep down you wish Starmer was cut from the same cloth.
I prefer Trumps tolerance level over yours and Starmers I bet the kids in the UK do too.
Difference here is I care about the kids all you care about is the Pakistani rapists and how they’re perceived.
In your world if someone has brown skin they are off limits from any criticism. Well that doesn’t apply in my world. I’ll continue to call it as it is.
There is an obvious problem with Pakistani men and Muslim men on how they’re perceived treat women and children and it’s not fucking tolerable.Sexually abusing women isn’t tolerable either. Difference is you defend a proven sexual abuser of women.
No I don’t wish Starmer was the same. Why would I want a PM who sexually abused women?Thats right Starmer likes rent boys I forgot.
You defend kiddy fiddlers. Sick cսnt!
If that was proven and not just some conspiracy theory I’d call him a sick cսnt.
difference is that you know Trump sexually abused women and you defend it. So who’s the sick cսnt?
difference is that you know Trump sexually abused women and you defend it. So who’s the sick cսnt?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 17:24Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 17:20goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 16:56hahaha look at you dance around it. He’s a proven sexual abuser of women, which was upheld via appeal as well.
I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.
You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?I like the idea of protecting British kids from the scourge of immigration and Islam.
Ban all Pakistani men and Halal they’re inhumane.
Trump has banned people from certain fucked up countries from entering the USA to protect the US people. It’s common sense. Which is why I like him, he has a backbone and puts America first.
Deep down you wish Starmer was cut from the same cloth.
I prefer Trumps tolerance level over yours and Starmers I bet the kids in the UK do too.
Difference here is I care about the kids all you care about is the Pakistani rapists and how they’re perceived.
In your world if someone has brown skin they are off limits from any criticism. Well that doesn’t apply in my world. I’ll continue to call it as it is.
There is an obvious problem with Pakistani men and Muslim men on how they’re perceived treat women and children and it’s not fucking tolerable.Sexually abusing women isn’t tolerable either. Difference is you defend a proven sexual abuser of women.
No I don’t wish Starmer was the same. Why would I want a PM who sexually abused women?
Thats right Starmer likes rent boys I forgot.
You defend kiddy fiddlers. Sick cսnt!
You defend kiddy fiddlers. Sick cսnt!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 17:20goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 16:56Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 16:52I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.
First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence.
To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.
nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.
For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.
hahaha look at you dance around it. He’s a proven sexual abuser of women, which was upheld via appeal as well.
I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.
You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?I like the idea of protecting British kids from the scourge of immigration and Islam.
Ban all Pakistani men and Halal they’re inhumane.
Trump has banned people from certain fucked up countries from entering the USA to protect the US people. It’s common sense. Which is why I like him, he has a backbone and puts America first.
Deep down you wish Starmer was cut from the same cloth.
I prefer Trumps tolerance level over yours and Starmers I bet the kids in the UK do too.
Difference here is I care about the kids all you care about is the Pakistani rapists and how they’re perceived.
In your world if someone has brown skin they are off limits from any criticism. Well that doesn’t apply in my world. I’ll continue to call it as it is.
There is an obvious problem with Pakistani men and Muslim men on how they’re perceived treat women and children and it’s not fucking tolerable.
Sexually abusing women isn’t tolerable either. Difference is you defend a proven sexual abuser of women. I’ve not defended anyone guilty of a crime, be it rape or sexual abuse. Both are abhorrent but you can’t bring yourself to say that because it would mean your messiah is in the same bracket.
No I don’t wish Starmer was the same. Why would I want a PM who sexually abused women?
ban all sexual abusers I say.
No I don’t wish Starmer was the same. Why would I want a PM who sexually abused women?
ban all sexual abusers I say.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 16:56Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 16:52I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.
First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence.
To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.
nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.
For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.
hahaha look at you dance around it. He’s a proven sexual abuser of women, which was upheld via appeal as well.
I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.
You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?
I like the idea of protecting British kids from the scourge of immigration and Islam.
Ban all Pakistani men and Halal they’re inhumane.
Trump has banned people from certain fucked up countries from entering the USA to protect the US people. It’s common sense. Which is why I like him, he has a backbone and puts America first.
Deep down you wish Starmer was cut from the same cloth.
I prefer Trumps tolerance level over yours and Starmers I bet the kids in the UK do too.
Difference here is I care about the kids all you care about is the Pakistani rapists and how they’re perceived.
In your world if someone has brown skin they are off limits from any criticism. Well that doesn’t apply in my world. I’ll continue to call it as it is.
There is an obvious problem with Pakistani men and Muslim men on how they’re perceived treat women and children and it’s not fucking tolerable.
Ban all Pakistani men and Halal they’re inhumane.
Trump has banned people from certain fucked up countries from entering the USA to protect the US people. It’s common sense. Which is why I like him, he has a backbone and puts America first.
Deep down you wish Starmer was cut from the same cloth.
I prefer Trumps tolerance level over yours and Starmers I bet the kids in the UK do too.
Difference here is I care about the kids all you care about is the Pakistani rapists and how they’re perceived.
In your world if someone has brown skin they are off limits from any criticism. Well that doesn’t apply in my world. I’ll continue to call it as it is.
There is an obvious problem with Pakistani men and Muslim men on how they’re perceived treat women and children and it’s not fucking tolerable.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 16:52I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.
First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence.
To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.
nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.
For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.
hahaha look at you dance around it. He’s a proven sexual abuser of women, which was upheld via appeal as well.
I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.
You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?
I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.
You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.
First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence.
To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.
nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.
For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.
First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence.
To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.
nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.
For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Lol keep dancing.
id happily see ALL sexual abusers castrated. Can you say the same?
id happily see ALL sexual abusers castrated. Can you say the same?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Let’s be clear before you post make sure you know what the fuck you are talking about.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Let’s be clear, neither is acceptable.
I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?
I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Get back to me when you know the difference between rape and sexual abuse.