Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Kneecap

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Leonard Hatred
Posts: 2605
Old WHO Number: 209880
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 158 times

Kneecap

Post Leonard Hatred »

Talk to me

User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 488
Has liked: 292 times
Been liked: 117 times

Re: Kneecap

Post One Sunny Day »

Mr French horse shit probably needs a kneecapping. Then again, probably pointless as his typing fingers will still work. 
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Imagine a  WHU central London  sit down protest  slagging off Jews ? ...(Not that we would. )
how long would we last before RoboCop turned up and slapped random football banning orders ?
 
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

What have you got to say ?
NOTHING
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 488
Has liked: 292 times
Been liked: 117 times

Re: Kneecap

Post One Sunny Day »

Without giving  Mr French click bait some.more clicking what is the bumblebee cսnt trying to say?
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Leonard Hatred" wrote: 30 Apr 2025, 21:15 I predict one of them will get shot.

You can't go around winding folk up like that.

Not in this day and age.
loyalist areas are solid and know the score with these twats 
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Leonard Hatred" wrote: 01 May 2025, 17:09 It'd be quite ironic if the UVF took umbrage and kneecapped them 
These kids weren't even born born at the back end of the troubles ...let alone in the business end .

Hopefully  they grow up and become responsible MEN for their family .

King Billy x
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Massive Attack" wrote: 10 Jul 2025, 22:42 People losing their shit over the tasteless effigy, ok fine. However the same demented cunts then howl with laughter when burning effigys were made up of both Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage.

It's the moral hypocrisy of it all that does my nut in with these hand-wringing wankers. 
Don't forget the Donald..
Mayor Knunt took great pleasure in that like
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Massive Attack" wrote: 10 Jul 2025, 22:42 People losing their shit over the tasteless effigy, ok fine. However the same demented cunts then howl with laughter when burning effigys were made up of both Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage.

It's the moral hypocrisy of it all that does my nut in with these hand-wringing wankers. 
Spot on mate.
but why is the loyalist genius work of art tasteless ?
If that was Wanksy the usual degenerates would be all over it
every year the loyalist community top off their bonnies to make a statement about what's in their heart
Last year the PSNI got it with the plod wagon..the driver was cammed up in rainbow colours 👍🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿⚒️🇮🇪⛪
User avatar
wils
Posts: 959
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 153 times
Been liked: 305 times

Re: Kneecap

Post wils »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 03 May 2025, 02:14 Good, balanced view that Billy Bragg has taken, over this. I think people on the right and the left will be surprised by some of it. -

"I’m glad to see that a number of artists have signed a letter defending Kneecap from attempts to remove them from various festival bills in the wake of comments made at shows over two years ago. The band have apologised for the hurt they caused to the families of murdered MPs and distanced themselves from Hamas and Hezbollah. Having taken that step, I believe they deserve to be reinstated on those bills that have removed them, and also confirmed as playing at those festivals where they are already scheduled to perform.
However, I’m not sure I would have felt comfortable signing the letter (I wasn’t asked). My problem is that the wording lacks any sense of nuance or understanding of why this whole furore kicked off. And in trying to avoid the complexities of this issue by claiming that the politics of an artist’s views are irrelevant, the signatories are arguing that the only principle at stake here is free speech. I disagree. Andrew Tate uses that justification to avoid accusations that he is pedalling misogyny. Free speech absolutism has made Twitter a sewer of right wing bile and sexist bullying. Rock Against Racism was founded on the belief that artists should not be free to say whatever they want to say, without any consequence.
If we want to live in a society where everyone can exercise their liberty to freely express their opinions, then we have to take two other crucial dimensions into consideration. Firstly, we must give equal space for other opinions to be expressed. And secondly, to prevent those first two rights from being exploited by those who would abuse them by threatening and discriminating against others, we need to accept that words have consequences.
What that means in practice is that we must be careful not to allow the considered and cogent arguments we seek to make - Free Palestine, end the genocide - to be undermined by flippant statements that we later have to apologise for. I think the artist’s letter would have been much stronger, as would the case for reinstating Kneecap, if it had recognised this crucial dynamic, rather than seeking to brush all other considerations aside.
Kneecap have been vocal allies of the Palestinian people, and their criticisms of Israel are, in my view, totally justified. Only the most blinkered supporters of Israel would now deny that what is being perpetrated in Gaza is genocide. I know that because I’ve argued with such people about this terminology on social media. The graphics that Kneecap displayed at Coachella, and the statements they made from the stage are not anti-Semitic, they are anti-Israel. It’s an important distinction: Anti-semitism is discrimination based on ethnicity and, like all racism, should always be opposed. The right to protest against the behaviour of a state is a fundamental freedom that must be upheld. Adopting laws that make it illegal to do so is the hallmark of a totalitarian regime.
And let’s not kid ourselves. The band are being punished for the anti-Israel statements they made at Coachella. Sharon Osbourne’s complaints sent the right wing press off to scour the internet looking for a stick to beat the band with and, unfortunately, they found it. While some might argue that there is a case to be made in support of Hamas, it cannot be done by ignoring the killing of 815 Israel civilians including 36 children on October 7th, just as it is not possible to express support for Israel without recognising the ongoing slaughter of over 40,000 Palestinian civilians, more than 14,500 of them children, according to UNICEF.
The weight of the moral argument against Israel rests on the fact that the targeting of civilians is a war crime. While the extreme magnitude of the retribution that is being inflicted on the people of Gaza is out of all proportion, we must not lose sight of that fact. If we hope to one day see Netanyahu tried in The Hague, then we must also accept that those responsible for killing civilians on October 7th should stand trial on similar charges. Failure to do so undermines support for the Palestinian people, because it suggests that not all dead children are equal. And, as Kneecap have discovered, it also gifts control of the narrative to one’s enemies.
It shouldn’t go unmentioned that the people calling for Kneecap to be banned are the same people who decry cancel culture whenever anyone of their political persuasion is called to account. That none of the reactionaries who argue for the right to offend has stepped up to defend the band shows you what a bunch of self-serving hypocrites they are. Nor should we be comfortable with the possibility that Kneecap could be prosecuted for ill-considered comments made during a concert.
The fact is, people say stupid things onstage in the heat of the moment. In calmer environments, the band make it clear that they do not support the targeting of civilians, be they non-combatants or members of parliament, citing the experience of their community during the Troubles. In doing so, they implicitly recognise that there are limits to freedom of expression, that some things cannot be said without consequence.
Perhaps if they addressed some of the complexities of this situation in an interview, putting their statements and subsequent treatment into context while defending their right to call out genocide, it might clear the air and garner wider support for Kneecap to perform as scheduled this summer.
What I don’t think helps them - or any of us who wish to engage in debate around highly contentious issues - is a blanket demand that artists be allowed to say whatever they want to say, without consequence.
We live in a time when acting with impunity is celebrated by people who believe that physical strength, unprecedented wealth, popular acclaim or technological nous gives an individual the right to do whatever they want. Yet freedom, and your ability to enjoy it, relies on no one being above the law. Liberty, the right to express yourself in word and deed, is not in and of itself enough to constitute the state of being free, for, without equality, liberty is nothing more than privilege. And, as our American cousins are discovering to their cost, liberty without accountability is tantamount to tyranny."
If like me your thumb ached scrolling through that. Here’s ChatGPT summary. 


The writer supports Kneecap’s return to festival lineups after their apology and distancing from extremist groups but criticizes a public letter defending them for ignoring the complexities of free speech and accountability. They argue that while Kneecap’s criticism of Israel isn’t antisemitic and should be protected, words have consequences—especially on sensitive issues like Gaza. The piece calls out hypocrisy in cancel culture and stresses that freedom of expression must be balanced with responsibility and equality.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Massive Attack »

People losing their shit over the tasteless effigy, ok fine. However the same demented cunts then howl with laughter when burning effigys were made up of both Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage.

It's the moral hypocrisy of it all that does my nut in with these hand-wringing wankers. 
User avatar
Bungo
Posts: 521
Old WHO Number: 228443
Has liked: 149 times
Been liked: 112 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Bungo »

Does being banned by Radio 1 have the desired impact on a music biz career that it used to?
Monsieur merde de cheval
Posts: 1630
Has liked: 1099 times
Been liked: 543 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Monsieur merde de cheval »

Eerie Decent" wrote: 01 May 2025, 10:12 Weller has signed an open letter of support for them, saying politics shouldn't get in the way of artists being able to play gigs/festivals.

Unless you have different political opinions to him, of course.
Weller has always despised the white working  class
Down in the tube station at midnight is classic Jam .
(He was on about me and my kind)
Eton rifles was a pop at the ruperts.

He's your  typical  leftwaffe minge   toby  throwing his weight around and putting  the white working class scum  in their place...(In his world)
 
i have news for Weller ...
You're the  cսnt ..TOP TABLE
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 488
Has liked: 292 times
Been liked: 117 times

Re: Kneecap

Post One Sunny Day »

Good, balanced view that Billy Bragg has taken, over this. I think people on the right and the left will be surprised by some of it. -

"I’m glad to see that a number of artists have signed a letter defending Kneecap from attempts to remove them from various festival bills in the wake of comments made at shows over two years ago. The band have apologised for the hurt they caused to the families of murdered MPs and distanced themselves from Hamas and Hezbollah. Having taken that step, I believe they deserve to be reinstated on those bills that have removed them, and also confirmed as playing at those festivals where they are already scheduled to perform.
However, I’m not sure I would have felt comfortable signing the letter (I wasn’t asked). My problem is that the wording lacks any sense of nuance or understanding of why this whole furore kicked off. And in trying to avoid the complexities of this issue by claiming that the politics of an artist’s views are irrelevant, the signatories are arguing that the only principle at stake here is free speech. I disagree. Andrew Tate uses that justification to avoid accusations that he is pedalling misogyny. Free speech absolutism has made Twitter a sewer of right wing bile and sexist bullying. Rock Against Racism was founded on the belief that artists should not be free to say whatever they want to say, without any consequence.
If we want to live in a society where everyone can exercise their liberty to freely express their opinions, then we have to take two other crucial dimensions into consideration. Firstly, we must give equal space for other opinions to be expressed. And secondly, to prevent those first two rights from being exploited by those who would abuse them by threatening and discriminating against others, we need to accept that words have consequences.
What that means in practice is that we must be careful not to allow the considered and cogent arguments we seek to make - Free Palestine, end the genocide - to be undermined by flippant statements that we later have to apologise for. I think the artist’s letter would have been much stronger, as would the case for reinstating Kneecap, if it had recognised this crucial dynamic, rather than seeking to brush all other considerations aside.
Kneecap have been vocal allies of the Palestinian people, and their criticisms of Israel are, in my view, totally justified. Only the most blinkered supporters of Israel would now deny that what is being perpetrated in Gaza is genocide. I know that because I’ve argued with such people about this terminology on social media. The graphics that Kneecap displayed at Coachella, and the statements they made from the stage are not anti-Semitic, they are anti-Israel. It’s an important distinction: Anti-semitism is discrimination based on ethnicity and, like all racism, should always be opposed. The right to protest against the behaviour of a state is a fundamental freedom that must be upheld. Adopting laws that make it illegal to do so is the hallmark of a totalitarian regime.
And let’s not kid ourselves. The band are being punished for the anti-Israel statements they made at Coachella. Sharon Osbourne’s complaints sent the right wing press off to scour the internet looking for a stick to beat the band with and, unfortunately, they found it. While some might argue that there is a case to be made in support of Hamas, it cannot be done by ignoring the killing of 815 Israel civilians including 36 children on October 7th, just as it is not possible to express support for Israel without recognising the ongoing slaughter of over 40,000 Palestinian civilians, more than 14,500 of them children, according to UNICEF.
The weight of the moral argument against Israel rests on the fact that the targeting of civilians is a war crime. While the extreme magnitude of the retribution that is being inflicted on the people of Gaza is out of all proportion, we must not lose sight of that fact. If we hope to one day see Netanyahu tried in The Hague, then we must also accept that those responsible for killing civilians on October 7th should stand trial on similar charges. Failure to do so undermines support for the Palestinian people, because it suggests that not all dead children are equal. And, as Kneecap have discovered, it also gifts control of the narrative to one’s enemies.
It shouldn’t go unmentioned that the people calling for Kneecap to be banned are the same people who decry cancel culture whenever anyone of their political persuasion is called to account. That none of the reactionaries who argue for the right to offend has stepped up to defend the band shows you what a bunch of self-serving hypocrites they are. Nor should we be comfortable with the possibility that Kneecap could be prosecuted for ill-considered comments made during a concert.
The fact is, people say stupid things onstage in the heat of the moment. In calmer environments, the band make it clear that they do not support the targeting of civilians, be they non-combatants or members of parliament, citing the experience of their community during the Troubles. In doing so, they implicitly recognise that there are limits to freedom of expression, that some things cannot be said without consequence.
Perhaps if they addressed some of the complexities of this situation in an interview, putting their statements and subsequent treatment into context while defending their right to call out genocide, it might clear the air and garner wider support for Kneecap to perform as scheduled this summer.
What I don’t think helps them - or any of us who wish to engage in debate around highly contentious issues - is a blanket demand that artists be allowed to say whatever they want to say, without consequence.
We live in a time when acting with impunity is celebrated by people who believe that physical strength, unprecedented wealth, popular acclaim or technological nous gives an individual the right to do whatever they want. Yet freedom, and your ability to enjoy it, relies on no one being above the law. Liberty, the right to express yourself in word and deed, is not in and of itself enough to constitute the state of being free, for, without equality, liberty is nothing more than privilege. And, as our American cousins are discovering to their cost, liberty without accountability is tantamount to tyranny."
Gank
Posts: 924
Has liked: 674 times
Been liked: 522 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Gank »

zebthecat wrote: 01 May 2025, 20:10
honky cat" wrote: 01 May 2025, 19:36 More interest in these plums than the spurs game.

Middle class stage school types causing faux outrage. 
Their promotional strategy is straight out of the Malcolm McLaren playbook and it certainly works.
That's what a fool believes.

Oh wait, McLaren? Ok, forget it.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1658
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 194 times
Been liked: 157 times

Re: Kneecap

Post zebthecat »

honky cat" wrote: 01 May 2025, 19:36 More interest in these plums than the spurs game.

Middle class stage school types causing faux outrage. 
Their promotional strategy is straight out of the Malcolm McLaren playbook and it certainly works.
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 793
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 439 times
Been liked: 289 times

Re: Kneecap

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Fenian cunts.
Would love them to get a gig in Gibraltar.
FLAVIUS👍
honky cat
Posts: 845
Has liked: 502 times
Been liked: 324 times

Re: Kneecap

Post honky cat »

More interest in these plums than the spurs game.

Middle class stage school types causing faux outrage. 
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1132
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 236 times
Been liked: 385 times

Re: Kneecap

Post southbankbornnbred »

They’ve been criticised for shouting “up the Hamas”.

But are we sure they’re not just big West Ham fans with a hefty Irish twang?!
Leonard Hatred
Posts: 2605
Old WHO Number: 209880
Has liked: 133 times
Been liked: 158 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Leonard Hatred »

It'd be quite ironic if the UVF took umbrage and kneecapped them 
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1347
Has liked: 338 times
Been liked: 550 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Even Ian Dury balked at using "cսnt"



Just realised he did in Plaistow Patricia

Eerie Decent
Posts: 747
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 306 times

Re: Kneecap

Post Eerie Decent »

Weller has signed an open letter of support for them, saying politics shouldn't get in the way of artists being able to play gigs/festivals.

Unless you have different political opinions to him, of course.
Post Reply