Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The UK online safety act

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4463
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 515 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Mike Oxsaw »

It IS a complete dog's breakfast of an act which will protect absolutely no one.

The intentions are admirable but the implementation is the equivalent of trying to run an electric car on lumps of coal.

It's the IT equivalent of HS2: poorly defined requirements, inadequately researched problems/potential solutions and every "interested" party pulling it every which way.

The best that can be said of it is that it's the digital equivalent of putting jazz mags on the top shelf of a newsagent - and I'm sure, despite that restriction, every 100% straight person (on here, at least) saw a porno mag before they were legally entitled to.

But, hey! You just freely hand over all and any information you're asked for; I'm sure there a few hundred Nigerians waiting for Mr. Stupid to freely pass over the last bit of the jigsaw to complete their profile of him.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:45
XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:42
goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:32
Dry your eyes you ginger nonce
🇮🇹🏆🤌🏼
Scouse loving soap dodging Eyetie 
 
underage cambodian noncing ginger div.
(note the word "again")

You greasy wop 😏👏
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:42
goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:32
XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:28
 
You talking 2006?
Cardiff ain't our  home home you scouse loving Eyetie 
Dry your eyes you ginger nonce
🇮🇹🏆🤌🏼
Scouse loving soap dodging Eyetie 
 
 
underage cambodian noncing ginger div.
(note the word "again")

User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

Happy Friday everyone! 🙌😆
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 770
Been liked: 186 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post THUNDERCLINT »

XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:40
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:35
XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:26
Ha ha paranoia from a flat earther freak
Got something to hide?
Noncing?Benefits Fraud?Convicted wife beater?
Projection; when someone attributes their thoughts, feelings or behaviours on to another person.
Braindead ThickClit 
 
 
XKhammer
Posts: 810
Has liked: 463 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post XKhammer »

goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:32
XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:28
goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:20
reminds me more of losing your first major final in god knows how long, as favourites, at home AND on penalties.
 
You talking 2006?
Cardiff ain't our  home home you scouse loving Eyetie 
Dry your eyes you ginger nonce
🇮🇹🏆🤌🏼
Scouse loving soap dodging Eyetie 
XKhammer
Posts: 810
Has liked: 463 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post XKhammer »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:35
XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:26
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:18
It's got fuck all to do with online safety and everything to do with mining data for AI to profile you.

Edit :  actually I take that back, there is an element of protecting someone's safety here. It's the government's, from you, because of the never ending shitcuntry they're balls deep in and in their arrogance they never dreamed they'd be held accountable for.
Ha ha paranoia from a flat earther freak
Got something to hide?
Noncing?Benefits Fraud?Convicted wife beater?
Projection; when someone attributes their thoughts, feelings or behaviours on to another person.
Braindead ThickClit 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 770
Been liked: 186 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post THUNDERCLINT »

XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:26
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:18
Mr Anon" wrote: 31 Jul 2025, 14:04 I've just tried to research a nice bottle of wine to get my Brother in Law for his birthday, so went to the sub Reddit "wine" - blocked unless photo ID!!! To READ about wine, you can't even fucking buy it on there.

So Starmer is saying 16-18 year olds can no longer read about wine or listen to Enemim,  while simultaneously giving them the vote?? What a fucking clown. 

For someone who's left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, he seems overly concerned with what mine are up to 🤬
It's got fuck all to do with online safety and everything to do with mining data for AI to profile you.

Edit :  actually I take that back, there is an element of protecting someone's safety here. It's the government's, from you, because of the never ending shitcuntry they're balls deep in and in their arrogance they never dreamed they'd be held accountable for.
Ha ha paranoia from a flat earther freak
Got something to hide?
Noncing?Benefits Fraud?Convicted wife beater?
Projection; when someone attributes their thoughts, feelings or behaviours on to another person.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

, wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:27 For millions and millions of us this online safety act is making no difference to our daily use so what’s the fuss?
 
 
Hi Sir Keir. How's your rentboys doing?
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:28
goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:20
XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:14
Very true would be a defeat and retreat not seen since  WW2 in you know where by you know whom
reminds me more of losing your first major final in god knows how long, as favourites, at home AND on penalties.
 
You talking 2006?
Cardiff ain't our  home home you scouse loving Eyetie 
Dry your eyes you ginger nonce
🇮🇹🏆🤌🏼
XKhammer
Posts: 810
Has liked: 463 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post XKhammer »

goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:20
XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:14
goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 11:43 The significant majority that Labour got at the last GE should be the kind of majority that guarantees at least two terms - maybe 3.
However, a number of the seats are smaller majorities.

Couple that with some awful policies/decisions and they could be gone after 1 term. Must be some kind of record?
Very true would be a defeat and retreat not seen since  WW2 in you know where by you know whom
reminds me more of losing your first major final in god knows how long, as favourites, at home AND on penalties.
 
 
You talking 2006?
Cardiff ain't our  home home you scouse loving Eyetie 
,
Posts: 1024
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post , »

For millions and millions of us this online safety act is making no difference to our daily use so what’s the fuss?
XKhammer
Posts: 810
Has liked: 463 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post XKhammer »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:18
Mr Anon" wrote: 31 Jul 2025, 14:04 I've just tried to research a nice bottle of wine to get my Brother in Law for his birthday, so went to the sub Reddit "wine" - blocked unless photo ID!!! To READ about wine, you can't even fucking buy it on there.

So Starmer is saying 16-18 year olds can no longer read about wine or listen to Enemim,  while simultaneously giving them the vote?? What a fucking clown. 

For someone who's left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, he seems overly concerned with what mine are up to 🤬
It's got fuck all to do with online safety and everything to do with mining data for AI to profile you.

Edit :  actually I take that back, there is an element of protecting someone's safety here. It's the government's, from you, because of the never ending shitcuntry they're balls deep in and in their arrogance they never dreamed they'd be held accountable for.
Ha ha paranoia from a flat earther freak
Got something to hide?
Noncing?Benefits Fraud?Convicted wife beater?
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post goose »

XKhammer wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 15:14
goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 11:43 The significant majority that Labour got at the last GE should be the kind of majority that guarantees at least two terms - maybe 3.
However, a number of the seats are smaller majorities.

Couple that with some awful policies/decisions and they could be gone after 1 term. Must be some kind of record?
Very true would be a defeat and retreat not seen since  WW2 in you know where by you know whom
reminds me more of losing your first major final in god knows how long, as favourites, at home AND on penalties.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 770
Been liked: 186 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Mr Anon" wrote: 31 Jul 2025, 14:04 I've just tried to research a nice bottle of wine to get my Brother in Law for his birthday, so went to the sub Reddit "wine" - blocked unless photo ID!!! To READ about wine, you can't even fucking buy it on there.

So Starmer is saying 16-18 year olds can no longer read about wine or listen to Enemim,  while simultaneously giving them the vote?? What a fucking clown. 

For someone who's left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, he seems overly concerned with what mine are up to 🤬
It's got fuck all to do with online safety and everything to do with mining data for AI to profile you.

Edit :  actually I take that back, there is an element of protecting someone's safety here. It's the government's, from you, because of the never ending shitcuntry they're balls deep in and in their arrogance they never dreamed they'd be held accountable for.
Last edited by THUNDERCLINT on 01 Aug 2025, 15:23, edited 1 time in total.
XKhammer
Posts: 810
Has liked: 463 times
Been liked: 140 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post XKhammer »

goose wrote: 01 Aug 2025, 11:43 The significant majority that Labour got at the last GE should be the kind of majority that guarantees at least two terms - maybe 3.
However, a number of the seats are smaller majorities.

Couple that with some awful policies/decisions and they could be gone after 1 term. Must be some kind of record?
Very true would be a defeat and retreat not seen since  WW2 in you know where by you know whom
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5019
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 416 times
Been liked: 865 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post goose »

The significant majority that Labour got at the last GE should be the kind of majority that guarantees at least two terms - maybe 3.
However, a number of the seats are smaller majorities.

Couple that with some awful policies/decisions and they could be gone after 1 term. Must be some kind of record?
Mr Anon
Posts: 650
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 152 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Mr Anon »

GxBbHVFXEAE5lzu.jpeg
Mr Anon
Posts: 650
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 134 times
Been liked: 152 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Mr Anon »

I've just tried to research a nice bottle of wine to get my Brother in Law for his birthday, so went to the sub Reddit "wine" - blocked unless photo ID!!! To READ about wine, you can't even fucking buy it on there.

So Starmer is saying 16-18 year olds can no longer read about wine or listen to Enemim,  while simultaneously giving them the vote?? What a fucking clown. 

For someone who's left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, he seems overly concerned with what mine are up to 🤬
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

Starmer's trolling the Nation, sure of it...

User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 4858
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 2769 times
Been liked: 1362 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Massive Attack »

Because it's all just about protecting kids from suicide, porn, paedos... and pizza.

User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1347
Has liked: 338 times
Been liked: 550 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Fauxstralian wrote: 30 Jul 2025, 18:58 So … Labour bloke calling Farage a PAEDO : Bad free speech
The bloke who owns Twitter saying everyone should say what they want (including Hitler was a good bloke : Free speech champion!

Farage looks more like the type into rubber suited gimpery to me
You obviously would know then?
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 707
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 179 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

Fauxstralian wrote: 30 Jul 2025, 18:58 So … Labour bloke calling Farage a PAEDO : Bad free speech
The bloke who owns Twitter saying everyone should say what they want (including Hitler was a good bloke : Free speech champion!

Farage looks more like the type into rubber suited gimpery to me
 
 
You're going to have to explain how those two remarks, twisted by you as they are, are in any way related or make any kind of point. Feel free to use symbols.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 747
Has liked: 112 times
Been liked: 306 times

Re: The UK online safety act

Post Eerie Decent »

Fauxstralian wrote: 30 Jul 2025, 18:58
Farage looks more like the type into rubber suited gimpery to me
How would you know, Sven?
Post Reply