AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
McCauley
-
Massive Attack
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: McCauley
ATHammer wrote: ↑18 Oct 2025, 13:22Massive Attack" wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025, 09:16 It's shit experts we don't need here and both Steidten and MacCaulay weren't good enough. Glad they've been moved on.We are now again rely on Sullivan and Brady as our "experts". Those two, beyond doubt, are not good enough, just look at their track record. The only thing they are any good at is blaming others for their short comings. Their actions are actively ruining our club.
And I cannot wait till they are gone as well. I want to see new highly competent people coming in from top to bottom and until that happens we will continue to be run like a Circus.
Re: McCauley
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025, 09:16 It's shit experts we don't need here and both Steidten and MacCaulay weren't good enough. Glad they've been moved on.
This must be the view through Brady's sunglasses.
Steidten failed because of Sullivan. Sullivan was happy with "competitive tension" between Moyes and Steidten to the point where Moyes got his way to bring in Phillips. Moyes did not want to work with a director of football role so the club went backwards with friction at the mid level and a lack of direction from the top.
With Moyes on his way out, Steidten came up with a list of managers to fit a vision "world class club attracting world class talent, blah, blah blah." Sullivan fucked that off and brought in Lopetegui who could only have been on one persons list. Sullivan then guaranteed failure by 3 for Sullivan; 3 for Lopetegui and 3 for Steidten. No joined up thinking at all. A 3 Humped Camel which fell over.
Up rocks Potter and eventually Macaulay. Once again Sullivan orchestrates failure by taking a respected data analysist who's success was built in a structured environment, and, subsequently, a financially unchallenged one. Sullivan makes an analysist a negotiator, head of recruitment in an anarchic, impoverished club. Square peg in round hole, failed.
Unlike Lopetegui and Potter who were rubbish before they got here and proved beyond doubt that they were, in fact, crap in their own rights, Steidten and Macaulay were set up to fail.
Not good enough? No idea based on their time at West Ham.
We are now again rely on Sullivan and Brady as our "experts". Those two, beyond doubt, are not good enough, just look at their track record. The only thing they are any good at is blaming others for their short comings. Their actions are actively ruining our club.
Steidten failed because of Sullivan. Sullivan was happy with "competitive tension" between Moyes and Steidten to the point where Moyes got his way to bring in Phillips. Moyes did not want to work with a director of football role so the club went backwards with friction at the mid level and a lack of direction from the top.
With Moyes on his way out, Steidten came up with a list of managers to fit a vision "world class club attracting world class talent, blah, blah blah." Sullivan fucked that off and brought in Lopetegui who could only have been on one persons list. Sullivan then guaranteed failure by 3 for Sullivan; 3 for Lopetegui and 3 for Steidten. No joined up thinking at all. A 3 Humped Camel which fell over.
Up rocks Potter and eventually Macaulay. Once again Sullivan orchestrates failure by taking a respected data analysist who's success was built in a structured environment, and, subsequently, a financially unchallenged one. Sullivan makes an analysist a negotiator, head of recruitment in an anarchic, impoverished club. Square peg in round hole, failed.
Unlike Lopetegui and Potter who were rubbish before they got here and proved beyond doubt that they were, in fact, crap in their own rights, Steidten and Macaulay were set up to fail.
Not good enough? No idea based on their time at West Ham.
We are now again rely on Sullivan and Brady as our "experts". Those two, beyond doubt, are not good enough, just look at their track record. The only thing they are any good at is blaming others for their short comings. Their actions are actively ruining our club.
-
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
- Posts: 425
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 188 times
Re: McCauley
Macauley didn't have much to do with transfers at Brighton either. It was Paul Winstanley who was head of recruitment there and also followed Potter to Chelsea (and recently signed a new contract with them). It was always Winstanley who was the one known for identifying talented players. I don't think Macauley had any experience whatsoever in actually dealing with transfers prior to coming here.
Agree that he surely would have been at least some use as a scout or analyst. But, as mentioned before, given the job title we gave him he could and probably would have sued us for constructive dismissal if we just gave him a role he was actually qualified for, rather than head of recruitment.
Agree that he surely would have been at least some use as a scout or analyst. But, as mentioned before, given the job title we gave him he could and probably would have sued us for constructive dismissal if we just gave him a role he was actually qualified for, rather than head of recruitment.
-
El Scorchio
- Posts: 3422
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 152 times
- Been liked: 863 times
Re: McCauley
Sacking Macauley was utterly pointless. We might as well have kept him on and got compo for when Potter came calling rather than spending money paying him off. Might as well have him working for us identifying players that the newly so called 'guru' Maximillian Hahn can either say 'yes' or 'no' to. Zero harm zero downside even if you believe the absolute Sullivan bullshit spin about Macauley having nothing to do with any player aside from Hermansen. Look at some of the players who came through Brighton or that they picked up and what some of them are doing now. To say Macauley doesn't know a good or suitable player is laughable.
As ever it was all too 'new fangled' and 'uncomfortable' for Sullivan doing business based on things other than his mates recommendation, the immediate term, and what he was familiar with.
As ever it was all too 'new fangled' and 'uncomfortable' for Sullivan doing business based on things other than his mates recommendation, the immediate term, and what he was familiar with.
-
GBHammer63
- Posts: 344
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 95 times
- Been liked: 84 times
Re: McCauley
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025, 09:16 It's shit experts we don't need here and both Steidten and MacCaulay weren't good enough. Glad they've been moved on.
Agreed if they were shit, but the stench of Sullivan interfering in everything makes me question how much of a chance Macauley especially was given.
-
Massive Attack
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: McCauley
It's shit experts we don't need here and both Steidten and MacCaulay weren't good enough. Glad they've been moved on.
-
GBHammer63
- Posts: 344
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 95 times
- Been liked: 84 times
Re: McCauley
Perhaps the reason they won’t work with specialists is that Sullivan is making enough out of his alleged wonky deals to keep him in the chavvy style he’s become accustomed to, if specialists were involved it could open a can of worms in regards some of the deals and would definitely mean more people than Sully and Brady knew about the goings on. Don’t forget that he’s come from nothing and spent all his life in a seedy industry doing shifty deals that the least people know about the better, which might explain why he keeps the serial failure Brady so close. Also I believe he doesn’t give a fuck about the club, it’s heritage, its support or the betterment of it, only for the best deal for him personally.
Maybe he’d like for the club to become a waking sleeping giant but the thought of the previous shenanigans he’s been party to being uncovered by a specialist or specialists is too much of a chance for him?
Whatever, the pair of cunts deserve everything that is potentially coming their way ( if we fight hard enough).
Maybe he’d like for the club to become a waking sleeping giant but the thought of the previous shenanigans he’s been party to being uncovered by a specialist or specialists is too much of a chance for him?
Whatever, the pair of cunts deserve everything that is potentially coming their way ( if we fight hard enough).
Re: McCauley
The question regarding BS that I constantly have is why are they afraid to work with experts?
If the name of the game is to bring in as much money as possible, one approach to achieving that goal is to employ the best in class available. It also means enabling a team of experts time to implement a vision of short, medium and long term planning with checkpoint goals they need to reach to work towards to larger aims.
If the name of the game is to bring in as much money as possible, one approach to achieving that goal is to employ the best in class available. It also means enabling a team of experts time to implement a vision of short, medium and long term planning with checkpoint goals they need to reach to work towards to larger aims.
-
Massive Attack
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: McCauley
I think ultimately the answer is for BS to finally fuck off so we can get on with installing a decent Director of Football and Manager for the long term strategy. Whilst he's still in charge at the top of the Club however it'll always be the short termism approach hopping from 1 dud to another, whatever part of the Club they happen to manage under his watch.
-
El Scorchio
- Posts: 3422
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 152 times
- Been liked: 863 times
Re: McCauley
The whole thing is a fucking farce, presided over by pair of vain, clueless, reactionary narcissists, and the state of the club sadly is stark reflection of their image.
Both are more interested in personally looking good than the club succeeding. Despite the latter being the best way to ensure the former.
Both are more interested in personally looking good than the club succeeding. Despite the latter being the best way to ensure the former.
-
southbankbornnbred
- Posts: 1360
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 312 times
- Been liked: 469 times
Re: McCauley
Genuinely, I think getting that structure (described below) right is exactly how we begin to act, in a sustained way, as the seventh biggests club in England, and the eighteenth biggest club in the world, and get the results that back it up.
We've been run like a fucking circus for far too long. Which is why getting rid of Suillivan and Brady is the biggest step we can take. Even if we'd appointed Pep, their incompetence and out-of-date ideas would continue to hinder us.
We've been run like a fucking circus for far too long. Which is why getting rid of Suillivan and Brady is the biggest step we can take. Even if we'd appointed Pep, their incompetence and out-of-date ideas would continue to hinder us.
-
southbankbornnbred
- Posts: 1360
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 312 times
- Been liked: 469 times
Re: McCauley
Clubs can’t rely on a single manager to do it all - I get that.
The modern Premier League moves too fast, and there’s too much to do if you’re the manager or head coach. That’s why having a technical director or director of football alongside a specialist head of recruitment is becoming increasingly essential.
In a ‘win-first’ league for managers, it’s those other roles that now bring structure, long-term vision and smart decision-making beyond the short-term demands of results and transfers.
BUT for clubs like us, who operate on less money than the supposed “big six”, getting the balance absolutely right is critical – or it all becomes a disjointed mess as we've seen.
In theory, a manager focuses on tactics, motivation, player management and matchday performance. The technical director shapes the club's football identity and ensures continuity even when managers change. The head of recruitment (really a chief scout in old parlance) digs into the detail – spotting players who fit not just the system, but the club’s character and budget.
The magic happens when these three (or four, including analytics) work in sync. A joined-up approach means everyone is chasing the same type of player – technically, tactically and temperamentally. Without it, you end up with a mismatch: a manager wanting one style, a scout signing for another, and a squad full of contradictions. West Ham, basically.
Too often, we’ve had the latter approach. High manager turnovers, interfering fuckwits in the boardroom, cheap appointments and a general lack of long-term planning/vision, has properly hindered us on that front. Sullivan and Brady are massive obstacles because they genuinely don’t know what they’re doing in the modern game. Sullivan is a Victorian-era owner in a twenty-first century game.
Under Moyes, for example, recruitment was sometimes hit (Paqueta, Bowen) and sometimes miss (Scamacca, Vlasic, Guilherme) – often because the club lacked a clear, consistent football vision linking the touchline to the boardroom. That hit and miss approach intensified under Lopetegui and Potter, under whom we've also wasted huge sums.
Get that structure right, make the right appointments in sync, and we could build a lasting identity rather than starting from scratch every few years.
With no Steidten and/or McCauley around, we’ve got an opportunity right now to align the approach of the manager (most important person), tech director and recruitment (chief scout). But we’re so short-term that it will all fall apart and become disjointed quickly.
The man in charge – and his massive, misplaced ego - is the biggest obstacle. He won’t allow others to make key decisions.
The modern Premier League moves too fast, and there’s too much to do if you’re the manager or head coach. That’s why having a technical director or director of football alongside a specialist head of recruitment is becoming increasingly essential.
In a ‘win-first’ league for managers, it’s those other roles that now bring structure, long-term vision and smart decision-making beyond the short-term demands of results and transfers.
BUT for clubs like us, who operate on less money than the supposed “big six”, getting the balance absolutely right is critical – or it all becomes a disjointed mess as we've seen.
In theory, a manager focuses on tactics, motivation, player management and matchday performance. The technical director shapes the club's football identity and ensures continuity even when managers change. The head of recruitment (really a chief scout in old parlance) digs into the detail – spotting players who fit not just the system, but the club’s character and budget.
The magic happens when these three (or four, including analytics) work in sync. A joined-up approach means everyone is chasing the same type of player – technically, tactically and temperamentally. Without it, you end up with a mismatch: a manager wanting one style, a scout signing for another, and a squad full of contradictions. West Ham, basically.
Too often, we’ve had the latter approach. High manager turnovers, interfering fuckwits in the boardroom, cheap appointments and a general lack of long-term planning/vision, has properly hindered us on that front. Sullivan and Brady are massive obstacles because they genuinely don’t know what they’re doing in the modern game. Sullivan is a Victorian-era owner in a twenty-first century game.
Under Moyes, for example, recruitment was sometimes hit (Paqueta, Bowen) and sometimes miss (Scamacca, Vlasic, Guilherme) – often because the club lacked a clear, consistent football vision linking the touchline to the boardroom. That hit and miss approach intensified under Lopetegui and Potter, under whom we've also wasted huge sums.
Get that structure right, make the right appointments in sync, and we could build a lasting identity rather than starting from scratch every few years.
With no Steidten and/or McCauley around, we’ve got an opportunity right now to align the approach of the manager (most important person), tech director and recruitment (chief scout). But we’re so short-term that it will all fall apart and become disjointed quickly.
The man in charge – and his massive, misplaced ego - is the biggest obstacle. He won’t allow others to make key decisions.
Re: McCauley
I had a look on the official site and the "mens team coaching staff section" just has a massive picture of nuno. I'd quite like it if he's decided to do it all himself, kit wash, cutting up the oranges, putting out the cones, scouting etc
-
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
- Posts: 425
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 188 times
Re: McCauley
Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑09 Oct 2025, 15:59You're right, but the issue with McCauley and Steidten were that both were promoted from lessor roles into Director of Recruitment and Technical Director when we employed them. Neither had that role prior.
Neither were very good in their roles, I thought. Regardless of how much they had their hands tied by the midget.
Trundle is spot on here.
Macauley was never really employed as a decision maker anyway, only to act as a go between to save Potter some time. He had that role at all Potter's other jobs and we know he wasn't responsible for the signings at Chelsea or Brighton.
As for Steidten, he was kind of given the director of football role, but only in a half assed way, and he was not qualified for that role anyway, having never been a decision maker at his previous clubs. Obviously he was quite good at getting deals done quickly, although given how much we paid for signings and laid out in wages during his time he didn't seem to make any attempt whatsoever at negotiating.
Macauley was never really employed as a decision maker anyway, only to act as a go between to save Potter some time. He had that role at all Potter's other jobs and we know he wasn't responsible for the signings at Chelsea or Brighton.
As for Steidten, he was kind of given the director of football role, but only in a half assed way, and he was not qualified for that role anyway, having never been a decision maker at his previous clubs. Obviously he was quite good at getting deals done quickly, although given how much we paid for signings and laid out in wages during his time he didn't seem to make any attempt whatsoever at negotiating.
-
Massive Attack
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: McCauley
Gank wrote: ↑09 Oct 2025, 15:16 You're looking at this all wrong. We NEED a Macaulay at the club to identify players who fit a predetermined system, contribute to the team and represent a future big profit.
We don't have the right people at the most senior levels to support this.
If we had such a system yielding returns year on year, we would then NEED a Steidten type at the club who could use the extra money to attract marquee signings he has identified from overseas.
But again, we don't have the right people at the club to finance this.
West Ham have had both of these experts in the last couple of seasons but has neither financed nor supported them for any length of time to do their jobs properly, then blamed those experts for gullible idiots on this site and elsewhere so it looks like they wasted money and time.
Even if that were true, it would be terrible management to chase these appointments, pay them good money then pay them to leave. But it isn't true, they began a project each that the club wouldn't sustain so they were made scapegoats.
Can't agree. Like you I'm also all for the right people for said role, however both are not good enough who either did poorly whilst with us and/or elsewhere like Macaulay who had a wildly exaggerated reputation. Steidten was here for longer and blew a lot of the Rice money and continued that on with signings like Fullkrug and Guilherme.
Since their arrivals we have wasted a shit load of money since winning the Cup and we've blown any advantage we initially had with the finances that came because of the Rice sale/Europe money.
It is fair to say they weren't only to blame for piss poor recruitment as Lopetegui, Potter and Sullivan are also culpable and deserve their own share of the blame for poor recruitment, but that doesn't mean they are not deserving of their blame either and getting the sack.
Ever since the trophy win Sullivan and Brady have made fuck up appointment after fuck up appointment just at a time where we really could have kicked on with the right ones. Again I go back to the likes of Glasner but no, they insisted first on offering Moyes a new contract - he'd still be here had he signed it! - and then deciding to withdraw the contract because they changed their minds on keeping him but then compounded it by running his current one down even though everyone and his dog knew he was leaving well before the end of the season because he's too tight to act proactively in search of a new quality manager.
What a wasteful mess both financially and on the playing field that's seriously set us back, rather than be an important springboard for the Club to possibly look at challenging seriously for a top 4 spot, rather than the current position we find ourselves in 2nd from bottom.
Re: McCauley
He is a cսnt. Just like Rob Newman; Tim Steidten; Hussillos; etc. and anyone else who has had a recruitment role at West Ham in the last 15 years, (apart from Silkman; Salthouse and Sullivan who are fucking genius's).
While I am at it. Grant; Allardyce; Bilic ; Moyes; Pellegrini; Lopetegui; Potter; and soon Nuno are all cunts too.
Who says so?
The biggest (smallest) fucking cսnt of all who employed them in the first place then had to justify their actions by rubbishing them when they are sacked/leave for being useless cunts.
Why cant the horrible little fucker, and his po-faced side kick just let him go without acting like, well cunts?
While I am at it. Grant; Allardyce; Bilic ; Moyes; Pellegrini; Lopetegui; Potter; and soon Nuno are all cunts too.
Who says so?
The biggest (smallest) fucking cսnt of all who employed them in the first place then had to justify their actions by rubbishing them when they are sacked/leave for being useless cunts.
Why cant the horrible little fucker, and his po-faced side kick just let him go without acting like, well cunts?
-
stubbo-admin
- Posts: 1391
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 295 times
- Been liked: 644 times
Re: McCauley
It's almost like all the briefing horseshit that was going on over the last week about how Hahn was the talent spotter, and Macauley was only responsible for Mads...was all part of an orchestration leading up to this moment.
What a bunch of horrible pathetic cunts they are. Fundamentally this sacking is only really appropriate if he's replaced by another hire in this position...preferably with no direct link to Nuno (and just someone that the manager runs his wishes and requirements through).
Useless arseholes that run this club.
What a bunch of horrible pathetic cunts they are. Fundamentally this sacking is only really appropriate if he's replaced by another hire in this position...preferably with no direct link to Nuno (and just someone that the manager runs his wishes and requirements through).
Useless arseholes that run this club.
-
Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3750
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 720 times
Re: McCauley
Gank wrote: ↑09 Oct 2025, 15:16 You're looking at this all wrong. We NEED a Macaulay at the club to identify players who fit a predetermined system, contribute to the team and represent a future big profit.
We don't have the right people at the most senior levels to support this.
If we had such a system yielding returns year on year, we would then NEED a Steidten type at the club who could use the extra money to attract marquee signings he has identified from overseas.
But again, we don't have the right people at the club to finance this.
West Ham have had both of these experts in the last couple of seasons but has neither financed nor supported them for any length of time to do their jobs properly, then blamed those experts for gullible idiots on this site and elsewhere so it looks like they wasted money and time.
Even if that were true, it would be terrible management to chase these appointments, pay them good money then pay them to leave. But it isn't true, they began a project each that the club wouldn't sustain so they were made scapegoats.
You're right, but the issue with McCauley and Steidten were that both were promoted from lessor roles into Director of Recruitment and Technical Director when we employed them. Neither had that role prior.
Neither were very good in their roles, I thought. Regardless of how much they had their hands tied by the midget.
Neither were very good in their roles, I thought. Regardless of how much they had their hands tied by the midget.
-
El Scorchio
- Posts: 3422
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 152 times
- Been liked: 863 times
Re: McCauley
Embarrassing pathetic gutless wankers running this club.
Of course this was so obviously going to happen after that pathetic bit of lying propaganda the other day which stated Macauley wasn't responsible for a single thing other than Mads Hermansen while he was here. Believe that and here are some magic beans...
Sacking him doesn't even make any sense. You've paid him- use him. Especially seen as he clearly does a job we sorely need, even if it's reporting into Maximillian Hahn- who for now is the transfer genius, until he isn't when they don't want him around any more or he leaves. Just see what players he might turn up and then when Potter maybe comes calling after finding a new club, claim compo for him.
They are just thick, reactionary cowards who are cutting their own noses off to spite their faces with this one. It's not even a logical move to fire him.
Of course this was so obviously going to happen after that pathetic bit of lying propaganda the other day which stated Macauley wasn't responsible for a single thing other than Mads Hermansen while he was here. Believe that and here are some magic beans...
Sacking him doesn't even make any sense. You've paid him- use him. Especially seen as he clearly does a job we sorely need, even if it's reporting into Maximillian Hahn- who for now is the transfer genius, until he isn't when they don't want him around any more or he leaves. Just see what players he might turn up and then when Potter maybe comes calling after finding a new club, claim compo for him.
They are just thick, reactionary cowards who are cutting their own noses off to spite their faces with this one. It's not even a logical move to fire him.
Re: McCauley
You're looking at this all wrong. We NEED a Macaulay at the club to identify players who fit a predetermined system, contribute to the team and represent a future big profit.
We don't have the right people at the most senior levels to support this.
If we had such a system yielding returns year on year, we would then NEED a Steidten type at the club who could use the extra money to attract marquee signings he has identified from overseas.
But again, we don't have the right people at the club to finance this.
West Ham have had both of these experts in the last couple of seasons but has neither financed nor supported them for any length of time to do their jobs properly, then blamed those experts for gullible idiots on this site and elsewhere so it looks like they wasted money and time.
Even if that were true, it would be terrible management to chase these appointments, pay them good money then pay them to leave. But it isn't true, they began a project each that the club wouldn't sustain so they were made scapegoats.
We don't have the right people at the most senior levels to support this.
If we had such a system yielding returns year on year, we would then NEED a Steidten type at the club who could use the extra money to attract marquee signings he has identified from overseas.
But again, we don't have the right people at the club to finance this.
West Ham have had both of these experts in the last couple of seasons but has neither financed nor supported them for any length of time to do their jobs properly, then blamed those experts for gullible idiots on this site and elsewhere so it looks like they wasted money and time.
Even if that were true, it would be terrible management to chase these appointments, pay them good money then pay them to leave. But it isn't true, they began a project each that the club wouldn't sustain so they were made scapegoats.
-
Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3750
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 720 times
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3565
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 59 times
- Been liked: 460 times
Re: McCauley
Said earlier they’d wait & then quietly bin him
During the international break naturally & no mention of the cost of wages & compensation paid about 5 mins ago
Embarrassing
Brady … tvs business genius
You’re fired ….. HOPEFULLY
During the international break naturally & no mention of the cost of wages & compensation paid about 5 mins ago
Embarrassing
Brady … tvs business genius
You’re fired ….. HOPEFULLY
-
Massive Attack
- Posts: 5719
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3317 times
- Been liked: 1647 times
Re: McCauley
Good riddance along with his other Chelsea failure that was so predictable to me would go tits up.
The financial waste forked out by the Club on all this is ridiculous and was totally avoidable.
Hopefully though it'll mean it's 1 step closer for Brady to get the boot having been her star picks as management...
The financial waste forked out by the Club on all this is ridiculous and was totally avoidable.
Hopefully though it'll mean it's 1 step closer for Brady to get the boot having been her star picks as management...
Re: McCauley
Just been officially binned on the OS
A very short statement reflecting the club’s embarassment? Well you’d hope they would be embarassed especially after Brady’s 100 word recent statement that talked about how the club’s future was being secured by the recruitment strategy of Potter and Macaulay
They ( Brady mostly but Sullivan too ) literally dress every reactive knee jerk decision up as if it is part of a well thought out plan. They dont and never had a plan other than increasing their wealth thru the asset West Ham.
We really do need people running the club who understand and have experience of building a strong football club. “No more BS”
A very short statement reflecting the club’s embarassment? Well you’d hope they would be embarassed especially after Brady’s 100 word recent statement that talked about how the club’s future was being secured by the recruitment strategy of Potter and Macaulay
They ( Brady mostly but Sullivan too ) literally dress every reactive knee jerk decision up as if it is part of a well thought out plan. They dont and never had a plan other than increasing their wealth thru the asset West Ham.
We really do need people running the club who understand and have experience of building a strong football club. “No more BS”
-
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
- Posts: 425
- Has liked: 44 times
- Been liked: 188 times
Re: McCauley
Oh dear. Comebacks aren't your strong suit, are they? I'll let you have the last word though so fill your boots.