AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1007
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 197 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1007
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 197 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I'm interested to know why the plastic Aussie, champagne communist Sven refers to Reform and right wing citizens as "gammons".
To me gammon is a racist slur given it's a pejorative term expressly targeted as white citizens with a right wing political persuasion.
Care to apologise for your racist slur, Sven?
Care to censor that poster for his use of a racist slur, Mods?
To me gammon is a racist slur given it's a pejorative term expressly targeted as white citizens with a right wing political persuasion.
Care to apologise for your racist slur, Sven?
Care to censor that poster for his use of a racist slur, Mods?
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5025
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 19:13 Not putting up lights
Thats usually cancelling Christmas in Gammon world isn’t it?
If it was a Labour council you’d be out painting another roundabout
Putting up Christmas lights or funding a care home.
Yep. I can see why that would be an impossible choice for some.
Yep. I can see why that would be an impossible choice for some.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6597
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3787 times
- Been liked: 1984 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 19:13 Not putting up lights
Thats usually cancelling Christmas in Gammon world isn’t it?
Nope. That's definitely not a thing I'm aware of in the UK that Christmas is cancelled if some lights do not go up for any reason.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3819
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 66 times
- Been liked: 519 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Not putting up lights
Thats usually cancelling Christmas in Gammon world isn’t it?
If it was a Labour council you’d be out painting another roundabout
Thats usually cancelling Christmas in Gammon world isn’t it?
If it was a Labour council you’d be out painting another roundabout
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5025
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 17:50 Reform have taken over a number of councils
What in their running of those makes you think they would make a competent government?
Any news on a costed economic plan?
Taking power away from the state = which, in reality really dictate what happens in the country - will allow Reform to begin to price what solving many issues will cost.
While the state continue to conduct a policy of civil disobedience (that they would never allow the general population to undertake) nothing will change.
It's the unelected bureaucrats who need nailing, but the unions & do-gooders will never allow that to happen, even if their reticence borders on being traitorous.
While the state continue to conduct a policy of civil disobedience (that they would never allow the general population to undertake) nothing will change.
It's the unelected bureaucrats who need nailing, but the unions & do-gooders will never allow that to happen, even if their reticence borders on being traitorous.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6597
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3787 times
- Been liked: 1984 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 17:50 Reform have taken over a number of councils
What in their running of those makes you think they would make a competent government?
Any news on a costed economic plan?
Reform Councils have proven they can successfully save a shit load of money in a short space of time, whereas Labour have achieved the opposite with taxes set to rise thanks to Reeves incompetency with our finances.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/h ... 03972.html
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6597
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3787 times
- Been liked: 1984 times
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3819
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 66 times
- Been liked: 519 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Reform have taken over a number of councils
What in their running of those makes you think they would make a competent government?
Any news on a costed economic plan?
What in their running of those makes you think they would make a competent government?
Any news on a costed economic plan?
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1007
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 197 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
This is a shocking government but the Tories weren't much better.
Both sides of the Uniparty are incompetent, lying charlatans.
The Tories consistently promised to get net migration down to the tens of thousands. They lied and did the opposite (increased it to record levels).
Labour promised not to raise income tax, NI or VAT. They lied and did the opposite.
Labour promised to "smash the gangs". They lied and illegal immigration is at record levels.
Vote Reform.
Both sides of the Uniparty are incompetent, lying charlatans.
The Tories consistently promised to get net migration down to the tens of thousands. They lied and did the opposite (increased it to record levels).
Labour promised not to raise income tax, NI or VAT. They lied and did the opposite.
Labour promised to "smash the gangs". They lied and illegal immigration is at record levels.
Vote Reform.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3819
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 66 times
- Been liked: 519 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Caught between the flag shaggers & those who say you can’t say Christmas without being arrested
Ironic
Angry middle aged men overload
Ironic
Angry middle aged men overload
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6597
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3787 times
- Been liked: 1984 times
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3926
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 782 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 17:13 Kent County Council (Reform) cancelling Christmas
No Christmas lights going up due to lamp posts covered in flags
Safety issue, innit
Reckon we've got 4 more years of pathetic articles like that to sully Reform, Sven (which you'll lap up).
I don't think it's going to work, though.
I don't think it's going to work, though.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3819
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 66 times
- Been liked: 519 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Kent County Council (Reform) cancelling Christmas
No Christmas lights going up due to lamp posts covered in flags
Safety issue, innit
No Christmas lights going up due to lamp posts covered in flags
Safety issue, innit
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 826
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 145 times
- Been liked: 225 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 13:10 Serious question …
All this talk by Rachel from Accounts about low productivity in the UK
In this modern world of services & finance etc how do they actually calculate productivity given most people don’t work in factories knocking out widgets these days?
With modern technology I imagine most office based people are far more productive than they ever were
I think if you allow half the population to skive from home and the other half to do a four day week for a full week's money, then productivity will drop off a tad.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5025
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 13:10 Serious question …
All this talk by Rachel from Accounts about low productivity in the UK
In this modern world of services & finance etc how do they actually calculate productivity given most people don’t work in factories knocking out widgets these days?
With modern technology I imagine most office based people are far more productive than they ever were
Very few people actually make anything of worth these days, anything that adds actual wealth to the economy.
The most money seems to be "created" through adding, then pocketing, commission to the little stuff the UK actually creates as it moves through the supply chain from creator to consumer.
The most money seems to be "created" through adding, then pocketing, commission to the little stuff the UK actually creates as it moves through the supply chain from creator to consumer.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3819
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 66 times
- Been liked: 519 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Serious question …
All this talk by Rachel from Accounts about low productivity in the UK
In this modern world of services & finance etc how do they actually calculate productivity given most people don’t work in factories knocking out widgets these days?
With modern technology I imagine most office based people are far more productive than they ever were
All this talk by Rachel from Accounts about low productivity in the UK
In this modern world of services & finance etc how do they actually calculate productivity given most people don’t work in factories knocking out widgets these days?
With modern technology I imagine most office based people are far more productive than they ever were
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5025
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Someone sent me this earlier:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/737105
Not sure if it's real/matters...
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/737105
Not sure if it's real/matters...
-
BerlingtonBertie
- Posts: 152
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 43 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Maybe stop sending arms/money to Ukraine and sink any incoming boats in the channel. That would be a good start and save a few quid. Fucking ponces and nonces running the UK since the 90’s.
A great nation ruined by incompetence and do gooders.
A great nation ruined by incompetence and do gooders.
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1497
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 140 times
- Been liked: 224 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fewer people working harder, paying more, for more and more not working.
Still it's great to know that all those taxes are being spent wisely, and the state of public bodies is in such a great state and doesn't lend itself open to jaw dropping incompetence on an almost daily basis.
Still it's great to know that all those taxes are being spent wisely, and the state of public bodies is in such a great state and doesn't lend itself open to jaw dropping incompetence on an almost daily basis.
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 990
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 366 times
- Been liked: 182 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
zico wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 10:24 Read this earlier, not sure if it's true, maybe someone can clarify?
"When Tony Blair came to power the national debt was 25% when he left it was 65%. The Conservatives had spent the last 14 years trying to pay of that debt that Labour had accumulated and also paying for a pandemic. Under Starmer 91% to 97% national debt in 18 months."
Blair spent it on Education Education Education.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
the speech was pretty much a list of excuses then told you that you'll have to pay for it.
labour (which means you) are fucked, they cannot get any welfare reform through parliament so the only option is to keep hiking taxes.
labour (which means you) are fucked, they cannot get any welfare reform through parliament so the only option is to keep hiking taxes.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Read this earlier, not sure if it's true, maybe someone can clarify?
"When Tony Blair came to power the national debt was 25% when he left it was 65%. The Conservatives had spent the last 14 years trying to pay of that debt that Labour had accumulated and also paying for a pandemic. Under Starmer 91% to 97% national debt in 18 months."
"When Tony Blair came to power the national debt was 25% when he left it was 65%. The Conservatives had spent the last 14 years trying to pay of that debt that Labour had accumulated and also paying for a pandemic. Under Starmer 91% to 97% national debt in 18 months."
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1497
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 140 times
- Been liked: 224 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I love the way she shoehorned AI into the speech a couple times.
”ooooh, brand new shiny AI!!! In that case please tax me more”!!
”ooooh, brand new shiny AI!!! In that case please tax me more”!!