Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 716
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 91 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

only1billybonds wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 19:17 Headline on BBC news site:

"UK and France have duty to 'firmly' tackle illegal immigration Macron tells Parliament"

Did this granny shagging cսnt manage to keep a straight face whilst saying that?

Fucking despise the irresponsible pig. He has the deaths of migrants (last count 147 deaths), as well as putting so many lives at risk of drowning on his hands for pathetically resisting making any serious effort to stop them crossing. On that moral issue alone he should be held accountable and vilified and yet what do us British saps do? Give him untold cash for the privilege to carry on ignoring them because they're still so fucking sea salty over Brexit. Fucking pathetic and oh so very French. A gutless Nation with little backbone with poor moral values.

Don't know how he can live with himself for allowing his ideological and pathological views on politics to cloud his judgement on ignoring saving lives, whilst we do our utmost to save and protect migrants at a huge cost both financially and socially to us.

It was summed up recently when our Border Force asked for some assistance from them as some of the migrant boats were struggling and their response back to our BF was can we make sure we return their poxy life rafts because they are so fucking tight, instead of their response being to help unconditionally first.

And what do we do? Roll out the red carpet and all the trimmings for the ponce, only to continue soon after with his disgusting ignorance to the crisis. 
Westham67
Posts: 618
Location: UK
Old WHO Number: 20994
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 28 times
Contact:

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Westham67 »

goose wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 17:49
Lee Trundle" wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 16:45
Westham67 wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 16:31
 
Defjam on the left with a balaclava on
... rocking the BUMBAG.
Nothing wrong with a fanny pack.
Naan pack for Defajm 
only1billybonds
Posts: 2119
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 445 times
Been liked: 641 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Headline on BBC news site:

"UK and France have duty to 'firmly' tackle illegal immigration Macron tells Parliament"

Did this granny shagging cսnt manage to keep a straight face whilst saying that?
nerd2
Posts: 48
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 35 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post nerd2 »

Do this lot stop people leaving, doubt much the other way  . They do know most people turn up on planes or Trains same as here , then there Visas run , boom illegal .
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 16:45
Westham67 wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 16:31
Lee Trundle" wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 11:03 Is that you with the black turtleneck, Pickled?  3rd from the left?

 
Defjam on the left with a balaclava on
... rocking the BUMBAG.
Nothing wrong with a fanny pack.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3550
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Westham67 wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 16:31
Lee Trundle" wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 11:03 Is that you with the black turtleneck, Pickled?  3rd from the left?

 
Defjam on the left with a balaclava on
... rocking the BUMBAG.
Westham67
Posts: 618
Location: UK
Old WHO Number: 20994
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 28 times
Contact:

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Westham67 »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 11:03 Is that you with the black turtleneck, Pickled?  3rd from the left?

 
Defjam on the left with a balaclava on
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3550
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Is that you with the black turtleneck, Pickled?  3rd from the left?

User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

I see the Left are now blaming Trump for the freakish flash flooding in Texas that took so many lives. Trump derangement syndrome is one truly sick demented illness in the world.
Nutsin
Posts: 2537
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 18:28
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:41
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:32
If that was proven and not just some conspiracy theory I’d call him a sick cսnt.

difference is that you know Trump sexually abused women and you defend it. So who’s the sick cսnt?
Not true, I already told you it was a kangaroo court. Or do you not know what that means ffs?
Oh it was only sexual assault not rape.
oh oh it was a kangaroo court.

lol

proven sexual abuser of women. Upheld via appeal as well. And you can’t even bring yourself to criticise him. Defending a known sexual predator. 
Perhaps if the Dems weren’t so obviously out to get Trump their Kangaroo court would be a bit more believable. They pulled similar bollocks at the Kavanaugh hearings. It’s in their play book.


Saying that,

The latest news on the Epstein files is bollocks. Bondi and Patel are full of shit. This doesn’t sit well with me, this is the sort of bollocks the Dems would and have pulled.

This is a cover up.
XKhammer
Posts: 810
Has liked: 463 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

collyrob wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 23:14 Can you two cunts just text each other privately.
They're having a game of tennis....well it is Wimbledon fortnight 
collyrob
Posts: 452
Old WHO Number: 226068
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 54 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post collyrob »

Can you two cunts just text each other privately.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:41
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:32
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:26
Thats right Starmer likes rent boys I forgot. 

You defend kiddy fiddlers. Sick cսnt!
If that was proven and not just some conspiracy theory I’d call him a sick cսnt.

difference is that you know Trump sexually abused women and you defend it. So who’s the sick cսnt?
Not true, I already told you it was a kangaroo court. Or do you not know what that means ffs?
Oh it was only sexual assault not rape.
oh oh it was a kangaroo court.

lol

proven sexual abuser of women. Upheld via appeal as well. And you can’t even bring yourself to criticise him. Defending a known sexual predator. 
Nutsin
Posts: 2537
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:32
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:26
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:24
Sexually abusing women isn’t tolerable either. Difference is you defend a proven sexual abuser of women.

No I don’t wish Starmer was the same. Why would I want a PM who sexually abused women? 
Thats right Starmer likes rent boys I forgot. 

You defend kiddy fiddlers. Sick cսnt!
If that was proven and not just some conspiracy theory I’d call him a sick cսnt.

difference is that you know Trump sexually abused women and you defend it. So who’s the sick cսnt?
Not true, I already told you it was a kangaroo court. Or do you not know what that means ffs?
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:26
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:24
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:20
I like the idea of protecting British kids from the scourge of immigration and Islam.

Ban all Pakistani men and Halal they’re inhumane.

Trump has banned people from certain fucked up countries from entering the USA to protect the US people. It’s common sense. Which is why I like him, he has a backbone and puts America first.


Deep down you wish Starmer was cut from the same cloth.
I prefer Trumps tolerance level over yours and Starmers I bet the kids in the UK do too.

Difference here is I care about the kids all you care about is the Pakistani rapists and how they’re perceived.
In your world if someone has brown skin they are off limits from any criticism. Well that doesn’t apply in my world. I’ll continue to call it as it is.

There is an obvious problem with Pakistani men and Muslim men on how they’re perceived treat women and children and it’s not fucking tolerable.
Sexually abusing women isn’t tolerable either. Difference is you defend a proven sexual abuser of women.

No I don’t wish Starmer was the same. Why would I want a PM who sexually abused women? 
Thats right Starmer likes rent boys I forgot. 

You defend kiddy fiddlers. Sick cսnt!
If that was proven and not just some conspiracy theory I’d call him a sick cսnt.

difference is that you know Trump sexually abused women and you defend it. So who’s the sick cսnt?
Nutsin
Posts: 2537
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:24
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:20
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 16:56
hahaha look at you dance around it. He’s a proven sexual abuser of women, which was upheld via appeal as well.

I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.

You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?
I like the idea of protecting British kids from the scourge of immigration and Islam.

Ban all Pakistani men and Halal they’re inhumane.

Trump has banned people from certain fucked up countries from entering the USA to protect the US people. It’s common sense. Which is why I like him, he has a backbone and puts America first.


Deep down you wish Starmer was cut from the same cloth.
I prefer Trumps tolerance level over yours and Starmers I bet the kids in the UK do too.

Difference here is I care about the kids all you care about is the Pakistani rapists and how they’re perceived.
In your world if someone has brown skin they are off limits from any criticism. Well that doesn’t apply in my world. I’ll continue to call it as it is.

There is an obvious problem with Pakistani men and Muslim men on how they’re perceived treat women and children and it’s not fucking tolerable.
Sexually abusing women isn’t tolerable either. Difference is you defend a proven sexual abuser of women.

No I don’t wish Starmer was the same. Why would I want a PM who sexually abused women? 
Thats right Starmer likes rent boys I forgot. 

You defend kiddy fiddlers. Sick cսnt!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 17:20
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 16:56
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 16:52
I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.

First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence. 

To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.

nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.

For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.

hahaha look at you dance around it. He’s a proven sexual abuser of women, which was upheld via appeal as well.

I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.

You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?
I like the idea of protecting British kids from the scourge of immigration and Islam.

Ban all Pakistani men and Halal they’re inhumane.

Trump has banned people from certain fucked up countries from entering the USA to protect the US people. It’s common sense. Which is why I like him, he has a backbone and puts America first.


Deep down you wish Starmer was cut from the same cloth.
I prefer Trumps tolerance level over yours and Starmers I bet the kids in the UK do too.

Difference here is I care about the kids all you care about is the Pakistani rapists and how they’re perceived.
In your world if someone has brown skin they are off limits from any criticism. Well that doesn’t apply in my world. I’ll continue to call it as it is.

There is an obvious problem with Pakistani men and Muslim men on how they’re perceived treat women and children and it’s not fucking tolerable.
Sexually abusing women isn’t tolerable either. Difference is you defend a proven sexual abuser of women. I’ve not defended anyone guilty of a crime, be it rape or sexual abuse. Both are abhorrent but you can’t bring yourself to say that because it would mean your messiah is in the same bracket.

No I don’t wish Starmer was the same. Why would I want a PM who sexually abused women? 

ban all sexual abusers I say. 
Nutsin
Posts: 2537
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 16:56
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 16:52
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 16:16
Lol keep dancing.

id happily see ALL sexual abusers castrated. Can you say the same?
I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.

First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence. 

To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.

nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.

For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.

hahaha look at you dance around it. He’s a proven sexual abuser of women, which was upheld via appeal as well.

I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.

You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?
I like the idea of protecting British kids from the scourge of immigration and Islam.

Ban all Pakistani men and Halal they’re inhumane.

Trump has banned people from certain fucked up countries from entering the USA to protect the US people. It’s common sense. Which is why I like him, he has a backbone and puts America first.


Deep down you wish Starmer was cut from the same cloth.
I prefer Trumps tolerance level over yours and Starmers I bet the kids in the UK do too.

Difference here is I care about the kids all you care about is the Pakistani rapists and how they’re perceived.
In your world if someone has brown skin they are off limits from any criticism. Well that doesn’t apply in my world. I’ll continue to call it as it is.

There is an obvious problem with Pakistani men and Muslim men on how they’re perceived treat women and children and it’s not fucking tolerable.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 16:52
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 16:16
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 15:24
Let’s be clear before you post make sure you know what the fuck you are talking about.
Lol keep dancing.

id happily see ALL sexual abusers castrated. Can you say the same?
I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.

First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence. 

To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.

nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.

For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.

hahaha look at you dance around it. He’s a proven sexual abuser of women, which was upheld via appeal as well.

I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.

You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?
Nutsin
Posts: 2537
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 16:16
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 15:24
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 14:11
Let’s be clear, neither is acceptable.

I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?
Let’s be clear before you post make sure you know what the fuck you are talking about.
Lol keep dancing.

id happily see ALL sexual abusers castrated. Can you say the same?
I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.

First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence. 

To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.

nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.

For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.

User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 15:24
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 14:11
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 14:09
Get back to me when you know the difference between rape and sexual abuse.
Let’s be clear, neither is acceptable.

I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?
Let’s be clear before you post make sure you know what the fuck you are talking about.
Lol keep dancing.

id happily see ALL sexual abusers castrated. Can you say the same?
Nutsin
Posts: 2537
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 14:11
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 14:09
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 13:54
 
Hilarious is actively supporting a proven sexual abuser of women but then making everyone one of your posts a protest about rape.

Irony is off the charts.
Get back to me when you know the difference between rape and sexual abuse.
Let’s be clear, neither is acceptable.

I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?
Let’s be clear before you post make sure you know what the fuck you are talking about.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 14:09
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 13:54
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 13:42
What’s hilarious is you not knowing the difference between rape and sexual abuse.
 
Hilarious is actively supporting a proven sexual abuser of women but then making everyone one of your posts a protest about rape.

Irony is off the charts.
Get back to me when you know the difference between rape and sexual abuse.
Let’s be clear, neither is acceptable.

I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?
Nutsin
Posts: 2537
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 13:54
Nutsin wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 13:42
goose wrote: 06 Jul 2025, 13:40
Yeh because sexually abusing women is way more acceptable? 
Hilarious that your defence is “he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abuses them”.
What’s hilarious is you not knowing the difference between rape and sexual abuse.
 
Hilarious is actively supporting a proven sexual abuser of women but then making everyone one of your posts a protest about rape.

Irony is off the charts.
Get back to me when you know the difference between rape and sexual abuse.
Post Reply