Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 907
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 50 times
Been liked: 168 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5364
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 462 times
Been liked: 959 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:46
goose wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:29
Lee Trundle" wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:16
Fixed it there for you, goose.
You can have it presented whichever way you want, but the point is there’s no backtracking to be done here. There’s no mass remigration coming because the law is on the side of the ‘British citizens’.

Ive not seen one plausible idea of how you solve this.
I'm pretty sure it's the way they'd want to be seen.  Barely any of these 'British citizens' you talk about would view themselves as British in any way.

The solution is to stop these types of people from ever getting into the country.

The only way to do that is to sort out our massive immigration problem.

The only party willing to do that is Reform.

There's your only solution.
I don’t think you’ll find anyone on here disagreeing about the future, but I’m talking about the people in the article below. They’re the problem here. How do you solve that? Even with no further immigration they’ll continue to grow quicker than the native population.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3791
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 734 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

A lot of these immigrants (a hell of a lot of them work in IT) will have their jobs taken away in the next 5/10 years because of AI.

They'll then be stuck on our benefits for the rest of their lives, I'd imagine.

Can no one else see this?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 966
Been liked: 231 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

goose wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:29
Lee Trundle" wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:16
goose wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:10 The irony is that foreign invasion is by and large 'British citizens'.
Fixed it there for you, goose.
You can have it presented whichever way you want, but the point is there’s no backtracking to be done here. There’s no mass remigration coming because the law is on the side of the ‘British citizens’.

Ive not seen one plausible idea of how you solve this.
We interned Italians during WW2, US did so with Italian-Americans. Just saying.

Classify them as enemy agents, fifth column etc. Job done.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3791
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 734 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

goose wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:29
Lee Trundle" wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:16
goose wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:10 The irony is that foreign invasion is by and large 'British citizens'.
Fixed it there for you, goose.
You can have it presented whichever way you want, but the point is there’s no backtracking to be done here. There’s no mass remigration coming because the law is on the side of the ‘British citizens’.

Ive not seen one plausible idea of how you solve this.
I'm pretty sure it's the way they'd want to be seen.  Barely any of these 'British citizens' you talk about would view themselves as British in any way.

The solution is to stop these types of people from ever getting into the country.

The only way to do that is to sort out our massive immigration problem.

The only party willing to do that is Reform.

There's your only solution.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5364
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 462 times
Been liked: 959 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:16
goose wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:10 The irony is that foreign invasion is by and large 'British citizens'.
Fixed it there for you, goose.
You can have it presented whichever way you want, but the point is there’s no backtracking to be done here. There’s no mass remigration coming because the law is on the side of the ‘British citizens’.

Ive not seen one plausible idea of how you solve this.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3791
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 734 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Lee Trundle »

goose wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 08:10 The irony is that foreign invasion is by and large 'British citizens'.
Fixed it there for you, goose.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5364
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 462 times
Been liked: 959 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

The irony is that ‘foreign invasion’ is by and large British citizens.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 966
Been liked: 231 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Nutsin wrote: 28 Oct 2025, 02:38 Farage is absolutely right.

This is what the virtual signalling wankers like Goose have encouraged.

When people show you who they are, believe them the first time.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5364
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 462 times
Been liked: 959 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Still obsessed with me I see. 
it’s virtue not virtual btw.

I would say post up the evidence but we both know you won’t (again).

You seem to believe that objecting to burning down neighbourhoods of people because of their religion is ‘virtue signalling’ 😂 
Nutsin
Posts: 2756
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 170 times
Been liked: 298 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Farage is absolutely right.

This is what the virtual signalling wankers like Goose have encouraged.

Nutsin
Posts: 2756
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 170 times
Been liked: 298 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

On a positive note, the Dow is up again, at an all time high.


As of late September the USA has hauled in $215 billion in Tarrif money. Inflation numbers are contained still way down from the Bidenomics nightmare.
Wage growth is up 0.7% from Aug 24 to Aug 25.

Trillions in new investment coming in to the country, Drug prices way down, No tax on pensions, overtime and tips. Oil prices way down and America leading the way with AI.

Secure border, crime way down. Close to 2 million deported in only 9 months. ICE taking care of business in the sanctuary cities.
DC and Memphis safe again, after years of rampant murder rates.

Now Trump is going after the drug smugglers in his war with Fetanyl crisis.

And a much more peaceful world with all the wars he has stopped.
Man is getting shit done.

Props where they are due, he is knocking it out of the ball park.

 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4792
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 34 times
Been liked: 613 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Gaffer58 wrote: 27 Oct 2025, 17:40 We had 14 years of mainly Tory incompetence ( they got most of Covid right) now just over a year of Labour incompetence, so basically the majority of politicians are just rank useless but the one common denominator during any government is the civil service, the home office has just been called “ unfit for purpose “ in some report. 
Of course it's unfit for purpose, being as it is, rammed to the rafters, at every level, with people who have never done a productive day's (tax generating) work in their lives.
Gaffer58
Posts: 276
Old WHO Number: 292526
Been liked: 42 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Gaffer58 »

We had 14 years of mainly Tory incompetence ( they got most of Covid right) now just over a year of Labour incompetence, so basically the majority of politicians are just rank useless but the one common denominator during any government is the civil service, the home office has just been called “ unfit for purpose “ in some report. 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3627
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 63 times
Been liked: 477 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Most of the hotels were signed up in 2019 on ten year deals
That was Boris or maybe the tailend of Theresa 
More Tory incompetence during their 14 year reign of horror
Massive Attack
Posts: 6096
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3490 times
Been liked: 1804 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Wow. Ellie Reynolds (rape gang survivor) has just been dropping truth bombs all over the gaff in a joint press conference alongside Farage regarding Labour's shambolic Inquiry calling them all out for being corrupt as fuck - Starmer included. 👏

At least 250,000 victims UK wide. 
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1815
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 326 times
Been liked: 218 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

That's Tories for you.
Massive Attack
Posts: 6096
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3490 times
Been liked: 1804 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

As Dominic Cummings regularly proclaims "The system as intended".
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4792
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 34 times
Been liked: 613 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Home Office squandered billions on asylum hotels, MPs say:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr43ww32xx0o

Like fuck was is "squandered".

Clearly favours being bought/paid back from/to mates & friends of the families of the authorities. More taxpayers money that will never be recovered.

Did we learn nothing from the Covid debacle?
Massive Attack
Posts: 6096
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3490 times
Been liked: 1804 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Oh look Don manages another historic peace agreement between 2 warring sides..

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/ ... eace-deal/
Massive Attack
Posts: 6096
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3490 times
Been liked: 1804 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Massive Attack" wrote: 24 Oct 2025, 16:10 Killed the very person trying to help him. The naive Left will never learn and Churchill knew it. Such a tragic needless waste of life.

Image


Churchill knew...



Useful idiot divs.
honky cat
Posts: 1113
Has liked: 626 times
Been liked: 425 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post honky cat »

We had election here for president of Ireland. To cut a long story short, the whole thing was a stitch up in that the only choice was between 2 lefty women (a male candidate withdrew because of a financial scandal, but remained on the ballot as they had already been printed - but he was a bit of a cսnt anyway).

Spoiled votes  213,000
Invalid votes for Bit of a cսnt 104,000 

The lefty woman won of course,  but the huge numbers of spoiled/invalid votes in a country this small - plus a very low turnout is interesting - it will all be brushed under the carpet and written off as far right I suppose.
 
Massive Attack
Posts: 6096
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3490 times
Been liked: 1804 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 25 Oct 2025, 20:48
OK_Guy wrote: 25 Oct 2025, 16:44 the way I see it now, 9,000+ 'historic' grooming cases being re-opened, it can only be a cover-up or were these cases deliberately ignored?

I fail to see how the Met/Khan(Commissioner)  can suddenly have a moment of realization that somehow 9,000+ grooming cases were overlooked, it must have been an absolute lightening moment when someone figured 'fuck my, these kids have been 'groomed', we better look into this before the Newspaper's get hold of some 'snaky grass of a whistleblower' and reveals all... ohh fuck, too late, best get it announced that we're re-opening historic grooming gang cases. 'Your a cսnt Khan, we told you this would come back to bite our arse because you wanted to protect your mates'.
9,000+ 'historic' grooming cases? That figure is mind-boggling, even if we go back 18 years from today, that averages out at (over) 500 per year, or 10 per week. How was it even possible to keep a lid on that without pressure from the highest authorities?

Go back over 36 years and that still equates to 5 abuse reports per week - one every single working day of the week, every year. Was Jimmy Savile in charge of the investigations?

That they know of. 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4792
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 34 times
Been liked: 613 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

OK_Guy wrote: 25 Oct 2025, 16:44 the way I see it now, 9,000+ 'historic' grooming cases being re-opened, it can only be a cover-up or were these cases deliberately ignored?

I fail to see how the Met/Khan(Commissioner)  can suddenly have a moment of realization that somehow 9,000+ grooming cases were overlooked, it must have been an absolute lightening moment when someone figured 'fuck my, these kids have been 'groomed', we better look into this before the Newspaper's get hold of some 'snaky grass of a whistleblower' and reveals all... ohh fuck, too late, best get it announced that we're re-opening historic grooming gang cases. 'Your a cսnt Khan, we told you this would come back to bite our arse because you wanted to protect your mates'.
9,000+ 'historic' grooming cases? That figure is mind-boggling, even if we go back 18 years from today, that averages out at (over) 500 per year, or 10 per week. How was it even possible to keep a lid on that without pressure from the highest authorities?

Go back over 36 years and that still equates to 5 abuse reports per week - one every single working day of the week, every year. Was Jimmy Savile in charge of the investigations?
Massive Attack
Posts: 6096
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3490 times
Been liked: 1804 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

See how they stage this shit to gaslight a nation 🎥 


Well done, girl! 👏




I'd have been so tempted to take a running punt at that Cameramans lens at me back down his smirking throat.

The Dog knows. They're always good judges of characters at times like these sniffing out rats.

By the way, why are the lovely Gentleman trying to hide their faces if they have fuck all to hide....🤔💭
Massive Attack
Posts: 6096
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3490 times
Been liked: 1804 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

The North Face Uber Division. 

Colour me frightened. 😂
Post Reply