Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Hammer I am" wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:43
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 18:58
zebthecat wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 18:30
That is weapons grade straw clutching.
As others have said they were based in Helmand province which was one of the most dangerous places in Aghanistan and got blown up and attacked regularly. Special Forces fought behind the lines alongside US Special forces. 
He said it, meant it and it was a pack of lies.
 
He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.

"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."
Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual though 
 
 
Hammer I am, are you Goose’s little side kick?

How many cats you got?
Westham67
Posts: 987
Location: UK
Old WHO Number: 20994
Has liked: 323 times
Been liked: 121 times
Contact:

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Westham67 »

zebthecat wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:33 btw - It still won't be true even if you type it in block caps..
 
 
Surface is a black belt at making straw man arguments(Take that as a compliment, Surface). In my own experience its best not go down an infinite rabbit hole with him
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:17
Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:14 Sssssh! Don’t tell Goose.


I gave you this lesson yesterday.
Refer back to my posts about net exports & inventories. Strip them away then talk to me about demand.
 
 
Here you go Goose and remember now, we had a Gov’t shut down that hurt the GDP numbers, without the Dirty Dems playing politics these numbers would be even higher.

I know it hurts!


https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/researc ... %20percent.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:32
goose wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:17
Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:14 Sssssh! Don’t tell Goose.


I gave you this lesson yesterday.
Refer back to my posts about net exports & inventories. Strip them away then talk to me about demand.
I know it’s hard to face the truth of your limitations Goose. First step is acceptance. You need to accept you have a lot to learn. For your own sake.
 
 
 
my limitations? no its simple maths as i pointed out yesterday. 
C+I+G+(X-M)

Any comments on todays PMI figures? minimal growth across the board.
Hammer I am
Posts: 395
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 96 times
Been liked: 96 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 18:58
zebthecat wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 18:30
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 01:26
I think you have this the wrong way round. It's you that's guessing what he meant. I'm simply repeating what he actually said. Which was that Britain avoided the front line in Afghanistan. Factually true. And not a criticism of British troops.
That is weapons grade straw clutching.
As others have said they were based in Helmand province which was one of the most dangerous places in Aghanistan and got blown up and attacked regularly. Special Forces fought behind the lines alongside US Special forces. 
He said it, meant it and it was a pack of lies.
 
He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.

"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."
Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual though 
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2036
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 513 times
Been liked: 309 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

btw - It still won't be true even if you type it in block caps..
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:17
Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:14 Sssssh! Don’t tell Goose.


I gave you this lesson yesterday.
Refer back to my posts about net exports & inventories. Strip them away then talk to me about demand.
I know it’s hard to face the truth of your limitations Goose. First step is acceptance. You need to accept you have a lot to learn. For your own sake.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2036
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 513 times
Been liked: 309 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 18:58
zebthecat wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 18:30
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 01:26
I think you have this the wrong way round. It's you that's guessing what he meant. I'm simply repeating what he actually said. Which was that Britain avoided the front line in Afghanistan. Factually true. And not a criticism of British troops.
That is weapons grade straw clutching.
As others have said they were based in Helmand province which was one of the most dangerous places in Aghanistan and got blown up and attacked regularly. Special Forces fought behind the lines alongside US Special forces. 
He said it, meant it and it was a pack of lies.
 
He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.

"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."
There you go again and in bold at that.
None of those statements are true.
The USA triggered NATO article 5, the only time it has been done, and asked for help.
Almost 20 countries answered the call.
Those armed forces were in the front line and they died helping the USA.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 19:14 Sssssh! Don’t tell Goose.


I gave you this lesson yesterday.
Refer back to my posts about net exports & inventories. Strip them away then talk to me about demand.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

I’m gonna completely ignore the fact that #1 and #2 completely disregard health care in the US which is paid for outside of the pay cheque.

id much rather live on the continent with higher life expectancies, better healthcare, free education and proper football.

oh and best of all, no dumb Americans.
 
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Sssssh! Don’t tell Goose.


Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Takashi Miike" wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 18:59 always find it strange, an apparent ex british citizen enjoying/welcoming the demise of his birth country because of some sick devotion to an orange oddball cսnt
Actually if you read what I wrote I am not welcoming our demise, in fact the opposite. I think Trump is bang on point when he comments on the current state of Europe.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3988
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 1160 times
Been liked: 1520 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Takashi Miike »

always find it strange, an apparent ex british citizen enjoying/welcoming the demise of his birth country because of some sick devotion to an orange oddball cսnt
User avatar
SurfaceAgentX2Zero
Posts: 878
Old WHO Number: 214126
Has liked: 160 times
Been liked: 255 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post SurfaceAgentX2Zero »

zebthecat wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 18:30
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 01:26
Mr Anon" wrote: 22 Jan 2026, 23:51
fuck me, you really going to defend that cսnt over that statement, all this "what he meant was" hand wringing is sickening 
I think you have this the wrong way round. It's you that's guessing what he meant. I'm simply repeating what he actually said. Which was that Britain avoided the front line in Afghanistan. Factually true. And not a criticism of British troops.
That is weapons grade straw clutching.
As others have said they were based in Helmand province which was one of the most dangerous places in Aghanistan and got blown up and attacked regularly. Special Forces fought behind the lines alongside US Special forces. 
He said it, meant it and it was a pack of lies.
 
 
He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.

"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."
User avatar
WHU(Exeter)
Posts: 1533
Old WHO Number: 13669
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 234 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post WHU(Exeter) »

And the US can crack on with it's being a world superpower, whilst also trying to be isonationalist at the same time.

Fuck me, even Somalialand could've worked out the two things aren't compatable in the 100 plus years, the US have battled with that toughie 
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

I think your angst is somewhat misdirected, judging by this if true, is your real problem.

Can’t blame Trump for your reality. Your future looks fucking miserable and I hate that Europe is in such a self imposed mess. Fuck the Globalists and the EU.

User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 2036
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 513 times
Been liked: 309 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post zebthecat »

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 01:26
Mr Anon" wrote: 22 Jan 2026, 23:51
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 22 Jan 2026, 23:16
 
British troops performed badly in both Iraq and Afghanistan, not because the troops were anything less than brave and utterly professional, but because they were criminally ill-equipped by Blair, Brown and Cameron. Furthermore the military leaders lacked the stones to admit this. This was well-documented at the time.

Trump's word are a criticism of the uselessness of their leaders and the leaders of other NATO nations and their continuing failure to properly fund the armed forces, not the troops.
fuck me, you really going to defend that cսnt over that statement, all this "what he meant was" hand wringing is sickening 
I think you have this the wrong way round. It's you that's guessing what he meant. I'm simply repeating what he actually said. Which was that Britain avoided the front line in Afghanistan. Factually true. And not a criticism of British troops.
That is weapons grade straw clutching.
As others have said they were based in Helmand province which was one of the most dangerous places in Aghanistan and got blown up and attacked regularly. Special Forces fought behind the lines alongside US Special forces. 
He said it, meant it and it was a pack of lies.
User avatar
One Sunny Day
Posts: 586
Has liked: 340 times
Been liked: 137 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post One Sunny Day »

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: 22 Jan 2026, 23:16
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: 22 Jan 2026, 22:21 Over 450 British, not to mention other nations, troops dying because of NATO’s  Article 5 in Afghanistan after 9/11. Yet the dementia ridden man-child appears to think that the nations that stood side by side with American troops weren’t on the ‘front line’, as the septics obviously were.
The cսnt’s fucking deluded, and I truly wish that for the memory of our, and other nations fallen, he dies a lingering death.
The cսnt has finally shown his true colour.
 
British troops performed badly in both Iraq and Afghanistan, not because the troops were anything less than brave and utterly professional, but because they were criminally ill-equipped by Blair, Brown and Cameron. Furthermore the military leaders lacked the stones to admit this. This was well-documented at the time.

Trump's word are a criticism of the uselessness of their leaders and the leaders of other NATO nations and their continuing failure to properly fund the armed forces, not the troops.
How do you know what Trump "meant?" Are you the fucking rapist whisperer, or something?
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7782
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4524 times
Been liked: 2397 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 17:17
goose wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:42
Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:19
 
Anon, you’re not a cat woman are you?

I bet Goose has got a cat.
nah i hate cats.

i bet you have diabetes and elasticated waitband jeans.
I had you pegged..
🚪🤔
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 17:17
goose wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:42
Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:19
 
Anon, you’re not a cat woman are you?

I bet Goose has got a cat.
nah i hate cats.

i bet you have diabetes and elasticated waitband jeans.
I had you pegged as owning a Ginger Cat.
You’re not embarrassed to admit it are you? I bet Anon has a couple of Cats.
Like i said, i hate cats.

I reckon you have a goldfish to go with the diabetes and elasticated jeans. Likely picked to give you a run for your money in the IQ stakes.
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:42
Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:19
Mr Anon" wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:18
TDS in full effect, little quisling weasel 
 
Anon, you’re not a cat woman are you?

I bet Goose has got a cat.
nah i hate cats.

i bet you have diabetes and elasticated waitband jeans.
I had you pegged as owning a Ginger Cat.
You’re not embarrassed to admit it are you? I bet Anon has a couple of Cats.
User avatar
WHU(Exeter)
Posts: 1533
Old WHO Number: 13669
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 234 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post WHU(Exeter) »

No need to explain Nutsin I get it.

The US is an infant country, already in terminal decline. I guess there's a limit worldwide, for the countries main two exports of stupidity and obesity.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:19
Mr Anon" wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:18
Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:05
Just as well Trump ends wars then isn’t it?
TDS in full effect, little quisling weasel 
 
Anon, you’re not a cat woman are you?

I bet Goose has got a cat.
nah i hate cats.

i bet you have diabetes and elasticated waitband jeans.
dealcanvey
Posts: 571
Old WHO Number: 212132
Has liked: 36 times
Been liked: 107 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post dealcanvey »

Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 15:51 It would appear Trumps hurty words are just too much for some.
As For the Mong who thinks if NATO collapses the European Gov’ts won’t have to pay 5% of their GDP for defense any more, I ask how you gonna defend yourself from Putin?

It’s like listening to a bunch of old housewives complain.

What a bunch of mincers!

Gotta laugh!
 
Jesus Christ Nutsack, give Putin time to take over the rest of Europe, hes currently 1400 days into his 48 hour military operation in Ukraine. 
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

WHU(Exeter) wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 16:19 You could be right about the 5% thing Nutsin, might have to raise it a lot more, if the BOSS goes full circle and starts actively supporting Putin, instead of just appeasing him.

(What is it with that relationship? I would've thought the leader of the worlds biggest stupidpower would have Putin in his pocket, rather than the other way round)

Wonder what the % of our GDP was spent towards aiding the infant nation stupidpower in Iraq and Afghanistan 

Reckon we could get a refund?
I’d try and explain it to you Exeter but O’d be wasting my time, you wouldn’t understand.

You got a cat?
Post Reply