AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1242
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 86 times
- Been liked: 251 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
- BRANDED
- Posts: 2037
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 123 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
When we were kids we would have watched a load of BBC programmes. Mostly because its all there was but also some of it was worth watching.
there’s almost nothing now that isnt available else where. As a result I hardly watch any of it.
who would realistically pay for any of it?
there’s almost nothing now that isnt available else where. As a result I hardly watch any of it.
who would realistically pay for any of it?
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3982
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 1158 times
- Been liked: 1517 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
"thieving the propaganda". service? what a cսnt
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 2120
- Has liked: 561 times
- Been liked: 895 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
They stitched words that he said to form something which he never said.
If you don't believe that, why did two top people from the BBC resign?
If you don't believe that, why did two top people from the BBC resign?
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4296
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 73 times
- Been liked: 604 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Have said before I’m in favour of binning the licence fee taking on some program sponsorship & moving to a streaming service
A world wide streaming service at say £5 a month
Need first to develop a way of identifying people thieving the service …. first offence £10,000 fine for watching 5 mins of EastEnders.
Would earn much more than the licence fee & the bbc could expand into the worlds largest tv & radio network
A world wide streaming service at say £5 a month
Need first to develop a way of identifying people thieving the service …. first offence £10,000 fine for watching 5 mins of EastEnders.
Would earn much more than the licence fee & the bbc could expand into the worlds largest tv & radio network
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4296
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 73 times
- Been liked: 604 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Trump said the bbc changed the words that he’d said
Broadcast words that he hadn’t said
Thats not true
To say so is a lie
And it’s a damaging statement for the reputation of a broadcaster
Do you accept that ?
Broadcast words that he hadn’t said
Thats not true
To say so is a lie
And it’s a damaging statement for the reputation of a broadcaster
Do you accept that ?
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 2120
- Has liked: 561 times
- Been liked: 895 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑18 Dec 2025, 05:20 When Trump made his speech on Jan 6 to his faithful rabble there was no controversy that he was being misrepresented
Cant imagine BBC Verify gets involved unless there is a reaction to the veracity of the story
How does GB News Verify work?
Understand Trump implied the other day that bbc had manipulated his speech (AI maybe?) to put words in his mouth
That is obviously untrue and a slur on a media organisation that could cause reputational damage
Surely they should sue him for this dangerous lie?
Do you actually believe that shit? Tell us what the lie is?
The BBC is finished in its current form because its reputation was in tatters even before all this.
The BBC is finished in its current form because its reputation was in tatters even before all this.
- goose
- Posts: 5950
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
XKhammer wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 22:47goose wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 17:31XKhammer wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 17:10You're the stupid one FFS!
Spain is in Europe and thats where the illegals want to get to due to the open borders and make their way to the channel and cross
Rwanda is in Africa and yes I'll say generally Rwandans tend to bit more stupid than Spanish,but neither are as thick as the EyetiesActually joyo, turns out you’re the stupid one (again).
Italy already has a scheme whereby they send illegal immigrants to Albania for processing. Other Europe countries (like the U.K.) are now trying to do similar schemes with the Balkan countries.
Do you need someone to point these countries out on a map to you? Or were you struggling with the difference between Europe & the EU?
you ain’t half dumb joyo son.Is Broxbourne in Italy thicko?
Well done for proving me correct yet again joyo son.
European countries are already taking illegal immigrants as part of a ‘Rwanda’ type scheme, so “Europe is where they want to get to” is completely retarded.
pretty standard stuff from our resident dipshit cycling nonce.
European countries are already taking illegal immigrants as part of a ‘Rwanda’ type scheme, so “Europe is where they want to get to” is completely retarded.
pretty standard stuff from our resident dipshit cycling nonce.
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2558
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 638 times
- Been liked: 953 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Reputational damage?
You really think that rancid organisation has a reputation that isn't already in tatters?
You really think that rancid organisation has a reputation that isn't already in tatters?
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4296
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 73 times
- Been liked: 604 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
When Trump made his speech on Jan 6 to his faithful rabble there was no controversy that he was being misrepresented
Cant imagine BBC Verify gets involved unless there is a reaction to the veracity of the story
How does GB News Verify work?
Understand Trump implied the other day that bbc had manipulated his speech (AI maybe?) to put words in his mouth
That is obviously untrue and a slur on a media organisation that could cause reputational damage
Surely they should sue him for this dangerous lie?
Cant imagine BBC Verify gets involved unless there is a reaction to the veracity of the story
How does GB News Verify work?
Understand Trump implied the other day that bbc had manipulated his speech (AI maybe?) to put words in his mouth
That is obviously untrue and a slur on a media organisation that could cause reputational damage
Surely they should sue him for this dangerous lie?
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5294
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 71 times
- Been liked: 723 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
XKhammer wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 17:13THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 15:00To be fair it's only one poster and because it's true it's great fun.Would that be Oxbore who lives in a mud hut in a poverty stricken village near the Cambodian border?
Not sure why you keep insisting that Belvedere is full of mud huts and poverty stricken, but if that floats your boat, crack on. It does share a border with a poverty zone though, I can see it with my own eyes as it lies just across the River Thames from me.
Oh, and here's a heads-up for you so that you can grass me up on here to your Pensions Department mates without "actually" grassing me up (bit like you not supporting Sullivan by supporting Sullivan, that).
I'll be back in the war zone/area of conflict, well within the range of Cambodian rockets, for Christmas. I'll give you the exact dates and times once I've confirmed my business class flights, so you can start the clock ticking. You know you want to.
Oh, and here's a heads-up for you so that you can grass me up on here to your Pensions Department mates without "actually" grassing me up (bit like you not supporting Sullivan by supporting Sullivan, that).
I'll be back in the war zone/area of conflict, well within the range of Cambodian rockets, for Christmas. I'll give you the exact dates and times once I've confirmed my business class flights, so you can start the clock ticking. You know you want to.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 17:31XKhammer wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 17:10Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 08:57Well, Rwanda was up for it.
Are you suggesting that Rwandans are more stupid than Spaniards?You're the stupid one FFS!
Spain is in Europe and thats where the illegals want to get to due to the open borders and make their way to the channel and cross
Rwanda is in Africa and yes I'll say generally Rwandans tend to bit more stupid than Spanish,but neither are as thick as the EyetiesActually joyo, turns out you’re the stupid one (again).
Italy already has a scheme whereby they send illegal immigrants to Albania for processing. Other Europe countries (like the U.K.) are now trying to do similar schemes with the Balkan countries.
Do you need someone to point these countries out on a map to you? Or were you struggling with the difference between Europe & the EU?
you ain’t half dumb joyo son.
Is Broxbourne in Italy thicko?
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 7763
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4516 times
- Been liked: 2391 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Gaffer58 wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 16:19 I actually wonder where the BBC Verify was when this was happening, there very quick to tell everyone that one of Putin’s rockets has hit a building in the Ukraine, but have kept very quite over one of their own programs splicing up speeches to make people look bad.
They'd be better off re-naming it BBC Certified with regards to how they cover Trump at times. The derangement is systemic.
- goose
- Posts: 5950
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
XKhammer wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 17:10Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 08:57Well, Rwanda was up for it.
Are you suggesting that Rwandans are more stupid than Spaniards?You're the stupid one FFS!
Spain is in Europe and thats where the illegals want to get to due to the open borders and make their way to the channel and cross
Rwanda is in Africa and yes I'll say generally Rwandans tend to bit more stupid than Spanish,but neither are as thick as the Eyeties
Actually joyo, turns out you’re the stupid one (again).
Italy already has a scheme whereby they send illegal immigrants to Albania for processing. Other Europe countries (like the U.K.) are now trying to do similar schemes with the Balkan countries.
Do you need someone to point these countries out on a map to you? Or were you struggling with the difference between Europe & the EU?
you ain’t half dumb joyo son.
Italy already has a scheme whereby they send illegal immigrants to Albania for processing. Other Europe countries (like the U.K.) are now trying to do similar schemes with the Balkan countries.
Do you need someone to point these countries out on a map to you? Or were you struggling with the difference between Europe & the EU?
you ain’t half dumb joyo son.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 15:00To be fair it's only one poster and because it's true it's great fun.
Would that be Oxbore who lives in a mud hut in a poverty stricken village near the Cambodian border?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 08:57XKhammer wrote: ↑15 Dec 2025, 13:45Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 17:04 You'd have thought that, if the state actually cared about the women & young girls in the UK, and can't (or more probably won't) identify which boat people are potential rapists, nonces and abusers, then they would keep all boat people away from UK communities until such time as they can (or will) pick the wrong'ns out.
Rent land from Spain on the Plazas de soberanía and build accommodation/assessment centres there.You know when l said you only post utter bollocks?
Seriously do you really think the Spanish would suffer that ridiculous statement?Well, Rwanda was up for it.
Are you suggesting that Rwandans are more stupid than Spaniards?
You're the stupid one FFS!
Spain is in Europe and thats where the illegals want to get to due to the open borders and make their way to the channel and cross
Rwanda is in Africa and yes I'll say generally Rwandans tend to bit more stupid than Spanish,but neither are as thick as the Eyeties
Spain is in Europe and thats where the illegals want to get to due to the open borders and make their way to the channel and cross
Rwanda is in Africa and yes I'll say generally Rwandans tend to bit more stupid than Spanish,but neither are as thick as the Eyeties
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I actually wonder where the BBC Verify was when this was happening, there very quick to tell everyone that one of Putin’s rockets has hit a building in the Ukraine, but have kept very quite over one of their own programs splicing up speeches to make people look bad.
- BRANDED
- Posts: 2037
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 123 times
- Been liked: 247 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 11:39 The bbc won’t settle and have no reason to engage with some Florida kangaroo court
Starmer should grow a pair and tell Trump to go fuck himself
Trump now saying the bbc broadcast words he didn’t say
Which is palpably untrue
Obviously needs a £20bn lawsuit against him
Seize his golf courses in Scotland and use them to house asylum seekers
I recon they'll pay to get rid and will be under huge pressure over content.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 2120
- Has liked: 561 times
- Been liked: 895 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Trump DID say those words, the problem is the cuntworthy BBC stitched his words out of context to make him seem he was instigating a riot. For the BBC to say it was a "mistake" is being disingenuous to the nth degree.
I hope he wins his lawsuit.
I hope he wins his lawsuit.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑17 Dec 2025, 11:39 The bbc won’t settle and have no reason to engage with some Florida kangaroo court
Starmer should grow a pair and tell Trump to go fuck himself
Trump now saying the bbc broadcast words he didn’t say
Which is palpably untrue
Obviously needs a £20bn lawsuit against him
Seize his golf courses in Scotland and use them to house asylum seekers
If I’m Trump I’m going to apply maximum pressure on the Muslim brotherhood, oops sorry. I mean the Labour Gov’t until they stop with all the fake news and ridiculously dangerous immigration policies. Which means crushing the BBC first and foremost then going after the entire party by crushing the UK economy. I’d also refuse to sell them and the EU any more US military equipment so Putin can do whatever the fuck he pleases.
Trump is your only hope to save yourself from Brussels illegal reign of terror.
Now you have a Taliban style Gov’t who want to do away with trial by jury on top of removing your right to free speech. Sharia law is coming and you all fucking know it.
They’re even telling you that they can’t kick out the Islamists ffs because they have more of a right to reign terror down on you than you do to live in peace.
It’s scary just how docile and easily led and abused the Brits have become.
Stand up and fight for the BBC, It’s our national treasure but don’t worry about the women and children, they’re not as important.
Fucking mental!
Trump is your best bet, he beats any alternative and it’s fucking obvious!
Trump is your only hope to save yourself from Brussels illegal reign of terror.
Now you have a Taliban style Gov’t who want to do away with trial by jury on top of removing your right to free speech. Sharia law is coming and you all fucking know it.
They’re even telling you that they can’t kick out the Islamists ffs because they have more of a right to reign terror down on you than you do to live in peace.
It’s scary just how docile and easily led and abused the Brits have become.
Stand up and fight for the BBC, It’s our national treasure but don’t worry about the women and children, they’re not as important.
Fucking mental!
Trump is your best bet, he beats any alternative and it’s fucking obvious!
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3982
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 1158 times
- Been liked: 1517 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
huw edwards lovechild, still whining about trump 
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 4296
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 73 times
- Been liked: 604 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
The bbc won’t settle and have no reason to engage with some Florida kangaroo court
Starmer should grow a pair and tell Trump to go fuck himself
Trump now saying the bbc broadcast words he didn’t say
Which is palpably untrue
Obviously needs a £20bn lawsuit against him
Seize his golf courses in Scotland and use them to house asylum seekers
Starmer should grow a pair and tell Trump to go fuck himself
Trump now saying the bbc broadcast words he didn’t say
Which is palpably untrue
Obviously needs a £20bn lawsuit against him
Seize his golf courses in Scotland and use them to house asylum seekers
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 7763
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 4516 times
- Been liked: 2391 times
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2866
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 121 times
- Been liked: 632 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Sack every single junior doctor. Job done.