Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Manchester Airport incident

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Leonard Hatred
Posts: 2605
Old WHO Number: 209880
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 158 times

Manchester Airport incident

Post Leonard Hatred »

"We're gonna have a British George Floyd now innit. The BLM mob are gonna be all over this. Expect a load of shoe shops to be looted as a ""protest"". This country's gone to the fucking dogs."
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

twoleftfeet wrote: 10 Jul 2025, 22:15 He punched a 5ft 3in, 8st WPC in the face. 

There is no defence for that.

Lock both the cunts up for 10 years and then deport them.
They ( boglims)  have no regard for our laws or culture .
Our establishment elites bend over and take it dry because theyre  shit scared of upsetting said  boglims.
Same for the Black 'community '...their fish feed compared to the boglims  though.
The yanks can arm themselves ...we can't.
I suggest you all start making plans ...FIGHT OR FLIGHT.
Last edited by Monsieur merde de cheval on 11 Jul 2025, 02:09, edited 1 time in total.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 2132
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 78 times
Been liked: 418 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post twoleftfeet »

He punched a 5ft 3in, 8st WPC in the face. 

There is no defence for that.

Lock both the cunts up for 10 years and then deport them.
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Massive Attack" wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 21:29
Alfs wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 16:29 I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation.  If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them. 

I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
Behave. The Old Bill in that instance were well within their right to do what they did in the full context of what had happened and the "aggressive approach" began with the perps. The geezer who kicked mateys head in to row Z deserves a medal. In fact I hope it gave lowlife shitcunt brain damage. 
They weren't aggressive enough and caused their own shit fest IMO.
DONT MESS ABOUT
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: 09 Jul 2025, 02:42 In the England I grew up in.

1)...NEVER PLAY UP IN AN AIRPORT OR YOU WILL BE RIGHTLY SERVED UP AND LUCKY TO LIVE 
2)..☝️
the worrying thing for me is the STANDARDS of the old bill now... especially in an Airport
..ARMED old bill should be highly trained and able to deal with these two cunts double lively with no fuss .
these officers were ...NOT VERY GOOD 
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Mad Ferret" wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 21:19 You just know Alfs has blue hair and a nose ring.
He's certainly  an artist 
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

In the England I grew up in.

1)...NEVER PLAY UP IN AN AIRPORT OR YOU WILL BE RIGHTLY SERVED UP AND LUCKY TO LIVE 
2)..☝️
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Alfs wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 16:29 I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation.  If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them. 

I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
Stick to writing your next  screenplay .
.which is worrying for a bod who knows nish about real life
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 1621
Has liked: 168 times
Been liked: 273 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Mad Ferret »

Massive Attack" wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 21:29
Alfs wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 16:29 I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation.  If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them. 

I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
The geezer who kicked mateys head in to row Z deserves a medal. In fact I hope it gave lowlife shitcunt brain damage. 
He prob already had it, the inbred cսnt.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Massive Attack »

Alfs wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 16:29 I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation.  If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them. 

I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
Behave. The Old Bill in that instance were well within their right to do what they did in the full context of what had happened and the "aggressive approach" began with the perps. The geezer who kicked mateys head in to row Z deserves a medal. In fact I hope it gave lowlife shitcunt brain damage. 
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 1621
Has liked: 168 times
Been liked: 273 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Mad Ferret »

You just know Alfs has blue hair and a nose ring.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2119
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 445 times
Been liked: 641 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post only1billybonds »

Alfs.

11 police officers turned up to arrest a young man who was protesting peacefully  (his right) against the mutilation of young kids in trans clinics, that is 'poor policing'.
This is where demanding a softly softly approach by the police gets you, plod become a laughing stock.

The formation of the college of policing has got a lot to answer for, it really has made real police work almost impossible to carry out.
Alfs
Posts: 947
Old WHO Number: 12872
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Alfs »

Like I said, the cunts deserve everything coming to them, that's not the point I'm making.  The WPCs nose may not have got broken if the arrest was handled differently, instead they went in very aggressively, escalating the violence.  This was poor policing.
,
Posts: 1024
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post , »

Alfs, these two blokes had violently resisted arrest, for a damaging assault on a co religionist, and in doing so had severely hurt a female police officer. The immediate bit of footage put out showed none of the context to what had transpired earlier.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 747
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 306 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Eerie Decent »

Im no fan of the current version of the old bill, but one of these cunts broke a woman's nose, Alfs. This is hot on the heels of the original incident.

You think the old bill's approach warranted that?
Alfs
Posts: 947
Old WHO Number: 12872
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Alfs »

I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation.  If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them. 

I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3550
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Lee Trundle »

In case you didn't know, Alfs.

"Police were at the airport responding to an incident at Starbucks in which Mr Amaaz is alleged to have headbutted a man and punched him."

You're right.  They should have made him a friendship bracelet and offered that to him before they kindly asked him if he would like to be arrested.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3550
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Lee Trundle »

"They were overly aggressive from the start"

From the start?  You do you know why they were having to be arrested in the first place?
Alfs
Posts: 947
Old WHO Number: 12872
Has liked: 74 times
Been liked: 168 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Alfs »

Though the two accused are clearly a couple of cunts, the police handled it very badly IMO.  They were overly aggressive from the start and that provoked the response that they got.
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 707
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 179 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

, wrote: 07 Jul 2025, 19:57 It depends what you mean by original press coverage and how people interpreted it anyway. For me from what I read and viewed it looked like these blokes had a case to answer and that is what has transpired.

This incident is a classic example of people choosing to use an interpretation that suits their beliefs/prejudices.
What people mean by 'original press coverage' is the coverage that originally appeared in the press.

I hope this helps.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4463
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 515 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Mike Oxsaw »

They'll be given bird and it will be a lengthy sentence in order to prove (PROVE) that two-tier policing in the UK is a myth.

There will be an instant appeal and they will be granted unconditional bail while waiting for that to work through the justice system.

However, when the case finally drops from the public eye, they'll be quietly let out on parole (to free up prison space for "proper" criminals, naturally) and asked if they'd mind wearing a tag every now and again for administration purposes.
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 707
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 179 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

On The Ball" wrote: 08 Jul 2025, 08:10 That's strange because I saw the full video on the BBC last year when it happened.
Not when they first put it up you didn't.

A somewhat disingenuous post, I feel.
aldgate
Posts: 137
Old WHO Number: 218646
Has liked: 5 times
Been liked: 34 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post aldgate »

very selective. here's the guardian three days after the "attack"
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/art ... y-robinson
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3550
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Lee Trundle »

I mean, it was even misreported by the usual racist MP's in the house of commons at the time as an abuse of power by the police.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3550
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post Lee Trundle »

A couple posters on here have VERY selective memories when it comes to the original reporting of this incident.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2119
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 445 times
Been liked: 641 times

Re: Manchester Airport incident

Post only1billybonds »

OTB.

I also saw the full video of the incident. Eventually.
The INITIAL reporting only showed footage of plod laying into the bloke on the floor.
Last edited by only1billybonds on 08 Jul 2025, 08:59, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply