AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1242
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 86 times
- Been liked: 251 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
-
Monsieur merde de cheval
- Posts: 2198
- Has liked: 1380 times
- Been liked: 723 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Like his uncle in 82' flying in his Meccano chopper
Yea.. fuck off you wankers...
Yea.. fuck off you wankers...
-
Monsieur merde de cheval
- Posts: 2198
- Has liked: 1380 times
- Been liked: 723 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Hello Mrs. Jones" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 01:24 Nutcheese. I suppose you back the orange buffoon's comments about NATO troops in Afghanistan? What an ill-educated cսnt.
Are you really that simple. ?
-
Monsieur merde de cheval
- Posts: 2198
- Has liked: 1380 times
- Been liked: 723 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Harry the wimp piping up proves my point.
Absolute fraud the cսnt...two tours at bastion PLAYING SOLDIER.
two tours ...?..do fuck off..it's an INSULT to mention that fuckin minge in the same breath as the likes of PTE Chris Gray .(1 RA)..
See how the mainstream media distort fings to fit their agenda..?
Absolute fraud the cսnt...two tours at bastion PLAYING SOLDIER.
two tours ...?..do fuck off..it's an INSULT to mention that fuckin minge in the same breath as the likes of PTE Chris Gray .(1 RA)..
See how the mainstream media distort fings to fit their agenda..?
-
Monsieur merde de cheval
- Posts: 2198
- Has liked: 1380 times
- Been liked: 723 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
The meltdown over Donalds comments is quite outstanding.
Even for the leftwaffe .
I served and I'm not offended in anyway whatsoever..
NO CONTEXT AS USUAL..JUST PILE ON.
he meant no disrespect to fallen British Servicemen or WRAC s..
Meanwhile the Government continue to hound veterans from the TROUBLES...and the general treatment of veterans .
NOW THAT DOES OFFEND ME
Even for the leftwaffe .
I served and I'm not offended in anyway whatsoever..
NO CONTEXT AS USUAL..JUST PILE ON.
he meant no disrespect to fallen British Servicemen or WRAC s..
Meanwhile the Government continue to hound veterans from the TROUBLES...and the general treatment of veterans .
NOW THAT DOES OFFEND ME
-
Hello Mrs. Jones
- Posts: 383
- Old WHO Number: 224273
- Has liked: 32 times
- Been liked: 66 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutcheese. I suppose you back the orange buffoon's comments about NATO troops in Afghanistan? What an ill-educated cսnt.
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 878
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 160 times
- Been liked: 255 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Hammer I am" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:43SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:58zebthecat wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:30That is weapons grade straw clutching.
As others have said they were based in Helmand province which was one of the most dangerous places in Aghanistan and got blown up and attacked regularly. Special Forces fought behind the lines alongside US Special forces.
He said it, meant it and it was a pack of lies.He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.
"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual though
What the fuck are you talking about, you illiterate oaf. It's there in black and white. The actual words, not your interpretation of a TDS summary you read in the Mirror.
And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.
And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1533
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 154 times
- Been liked: 234 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:49Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:47goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he.
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.We all know what happened, stop lying!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!Yup thought as much.
Never happened did it?
I think we all know it happened.
Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.
But thanks for the laugh!
Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.
But thanks for the laugh!
- goose
- Posts: 5949
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:47goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he.
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.We all know what happened, stop lying!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!
Yup thought as much.
Never happened did it?
I’m off to bed so you’ve got all night to post it, but we both know you won’t.
You’re lost son. Is it still a midlife crisis at 60?
Never happened did it?
I’m off to bed so you’ve got all night to post it, but we both know you won’t.
You’re lost son. Is it still a midlife crisis at 60?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he.
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.
We all know what happened, stop lying!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!
- goose
- Posts: 5949
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!Oh and while you’re at the book store pop into the pet store too, see if they’ll sell you a Cat, you cսnt!
- goose
- Posts: 5949
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:28Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:20Oh it happened. You were on here screaming sell when the market corrected last year. And I provided proof I bought the bottom. You weren’t having it. You wouldn’t be told. You thought you knew best but ended up looking like a right mug.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
You’re mental son.
Proper mental.
Not once have I told anyone to sell (or buy). As for your personal finances, I couldn’t care less. I find it so weird that you feel the need to try and prove something to a website full of anonymous strangers.It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!
Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he
.
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:28Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:20Oh it happened. You were on here screaming sell when the market corrected last year. And I provided proof I bought the bottom. You weren’t having it. You wouldn’t be told. You thought you knew best but ended up looking like a right mug.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
You’re mental son.
Proper mental.
Not once have I told anyone to sell (or buy). As for your personal finances, I couldn’t care less. I find it so weird that you feel the need to try and prove something to a website full of anonymous strangers.It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!
Oh and while you’re at the book store pop into the pet store too, see if they’ll sell you a Cat, you cսnt!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:28Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:20Oh it happened. You were on here screaming sell when the market corrected last year. And I provided proof I bought the bottom. You weren’t having it. You wouldn’t be told. You thought you knew best but ended up looking like a right mug.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
You’re mental son.
Proper mental.
Not once have I told anyone to sell (or buy). As for your personal finances, I couldn’t care less. I find it so weird that you feel the need to try and prove something to a website full of anonymous strangers.
It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!
- goose
- Posts: 5949
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:20Oh it happened. You were on here screaming sell when the market corrected last year. And I provided proof I bought the bottom. You weren’t having it. You wouldn’t be told. You thought you knew best but ended up looking like a right mug.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
You’re mental son.
Proper mental.
Not once have I told anyone to sell (or buy). As for your personal finances, I couldn’t care less. I find it so weird that you feel the need to try and prove something to a website full of anonymous strangers.
Proper mental.
Not once have I told anyone to sell (or buy). As for your personal finances, I couldn’t care less. I find it so weird that you feel the need to try and prove something to a website full of anonymous strangers.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Oh it happened. You were on here screaming sell when the market corrected last year. And I provided proof I bought the bottom. You weren’t having it. You wouldn’t be told. You thought you knew best but ended up looking like a right mug.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
Poor old Goose, sells the bottom and buys the top.
Listen to Goose if you want to lose money.
- goose
- Posts: 5949
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
This again? Classic Nutsin
I’m fine thanks without your GCSE insights.
I’m fine thanks without your GCSE insights.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yeah you keep selling the bottom and buying the top.
- goose
- Posts: 5949
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Yeh how can I compete with your GCSE
“micro & macro economics”
you do make me laugh, please never change.
“micro & macro economics”
you do make me laugh, please never change.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:01I got your business studies O-level bang on.
Whens your birthday? I’ll get you one of those idiots guides to economics![]()
I’ve forgotten more than you’ll ever know. Get back to me when you pick up a book. Mr Stagflation.
- goose
- Posts: 5949
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:57Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:54goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:44barely above 50 and still shedding jobs. take a 6 month view and its goin backwards. what a 'golden age'
obvious robust growth? obvious to you and??? anyone else? The LEI data (which is forward looking) contradicts that.
The consensus for 2026 is a "low-growth recovery" driven by data centres and defence.
I think you must have read about micro/macro economics once in GCSE business studies once and now that's you fall back when you start getting out of your depth.At least I read it once.
Do yourself a favour and catch a clue. You might just stop embarassing yourself.Fucking Stagflation, what a cսnt!
Your track record leaves a lot to be desired. Get back to me when you finally get something right. A broken clock is more useful than you.
I got your business studies O-level bang on.
Whens your birthday? I’ll get you one of those idiots guides to economics
Whens your birthday? I’ll get you one of those idiots guides to economics
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:54goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:32Actually PMI is above 50 so it’s not contracting.
Manufacturing is part of capex see Rolls Royce as just one example. There are plenty of others if you care to look.
Manufacturing is only 10% of US GDP.
Even without the obvious robust growth we will see in manufacturing in the year ahead the US GDP and therefor the US consumer and Economy are gonna do very well under Trump and Trumps policies moving forward.
You must be gutted. Like I keep saying read about the difference between Macro and micro economics then apply them to the US economy. You might just stop mugging yourself off.barely above 50 and still shedding jobs. take a 6 month view and its goin backwards. what a 'golden age'
obvious robust growth? obvious to you and??? anyone else? The LEI data (which is forward looking) contradicts that.
The consensus for 2026 is a "low-growth recovery" driven by data centres and defence.
I think you must have read about micro/macro economics once in GCSE business studies once and now that's you fall back when you start getting out of your depth.At least I read it once.
Do yourself a favour and catch a clue. You might just stop embarassing yourself.
Fucking Stagflation, what a cսnt!
Your track record leaves a lot to be desired. Get back to me when you finally get something right. A broken clock is more useful than you.
Your track record leaves a lot to be desired. Get back to me when you finally get something right. A broken clock is more useful than you.
- goose
- Posts: 5949
- Old WHO Number: 212806
- Has liked: 535 times
- Been liked: 1060 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:54goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:32Actually PMI is above 50 so it’s not contracting.
Manufacturing is part of capex see Rolls Royce as just one example. There are plenty of others if you care to look.
Manufacturing is only 10% of US GDP.
Even without the obvious robust growth we will see in manufacturing in the year ahead the US GDP and therefor the US consumer and Economy are gonna do very well under Trump and Trumps policies moving forward.
You must be gutted. Like I keep saying read about the difference between Macro and micro economics then apply them to the US economy. You might just stop mugging yourself off.barely above 50 and still shedding jobs. take a 6 month view and its goin backwards. what a 'golden age'
obvious robust growth? obvious to you and??? anyone else? The LEI data (which is forward looking) contradicts that.
The consensus for 2026 is a "low-growth recovery" driven by data centres and defence.
I think you must have read about micro/macro economics once in GCSE business studies once and now that's you fall back when you start getting out of your depth.At least I read it once.
Do yourself a favour and catch a clue. You might just stop embarassing yourself.
Yup GCSE business studies, I knew it
actually I bet it was an O-level.
actually I bet it was an O-level.
Last edited by goose on 23 Jan 2026, 21:59, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:32goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 21:18You should probably take a look at the jobs numbers - there is no growth.
Again I suggest you go back and look at the capital investment data I shared with you. It's data centres/AI driving it. Not cars, not iphones (when are those US made iphones going on sale?), not steelworks.
The manufacturing sector in the US is contracting and so is demand and this while input prices continue to rise.
Be my gust to come back every month with manufacturing PMI.Actually PMI is above 50 so it’s not contracting.
Manufacturing is part of capex see Rolls Royce as just one example. There are plenty of others if you care to look.
Manufacturing is only 10% of US GDP.
Even without the obvious robust growth we will see in manufacturing in the year ahead the US GDP and therefor the US consumer and Economy are gonna do very well under Trump and Trumps policies moving forward.
You must be gutted. Like I keep saying read about the difference between Macro and micro economics then apply them to the US economy. You might just stop mugging yourself off.barely above 50 and still shedding jobs. take a 6 month view and its goin backwards. what a 'golden age'
obvious robust growth? obvious to you and??? anyone else? The LEI data (which is forward looking) contradicts that.
The consensus for 2026 is a "low-growth recovery" driven by data centres and defence.
I think you must have read about micro/macro economics once in GCSE business studies once and now that's you fall back when you start getting out of your depth.
At least I read it once.
Do yourself a favour and catch a clue. You might just stop embarassing yourself.
Do yourself a favour and catch a clue. You might just stop embarassing yourself.