Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 1242
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 86 times
Been liked: 251 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7763
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4516 times
Been liked: 2391 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 18:41
Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 17:11
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:53
Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?
 
It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years
It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.


What whataboutery is about is that it's about what something else is about. 🤨
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 17:14
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:59
Fauxstralian wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?





 
Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?
Was the protest at Capitol Hill Peaceful or an incitement to violence then? plenty of guns on display there
Well if we ever get to the bottom of that one and find out what Ray Epps and the hundreds of FBI assest were really up to I'll let you know.

But you carry on with the endless whataboutery.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

only1billybonds wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 17:48
So much of the recent unrest In Minneapolis is a result of who is in the White House.
So politically motivated violence, like terrorism?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 17:11
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:53
Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:18
And what about assault rifles?
Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?
 
It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years
It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

The point I've made which your so keen to dance around but not touch is why he felt the need to take a specialised firearm to a "peaceful" protest. I never said a laser sight was " too much" I said it changes the nature of why the weapon is carried.

As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care. 
Mr Anon
Posts: 819
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 197 times
Been liked: 225 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

Nutsin wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 17:27
Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 17:18 Amusing that the NRA and hardline republicans have pushed back against trumps claim  that guns have no place at a protest. you agree with open carry or even closed laws or not? Some of you can't seem to decide
I agree with all of the above, however you need to use a little common sense with such a responsibility, don’t you agree?
 
 
Maybe we're both agreeing here, I don't believe any guns of any sort should be carried by civilians at a protest
only1billybonds
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 638 times
Been liked: 953 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post only1billybonds »

Attention should be drawn to Nurse's post at 15.09.

Under Obama, 51 civilians died at the hands of ICE agents. These same agents received nothing but applause from the left wing media/establishment.

Obama deported more than 8 million people during his two terms.

Obama pinned a madal on Tom Homan, the Trump appointed border czar. Homan is now seen as a menace to the public.

So much of the recent unrest In Minneapolis is a result of who is in the White House.
Nutsin
Posts: 3245
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 225 times
Been liked: 388 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 17:18 Amusing that the NRA and hardline republicans have pushed back against trumps claim  that guns have no place at a protest. you agree with open carry or even closed laws or not? Some of you can't seem to decide
I agree with all of the above, however you need to use a little common sense with such a responsibility, don’t you agree?
Mr Anon
Posts: 819
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 197 times
Been liked: 225 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

Amusing that the NRA and hardline republicans have pushed back against trumps claim  that guns have no place at a protest. you agree with open carry or even closed laws or not? Some of you can't seem to decide
Mr Anon
Posts: 819
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 197 times
Been liked: 225 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:59
Fauxstralian wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?




 
Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?
Was the protest at Capitol Hill Peaceful or an incitement to violence then? plenty of guns on display there
Mr Anon
Posts: 819
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 197 times
Been liked: 225 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:53
Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:18
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 14:32
 
A pistol carried for self defence is likely to be used purely as a deterrent or at reasonably close range.

A laser sighted pistol implies a completely different intent and the presumption of needing to be very accurate at a longer range.
And what about assault rifles?
Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?
 
 
It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 7763
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 4516 times
Been liked: 2391 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Massive Attack »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:59
Fauxstralian wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?







 
Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?

Totally normal behaviour. Especially for an intensive Nurse.. *Looks nervously over in Nurse Ratcheds direction* 

Geezer was half expecting a shoot-out when in the close vicinity of ICE agents. Thick as mince prat fucked about and found out, as they say. 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Fauxstralian wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?



 
Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 15:18
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 14:32
Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 12:45
What's the issue with a laser sight? if you had to use one why wouldn't you want to shoot straight? 
 
A pistol carried for self defence is likely to be used purely as a deterrent or at reasonably close range.

A laser sighted pistol implies a completely different intent and the presumption of needing to be very accurate at a longer range.
And what about assault rifles?
Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?
Mr Anon
Posts: 819
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 197 times
Been liked: 225 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 14:32
Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 12:45
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 12:33
Why would you take a firearm to a vigil/protest?

And not just a regular run of the mill concealled carry straight out of the box one but one which is laser sighted...
What's the issue with a laser sight? if you had to use one why wouldn't you want to shoot straight? 
 
A pistol carried for self defence is likely to be used purely as a deterrent or at reasonably close range.

A laser sighted pistol implies a completely different intent and the presumption of needing to be very accurate at a longer range.
And what about assault rifles?
Fauxstralian
Posts: 4295
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 73 times
Been liked: 604 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Fauxstralian »

Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?
Someone should tell the NRA that they are being undermined by Republicans 
Man up you soft cock commies

Not aware of Obama sending untrained masked gunmen onto the streets to shoot people dead during the course of identifying and removing illegals

 
Nutsin
Posts: 3245
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 225 times
Been liked: 388 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

The Governor Tim Walz spoke with Trump about ICE and what’s happened and Trump told him that he will be happy to reduce ICE numbers if the police co-operate amd hand over the criminals instead of letting them back out on the street. 
Trump is not going to allow the Sancguary city madness to continue.
As for Walz he’s probably trying to negotiate a pardon for his involvement in all the fraud that’s been going on where there are whistleblowers and evidence verifying he knew it was happening but allowed it because it funded the Dem party.

the Dems are rotten to the core.
 
User avatar
Nurse Ratched
Posts: 1195
Old WHO Number: 18642
Has liked: 689 times
Been liked: 669 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nurse Ratched »

Bottom line, if Saint Barak of Obama was driving these deportations of illegals, no one would care. 
Pub Bigot
Posts: 882
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 1155 times
Been liked: 429 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Pub Bigot »

More slave trade nonsense

£1.1 mill for a vanity project? Constantly harping on about the slave trade never the work done to stop it. 

If they want to build a memorial, do it for those who lost their lives stopping human trafficking, and shame the African chieftains who sold their own people. 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 14:13 I don't have an issue with how they remove offending illegals, don't have an issue with targeted arrests full stop, it's more their routine "check ins" of places of work and rounding up of working illegals that all feels a little "where are your papers?" and wearing masks and balaclavas is reinforcing that image.

 
That's entirely the point, they don't have papers because they're, duh, fucking illegals.

And the masks and balaclavas wouldn't be necessary if they and their families weren't at risk of being doxed by scumny commies.
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 12:45
THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 12:33
Fauxstralian wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 11:45 Yes, Trump did say the bloke murdered shouldn’t have been carrying a legal gun in a holster which was taken off him
I guess he is finally coming round to the idea that citizens walking round with guns is insane 
Maybe that’s progress … or a bit more dementia 
Why would you take a firearm to a vigil/protest?

And not just a regular run of the mill concealled carry straight out of the box one but one which is laser sighted...
What's the issue with a laser sight? if you had to use one why wouldn't you want to shoot straight? 
 
 
A pistol carried for self defence is likely to be used purely as a deterrent or at reasonably close range.

A laser sighted pistol implies a completely different intent and the presumption of needing to be very accurate at a longer range.
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Council Scum »

THUNDERCLINT wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 14:28
Fauxstralian wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 12:54 As an American who are entitled to carry a legal weapon to the grocery store, a protest, a Charlie Kirk rally, a President Trump rally, a child care centre, a school or a football match
Anyone who says otherwise is un American , a soft cock liberal commie and should be rounded up and deported. Or shot in the back by the ICE Gestapo
But why would you feel the need to take a laser sighted firearm to a protest?

If it's all tolerant soy fed commies on a jollytheys outing why would you even think "I know I'd better take my laser sighted Sig Sauer 9mm?"
I mean, he was a nurse, wouldn't he be taking a first aid kit to help. 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 1512
Been liked: 366 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

Fauxstralian wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 12:54 As an American who are entitled to carry a legal weapon to the grocery store, a protest, a Charlie Kirk rally, a President Trump rally, a child care centre, a school or a football match
Anyone who says otherwise is un American , a soft cock liberal commie and should be rounded up and deported. Or shot in the back by the ICE Gestapo
But why would you feel the need to take a laser sighted firearm to a protest?

If it's all tolerant soy fed commies on a jollytheys outing why would you even think "I know I'd better take my laser sighted Sig Sauer 9mm?"
Council Scum
Posts: 736
Old WHO Number: 19891
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 267 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Council Scum »

Mr Anon" wrote: 28 Jan 2026, 14:13 I don't have an issue with how they remove offending illegals, don't have an issue with targeted arrests full stop, it's more their routine "check ins" of places of work and rounding up of working illegals that all feels a little "where are your papers?" and wearing masks and balaclavas is reinforcing that image.

It's one step away from checkpoints and national ID cards that nearly everyone here is dead against 
Easier to find someone when you know exactly where they are going to be isn't it?

Turn up at the house and they aren't there, you won't ever find them again. 
Post Reply