Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Tom Wooster signed

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Gank
Posts: 1034
Has liked: 750 times
Been liked: 583 times

Tom Wooster signed

Post Gank »

Released by Manchester United. Don't overreact to that, Rice was released by Chelsea.

If Macaulay is behind this, I'm starting to think he might be worth keeping around and that his remit for signing young players with potential to grow into either saleable assets or first team players is wholly independent of who the manager is.
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 425
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 188 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

Yeah, it's pretty telling that in the last 15 years, we've made a loss on nearly all the 1st team players we've bought except Payet and Kudus, while young players that cost us nothing like Fletcher, Diangana and Rice have paid off. Yet for years Sullivan didn't want to invest anything in the academy because he thought it was a complete waste of money.
Gank
Posts: 1034
Has liked: 750 times
Been liked: 583 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post Gank »

Yep, it does seem that way but since it's low risk, I like the idea of it. We can have an almost unlimited number of these and only one has to come good to fund all the others.
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 425
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 188 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

Yeah, maybe so. Hard to tell. The fact that he's only on a 1 year contract with 1 year option suggests that the club don't have much faith in him though.
Gank
Posts: 1034
Has liked: 750 times
Been liked: 583 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post Gank »

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: 30 Sep 2025, 09:38 Much as I admire the positivity, being released at 20 is quite a bit different to being released at 14. I don't imagine anyone's expecting him to end up as a premier league player, but we needed a replacement when we loaned out 2 of our other U21 keepers. We also brought in another 20 year old keeper, Reece Byrne.

I don't imagine Macaulay had anything to do with either signing, unless he's been scouting non league matches.
I get your point about being released at 20 rather than 14 but another way to look at it is that Manchester United saw first team potential in this kid for 6 years in a row after he was 14 and it was only at the very time he should have been knocking on the first team door that they drew the line. 
Swiss.
Posts: 1766
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 261 times
Been liked: 323 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post Swiss. »

I'd prefer Bertie
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1550
Has liked: 380 times
Been liked: 625 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Did we get any dosh for that Man U hooligan we signed Ravel Morrison or summat?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 910
Been liked: 219 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: 30 Sep 2025, 09:56 We sold Ashley Fletcher to Boro for £6.5m (one of only a handful of players we've made a decent profit on during Sullivan's reign), so he's actually a very good example of a saleable asset.
Well we spunked that on Jaanai Gordon and Danny Whitehead...Mipo Odubeko...
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 425
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 188 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

We sold Ashley Fletcher to Boro for £6.5m (one of only a handful of players we've made a decent profit on during Sullivan's reign), so he's actually a very good example of a saleable asset.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 910
Been liked: 219 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Gank wrote: 30 Sep 2025, 01:19 Released by Manchester United. Don't overreact to that, Rice was released by Chelsea.

If Macaulay is behind this, I'm starting to think he might be worth keeping around and that his remit for signing young players with potential to grow into either saleable assets or first team players is wholly independent of who the manager is.
Ashley Fletcher, David Bellion and a bunch of other non league destined cunts whose names even their parents can't remember say hi.
theaxeman
Posts: 19
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post theaxeman »

Sauce?
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 425
Has liked: 44 times
Been liked: 188 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

Much as I admire the positivity, being released at 20 is quite a bit different to being released at 14. I don't imagine anyone's expecting him to end up as a premier league player, but we needed a replacement when we loaned out 2 of our other U21 keepers. We also brought in another 20 year old keeper, Reece Byrne.

I don't imagine Macaulay had anything to do with either signing, unless he's been scouting non league matches.
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1550
Has liked: 380 times
Been liked: 625 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post Far Cough UKunt »

eusebiovic wrote: 30 Sep 2025, 09:12 Good genetics if his father Bertie is anything to go by...
Hahahaha
eusebiovic
Posts: 389
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 728 times
Been liked: 145 times

Re: Tom Wooster signed

Post eusebiovic »

Good genetics if his father Bertie is anything to go by...
Post Reply