Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Crapaqueta

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1515
Been liked: 366 times

Crapaqueta

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Hopefully that's the last we see of the overhyped cսnt.

Out the door 1st Jan.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7770
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4519 times
Been liked: 2392 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

*Correction - He was involved in Villa’s Rogers goal by getting caught dicking about on the ball gifting it back to them 💩 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7770
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4519 times
Been liked: 2392 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

Yet another game is fails to create an assist, his 60th consecutive match in a row and not involved in either goal. Carrying the waste of space these days.
twoleftfeet
Posts: 2866
Old WHO Number: 214368
Has liked: 121 times
Been liked: 632 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post twoleftfeet »

wils wrote: 14 Dec 2025, 17:05 Back in the team and a winnable game gets lost. You can’t ignore performances like this when evaluating his contribution. Long thought he is a net negative. 
He is gash! Potts, Magassa and Fernandes all outshone him. 
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1172
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 223 times
Been liked: 504 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post wils »

Back in the team and a winnable game gets lost. You can’t ignore performances like this when evaluating his contribution. Long thought he is a net negative. 
User avatar
Mad Ferret
Posts: 2323
Has liked: 211 times
Been liked: 364 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Mad Ferret »

Can’t work out who was worse, Paq or Potts.

Magassa and Fernandes were mustard.
User avatar
Sweep
Posts: 278
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 87 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Sweep »

If Newcastle offered us Harvey Barnes or Anthony Elanga in return I reckon we'd take it.
eusebiovic
Posts: 671
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 1185 times
Been liked: 233 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post eusebiovic »

It's become a running joke with Paqueta now...He does it so often that other teams actively press and target him for that very reason.

Jack Rudoni from Coventry would be a much better replacement and he's naturally left footed to give the midfield some balance but we ain't getting anywhere near him now. Watch Palace or Brighton sign him up.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1515
Been liked: 366 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Costs us yet another goal and potentially 2 points.

Can we finally be rid of this cսnt now.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:35
fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:33
Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:26
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks 
You're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.
Yep and we also didn't lose or won the previous times we played the same opposition with him in the team therefore the results didn't improve..
We didn't lose against Bournemouth but we won the previous two with him playing, see how fucking ridiculous your proof is, I'm the dumb one really 
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Come On You Irons »

fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:33
Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:26
fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:20
They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match. 
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks 
You're a bit dumb aren't you. My very point is that Paqueta didn't play in a bunch of games West Ham didn't lose.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:26
fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:20
Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:15
The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.
They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match. 
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
So did the rest of the team so again you're talking bollocks

Again you've ignored me debunking your solid proof... 
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Come On You Irons »

fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:20
Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:15
fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:11
You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play... 

We did the double over man u last season with him

Yeah solid proof 
The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.
They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match. 
Paqueta also played in the 1-5 home defeat to Chelsea, the 0-2 home defeat to Liverpool, the 0-3 away defeat at Sunderland, the 0-3 home defeat to Tottenham. Etc., etc., etc.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:15
fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:11
Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 10:58
Clear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.
You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play... 

We did the double over man u last season with him

Yeah solid proof 
The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.
They were pretty shit too.. What about your other "proof" that's all you've got cause it's bollocks... Tell us how well we played against Bournemouth without him as you did when slaughtering the team for being shit after the match. 
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Come On You Irons »

fraser wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 11:11
Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 10:58
wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:46
Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.

But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:

Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
Clear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.
You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play... 

We did the double over man u last season with him

Yeah solid proof 
The worst Premier League team in years was Southampton last season, not Leicester. Do try to make your arguments make sense if you wish to be taken seriously on here.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Come On You Irons" wrote: 06 Dec 2025, 10:58
wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:46
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.

But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:

Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
Clear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.
You slaughtered us for our display at Bournemouth... We also drew there last year with him in the team.. Leicester... The worst PL team in years and you think we won because he didn't play... 

We did the double over man u last season with him

Yeah solid proof 
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Come On You Irons »

wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:46
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.

But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:

Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
Clear evidence there that we are a better and more solid team without the showboating, cheating, diving, samba dancing Brazilian liability.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7770
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4519 times
Been liked: 2392 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:29
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:22
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:15
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we... 

Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban.. 

No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension. 
But anyway take them away and we're possibly Wolves, so yes he isn't as good as he should be and should do better but why leave him and his contributions out when we need them? 
Because I seriously question his state of mind for obvious reasons. I'm actually genuinely concerned for the bloke as he's clearly struggled and the last match he played he proved he couldn't keep it together when we can ill afford for it to happen. We lose that game scoring nothing he doesn't play the next difficult game away and we score and draw without him. I genuinely think both he and us would benefit if he was available on the bench. It would also send the right message to others that you have to earn your place back especially after how he badly reacted. It feels a bit soon to chuck him straight back in to the fold but hopefully it works out and we can beat Brighton. He's going to be back under intense pressure, let's hope he manages to cope alright.
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:22
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:15
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:07
Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended. 
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we... 

Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban.. 

No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension. 
But anyway take them away and we're possibly Wolves, so yes he isn't as good as he should be and should do better but why leave him and his contributions out when we need them? 
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7770
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4519 times
Been liked: 2392 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:15
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:07
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended. 
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we... 

Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban.. 

No, I was told by someone else I was referring to that said he contributes close to almost all our goals, that's why I questioned it. And I didn't say he always gets suspended I said he keeps getting suspended because he just did again straight away after returning from a 5 yellow card suspension. 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 19:07
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:32

So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals. 
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended. 
Only contributed to half the goals we've scored... Wtf... Take those goals away and where are we... 

Always suspended 2 fucking games... Didn't Soucek get a 3 game ban.. 
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

wils wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:46
fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.

But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:

Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
 
 
I didn't say he was our best player this year, I said he contributes more than most but they don't get the stick he does. He gets the blame for everything but is one of our best performers and why he's straight back in the team... But what I do find bollocks is those claiming we're better without him and even bigger bollocks those saying he isn't a team player when he doesn't stop grafting. 
Gaffer58
Posts: 310
Old WHO Number: 292526
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Gaffer58 »

Probably if we didn’t spend most of every game with less possession then our opponents and not defending on our 18 yard line then he would have a lot better stats.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7770
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4519 times
Been liked: 2392 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post Massive Attack »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:32
Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 17:52
 
 

He hasn't contributed to any assists? He's contributed to almost ALL our assists! Close to every single one. If you only count his contributions if he's the very last player to touch the ball 




 

So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals. 
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Even if we added his 4 goals he scored to those 3 challenges for the ball as well as the other 2, that's still contributing half the total amount we've scored. And this is supposed to be a Club record signing creative attacking midfielder on £150,000 a week who keeps getting suspended. 
Last edited by Massive Attack on 05 Dec 2025, 19:11, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
wils
Posts: 1172
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 276191
Has liked: 223 times
Been liked: 504 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post wils »

fraser wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:38
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Yes, agreed he was excellent in that one game.

But if he was our best player this year it's not easy to see in the stats. We lost most of our games this year yet this is all the games he has missed in 2025 so far:

Arsenal 0-1 West Ham
West Ham 2-0 Leicester
Bournemouth 2-2 West Ham
Man United 1-1 West Ham
User avatar
fraser
Posts: 3100
Old WHO Number: 10134
Has liked: 221 times
Been liked: 587 times

Re: Crapaqueta

Post fraser »

Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 18:32
Gank wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 17:52
Massive Attack" wrote: 05 Dec 2025, 15:58
The post said we absolutely missed him and gave clear evidence of not only that game but also his previous 58 games in a row where he doesn't contribute to a single assist, yet he is supposed to be our main creative attacking midfielder. And the fact we instantly got a very positive result and performance without him.
 
 

He hasn't contributed to any assists? He's contributed to almost ALL our assists! Close to every single one. If you only count his contributions if he's the very last player to touch the ball 


 

So out of the 18 goals we've scored so far this season, how many was his involved in passing moves resulting in goals? I can only think of 2, 1 against Burnley and another against Newcastle. Beyond that I'm struggling to think of amy others regardless of him having the last touch to assist goals. 
I'm sure he was involved in all three goals against Forest... 
Post Reply