Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The UK online safety act

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

Hopefully Farage gets at least 2 consecutive terms in Office.🤞 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3301
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 402 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Fauxstralian »

So … Labour bloke calling Farage a PAEDO : Bad free speech
The bloke who owns Twitter saying everyone should say what they want (including Hitler was a good bloke : Free speech champion!

Farage looks more like the type into rubber suited gimpery to me
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

Pi Alpha Nu" wrote: 29 Jul 2025, 17:16
Massive Attack" wrote: 29 Jul 2025, 15:24 Didn't think Labour could sink any lower but then they go and prove me wrong.. 



https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1A7V4EBiSh/


 
He should have gone further and called Farage a cսnt.
A Prime Minister-in-waiting. 👌
Pi Alpha Nu
Posts: 104
Old WHO Number: 210470
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 38 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Pi Alpha Nu »

Massive Attack" wrote: 29 Jul 2025, 15:24 Didn't think Labour could sink any lower but then they go and prove me wrong.. 



https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1A7V4EBiSh/

 
He should have gone further and called Farage a cսnt.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4463
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 515 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Swiss. wrote: 29 Jul 2025, 10:00
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 28 Jul 2025, 15:10 How do you know that the VPN service you use is not provided by the authorities as simply another method of hoovering up user details and what they access?

Because it says so on their web page? Right-o.

And it also says so on several "independent" review web pages? Double right-o.

And you (YOU) have not yet had a knock at your front door...

...Do you want ice with your rightos or are you cool enough already?
What a load of bollocks you talk you senile old git. Seriously get some professional help and take a break from this site. It's not healthy to be on here 24/7 like you. 
OK. So the answers to such questions scare so much shit out of you that you'd rather they were not asked.

Why am I not surprised?
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

Didn't think Labour could sink any lower but then they go and prove me wrong.. 



https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1A7V4EBiSh/
 
XKhammer
Posts: 810
Has liked: 463 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post XKhammer »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 28 Jul 2025, 17:43 Made me laugh when I saw that trannies are grizzling about being age restricted on lgbtq sub reddits.



 
I knew you was a wrong un
This site has now  got how many trannie conspiracy theorists?
Swiss.
Posts: 1559
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 275 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Swiss. »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 28 Jul 2025, 15:10 How do you know that the VPN service you use is not provided by the authorities as simply another method of hoovering up user details and what they access?

Because it says so on their web page? Right-o.

And it also says so on several "independent" review web pages? Double right-o.

And you (YOU) have not yet had a knock at your front door...

...Do you want ice with your rightos or are you cool enough already?
What a load of bollocks you talk you senile old git. Seriously get some professional help and take a break from this site. It's not healthy to be on here 24/7 like you. 
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1112
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 52 times
Been liked: 240 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

Made me laugh when I saw that trannies are grizzling about being age restricted on lgbtq sub reddits.


 
User avatar
factory seconds
Posts: 169
Old WHO Number: 294848
Been liked: 64 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post factory seconds »

so it's either a useless annoyance that has been implemented at a massive cost to the taxpayer like the internet equivilent of removing your shoes every time you get on a plane for fuck all reason except to make the queue an hour longer, or a massive authoritarian overreach that paves the way for wholesale china-style web censorship (there are already plenty of non wank related things getting caught in the crossfire).

either way anyone for it needs a one way ticket to DPRK to live out their stasi fantasies.
 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4463
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 515 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Mike Oxsaw »

How do you know that the VPN service you use is not provided by the authorities as simply another method of hoovering up user details and what they access?

Because it says so on their web page? Right-o.

And it also says so on several "independent" review web pages? Double right-o.

And you (YOU) have not yet had a knock at your front door...

...Do you want ice with your rightos or are you cool enough already?
Swiss.
Posts: 1559
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 233 times
Been liked: 275 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Swiss. »

Any one who doesn't use a VPN is a mug. Ban them..haha right
User avatar
wils
Posts: 959
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 153 times
Been liked: 305 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post wils »

One Sunny Day" wrote: 27 Jul 2025, 23:43 It's almost like whoever came up with this brain fart has never heard of VPNs
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 488
Has liked: 292 times
Been liked: 117 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post One Sunny Day »

It's almost like whoever came up with this brain fart has never heard of VPNs
User avatar
mallard
Posts: 917
Old WHO Number: 14461
Has liked: 276 times
Been liked: 122 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post mallard »

Trust people and they'll be true to you. Treat them greatly, and they will show themselves to be great.
riosleftsock
Posts: 1773
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 322 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post riosleftsock »

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
riosleftsock
Posts: 1773
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 322 times
Been liked: 103 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post riosleftsock »

When obedience means slavery and death, rebellion is freedom and life.

Those whom make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

yngwies Cat" wrote: 27 Jul 2025, 08:04 For such an advocate of free speech, how come musk suspended me from twitter for using some Anglo Saxon metaphors to describe the so called leader of the free world?



 

He did that personally, or someone wasn't doing their job properly?
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4463
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 515 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Mike Oxsaw »

It's more the On-Line Straight-Jacket Act than the On-Line Safety Act, but I guess you right-on cool dudes know much better than me what it covers and won't be demanding (of people like me) why you were not warned when it steams in on your (YOUR) freedoms.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 770
Been liked: 186 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post THUNDERCLINT »

So now joyo can't satisfy his depraved urges with weird fetish porn, are the nation's special needs school in immediate danger and should we be boarding up trees nationwide?
Nutsin
Posts: 2537
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Nutsin »

Fauxstralian wrote: 27 Jul 2025, 08:10 Nutsack
Do you listen to Musk when he tells you Trump is on the Epstein list?

 
Faux,
Elon has a right to free speech just like the rest of us, wether or not I agree with what he says is irrelevant.

Fauxstralian
Posts: 3301
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 402 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Fauxstralian »

Nutsack
Do you listen to Musk when he tells you Trump is on the Epstein list?
 
yngwies Cat
Posts: 421
Old WHO Number: 17468
Has liked: 120 times
Been liked: 91 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post yngwies Cat »

For such an advocate of free speech, how come musk suspended me from twitter for using some Anglo Saxon metaphors to describe the so called leader of the free world?




 
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1112
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 52 times
Been liked: 240 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

David Icke" wrote: 26 Jul 2025, 17:28
Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 26 Jul 2025, 17:01 Give it arrest you boring ginger misery.


 
 
It's 'a rest' Jaan, although knowing the sick fuckers history perhaps your original post wasn't too wide of the mark.
Phone auto corrected it. So Apple must know all about him
David Icke
Posts: 16
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 4 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post David Icke »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 26 Jul 2025, 17:01 Give it arrest you boring ginger misery.

 
 
It's 'a rest' Jaan, although knowing the sick fuckers history perhaps your original post wasn't too wide of the mark.
Post Reply