Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

No to Digital ID

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
riosleftsock
Posts: 1783
Old WHO Number: 14557
Has liked: 359 times
Been liked: 114 times

No to Digital ID

Post riosleftsock »

XKhammer
Posts: 1215
Has liked: 683 times
Been liked: 186 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 12:04
XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 12:01
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:56
...and going on your register involves a criminal record.

I guess that makes you James Saville.
ThickClit you are so dense that you don't even know what a DBS check is,you have to pay for it and its done by in my case the Metropolitan Police 
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek help 
Disclosure and Barring service, costs about 20, practically everyone does them now as a liability issue. It doesn't make you or you job on the bins seem important.
Oh dear ThickClit you truly are making yourself look fucking a liar and thick as shit
My DBS is enhanced and costs £78.50,bit more than you're super duper 007 James Bent clearance that the Met Plod can't excess for a score lol 
Keep this up as its hilarious...you need back up mate,maybe David Icke the sailor boy,the gutless Eyetie shitbag or the sad old creepy trannie raspberry Oxbore 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1153
Been liked: 273 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post THUNDERCLINT »

XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 12:01
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:56
XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:21
Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation 
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender 
...and going on your register involves a criminal record.

I guess that makes you James Saville.
ThickClit you are so dense that you don't even know what a DBS check is,you have to pay for it and its done by in my case the Metropolitan Police 
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek help 
Disclosure and Barring service, costs about 20, practically everyone does them now as a liability issue. It doesn't make you or you job on the bins seem important.
XKhammer
Posts: 1215
Has liked: 683 times
Been liked: 186 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:56
XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:21
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:13
And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.

Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.


Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation 
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender 
...and going on your register involves a criminal record.

I guess that makes you James Saville.
ThickClit you are so dense that you don't even know what a DBS check is,you have to pay for it and its done by in my case the Metropolitan Police 
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek help 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1153
Been liked: 273 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post THUNDERCLINT »

XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:21
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:13
XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:05
I'm DBS checked every 3 years moron by Met plod,bet you're not
And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.

Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.


Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation 
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender 
...and going on your register involves a criminal record.

I guess that makes you James Saville.
XKhammer
Posts: 1215
Has liked: 683 times
Been liked: 186 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:13
XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:05
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 05:37
As you're already on a few "registers" you've no ID left to surrender.
I'm DBS checked every 3 years moron by Met plod,bet you're not
And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.

Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.


Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation 
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1153
Been liked: 273 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post THUNDERCLINT »

XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 11:05
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 05:37
XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 05:25
Im all for it if it stops benefits cheats like you,so l understand why you fear it 
As you're already on a few "registers" you've no ID left to surrender.
I'm DBS checked every 3 years moron by Met plod,bet you're not
And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.

Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.


XKhammer
Posts: 1215
Has liked: 683 times
Been liked: 186 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 05:37
XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 05:25
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 04 Nov 2025, 23:47
Looks like you're all 4 it, 2 me, but 1 can always see 0 in it.
Im all for it if it stops benefits cheats like you,so l understand why you fear it 
As you're already on a few "registers" you've no ID left to surrender.
I'm DBS checked every 3 years moron by Met plod,bet you're not
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1153
Been liked: 273 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post THUNDERCLINT »

XKhammer wrote: 05 Nov 2025, 05:25
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 04 Nov 2025, 23:47
Alfs wrote: 04 Nov 2025, 20:54 100
Looks like you're all 4 it, 2 me, but 1 can always see 0 in it.
Im all for it if it stops benefits cheats like you,so l understand why you fear it 
As you're already on a few "registers" you've no ID left to surrender.
XKhammer
Posts: 1215
Has liked: 683 times
Been liked: 186 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 04 Nov 2025, 23:47
Alfs wrote: 04 Nov 2025, 20:54 100
Looks like you're all 4 it, 2 me, but 1 can always see 0 in it.
Im all for it if it stops benefits cheats like you,so l understand why you fear it 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5025
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 650 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Alfs wrote: 04 Nov 2025, 20:54 100
Looks like you're all 4 it, 2 me, but 1 can always see 0 in it.
Alfs
Posts: 1045
Old WHO Number: 12872
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Alfs »

100
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3599
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 906 times
Been liked: 1304 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Takashi Miike »

User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5025
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 650 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Mike Oxsaw »

XKhammer wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 11:58
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 07:28
XKhammer wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 23:30
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with 
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore 
When people want some background on how governments and organisations, (plan to) use information it makes perfect sense to discuss the subject with people who have (had) a significant role working/studying such areas.

When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.
Bet you sweep the Trannies off their feet
You care to stop infesting every post you respond to with your favourite hobby?

We all get it - you're absolutely besotted with ladyboys. It couldn't be clearer.
XKhammer
Posts: 1215
Has liked: 683 times
Been liked: 186 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 04 Oct 2025, 07:28
XKhammer wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 23:30
only1billybonds wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 22:05 =12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"


Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.





 
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with 
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore 
When people want some background on how governments and organisations, (plan to) use information it makes perfect sense to discuss the subject with people who have (had) a significant role working/studying such areas.

When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.
Bet you sweep the Trannies off their feet
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5025
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 650 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Mike Oxsaw »

XKhammer wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 23:30
only1billybonds wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 22:05 =12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"


Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.




 
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with 
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore 
When people want some background on how governments and organisations, (plan to) use information it makes perfect sense to discuss the subject with people who have (had) a significant role working/studying such areas.

When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.
XKhammer
Posts: 1215
Has liked: 683 times
Been liked: 186 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

only1billybonds wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 22:05 =12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"


Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.



 
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with 
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore 
XKhammer
Posts: 1215
Has liked: 683 times
Been liked: 186 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

Eerie Decent" wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 21:59 There's also 1.2billion people there, compared to 70mil here.

Considering the UK tops the charts for that sort of arrest by absolutely mental numbers, you could just use any other country you fancy, where you won't be able to use that argument.

Anyway, going by the rate we are with all that shit, we very much are going the way of China. That was the point.
If we are going the way of China there won't be as many doing bird  as you stated 
Seriously don't get your point ..you think its better in China what you say online or we are stricter?
Been to China twice and its very restricted to what you can access online...couldn't access BBC...well that's a bonus point l suppose for the cufflinks 
XKhammer
Posts: 1215
Has liked: 683 times
Been liked: 186 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post XKhammer »

zebthecat wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 19:19
Eerie Decent" wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 18:43
XKhammer wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 17:15 We ain't China ffs!
Don't understand stand the paranoia about this
How many people are in prison for saying words on the internet in China?

I'll give you a clue - it's a fuck ton less than here. And there's a fuck ton more people over there an all.
I'm sure that will be a comfort for the million or so Uigurs in internment camps.
Lol ...fair point 
only1billybonds
Posts: 2384
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 570 times
Been liked: 848 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post only1billybonds »

=12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"


Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.


 
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1020
Has liked: 161 times
Been liked: 467 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Eerie Decent »

There's also 1.2billion people there, compared to 70mil here.

Considering the UK tops the charts for that sort of arrest by absolutely mental numbers, you could just use any other country you fancy, where you won't be able to use that argument.

Anyway, going by the rate we are with all that shit, we very much are going the way of China. That was the point.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1894
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 370 times
Been liked: 235 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post zebthecat »

You have a point ED.
There is a reason why not many Chinese poeple are arrested for posting stuff on the internet as they know that their governnment area monitoring everything they do online as a matter of course. They are also limited to only Chinese government approved or owned sites.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1020
Has liked: 161 times
Been liked: 467 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Eerie Decent »

What has that got to do with what I said?
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1894
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 370 times
Been liked: 235 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post zebthecat »

Eerie Decent" wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 18:43
XKhammer wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 17:15 We ain't China ffs!
Don't understand stand the paranoia about this
How many people are in prison for saying words on the internet in China?

I'll give you a clue - it's a fuck ton less than here. And there's a fuck ton more people over there an all.
I'm sure that will be a comfort for the million or so Uigurs in internment camps.
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1020
Has liked: 161 times
Been liked: 467 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Eerie Decent »

XKhammer wrote: 03 Oct 2025, 17:15 We ain't China ffs!
Don't understand stand the paranoia about this
How many people are in prison for saying words on the internet in China?

I'll give you a clue - it's a fuck ton less than here. And there's a fuck ton more people over there an all.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3819
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 66 times
Been liked: 519 times

Re: No to Digital ID

Post Fauxstralian »

Don’t you know… Digital ID will be used to stop you buying meat & arrest you for not buying the new Taylor Swift album
Post Reply