AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
-
camel-with-3-humps
- Posts: 112
- Has liked: 1 time
- Been liked: 10 times
Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
In light of the horrific display at Wolves, is Max Kilman the worst centre back we've had? There is probably worse, but I can't remember.
Gary Breen was pretty bad. He didn't make as many mistakes as Kilman, but he was weak - like a road cone easily bypassed.
Views?
Gary Breen was pretty bad. He didn't make as many mistakes as Kilman, but he was weak - like a road cone easily bypassed.
Views?
Last edited by camel-with-3-humps on 06 Jan 2026, 12:51, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
Kilman is the worst I’ve seen. Gary Breen was up there, but the lack of confidence across the team under Roeder probably accounted for that. I seem to remember reading a report on here that some Wolves fans were laughing at us for buying Kilman. In any case, he’s the worst defensive signing at that price.
Rigobert Song looked decent when he was shifted to right back. I saw Richard Hall once at Upton Park - he looked class but had terrible luck with injuries and retired at 27.
Rigobert Song looked decent when he was shifted to right back. I saw Richard Hall once at Upton Park - he looked class but had terrible luck with injuries and retired at 27.
- Keep dreaming
- Posts: 1774
- Location: here and there, mostly here
- Old WHO Number: 225644
- Has liked: 626 times
- Been liked: 321 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
Yes
And by a margin too.
Not only poor technically, but body language, positioning, and agility is far below u21 standard
And by a margin too.
Not only poor technically, but body language, positioning, and agility is far below u21 standard
-
eusebiovic
- Posts: 581
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 1074 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
camel-with-3-humps wrote: ↑06 Jan 2026, 12:49 In light of the horrific display at Wolves, is Max Kilman the worst centre back we've had? There is probably worse, but I can't remember.
Gary Breen was pretty bad. He didn't make as many mistakes as Kilman, but he was weak - like a road cone easily bypassed.
Views?
There have been much worse - we all know it
However, for the transfer fee, wages and length of contract (7 years!) he wins hands down by a country mile.
However, for the transfer fee, wages and length of contract (7 years!) he wins hands down by a country mile.
- Mex Martillo
- Posts: 1848
- Location: Catalonia
- Old WHO Number: 11796
- Has liked: 293 times
- Been liked: 276 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
I find it a bit weird. He was captain at Wolves. With us he is just rubbish and shows absolutely no leadership. How is it possible?
-
F 129 Row66
- Posts: 578
- Has liked: 284 times
- Been liked: 315 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
We've had numerous shit CBs over the years, but with Kilman there are two things that set him apart.
1. He cost 40 million quid
2. He is surrounded by other duds.
The most disastrous signing in living memory. Thanks Loppy.
1. He cost 40 million quid
2. He is surrounded by other duds.
The most disastrous signing in living memory. Thanks Loppy.
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2738
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 113 times
- Been liked: 599 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
Both played, both were blighted by injury therefore both were bad signings although in Websters case his leg was fucked up by Julian Dicks.
I saw both play and neither filled me with confidence.
I saw both play and neither filled me with confidence.
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2738
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 113 times
- Been liked: 599 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
In my time of supporting them I'd say Bill Green.
However we have had plenty of shocking CBs over the years including Simon Webster, Richard Hall and Gary Breen.
However we have had plenty of shocking CBs over the years including Simon Webster, Richard Hall and Gary Breen.
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 848
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 152 times
- Been liked: 245 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
Neither Paul Hilton nor Mick McGiven were shit. They were very capable understudies for good players. What are people on?
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5193
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 57 times
- Been liked: 697 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
When his transfer/contract was announced, I'm sure I got the faintest whiff of stuffed brown envelopes & tax-dodging back-handers...
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3837
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 1073 times
- Been liked: 1421 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
and to think really consistent performers like Balbuena got fucked about for appearances, yet this useless fucker already has more starts
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1965
- Has liked: 521 times
- Been liked: 831 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
Didn't Margas have a hotel and anyone from West Ham was welcome there?
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4040
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 226 times
- Been liked: 1156 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
honky cat" wrote: ↑06 Jan 2026, 14:55Im sure Jav scored for us, and dyed his hair claret and blue. Id have him back tomorrow.
Didnt he just decide one day hed had enough of west ham and fuck off without telling anyone?
Kilman is our most disastrous signing ever.
Be helpful if Kilman just decided to walk off and not come back.
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
Im sure Jav scored for us, and dyed his hair claret and blue. Id have him back tomorrow.
Didnt he just decide one day hed had enough of west ham and fuck off without telling anyone?
Kilman is our most disastrous signing ever.
Didnt he just decide one day hed had enough of west ham and fuck off without telling anyone?
Kilman is our most disastrous signing ever.
-
Pub Bigot
- Posts: 837
- Old WHO Number: 255703
- Has liked: 1096 times
- Been liked: 399 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
For someone with his physical attributes he should be a colossus, instead he’s a fanny.
Absolutely zero physicality to his game, cannot head a ball, cannot lead, has limited positional sense and whoever thought signing a player for 7 years on £100k a week needs taking around the back and shooting like old Yeller.
The worst player in a West Ham shirt possibly ever, and definitely the worst in financial terms.
Absolutely zero physicality to his game, cannot head a ball, cannot lead, has limited positional sense and whoever thought signing a player for 7 years on £100k a week needs taking around the back and shooting like old Yeller.
The worst player in a West Ham shirt possibly ever, and definitely the worst in financial terms.
- stubbo-admin
- Posts: 1705
- Old WHO Number: 12009
- Has liked: 339 times
- Been liked: 771 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
I'd say we've had worse...Hayden Foxe, Raggy Soma, Rigobert Song...to name but a few (funnily enough all of the same era).
But Kilman's price, salary, contract length...these all need to beonsidered in the context of worst.
I'd say he's the most infurating. Like a fast bowler who doesn't like bowling bouncers. Timid characters are not the right types to play at CB. He's as timid as I've seen and has that PTSD look on his face.
Would he better with a Sargent major type next to him, basically calling the play for 90 mins so he just has to listen and use his physical attributes....maybe. He's had good seasons before, and good numbers. But lef tto his own devices, he's meek and mute and can't 'do it on his own'.
Hard to judge players in different teams in different eras...but he's up there.
But Kilman's price, salary, contract length...these all need to beonsidered in the context of worst.
I'd say he's the most infurating. Like a fast bowler who doesn't like bowling bouncers. Timid characters are not the right types to play at CB. He's as timid as I've seen and has that PTSD look on his face.
Would he better with a Sargent major type next to him, basically calling the play for 90 mins so he just has to listen and use his physical attributes....maybe. He's had good seasons before, and good numbers. But lef tto his own devices, he's meek and mute and can't 'do it on his own'.
Hard to judge players in different teams in different eras...but he's up there.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4040
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 226 times
- Been liked: 1156 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
I'm not sure he gives a fuck. Feels like one of those players who finally got his payday and then just went through the motions without caring about anything but his guaranteed paycheque.
-
Russ of the BML
- Posts: 1275
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 484 times
- Been liked: 479 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
A CB that doesn't tackle, loses more headers than he wins, isn't comfortable on the ball and doesn't pick up runners.
I mean, I literally cannot remember a CB so bad.
I mean, I literally cannot remember a CB so bad.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 4040
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 226 times
- Been liked: 1156 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
We've probably fielded actual worse players a couple of times, but they'd have been barrel scraping freebies and last resorts due to injury crises who only played a handful of times.
With context of how much he cost, how long his contract is, and what we bought him to do, he's by far the worst centre back we have ever had. I do not know how he made a living in the premier league until this point. I sort of feel like he'd be a liability back at Maidenhead.
Genuine question- was he THIS shit at Wolves? I never really watched him play there. He can't have been, right? Was he a powder puff who never concentrated, doesn't show any leadership, and couldn't head the ball there as well? As usual Sullivan had his pants proper pulled down and got bent over when buying him.
With context of how much he cost, how long his contract is, and what we bought him to do, he's by far the worst centre back we have ever had. I do not know how he made a living in the premier league until this point. I sort of feel like he'd be a liability back at Maidenhead.
Genuine question- was he THIS shit at Wolves? I never really watched him play there. He can't have been, right? Was he a powder puff who never concentrated, doesn't show any leadership, and couldn't head the ball there as well? As usual Sullivan had his pants proper pulled down and got bent over when buying him.
-
Gary Strodders shank
- Posts: 988
- Old WHO Number: 304873
- Has liked: 18 times
- Been liked: 170 times
Re: Is Max Kilman the worst centre back in your memory - name worse?
He is a big girls blouse of a centre half
Others have been technically poor but cost and earned far less.and some made up for their shortcomings with bravery and endeavour.
Others have been technically poor but cost and earned far less.and some made up for their shortcomings with bravery and endeavour.