West Ham Online

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

The US sends a fleet to the Persian Gulf to stop Iran murdering protesters, meanwhile back in the US they execute protesters.

Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑26 Jan 2026, 23:10 after seven kids, you'd have to be hung like a shire horse to touch the sides.

that and the desperate dan lantern jaw, it's a big NO for me.

WHU(Exeter) wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 00:08 Nutsin - 28 Jan 2026 21:46

Cheers for the update. Good to hear how all these developing countries around the world are doing.

Anyone got the the shipping forecast?



 

WHU(Exeter) wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 00:08 Nutsin - 28 Jan 2026 21:46

Cheers for the update. Good to hear how all these developing countries around the world are doing.

Anyone got the the shipping forecast?



 

 

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 00:14

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:57

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:32

 

going around in circles at this point, as others have said why were assault rifles taken to previous protests? I think all guns should be banned, what do you think?

 

Yet again avoid the point at all costs.

Why did he feel the need to take a pistol to a peaceful protest?

And but MAGA did it isn't an answer.

As for guns, they are nothing more than inanimate objects incapable of causing harm without input from an operator, I could list many everyday objects that also fit that description.

If someone means to do harm they'll find away whether guns are available or not. 

Banning them doesn't get rid of them as they quite ubiquitous even where banned, and fairly simple to improvise.

You say you "think all guns should be banned" but you that's probably not true because I doubt you've ever actually thought about it you've just been conditioned to accept it as fact.







 

contradiction then isnt it, didn't matter if he took a gun or a spoon, fairly simply to improvise 

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:57

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:32

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:27

What difference does it make? It's completely irrelevant to the point y'all seem to be going out of your way to avoid.

Why did he feel the need to take a modified sidearm to a (peaceful) protest?

 

going around in circles at this point, as others have said why were assault rifles taken to previous protests? I think all guns should be banned, what do you think?

 

Yet again avoid the point at all costs.

Why did he feel the need to take a pistol to a peaceful protest?

And but MAGA did it isn't an answer.

As for guns, they are nothing more than inanimate objects incapable of causing harm without input from an operator, I could list many everyday objects that also fit that description.

If someone means to do harm they'll find away whether guns are available or not. 

Banning them doesn't get rid of them as they quite ubiquitous even where banned, and fairly simple to improvise.

You say you "think all guns should be banned" but you that's probably not true because I doubt you've ever actually thought about it you've just been conditioned to accept it as fact.







 

Nutsin - 28 Jan 2026 21:46

Cheers for the update. Good to hear how all these developing countries around the world are doing.

Anyone got the the shipping forecast?

 

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:32

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:27

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:10

so you do care there then? you pro guns free carry etc or not?

What difference does it make? It's completely irrelevant to the point y'all seem to be going out of your way to avoid.

Why did he feel the need to take a modified sidearm to a (peaceful) protest?

 

going around in circles at this point, as others have said why were assault rifles taken to previous protests? I think all guns should be banned, what do you think?

 

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:27

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:10

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 20:07

Someone need to go to sarcasm detection school...

so you do care there then? you pro guns free carry etc or not?

What difference does it make? It's completely irrelevant to the point y'all seem to be going out of your way to avoid.

Why did he feel the need to take a modified sidearm to a (peaceful) protest?

 

Nutsin wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 21:46 It’s becoming glaringly obvious that the NGO scam is the playbook they all use to rip off the tax payer.

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 23:10

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 20:07

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 19:34

"As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care". 

yeah that's the attitude I'm saying is mental

Someone need to go to sarcasm detection school...

so you do care there then? you pro guns free carry etc or not?

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 20:07

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 19:34

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

The point I've made which your so keen to dance around but not touch is why he felt the need to take a specialised firearm to a "peaceful" protest. I never said a laser sight was " too much" I said it changes the nature of why the weapon is carried.

As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care. 

"As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care". 

yeah that's the attitude I'm saying is mental

Someone need to go to sarcasm detection school...

This typifies just how incompetent these Dems are.

The victims of the big fires that burned down Altadena and Pacific Palisades, (two extremely beautiful and wealthy areas in Los Angeles) are still waiting on building permits more than a year after the fires.

Governor Gavin Newsome who has his eye on running for President in 2028 has been absolutely horrific in this disaster. 

So Trump announced that he is taking over and will provide immediate building permits and offer a 10% square footage bonus for those that want it. The increase in Sq Footage adds value for those that don’t know. Without Trump getting involved who knows how long these people will wait.

Truly shocking Governance. It really is beyond belief just how bad Newsome is.
Also the Feds are about to investigate fraud in the state too as Billions have disappeared for a speed rail project linking so cal to Nor cal, Billions have gone missing for the Homeless too. Don’t be surprised if the missing Billions were filtered through NGO’s. It’s becoming glaringly obvious that the NGO scam is the playbook they all use to rip off the tax payer.

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 19:34

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

The point I've made which your so keen to dance around but not touch is why he felt the need to take a specialised firearm to a "peaceful" protest. I never said a laser sight was " too much" I said it changes the nature of why the weapon is carried.

As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care. 

"As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care". 

yeah that's the attitude I'm saying is mental

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:53

Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

The point I've made which your so keen to dance around but not touch is why he felt the need to take a specialised firearm to a "peaceful" protest. I never said a laser sight was " too much" I said it changes the nature of why the weapon is carried.

As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care. 

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:52

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

What whataboutery is about is that it's about what something else is about.

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:59

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:06

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:59

Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?

Geezer was half expecting a shoot-out when in the close vicinity of ICE agents. Thick as mince prat fucked about and found out, as they say. 

I think Bill Hick's may have spoken the defining words on matters such as this when he very eloquently said; "He's an idiot. He's dead. Good! We lost a moron? Fucking celebrate. There's one less moron in the World".

Nutsin wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 19:00

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

The point I've made which your so keen to dance around but not touch is why he felt the need to take a specialised firearm to a "peaceful" protest. I never said a laser sight was " too much" I said it changes the nature of why the weapon is carried.

As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care. 

 

What you will find is Anon and the other libs on here can only post messages of criticism of Trump but have very little else to offer on any debate about anything. Probably because all the Libs have very little to offer by way of policy that make sense.

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:53

Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

The point I've made which your so keen to dance around but not touch is why he felt the need to take a specialised firearm to a "peaceful" protest. I never said a laser sight was " too much" I said it changes the nature of why the weapon is carried.

As for firearms in public I really couldn't care less, go fucking nuts, legalise stinger missles. I don't care. 

 

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:06

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:59

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?









 

Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?

Geezer was half expecting a shoot-out when in the close vicinity of ICE agents. Thick as mince prat fucked about and found out, as they say. 

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:41

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:53

Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

It's not whataboutery when you start a question with "And what about... " in order to deflect rather than answer the point

You clown, that's exactly what whataboutery is.

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:14

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:59

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:15 Is there a restriction on the type of gun someone should be allowed to carry now?





 

Never said there was or should be. 

The point you're contorting yourself to dodge is why take one to a  (peaceful) protest?

Was the protest at Capitol Hill Peaceful or an incitement to violence then? plenty of guns on display there

only1billybonds wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:48
So much of the recent unrest In Minneapolis is a result of who is in the White House.

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:11

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:53

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 15:18

And what about assault rifles?

Ah, whataboutery...let's deal with this prick first shall we?

Why did he need a laser sighted sidearm at a, I'm guessing the intent was peaceful, protest?

 

It's not whataboutary, should have preempted you saying something so idiotic, I haven't changed the point, talking about a different class of gun within the same frame of reference is not whataboutary, it's a valid point. Do you have a problem with guns of any class being allowed in public or what? I mentioned assault rifles as suddenly you feel a laser sight is too much, when people have been openly carrying AR-15s in MAGA protests for the last couple of years

Nutsin wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:27

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 17:18 Amusing that the NRA and hardline republicans have pushed back against trumps claim  that guns have no place at a protest. you agree with open carry or even closed laws or not? Some of you can't seem to decide

I agree with all of the above, however you need to use a little common sense with such a responsibility, don’t you agree?