Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 839
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 35 times
Been liked: 141 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Nutsin
Posts: 2674
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 166 times
Been liked: 283 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

, wrote: 18 Sep 2025, 15:20 In his Monday night monologue, Kimmel said: "The Maga Gang desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from It.”

The above statement infuriated Republicans who seem to think that they can say what they like but anything said/written  they disagree with leads to the media outlet responsible being attacked with pressure also put upon the company to ban the author/speaker.

This kid came from the heart of a solid Christian, Republican, community it’s undeniable yet telling people that fact is deemed as an abuse of free speech. 
 
 
I think anyone with half a brain understands why Disney indefinitely suspended him. 

Not that difficult to figure out unless you’re a disengenuous, unhinged, leftist minge.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3751
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 720 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

You live by the sword, you die by the sword, comma.

,
Posts: 1093
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 109 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post , »

In his Monday night monologue, Kimmel said: "The Maga Gang desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from It.”

The above statement infuriated Republicans who seem to think that they can say what they like but anything said/written  they disagree with leads to the media outlet responsible being attacked with pressure also put upon the company to ban the author/speaker.

This kid came from the heart of a solid Christian, Republican, community it’s undeniable yet telling people that fact is deemed as an abuse of free speech. 
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1174
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 275 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

Fauxstralian wrote: 18 Sep 2025, 14:45 Why is being pro gay & trans evidence that he is leftist?
Did he also advocate for public ownership of the means of production
Are we saying that no right wing people are gay / pro gay?

I suspect he had a personal interest in transphobic vilification from Kirk because he was poking a trans individual 
But that his other core values were Mormon gun nut along with other MAGA’s 
Possibly even aligned with Nick Fuentes who I understand is even more right wing 

I see Jimmy Kimmel has been thrown off air for suggesting MAGA’s are trying to paint Robinson as a lefty
Free speech innit?
Tyler Robinson’s family have stated he had become left wing.

Jimmy Kimmel has been suspended for refusing to apologise for lying about Tyler Robinson by claiming he was MAGA.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3751
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 720 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Fauxstralian wrote: 18 Sep 2025, 14:45 Why is being pro gay & trans evidence that he is leftist?
 
It isn't.  The bit before does though.

If you can't be bothered to read things correctly, then I doubt I'll bother with the rest of what you typed out below.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3565
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 460 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Why is being pro gay & trans evidence that he is leftist?
Did he also advocate for public ownership of the means of production
Are we saying that no right wing people are gay / pro gay?

I suspect he had a personal interest in transphobic vilification from Kirk because he was poking a trans individual 
But that his other core values were Mormon gun nut along with other MAGA’s 
Possibly even aligned with Nick Fuentes who I understand is even more right wing 

I see Jimmy Kimmel has been thrown off air for suggesting MAGA’s are trying to paint Robinson as a lefty
Free speech innit?
Massive Attack
Posts: 5720
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3319 times
Been liked: 1647 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

"Oi Fauxstralian, stop mucking about with that gaslight and attach this Union Jack instead, there's a good chap!"

Image
User avatar
BRANDED
Posts: 1903
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 209826
Has liked: 93 times
Been liked: 198 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post BRANDED »

Come on. We really dont know what led up to this or even if he's guilty. 

We will try and bring our priors to the table though.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3751
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 720 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

His own mother (according to court findings) said his political views had changed over the past year or so, shifting toward the left and becoming more pro-gay and trans-rights.

That's probably not good enough for you, I'm guessing, Sven.
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 775
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 119 times
Been liked: 202 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »


Are there not any trans people in the Republican Party or followers of Nick Fuentes?
 
 
 
Probably not.

You're looking desperate and rather silly now and people in prominent positions in the ultra-liberal US mainstream media are now being sacked for insisting on the very nonsense you are proposing.
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4722
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 33 times
Been liked: 588 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Awful lot of energy being poured into proving (PROVING) that the assassin was "not one of us".

Wonder why that is.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3751
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 720 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

Fauxstralian wrote: 18 Sep 2025, 12:31 Is there evidence that the child of MAGA Mormon  gun fanatics was left leaning beyond the ‘fact’ that because he was bumming a trans individual and supposedly shot Kirk because he didn’t like his transphobic views that he MUST be an unhinged leftist?
Are there not any trans people in the Republican Party or followers of Nick Fuentes?
Seems a strange conclusion to jump to in a world where the MAGA Vice President appears to wear mascara in public 
Don't you think accepting he was part of your mob will help you move on, Sven?
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3565
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 59 times
Been liked: 460 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Is there evidence that the child of MAGA Mormon  gun fanatics was left leaning beyond the ‘fact’ that because he was bumming a trans individual and supposedly shot Kirk because he didn’t like his transphobic views that he MUST be an unhinged leftist?
Are there not any trans people in the Republican Party or followers of Nick Fuentes?
Seems a strange conclusion to jump to in a world where the MAGA Vice President appears to wear mascara in public 
Massive Attack
Posts: 5720
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3319 times
Been liked: 1647 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

violator wrote: 18 Sep 2025, 08:47 Wonder what that fucking cսnt Khan thinks of it

Would be far too busy knocking one out to the news would be my guess.
Massive Attack
Posts: 5720
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3319 times
Been liked: 1647 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 18 Sep 2025, 08:26 "Egyptian illegal migrant, 42, who raped woman in Hyde Park while living in the Hilton hotel is a convicted Islamic terrorist"

Just your average news headline to wake up to nowadays, isn't it?

"SAY IT LOUD, SAY IT CLEAR, RAPISTS ARE WELCOME HERE"

#Hugarapist
violator
Posts: 713
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 215 times
Been liked: 205 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post violator »

Wonder what that fucking cսnt Khan thinks of it
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3751
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 720 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

"Egyptian illegal migrant, 42, who raped woman in Hyde Park while living in the Hilton hotel is a convicted Islamic terrorist"

Just your average news headline to wake up to nowadays, isn't it?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 910
Been liked: 219 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

goose wrote: 17 Sep 2025, 20:31 dont tell joyo.
Too late, ECPAT have him boarding Pegasus Air to Iman Khomeini Airport within an hour of that post.
OK_Guy
Posts: 133
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 164 times
Been liked: 72 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 18 Sep 2025, 01:10
So you were being deliberately obtuse. Thanks for confirming. I think we can all agree on that basis I was right with the rest of my post.
what's 'deliberately obtuse' mean?
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 775
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 119 times
Been liked: 202 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

OK_Guy wrote: 17 Sep 2025, 21:59
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 17 Sep 2025, 19:21
OK_Guy wrote: 17 Sep 2025, 17:23
 
wtf is gaslighting?... I believe we've progressed from the 1800's.

the constant bickering on here about whether he was a immigrant, muslim, Welsh, a terrorist etc. made me think what about the victims. The post was about remembering the victims in your mass-debating... think you'll find that it was the Establishment who failed to recognize the threat, despite earnest warnings from the Teacher. That failure resulted in an absolute tragedy would you not agree?

Sorry to electriclight you, hope you don't get too lit up.
I'll tell what gaslighting is, although it has been a well-known part of the English language since the 1950s, so you're either thick or being deliberately obtuse.

Gaslighting is, for instance, the implication that wanting to allocate the responsibility for a heinous crime at the door of the person and the circumstances that actually pertain to that crime is in some way distasteful and shows a lack of compassion for the victims of that crime. Which is precisely what you are doing.

Far-left, self-righteous, mealy-mouthed, terrorist sympathising wanker...
I knew you'd get all lit-up when I 'electriclighted' you... you didn't have to go to all that trouble to explain the meaning of 'gaslighting', I googled it earlier, that obtuse enough for you?

love the way you surmise, your intelligence knows no boundaries outside of your arse.
So you were being deliberately obtuse. Thanks for confirming. I think we can all agree on that basis I was right with the rest of my post.
Mad Dog
Posts: 2251
Old WHO Number: 10053
Has liked: 160 times
Been liked: 275 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mad Dog »

10?  Oh thats "ok" then.....
OK_Guy
Posts: 133
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 164 times
Been liked: 72 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

Mad Dog" wrote: 17 Sep 2025, 20:22 Is that why the legal age of marriage in Iraq and Iran is 9

Fucking 9

vile
Iran passed it into law earlier this year(?), with the caveat that the marriage can't be consummated until the wife is 10... and people wonder why there's grooming gangs/rapist etc.
OK_Guy
Posts: 133
Old WHO Number: 294855
Has liked: 164 times
Been liked: 72 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post OK_Guy »

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 17 Sep 2025, 19:21
OK_Guy wrote: 17 Sep 2025, 17:23
Don't you gaslight me, matey-boy.

This particular murdering scumbag of children was a racist, terrorist, Islamist murdering scumbag of children.

Details matter.
 
wtf is gaslighting?... I believe we've progressed from the 1800's.

the constant bickering on here about whether he was a immigrant, muslim, Welsh, a terrorist etc. made me think what about the victims. The post was about remembering the victims in your mass-debating... think you'll find that it was the Establishment who failed to recognize the threat, despite earnest warnings from the Teacher. That failure resulted in an absolute tragedy would you not agree?

Sorry to electriclight you, hope you don't get too lit up.
I'll tell what gaslighting is, although it has been a well-known part of the English language since the 1950s, so you're either thick or being deliberately obtuse.

Gaslighting is, for instance, the implication that wanting to allocate the responsibility for a heinous crime at the door of the person and the circumstances that actually pertain to that crime is in some way distasteful and shows a lack of compassion for the victims of that crime. Which is precisely what you are doing.

Far-left, self-righteous, mealy-mouthed, terrorist sympathising wanker...
I knew you'd get all lit-up when I 'electriclighted' you... you didn't have to go to all that trouble to explain the meaning of 'gaslighting', I googled it earlier, that obtuse enough for you?

love the way you surmise, your intelligence knows no boundaries outside of your arse.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5225
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 451 times
Been liked: 930 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

dont tell joyo.
Mad Dog
Posts: 2251
Old WHO Number: 10053
Has liked: 160 times
Been liked: 275 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mad Dog »

Is that why the legal age of marriage in Iraq and Iran is 9

Fucking 9

vile
Post Reply