Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 716
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 92 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 2135
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 78 times
Been liked: 421 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post twoleftfeet »

Starmer said it’s only fair that those that are paying in ie taxes etc etc should have the right to have a say in how the country is run.

So does that mean that those on benefits shouldn’t? As far as I’m aware they don’t pay in.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4865
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2777 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

We did know the identity. He was a Welsh Choirboy!
violator
Posts: 659
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 196 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post violator »

dm wrote: 17 Jul 2025, 10:57 Looks like the government is going ahead with its intentions to lower the voting age to 16
So we weren't allowed to know the identity of that cսnt who butchered the kids in Southport because he wasn't yet 18, but 16 year olds are allowed to vote in the GE...
XKhammer
Posts: 815
Has liked: 464 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post XKhammer »

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c39zy4107mko

Couldn't make it up...maybe he's after all the millons the Nigerians are waiting for us to claim 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4865
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2777 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Impressionable youngsters these days are more likely to vote for Farage than Starmer, so to coin a phrase...

Be careful what you wish for. 🗳
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3553
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

They're certainly doing everything possible to try to stay in power.  How long before all these Afghans are allowed to vote?
dm
Posts: 328
Has liked: 130 times
Been liked: 112 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post dm »

Looks like the government is going ahead with its intentions to lower the voting age to 16
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3553
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Land Rover axe hundreds of jobs.

User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4865
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2777 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

He's not wrong though.
Hello Mrs. Jones
Posts: 336
Old WHO Number: 224273
Has liked: 23 times
Been liked: 46 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hello Mrs. Jones »

Nutsin...posting Bill Maher videos..really? I wouldnt go down that rabbit hole if i were you. 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3305
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 402 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

The rise in inflation should see interest rates go up
Have a cash ISA maturing in October so up to about 8% would do the trick. Just in time for the protected balance on deposits going from £85,000 to £100,000 on Dec 1st as well

I see Trump reckons this whole Epstein thing is ‘a hoax’.
Guess the next executive order will be the release of Ghislaine Maxwell
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5020
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 420 times
Been liked: 866 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/c4g89vqp8p4t

UK inflation going up again, especially on food.
Rachel from accounts raises employer NI contributions then acts surprised when it gets passed on to consumers.
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 350 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 15 Jul 2025, 09:13 David LAMMY has just handed Singapore, the 4th richest country in the world, £70m for their green energy push.
Agreed its the same when we'd give India a whole load of aid for their health and education while India spend billions on their space agency and nuclear missiles. We've started to move away from that with a focus more on private finance investments. 
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 350 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

only1billybonds wrote: 15 Jul 2025, 06:31 No, I'm done because we are going around in circles. We have both said that individual states have their biases depending on how that statee votes.


Do you agree that getting men out of women's sport is a good thing?

Agreed

Do you agree that securing the Southern border in the USA is a good thing?

Agreed - however wasnt it Biden who tried to get a bi partisan border security bill thru that the Republicans voted out. Context is everything and Trump saw the issue as an election winner. No good if the problem was already solved.

Do you agree that people will no longer be taxed on their tips they receive at work is a good thing.

Agreed - however the pennies saved pale in comparison to the billions the rich will save via the big ugly bill and the cost for those falling off medicaid eligibility.

Do you agree that DOGE have done a good job, saving the American tax payer millions in needless expenditure?

No I cant say theyve done that much. By all accounts promising $2tn savings and getting nowhere near and spending an absolute fortune. Will be interesting to see what they spent and what they saved. None of it was fraud as it was all voted for by congress.

That'll do for a start, feel free to highlight any failures by the Trump govnmt since Jan, there's obviously been a couple.

Tarrifs are his one trick and are a joke. The guy is a flat track bully put him at the head of any other country and he wouldn't have a  chance. He has no clue about the histiry of how tarrifs were used and their impact. How effective they were we will only know once its all settled down but dont bank on it being positive it might make the deficits worse yet.
Markets manipulated by him and his cronies are profiting. Not a good look at the very least. Inflation promises are yet to be impacted by his tarrifs but could well be a lot worse to come rather than the promised "end" of inflation.
Unlawfully Commercialising the Presidency with the watch, phone etc is a disgrace. But then without thise funds his own business would go bust by all accounts.
No peace as promised in Ukraine. Im glad he's finally realised Putin is not to be trusted but jeez how dumb was he to think he could.
Trump should come down harder on Netanyahu - 50k dead is just horrific but Trump could encourage him to stop if he wanted to.
His promise to rid America of gangs, rapists and murderers was a good one. However turning his attention to "illegals" as criminals so quickly and publicly rounding them up on the streets and at work is not what the public were expecting and smacks of a nazi police state.

I could go on.


But nice to have an intelligent exchange rather than Nutsack going all MAGA!

 
We both agree individual states have their biases. Hiwever you fail to agree that the nationwide polls that overlook the state biases show that he's underwater across the board. Even if you found a nationwide poll that showed him above water his numbers are still slipping. 

See above 😉
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3553
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 625 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

David LAMMY has just handed Singapore, the 4th richest country in the world, £70m for their green energy push.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2123
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 445 times
Been liked: 645 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

No, I'm done because we are going around in circles. We have both said that individual states have their biases depending on how that statee votes.


Do you agree that getting men out of women's sport is a good thing?

Do you agree that securing the Southern border in the USA is a good thing?

Do you agree that people will no longer be taxed on their tips they receive at work is a good thing.

Do you agree that DOGE have done a good job, saving the American tax payer millions in needless expenditure?

That'll do for a start, feel free to highlight any failures by the Trump govnmt since Jan, there's obviously been a couple.

 
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 350 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

only1billybonds wrote: 13 Jul 2025, 18:50 OK, I'm done now, we both agree that certain states will show bias towards their favoured politician(s).
But just take a look at the big cities that are democratic run. Do you really think thecwholevof America would be in a better shape were the entire country to follow that blueprint?
Come on, put your TDS to one side for a second and reply honestly or not at all. 
Done because you lost the argument 👌 
Im unsure of your point as I dont live in a US city? But if you explain what you mean maybe I can understand this particular argument.
only1billybonds
Posts: 2123
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 445 times
Been liked: 645 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

OK, I'm done now, we both agree that certain states will show bias towards their favoured politician(s).
But just take a look at the big cities that are democratic run. Do you really think thecwholevof America would be in a better shape were the entire country to follow that blueprint?
Come on, put your TDS to one side for a second and reply honestly or not at all. 
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 350 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

only1billybonds wrote: 13 Jul 2025, 18:09 Like I said, red states will favour  a republican president.

Florida is among 27 states where Trump has received a net positive approval rating. His best ranking is in Wyoming, where 67% of voters approve of his performance, Morning Consult data shows. His worst ranking is in Vermont, where 64% disapprove of how he is handling his job.


 
State based polls are clearly going to show the extremes based on the voting of those states. All the nationwide average polls see him negative I believe.

https://www.natesilver.net/p/trump-appr ... r-bulletin

https://eu.phillyburbs.com/story/news/2 ... 612261007/

Find a nationwide poll that shows him positive you wont be able to so give it up!


only1billybonds
Posts: 2123
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 445 times
Been liked: 645 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Like I said, red states will favour  a republican president.

Florida is among 27 states where Trump has received a net positive approval rating. His best ranking is in Wyoming, where 67% of voters approve of his performance, Morning Consult data shows. His worst ranking is in Vermont, where 64% disapprove of how he is handling his job.

 
User avatar
BillyJenningsBoots
Posts: 1063
Old WHO Number: 33164
Has liked: 350 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BillyJenningsBoots »

only1billybonds wrote: 13 Jul 2025, 14:19 BJB

Sorry to keep to you waiting, I've had my grandson here but rest assured,next time he asks for a sleepover,I'll put him off as i have to stay glued to my phone all weekend in case you need a reply.

OK, well the example you posted is from a solid blue state which of course is going to be anti red, regardless who the leader is and the reverse is true.
The long and short of it is that Trump got elected because the alternative was unthinkable. The dems continue to be a train wreck and Trump can be as unlikeable as you want, he's still a better choice than his last opponent.

 
😆 no polls that you can come up with not even one!! 

Yep the Dems are a train wreck. They should be out there debunking Trumps bullshit and defending the US people from his authoritarian rule!
Post Reply