AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1023
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 200 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
- BRANDED
- Posts: 1960
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 109 times
- Been liked: 230 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Well. I’ve unfortunately seen the responses of some on the left and they really are deranged or unhinged.
It’s clearly best not to arm a society but if the society is ideologically pretty sensible then you wont get this constant blood thirst raging madness.
murder and mayhem is NOT intrinsic to the weapon it is extrinsic and belongs in the minds of the mad violent people.
It’s clearly best not to arm a society but if the society is ideologically pretty sensible then you wont get this constant blood thirst raging madness.
murder and mayhem is NOT intrinsic to the weapon it is extrinsic and belongs in the minds of the mad violent people.
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1021
- Has liked: 161 times
- Been liked: 468 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
The foaming nutters came to the surface a long time ago, one of them shot Charlie Kirk last night.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Be interesting to see who was responsible and why they did it. The list of possibles must be enormous with this bloke. I read he was wearing body armour but the bullet ricocheted off the armour into his neck. Bit unlucky that.
This is just gonna bring a load of foaming nutters to the surface now, as if there weren't enough already.
This is just gonna bring a load of foaming nutters to the surface now, as if there weren't enough already.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3609
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 919 times
- Been liked: 1307 times
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3926
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 782 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 09:04
Not much word on the actual act itself, or what drove it, unsurprisingly.
They can't admit they're ever wrong, about anything. The majority of them have painted themselves into a corner with the cocks on women debate.
It never enters their mind that they could be supporting the baddies who encourage things like this, in all this.
It never enters their mind that they could be supporting the baddies who encourage things like this, in all this.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 08:17 Classic diversion tactics from the left to rush to blame the gun laws rather than admit their own side is probably a bit mental (much more mental than the other side, going by recent history).
yes the US clearly has a mental health crisis, which is precisely why they need stricter gun laws
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1021
- Has liked: 161 times
- Been liked: 468 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 08:17 Classic diversion tactics from the left to rush to blame the gun laws rather than admit their own side is probably a bit mental (much more mental than the other side, going by recent history).
Yeah, I've noticed that.
Not much word on the actual act itself, or what drove it, unsurprisingly.
Gun laws in the UK didn't save David Amess, sadly. Although that has been pretty much brushed under the carpet.
Not much word on the actual act itself, or what drove it, unsurprisingly.
Gun laws in the UK didn't save David Amess, sadly. Although that has been pretty much brushed under the carpet.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1023
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 200 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
So that's now two people they have supposedly arrested and released and there's now a manhunt underway.
This has all the markings of a conspiracy and orchestrated political assassination. Eerily similar to JFK"s assassination.
This has all the markings of a conspiracy and orchestrated political assassination. Eerily similar to JFK"s assassination.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6630
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3802 times
- Been liked: 1996 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 08:17 Classic diversion tactics from the left to rush to blame the gun laws rather than admit their own side is probably a bit mental (much more mental than the other side, going by recent history).
And shit at debating.
In the UK and America it is legal to drive a car. So Lefty logic...Well fuck it, I'll show that twat what a dopey prick he is by using the Law against him by running him over unprovoked as it's legal to drive my car.
In the UK and America it is legal to drive a car. So Lefty logic...Well fuck it, I'll show that twat what a dopey prick he is by using the Law against him by running him over unprovoked as it's legal to drive my car.
-
Russ of the BML
- Posts: 1244
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 459 times
- Been liked: 465 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There is a video on Youtube of a young man calling Kirk a hater and a racist. Kirk asks him to say what he has ever said that's hateful and racist. The young man cannot answer and just ends with "I hate you, get off my campus" and storms off. Kirk says "That there is the Left in a nutshell. Accusing me of being racist and hateful but cannot say why. And says he hates me but cannot say why".
And this sums it all up. Kirk was an intelligent and articulate human being with his own opinions and views of the America and the world. He offered truthful, logical, reasoned and factual comment and debate in a sensible common sense way. He also listened and accepted other people's opinions and views in a humble and positive way.
Unfortunately, the modern fascist Left has no time for truth logic, reason and facts. Many have tried to debate with Kirk and found themselves overshadowed by his logic and reason. And the truth. And when the fascist Left find themselves backed into a corner they do what they do best. Resort to violence.
The modern fascist Left's new slogan "If you can't beat them. Kill them"
And this sums it all up. Kirk was an intelligent and articulate human being with his own opinions and views of the America and the world. He offered truthful, logical, reasoned and factual comment and debate in a sensible common sense way. He also listened and accepted other people's opinions and views in a humble and positive way.
Unfortunately, the modern fascist Left has no time for truth logic, reason and facts. Many have tried to debate with Kirk and found themselves overshadowed by his logic and reason. And the truth. And when the fascist Left find themselves backed into a corner they do what they do best. Resort to violence.
The modern fascist Left's new slogan "If you can't beat them. Kill them"
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6630
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3802 times
- Been liked: 1996 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mad Dog" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 08:02 Massive attack.
Mainly in the way that he knew going to these places was going to set off the nutnuts.
I wholly agree that dialogue needs to happen, but he was fully aware his presence annoyed the purple haired, nose ringed, they/them, pro hamas wankstains. And for some reason they can not be reasoned with. Despite the fact that he did it calmly armed with facts and figures.
I agrred with him on quite a few topics, but not all.
And now matter anyone's views, his kid should still have a dad today.
the celebrations reminds me of when all the lefties celebrated thatchet's death. aside from actual paedophiles, nobody's death should be celebrated
I'm afraid that still doesn't make it Inflammatory. That's actually on them divs for getting themselves far too worked up and incapable to debate him intellectually and calmly. Not him inflaming a situation that he was entitled to have in a free and open space to debate in a supposed Free Country, especially at the highest levels of Education which is supposed to be the bloody point of the places. To debate and learn.
During Covid I remember first watching some of his work online where he'd go to Uni Campuses when he was able too. And some of the hostility was bonkers wishing he was de-platformed and the like for simply holding and sharing conventional conservative and Christian legal American values which the left were trying to destroy. And it marries up with events yesterday where he for the last time attempted to debate anyone calmly who might disagree having been invited there to speak and be challenged.
And like you, I didn't agree with some of his arguments on say gun laws (I did agree with him on many other issues). Instead of shooting the poor sod dead, I'd likely grin calling him a silly know nothing cսnt before shaking his hand and buying him a beer afterwards. Unfortunately a fair few of the Left in America are far too precious for that kind of interaction and would rather eye up their rifle to polish.
During Covid I remember first watching some of his work online where he'd go to Uni Campuses when he was able too. And some of the hostility was bonkers wishing he was de-platformed and the like for simply holding and sharing conventional conservative and Christian legal American values which the left were trying to destroy. And it marries up with events yesterday where he for the last time attempted to debate anyone calmly who might disagree having been invited there to speak and be challenged.
And like you, I didn't agree with some of his arguments on say gun laws (I did agree with him on many other issues). Instead of shooting the poor sod dead, I'd likely grin calling him a silly know nothing cսnt before shaking his hand and buying him a beer afterwards. Unfortunately a fair few of the Left in America are far too precious for that kind of interaction and would rather eye up their rifle to polish.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3926
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 782 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 08:24 More mental than Trump & RFK Jr?
Thats saying something
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
Yes, MUCH more mental, if I'm taking you as an example compared to those 2.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3829
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 524 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
More mental than Trump & RFK Jr?
Thats saying something
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
Thats saying something
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3926
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 782 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Classic diversion tactics from the left to rush to blame the gun laws rather than admit their own side is probably a bit mental (much more mental than the other side, going by recent history).
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Massive attack.
Mainly in the way that he knew going to these places was going to set off the nutnuts.
I wholly agree that dialogue needs to happen, but he was fully aware his presence annoyed the purple haired, nose ringed, they/them, pro hamas wankstains. And for some reason they can not be reasoned with. Despite the fact that he did it calmly armed with facts and figures.
I agrred with him on quite a few topics, but not all.
And now matter anyone's views, his kid should still have a dad today.
the celebrations reminds me of when all the lefties celebrated thatchet's death. aside from actual paedophiles, nobody's death should be celebrated
Mainly in the way that he knew going to these places was going to set off the nutnuts.
I wholly agree that dialogue needs to happen, but he was fully aware his presence annoyed the purple haired, nose ringed, they/them, pro hamas wankstains. And for some reason they can not be reasoned with. Despite the fact that he did it calmly armed with facts and figures.
I agrred with him on quite a few topics, but not all.
And now matter anyone's views, his kid should still have a dad today.
the celebrations reminds me of when all the lefties celebrated thatchet's death. aside from actual paedophiles, nobody's death should be celebrated
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1146
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 632 times
- Been liked: 587 times
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3609
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 919 times
- Been liked: 1307 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
best comment I saw on youtube, and before the resident communists start : I support none of the cunts. all corrupt, self serving pigs that hate the electorate
"This isn't the "radical" or "far" left. This is just the left. The entire democratic party has shown us that they're domestic terrorists, and domestic enemies. "
"This isn't the "radical" or "far" left. This is just the left. The entire democratic party has shown us that they're domestic terrorists, and domestic enemies. "
-
Sydney_Iron
- Posts: 1971
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 183 times
- Been liked: 389 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Gobsmacking
this silly cսnt got fired though!
MSNBC analyst Matthew Dowd fired from MSNBC following ‘atrocious’ Charlie Kirk comments | Daily Telegraph
MSNBC has fired its political analyst Matthew Dowd over his comments following the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Variety revealed a source at the network confirmed Dowd would be let go after he suggested Kirk was to blame for his own shooting
MSNBC analyst Matthew Dowd fired from MSNBC following ‘atrocious’ Charlie Kirk comments | Daily Telegraph
MSNBC has fired its political analyst Matthew Dowd over his comments following the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Variety revealed a source at the network confirmed Dowd would be let go after he suggested Kirk was to blame for his own shooting
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6630
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3802 times
- Been liked: 1996 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mad Dog" wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 07:11 Seen loads of examples of people cheering this murder from the "caring left". How much hate do you have to have in your heart to cheer the execution of a person purely because you dont agree with his politics? Baffles me.
Moat of his shtick was that opposing sides need to have serious debates about issues they agree on. Yes he did it in an inflammatory way, but still doesn't mean he deserved to die over it
Inflammatory, how? He was always calm, never swore, got angry, or called for any violence. He just said things that others disagreed with. That is not inflammatory.
Agreed on the rest.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6630
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3802 times
- Been liked: 1996 times
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3829
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 524 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
The Second Amendment enshrining the right to bear arms comes from when they were a nation of cowboys
In 2025 it is madness
As said given the number of school kids murdered over the years and no one changes anything obviously nothing will happen now
Bar a bit of handwringing & pointless prayers to a non existent God
A God who allowed this man to die
In 2025 it is madness
As said given the number of school kids murdered over the years and no one changes anything obviously nothing will happen now
Bar a bit of handwringing & pointless prayers to a non existent God
A God who allowed this man to die
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Seen loads of examples of people cheering this murder from the "caring left". How much hate do you have to have in your heart to cheer the execution of a person purely because you dont agree with his politics? Baffles me.
Moat of his shtick was that opposing sides need to have serious debates about issues they agree on. Yes he did it in an inflammatory way, but still doesn't mean he deserved to die over it
Moat of his shtick was that opposing sides need to have serious debates about issues they agree on. Yes he did it in an inflammatory way, but still doesn't mean he deserved to die over it