Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Ings

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
northbankboy68
Posts: 271
Old WHO Number: 17239
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 32 times

Ings

Post northbankboy68 »

"Last week the Birmingham Post carried an article in which the Udai Emrie, listed his best 10 decisions since becoming Villa's coach. First in the list was ""selling Ings"". How on earth did we fall for this? Mubama MUST start on Saturday. Let Ings earn his corn against the Serbian no hopers on Thursday."
Willtell
Posts: 720
Old WHO Number: 224238

Re: Ings

Post Willtell »

In all fairness Vexed you did call this one right at the time. But even a broken clock is right twice a day...
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Ings

Post Vexed »

"Yesterday's quiz question : Which poster coughed up this gem: 'has scored at this level for years. Good signing if it happens."" None other than site Amoeba and Moyes fluffer Twoleftfeet. What a fucking lunch. Another Ings quiz question later!"
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 966
Old WHO Number: 251573
Has liked: 83 times
Been liked: 240 times

Re: Ings

Post Iron Duke »

We could make a YouTube montage of him playing for Burnley and Villa. They wouldn’t know the difference
pdbis
Posts: 170
Old WHO Number: 212174

Re: Ings

Post pdbis »

I wonder ifSaudis would take Ings for a knockdown price?
Willtell
Posts: 720
Old WHO Number: 224238

Re: Ings

Post Willtell »

I buried Maddie right in the middle of your sick mind y’a perv…
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Ings

Post Vexed »

Interesting that you've pretty much outed yourself there Willtell but for once it wasn't your usual shit clueless football opinions interspersed with weird sex offender stories you usually shit up this board with. Tell us where you've buried Maddie you beast.
Willtell
Posts: 720
Old WHO Number: 224238

Re: Ings

Post Willtell »

Good of you to own up to your growing list of failed forecasts Vexed. It doesn’t rank with Declan Rice being a CB in midfield mind…
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4397
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Ings

Post goose »

If it was me i'm retiring my username.
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Ings

Post Vexed »

"""he has scored at this level for years. Good signing if it happens."" Name the poster."
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3089
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 443 times

Re: Ings

Post Lee Trundle »

"I was against his wages and his contract length. Many were just simply happy we were at last signing a striker. He was Sullivan's signing, so Moyes shouldn't be seen as a baddie for him joining. But it will be Moyes's decision to play him."
Eerie Descent
Posts: 705
Old WHO Number: 270194
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Ings

Post Eerie Descent »

"I was one of those that questioned why we were signing a striker that was slow, and not much of a physical presence, when it's been blindingly fucking obvious that we cannot function as a team with someone quick and physical up front. However, even I'll admit that I still thought he'd contribute regular enough goals along the way. Fuck me what a disaster."
chedylan 2
Posts: 39
Old WHO Number: 224564

Re: Ings

Post chedylan 2 »

"agreed, he needs to go on the first day, i hope the club are looking at potential clubs now. we still need a replacement for scamaca, but ings wont be missed at all even with no antonio and the african players off."
ludo21
Posts: 561
Old WHO Number: 240355
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Ings

Post ludo21 »

"Ings is shit and he should be out the moment the window opens. Instead we will trot out the old 'we can't let him go until we get a replacement in' line, and we will be stuck with him as 20 mins at the end of the window won't be enough time to get rid. I wouldn't give Ings one second on the bench let alone the pitch."
paul6565
Posts: 136
Old WHO Number: 249107

Re: Ings

Post paul6565 »

He is utter gash and up there with one of the worst signings ever made.
swindon hammer
Posts: 294
Old WHO Number: 214286

Re: Ings

Post swindon hammer »

TBF that’s the only positive of the deal that we gave him a 2.5 year contract rather than a 3 or 4 year one. I still think there will be clubs down the bottom that will desperate in January and take him on. Even if It’s just a loan.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Ings

Post Manuel »

"BRANDED - Well he won't be learning anything from Moyes, we can be sure of that."
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 966
Old WHO Number: 251573
Has liked: 83 times
Been liked: 240 times

Re: Ings

Post Iron Duke »

"We were in quite a bit of trouble last January, so it seemed a decent signing at the time. I wasn’t so bothered about the £15m fee, but £125k a week for 30 months was excessive. That’s another £16m on top. But I suppose we were desperate at the time. Unfortunately he doesn’t fit into Moyes’s system and Moyes is not flexible enough to adapt his system. Now it seems his legs have also gone, so we’re stuck with an expensive flop."
swindon hammer
Posts: 294
Old WHO Number: 214286

Re: Ings

Post swindon hammer »

Have to admit I was one of those that thought he was a decent signing when we signed him (Albeit I thought we overpaid). At the time I also said he would have been the perfect signing the previous January when we were desperate for another striker to help Antonio. It’s been a disappointment.
User avatar
BRANDED
Posts: 1706
Location: London
Old WHO Number: 209826
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Ings

Post BRANDED »

Just as well we‚Äôve got Divin Lets hope Ings is passing on some of his knowledge to the young lad. ?üò±?üò±?üò±
chedylan 2
Posts: 39
Old WHO Number: 224564

Re: Ings

Post chedylan 2 »

"its soon coming up to a year since we signed Danny the goal machine Ings, I will admit I was not unhappy at the signing at the time. I thought we paid too much but given our situation, was a welcome addition. I also stupidly believed he would be used in a front 2 with Antonio. fast forward 11 months and the only notable things, are discovering his outrageous salary and him sewing his arse hair into his scalp."
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Ings

Post Vexed »

"Willtell 11:06 Tue Nov 28 You must be minted then, you inverse Midas cսnt"
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Ings

Post Vexed »

"Willtell 11:06 Tue Nov 28 You must be minted then, you inverse Midas cսnt"
Vexed
Posts: 890
Old WHO Number: 240179
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 93 times

Re: Ings

Post Vexed »

"It has been reported recently that Ings is not on 125k a week. If he's on twenty quid a week he should give fifteen of it back, the fuckin waster."
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4397
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Ings

Post goose »

which teams did Yarmalenko rip apart?
Willtell
Posts: 720
Old WHO Number: 224238

Re: Ings

Post Willtell »

I’ve seen it said that Ings was a “gift” for Moyes from Sullivan. But so we’re Downes and Vlassic and they didn’t play anywhere near as much. I can only assume it was actually a Moyes buy and he keeps hoping Ings will justify his joining WH…
Post Reply