Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:54
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:38
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:32
Not true, it’s been proven less tax means more consumer spending creating more GDP a vibrant economy and stronger markets which is good for your retirement accounts. Creates the wealth mindset effect, people fell better about spending. 

Once again you show your simpleton understanding of economics.

Pick up a book you cսnt!
It’s been proven that the cost of the growth projected is far outweighed by the loss of tax revenue. $300 odd billion every year.
You were pointed to multiple well respected sources and your own congressional committee all saying the same thing.

you can shout and avoid and throw insults around but these people know what they’re talking about.
How has it been proven? It’s January ffs! This is their opinion, forecasts. Just like Stagflation and Inflation and all the others. Let’s see how much growth we get first and how much tax revenues that brings. You really have no idea. Your lack of understanding is unreal!
You think it’s an ‘opinion’??? 😂 😂 😂 

it’s the output of the most advanced technical economic models. 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:51
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:33
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:29
 
What’s interesting about the chart is if you select the 5 yr chart you’ll see that Interest rates took off in 2022, While Biden was in office, right around the time he announced his $5 trillion spending bill whilst telling us we had supply chain issues. 
 
And yet Trump has delivered more debt at a faster rate. 
And yet Interest rates are down and so is inflation, so is crime and drug death.

You know what’s up, GDP. As is Consumer sentiment and wage growth.
Up but slower than the Biden administration in ‘23 and ‘24.
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:38
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:32
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:27
But the debt grows at record levels and will grow even faster when the tax cuts land.
Good luck with that.

More debt than Biden, faster acceleration of debt and lower growth. 
Not true, it’s been proven less tax means more consumer spending creating more GDP a vibrant economy and stronger markets which is good for your retirement accounts. Creates the wealth mindset effect, people fell better about spending. 

Once again you show your simpleton understanding of economics.

Pick up a book you cսnt!
It’s been proven that the cost of the growth projected is far outweighed by the loss of tax revenue. $300 odd billion every year.
You were pointed to multiple well respected sources and your own congressional committee all saying the same thing.

you can shout and avoid and throw insults around but these people know what they’re talking about.
How has it been proven? It’s January ffs! This is their opinion, forecasts. Just like Stagflation and Inflation and all the others. Let’s see how much growth we get first and how much tax revenues that brings. You really have no idea. Your lack of understanding is unreal!
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:33
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:29
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:23
 
I never said our debt was nothing, I agree with Trump we need lower interest rates so servicing the debt is not so expensive. Rates have been dropping since Trump took office. See the 30 year fixed mortgage rate for proof or the 10 yr T-Bill, 

Here’s the 1 year chart for proof.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
 
What’s interesting about the chart is if you select the 5 yr chart you’ll see that Interest rates took off in 2022, While Biden was in office, right around the time he announced his $5 trillion spending bill whilst telling us we had supply chain issues. 
 
And yet Trump has delivered more debt at a faster rate. 
And yet Interest rates are down and so is inflation, so is crime and drug death.

You know what’s up, GDP. As is Consumer sentiment and wage growth.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:32
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:27
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:23
 
I never said our debt was nothing, I agree with Trump we need lower interest rates so servicing the debt is not so expensive. Rates have been dropping since Trump took office. See the 30 year fixed mortgage rate for proof or the 10 yr T-Bill, 

Here’s the 1 year chart for proof.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
But the debt grows at record levels and will grow even faster when the tax cuts land.
Good luck with that.

More debt than Biden, faster acceleration of debt and lower growth. 
Not true, it’s been proven less tax means more consumer spending creating more GDP a vibrant economy and stronger markets which is good for your retirement accounts. Creates the wealth mindset effect, people fell better about spending. 

Once again you show your simpleton understanding of economics.

Pick up a book you cսnt!
It’s been proven that the cost of the growth projected is far outweighed by the loss of tax revenue. $300 odd billion every year.
You were pointed to multiple well respected sources and your own congressional committee all saying the same thing.

you can shout and avoid and throw insults around but these people know what they’re talking about.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:29
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:23
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:16
 
So when you posted about GDP data why bother? It’s a nothing burger right? Just happens to be a slower growth than Biden. 
Did your GCSE teach you that GDP growth was nothing but deregulation was really important? No wonder you failed.

And that record accumulation of debt is nothing as well right?

Biden was a corpse in office but that corpse delivered more growth than your orange abuser 😂 😂 😂 
 
I never said our debt was nothing, I agree with Trump we need lower interest rates so servicing the debt is not so expensive. Rates have been dropping since Trump took office. See the 30 year fixed mortgage rate for proof or the 10 yr T-Bill, 

Here’s the 1 year chart for proof.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
 
What’s interesting about the chart is if you select the 5 yr chart you’ll see that Interest rates took off in 2022, While Biden was in office, right around the time he announced his $5 trillion spending bill whilst telling us we had supply chain issues. 
 
 
And yet Trump has delivered more debt at a faster rate. 
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:27
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:23
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:16
 
So when you posted about GDP data why bother? It’s a nothing burger right? Just happens to be a slower growth than Biden. 
Did your GCSE teach you that GDP growth was nothing but deregulation was really important? No wonder you failed.

And that record accumulation of debt is nothing as well right?

Biden was a corpse in office but that corpse delivered more growth than your orange abuser 😂 😂 😂 
 
I never said our debt was nothing, I agree with Trump we need lower interest rates so servicing the debt is not so expensive. Rates have been dropping since Trump took office. See the 30 year fixed mortgage rate for proof or the 10 yr T-Bill, 

Here’s the 1 year chart for proof.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
But the debt grows at record levels and will grow even faster when the tax cuts land.
Good luck with that.

More debt than Biden, faster acceleration of debt and lower growth. 
Not true, it’s been proven less tax means more consumer spending creating more GDP a vibrant economy and stronger markets which is good for your retirement accounts. Creates the wealth mindset effect, people fell better about spending. 

Once again you show your simpleton understanding of economics.

Pick up a book you cսnt!
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:23
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:16
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:08
What does it matter, the economy is now picking up steam, it’s what’s in front of us what counts you retard.
Markets are priced on what lies ahead. Tax cuts kick this year, Deregulation is happening at a fast clip, new technology, Trillions in new investment. Nobody cares about your silly little nothingburger negative data point. It’s not relevant! 
 
So when you posted about GDP data why bother? It’s a nothing burger right? Just happens to be a slower growth than Biden. 
Did your GCSE teach you that GDP growth was nothing but deregulation was really important? No wonder you failed.

And that record accumulation of debt is nothing as well right?

Biden was a corpse in office but that corpse delivered more growth than your orange abuser 😂 😂 😂 
 
I never said our debt was nothing, I agree with Trump we need lower interest rates so servicing the debt is not so expensive. Rates have been dropping since Trump took office. See the 30 year fixed mortgage rate for proof or the 10 yr T-Bill, 

Here’s the 1 year chart for proof.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
 
 
What’s interesting about the chart is if you select the 5 yr chart you’ll see that Interest rates took off in 2022, While Biden was in office, right around the time he announced his $5 trillion spending bill whilst telling us we had supply chain issues. 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:23
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:16
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:08
What does it matter, the economy is now picking up steam, it’s what’s in front of us what counts you retard.
Markets are priced on what lies ahead. Tax cuts kick this year, Deregulation is happening at a fast clip, new technology, Trillions in new investment. Nobody cares about your silly little nothingburger negative data point. It’s not relevant! 
 
So when you posted about GDP data why bother? It’s a nothing burger right? Just happens to be a slower growth than Biden. 
Did your GCSE teach you that GDP growth was nothing but deregulation was really important? No wonder you failed.

And that record accumulation of debt is nothing as well right?

Biden was a corpse in office but that corpse delivered more growth than your orange abuser 😂 😂 😂 
 
I never said our debt was nothing, I agree with Trump we need lower interest rates so servicing the debt is not so expensive. Rates have been dropping since Trump took office. See the 30 year fixed mortgage rate for proof or the 10 yr T-Bill, 

Here’s the 1 year chart for proof.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
But the debt grows at record levels and will grow even faster when the tax cuts land.
Good luck with that.

More debt than Biden, faster acceleration of debt and lower growth. 
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:16
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:08
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:59
Simple way to prove that big boy.
whats the full year 2025 GDP?
What does it matter, the economy is now picking up steam, it’s what’s in front of us what counts you retard.
Markets are priced on what lies ahead. Tax cuts kick this year, Deregulation is happening at a fast clip, new technology, Trillions in new investment. Nobody cares about your silly little nothingburger negative data point. It’s not relevant! 
 
So when you posted about GDP data why bother? It’s a nothing burger right? Just happens to be a slower growth than Biden. 
Did your GCSE teach you that GDP growth was nothing but deregulation was really important? No wonder you failed.

And that record accumulation of debt is nothing as well right?

Biden was a corpse in office but that corpse delivered more growth than your orange abuser 😂 😂 😂 
 
 
I never said our debt was nothing, I agree with Trump we need lower interest rates so servicing the debt is not so expensive. Rates have been dropping since Trump took office. See the 30 year fixed mortgage rate for proof or the 10 yr T-Bill, 

Here’s the 1 year chart for proof.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DGS10
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:13
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:58 5% GDP 😂 😂 

​​​ no wonder you failed that GCSE
That’s the Atlanta Fed forecast, they forecast 5.4- 5.6%. They have the reputation of having the best model for this. Those that know this follow it, markets and investors pay attention to this. It matters a whole lot more than your silly backward looking data points.

The mere fact that you don’t understand that it’s what’s in front of us that counts says it all.

Once again you are proving just how little you understand economics and markets.

It’s below GCSE grade. Did you graduate high school?
 
It’s a Q4 forecast which has been widely debunked and is driven by demand import which has fallen off a cliff. Even 5% lands a full year growth behind Biden.
LEI is the most widely used tool for forward projection, shall we talk about that?
“High school” 😂 
 
Last edited by goose on 24 Jan 2026, 16:24, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 16:08
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:59
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:56
What a load of bollocks!
Simple way to prove that big boy.
whats the full year 2025 GDP?
What does it matter, the economy is now picking up steam, it’s what’s in front of us what counts you retard.
Markets are priced on what lies ahead. Tax cuts kick this year, Deregulation is happening at a fast clip, new technology, Trillions in new investment. Nobody cares about your silly little nothingburger negative data point. It’s not relevant! 
 
 
So when you posted about GDP data why bother? It’s a nothing burger right? Just happens to be a slower growth than Biden. 
Did your GCSE teach you that GDP growth was nothing but deregulation was really important? No wonder you failed.

And that record accumulation of debt is nothing as well right?

Biden was a corpse in office but that corpse delivered more growth than your orange abuser 😂 😂 😂 
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:58 5% GDP 😂 😂 

​​​ no wonder you failed that GCSE
That’s the Atlanta Fed forecast, they forecast 5.4- 5.6%. They have the reputation of having the best model for this. Those that know this follow it, markets and investors pay attention to this. It matters a whole lot more than your silly backward looking data points.

The mere fact that you don’t understand that it’s what’s in front of us that counts says it all.

Once again you are proving just how little you understand economics and markets.

It’s below GCSE grade. Did you graduate high school?
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:59
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:56
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:53
 
Your track record is worshipping a makeup wearing abuser of woman and posting random links from Facebook which are quite often proven to be complete nonsense.

Every data point & fact you are presented you hide behind “liberal myth” and your failed GCSE business studies.

The ‘golden age’ you talk of is actually a worse jobs market than Biden, a higher national debt and faster acceleration of debt, lower manufacturing jobs and output, and most importantly slower gdp growth than 2023 and 2024 under Biden.

slower growth than Biden. What a golden age 😂 😂 😂 
What a load of bollocks!
Simple way to prove that big boy.
whats the full year 2025 GDP?
What does it matter, the economy is now picking up steam, it’s what’s in front of us what counts you retard.
Markets are priced on what lies ahead. Tax cuts kick this year, Deregulation is happening at a fast clip, new technology, Trillions in new investment. Nobody cares about your silly little nothingburger negative data point. It’s not relevant! 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:56
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:53
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:31
 
I say we because we all witnessed it. FACT!
You continually pick out negative data points that are minor details and present them like they are a bigger issue than they are.
In one breath you are playing the long game regarding Stagflation LOL. In the other you point out lagging data as disastrous such as  manufacturing output. Nobody is thick enough to not understand that Jobs and manufacturing output follows Capex, except you.

my track record speaks for itself, I’ve been dead right, while you’ve been proven to be nothing but wrong, which will continue by the way.

I’d like to say you amuse me but you constantly blowing up every thread chasing Joyo around with your childish, retarded abuse is far from entertaining. You’re just a shit bully with fuck all to offer. 
 
Your track record is worshipping a makeup wearing abuser of woman and posting random links from Facebook which are quite often proven to be complete nonsense.

Every data point & fact you are presented you hide behind “liberal myth” and your failed GCSE business studies.

The ‘golden age’ you talk of is actually a worse jobs market than Biden, a higher national debt and faster acceleration of debt, lower manufacturing jobs and output, and most importantly slower gdp growth than 2023 and 2024 under Biden.

slower growth than Biden. What a golden age 😂 😂 😂 
What a load of bollocks!
Simple way to prove that big boy.
whats the full year 2025 GDP?
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

5% GDP 😂 😂 

​​​ no wonder you failed that GCSE
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:53
Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:31
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 08:06
We? No just you.
You get presented with clear data & facts from your own government or renowned experts, your response is always ‘liberal myth’ or GCSE business studies. Although I’m reasonably certain you failed it.

You don’t have a point, you just post random links from Facebook.

Like I said, you’re 60 years old, still working and you have some desperate need for validation of your life from anonymous strangers. Your (late) midlife crisis brings me amusement every day 👏🏻
 
I say we because we all witnessed it. FACT!
You continually pick out negative data points that are minor details and present them like they are a bigger issue than they are.
In one breath you are playing the long game regarding Stagflation LOL. In the other you point out lagging data as disastrous such as  manufacturing output. Nobody is thick enough to not understand that Jobs and manufacturing output follows Capex, except you.

my track record speaks for itself, I’ve been dead right, while you’ve been proven to be nothing but wrong, which will continue by the way.

I’d like to say you amuse me but you constantly blowing up every thread chasing Joyo around with your childish, retarded abuse is far from entertaining. You’re just a shit bully with fuck all to offer. 
 
Your track record is worshipping a makeup wearing abuser of woman and posting random links from Facebook which are quite often proven to be complete nonsense.

Every data point & fact you are presented you hide behind “liberal myth” and your failed GCSE business studies.

The ‘golden age’ you talk of is actually a worse jobs market than Biden, a higher national debt and faster acceleration of debt, lower manufacturing jobs and output, and most importantly slower gdp growth than 2023 and 2024 under Biden.

slower growth than Biden. What a golden age 😂 😂 😂 
What a load of bollocks!
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5953
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 535 times
Been liked: 1061 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Nutsin wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:31
goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 08:06
Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 22:58
I think we all know it happened.

Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.


But thanks for the laugh!
We? No just you.
You get presented with clear data & facts from your own government or renowned experts, your response is always ‘liberal myth’ or GCSE business studies. Although I’m reasonably certain you failed it.

You don’t have a point, you just post random links from Facebook.

Like I said, you’re 60 years old, still working and you have some desperate need for validation of your life from anonymous strangers. Your (late) midlife crisis brings me amusement every day 👏🏻
 
I say we because we all witnessed it. FACT!
You continually pick out negative data points that are minor details and present them like they are a bigger issue than they are.
In one breath you are playing the long game regarding Stagflation LOL. In the other you point out lagging data as disastrous such as  manufacturing output. Nobody is thick enough to not understand that Jobs and manufacturing output follows Capex, except you.

my track record speaks for itself, I’ve been dead right, while you’ve been proven to be nothing but wrong, which will continue by the way.

I’d like to say you amuse me but you constantly blowing up every thread chasing Joyo around with your childish, retarded abuse is far from entertaining. You’re just a shit bully with fuck all to offer. 
 
 
Your track record is worshipping a makeup wearing abuser of woman and posting random links from Facebook which are quite often proven to be complete nonsense.

Every data point & fact you are presented you hide behind “liberal myth” and your failed GCSE business studies.

The ‘golden age’ you talk of is actually a worse jobs market than Biden, a higher national debt and faster acceleration of debt, lower manufacturing jobs and output, and most importantly slower gdp growth than 2023 and 2024 under Biden.

slower growth than Biden. What a golden age 😂 😂 😂 
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Hello Mrs. Jones" wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 05:00 Nutjob. Is there nothing the retard in the Whire House can do or say that you would criticize? Y



 
 
 
Hello Jones, you again.

I don’t get caught up in the lefts constant theatrics about Trump. We all know the left are gonna throw their toys out of their pram every chance they get. So Iignore their bullshit, perhaps you’d be better served if you did too.

Here’s what I do pay attention to.
A secure border. Something Biden couldn’t do, Was he rally that useless?

Crime rates plummeting and Drug overdoses plummeting too. Wonder why that is? Could it be Trumps policies perhaps?

Massive fraud being used to fund Democratics campaigns, see Minnesotta.

Irans nuclear program being obliterated.
Maduro and his hateful regime being decapitated, the Venezuelans like that too.

The end of Wokism , no more men in women’s sports, tax cuts, less regulation, 5% GDP, cheaper oil, gasoline prices, the ending of 8 wars, the Abraham accords and a better model for the Middle East, much better than any Democrat has ever offered. America first and common sense policy on Immigration. A fully funded military and peace rough strength. A fully funded NATO and a better protected Arctic circle.The fall of the evil Iranian regime and the end of Communist Cuba. I could go on.

So what’s your point?
Hammer I am
Posts: 395
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 96 times
Been liked: 96 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

nychammer wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 15:19 Nazi, Facist, Communist, Stalinist  -  all 'dramatic' labels thrown by one side against the other. 



 
add libtards to that, fancy being threatened by a bunch of mungbean eating, low iron, bluehaired fops
Nutsin
Posts: 3250
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 226 times
Been liked: 389 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

goose wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 08:06
Nutsin wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 22:58
goose wrote: 23 Jan 2026, 22:49
Yup thought as much. 
Never happened did it?
I think we all know it happened.

Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.


But thanks for the laugh!
We? No just you.
You get presented with clear data & facts from your own government or renowned experts, your response is always ‘liberal myth’ or GCSE business studies. Although I’m reasonably certain you failed it.

You don’t have a point, you just post random links from Facebook.

Like I said, you’re 60 years old, still working and you have some desperate need for validation of your life from anonymous strangers. Your (late) midlife crisis brings me amusement every day 👏🏻
 
 
I say we because we all witnessed it. FACT!
You continually pick out negative data points that are minor details and present them like they are a bigger issue than they are.
In one breath you are playing the long game regarding Stagflation LOL. In the other you point out lagging data as disastrous such as  manufacturing output. Nobody is thick enough to not understand that Jobs and manufacturing output follows Capex, except you.

my track record speaks for itself, I’ve been dead right, while you’ve been proven to be nothing but wrong, which will continue by the way.

I’d like to say you amuse me but you constantly blowing up every thread chasing Joyo around with your childish, retarded abuse is far from entertaining. You’re just a shit bully with fuck all to offer. 
nychammer
Posts: 2140
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 320 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post nychammer »

Nazi, Facist, Communist, Stalinist  -  all 'dramatic' labels thrown by one side against the other. 


 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5298
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 725 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Fauxstralian wrote: 24 Jan 2026, 10:56 The rise of Nigel has been good as it’s outed all the Tories who thought their party didn’t goose step enough
A bit like how Trump has rallied the inner fascist of Republicans 
 
A bit like how Trump has rallied the inner fascist wealth creators of Republicans .

There. Adjusted it to align more with the reality of the world we all live in, not your sixth-form debating forum ideal world,
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4298
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

The rise of Nigel has been good as it’s outed all the Tories who thought their party didn’t goose step enough
A bit like how Trump has rallied the inner fascist of Republicans 
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 2123
Has liked: 563 times
Been liked: 896 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

I'd rather have Nigel than Keir Stalin.
Post Reply