AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Potter Out
-
- Posts: 770
- Been liked: 186 times
Potter Out
Had enough of this arogrant no mark now.
11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.
Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
11 games, 27% win ratio and 0.66 goals per game.
Either the break clause is true or this flake quits otherwise were proper fucked.
-
- Posts: 231
- Old WHO Number: 319145
- Has liked: 193 times
- Been liked: 115 times
Re: Potter Out
Antonio, Fullkrug, Summerville have been out for the whole of his tenure, and Bowen for half of that time. Kudas and Paqueta have gone off the boil. Basically our entire forward line has been injured and those that aren't are shit out of form.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 137 times
- Been liked: 438 times
Re: Potter Out
Anyone who rolls out the old ''what do you expect'' line is a bit of a retard Im afraid.
You know that big thing with a crossbar, two posts and a net?? It's called a goal, and the object of football is to put the fucking ball into it. That's what I'd expect from a PL football side. We're just about the lowest scorers and chance creators in the league since this pansy rocked up.
You know that big thing with a crossbar, two posts and a net?? It's called a goal, and the object of football is to put the fucking ball into it. That's what I'd expect from a PL football side. We're just about the lowest scorers and chance creators in the league since this pansy rocked up.
Re: Potter Out
What does anybody expect
Surely the first thing and most important thing to expect is for him to get better results than the bloke he replaced, he hasn't, in fact I believe since he arrived we're bottom of the league for shots on goal and chances created...
I'm not saying I want him sacked but I am saying so far he's done a fucking shit job.. Hopefully in the future it will be better...
Surely the first thing and most important thing to expect is for him to get better results than the bloke he replaced, he hasn't, in fact I believe since he arrived we're bottom of the league for shots on goal and chances created...
I'm not saying I want him sacked but I am saying so far he's done a fucking shit job.. Hopefully in the future it will be better...
-
- Posts: 353
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 662 times
- Been liked: 123 times
Re: Potter Out
He's doing what he can with a disjointed aging squad of players with a lack of pace and mobility. The half decent players have been frequently injured or unfit.
I knew it was going to be a bit drab when he took over but take a long hard look at what he's working with. What does anybody expect? Yes, a fortune was spent in the summer but as usual it was very badly spent.
Hopefully things will look better after the summer. I do think Potts and Earthly might step up but let's see how things go. I haven't written off Luis Guillerme either.
Our club is badly run on the playing staff side but who's that down to? We all know the answer. It always comes full circle.
I knew it was going to be a bit drab when he took over but take a long hard look at what he's working with. What does anybody expect? Yes, a fortune was spent in the summer but as usual it was very badly spent.
Hopefully things will look better after the summer. I do think Potts and Earthly might step up but let's see how things go. I haven't written off Luis Guillerme either.
Our club is badly run on the playing staff side but who's that down to? We all know the answer. It always comes full circle.
Re: Potter Out
stubbo wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 20:01 Good article this from Jacob S.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/20 ... -lopetegui
"a club as excitable as West Ham" 
-
- Posts: 241
- Has liked: 312 times
- Been liked: 91 times
Re: Potter Out
IL judge potter when he has his own players through the door. He realises the clubs main problem is having 12 players aged over 30 . Until then he deserves patience.
Re: Potter Out
I think Potter being safe/boring/limp wristed etc etc would buy players that fit into regular team formations. Not some incomprehensible moyesball system that worked a treat for a season and a half, with a limited pool of suitable players. Or jlop who just spent £40m on the only person in the world that didnt hate him, and his slow spanish mates.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 137 times
- Been liked: 438 times
Re: Potter Out
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 15:01No, I'm not saying that. Just that there should be a longer term plan in mind. If the board aren't sure who or what type of manager comes in next then they ought to be careful of the players they bring in now, rather than just whoever Potter decides he wants.
Say he wants to spend a lot of money on an attacking left wing back (which he probably will) and say he picks one who's great for that role but would be completely useless as a full back or inverted winger under most managers, then that signing will be yet another albatross who'll be sat on the bench on big wages or sold for half his value.
Of course, the same sort of thing is true of every manager, but especially so if the manager wants to play an unusual formation or has a "unique" style of play. And it's even more true if the manager will almost certainly be sacked next autumn/winter unless things change massively from what we've seen so far under him.
Fair points. Based on nothing more than gut feeling I think we are going to be bringing in some good players this summer and getting rid of a lot of dross including the dad's army who are out of contract. Mildly optimistic we are going to have a much better side come August. I've knocked Potter myself and haven't been that impressed, like most, but at the same time don't think he's a total charlatan and happy to see what he comes up with.
- Keep dreaming
- Posts: 1386
- Location: here and there, mostly here
- Old WHO Number: 225644
- Has liked: 478 times
- Been liked: 231 times
Re: Potter Out
I'm confident that Potter will take up a notch from what we have endures the last 5 years.
I'm also confident he will contribute to bring in players with a general higher standard that what we have brought in lately.
ATS always a gamble with managers and players, but what is the alternative to stick and give him some time to give it a go? Something in between will always be a fuck up!
I'm also confident he will contribute to bring in players with a general higher standard that what we have brought in lately.
ATS always a gamble with managers and players, but what is the alternative to stick and give him some time to give it a go? Something in between will always be a fuck up!
-
- Posts: 347
- Has liked: 39 times
- Been liked: 148 times
Re: Potter Out
No, I'm not saying that. Just that there should be a longer term plan in mind. If the board aren't sure who or what type of manager comes in next then they ought to be careful of the players they bring in now, rather than just whoever Potter decides he wants.
Say he wants to spend a lot of money on an attacking left wing back (which he probably will) and say he picks one who's great for that role but would be completely useless as a full back or inverted winger under most managers, then that signing will be yet another albatross who'll be sat on the bench on big wages or sold for half his value.
Of course, the same sort of thing is true of every manager, but especially so if the manager wants to play an unusual formation or has a "unique" style of play. And it's even more true if the manager will almost certainly be sacked next autumn/winter unless things change massively from what we've seen so far under him.
Say he wants to spend a lot of money on an attacking left wing back (which he probably will) and say he picks one who's great for that role but would be completely useless as a full back or inverted winger under most managers, then that signing will be yet another albatross who'll be sat on the bench on big wages or sold for half his value.
Of course, the same sort of thing is true of every manager, but especially so if the manager wants to play an unusual formation or has a "unique" style of play. And it's even more true if the manager will almost certainly be sacked next autumn/winter unless things change massively from what we've seen so far under him.
-
- Posts: 537
- Has liked: 85 times
- Been liked: 169 times
Re: Potter Out
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 13:05 This whole thing about "give him time" and "bring in the players he wants" is all very well, but if he brings in a bunch of players who fit in his preferred formation and style what happens when he inevitably gets the sack?
His preferred setup is the 343 box, which means attacking wingbacks/wingers playing on their "normal" side, 2 CDMs and 2 CAMs. There'll be no place for inverted wingers like Bowen so he'll probably carry on his dismal form under Potter if he's not sold.
This is all fine if there's a succession plan in place where the next manager will play a similar setup (eg Amorim) but does anyone really believe that's the case? More likely we'll end up with a manager who favours the much more typical 4231/433 and then we'll have another big squad rebuild on our hands.
There would be a plan but unfortunately it’s the same one Sullivan always goes for, an out of work manager on the cheap who once managed a big club. That’s all he cares about.
Also not helped by a fan base that are in complete denial about how bad Potter really is, and want to give him as much time as possible not because they truly believe in him but because they don’t want us to come across as a joke club who keeps sacking managers, when in reality we are a joke club cos we’re run so badly that all of this could of been avoided twice if the cսnt in charge would just pay to release one of the several great managers who currently work in the premier league at clubs that aren’t any bigger than West Ham and we could realistically get.
Also not helped by a fan base that are in complete denial about how bad Potter really is, and want to give him as much time as possible not because they truly believe in him but because they don’t want us to come across as a joke club who keeps sacking managers, when in reality we are a joke club cos we’re run so badly that all of this could of been avoided twice if the cսnt in charge would just pay to release one of the several great managers who currently work in the premier league at clubs that aren’t any bigger than West Ham and we could realistically get.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 137 times
- Been liked: 438 times
Re: Potter Out
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 13:05 This whole thing about "give him time" and "bring in the players he wants" is all very well, but if he brings in a bunch of players who fit in his preferred formation and style what happens when he inevitably gets the sack?
His preferred setup is the 343 box, which means attacking wingbacks/wingers playing on their "normal" side, 2 CDMs and 2 CAMs. There'll be no place for inverted wingers like Bowen so he'll probably carry on his dismal form under Potter if he's not sold.
This is all fine if there's a succession plan in place where the next manager will play a similar setup (eg Amorim) but does anyone really believe that's the case? More likely we'll end up with a manager who favours the much more typical 4231/433 and then we'll have another big squad rebuild on our hands.
So what do you suggest we do then? Don't buy anyone?
-
- Posts: 347
- Has liked: 39 times
- Been liked: 148 times
Re: Potter Out
This whole thing about "give him time" and "bring in the players he wants" is all very well, but if he brings in a bunch of players who fit in his preferred formation and style what happens when he inevitably gets the sack?
His preferred setup is the 343 box, which means attacking wingbacks/wingers playing on their "normal" side, 2 CDMs and 2 CAMs. There'll be no place for inverted wingers like Bowen so he'll probably carry on his dismal form under Potter if he's not sold.
This is all fine if there's a succession plan in place where the next manager will play a similar setup (eg Amorim) but does anyone really believe that's the case? More likely we'll end up with a manager who favours the much more typical 4231/433 and then we'll have another big squad rebuild on our hands.
His preferred setup is the 343 box, which means attacking wingbacks/wingers playing on their "normal" side, 2 CDMs and 2 CAMs. There'll be no place for inverted wingers like Bowen so he'll probably carry on his dismal form under Potter if he's not sold.
This is all fine if there's a succession plan in place where the next manager will play a similar setup (eg Amorim) but does anyone really believe that's the case? More likely we'll end up with a manager who favours the much more typical 4231/433 and then we'll have another big squad rebuild on our hands.
-
- Posts: 770
- Been liked: 186 times
Re: Potter Out
Manuel wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 17:17LeroysBoots wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 15:35 His comment today that Fullkrug will be assessed, fuck off you miserable twat. He is again setting us up to play a containing game with no focal point in attack. I'm sick to death of him wedging people in positions alien to themYep, he has been saying this same thing in his pre match pressers for weeks now, about Ferguson too. I'm beginning to really dislike this limp wristed cսnt. You can just imagine him going home after training and doing the washing up and peeling the potato's.
While his missus is upstairs getting reamed by Todd Boehly and Karen Brady is pegging him.
-
- Posts: 1145
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 402 times
- Been liked: 412 times
Re: Potter Out
Manuel wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 17:17LeroysBoots wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 15:35 His comment today that Fullkrug will be assessed, fuck off you miserable twat. He is again setting us up to play a containing game with no focal point in attack. I'm sick to death of him wedging people in positions alien to themYep, he has been saying this same thing in his pre match pressers for weeks now, about Ferguson too. I'm beginning to really dislike this limp wristed cսnt. You can just imagine him going home after training and doing the washing up and peeling the potato's.
You are right. Not sure if you recall a few weeks ago I said after losing to Newcastle at home that he was starting to come across as a bit of a loser. I said he does seem quite comfortable with a loss and rolls out the standard patter about balance, making good decisions, being best versions of ourselves.... I mean, I get it, I know he's not going to stand there and go "Look, I am struggling, the squad is shit and the boys were shit" but it just all seems a little bit namby pamby for me.... A bit too comfortable. As you said 'limp wristed'.
Not sure he has it in him to call a player out for being lazy or shit. Not sure he's got a bollocking in him. I know he certainly won't be kicking football boots at players heads.
Very tough situation all round. Has he shown enough to convince us he is the right man? Not for me. But has he been dealt a bad hand? Yes. I know we keep saying it, but he does need time. He needs a window and a pre-season. The real judgement from me will come at Christmas. I think that will be enough time for him to integrate his new signings and start to show what his methods are and how productive / efficient they are.
And before you shoot me down again about Christmas, I would say obviously that is if we are having a good to average season - If we are struggling from the off then its doubtful he will make October.
Not sure he has it in him to call a player out for being lazy or shit. Not sure he's got a bollocking in him. I know he certainly won't be kicking football boots at players heads.
Very tough situation all round. Has he shown enough to convince us he is the right man? Not for me. But has he been dealt a bad hand? Yes. I know we keep saying it, but he does need time. He needs a window and a pre-season. The real judgement from me will come at Christmas. I think that will be enough time for him to integrate his new signings and start to show what his methods are and how productive / efficient they are.
And before you shoot me down again about Christmas, I would say obviously that is if we are having a good to average season - If we are struggling from the off then its doubtful he will make October.
-
- Posts: 2115
- Old WHO Number: 10221
- Has liked: 142 times
- Been liked: 47 times
Re: Potter Out
Judge him by results…
…and quality of football…
Not impressed so far…
Poor man’s Southgate…
…and quality of football…
Not impressed so far…
Poor man’s Southgate…
-
- Posts: 353
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 662 times
- Been liked: 123 times
Re: Potter Out
Manuel wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 17:10eusebiovic wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 16:57 Just imagine if we were a properly run club with genuine ambition and shrewd acquisition in the transfer market.
This summer we could get free of charge
Jonathan Tah (Leverkusen)
Tyrick Mitchell (Palace)
Angel Gomes (Lille)
Jonathan David (Lille)
Then you could probably sign Delap from Ipswich or Cherki from Lyon or Etikte from Frankfurt - players we were constantly linked with at a cheaper price for the best part of two fuckin' years.
Still, I'm enjoying a nice pint in The Blue Maid on Borough High Street so it could be worse.Yea, all the ''properly run clubs with genuine ambition'' are going to snap up all of them players, it's so frustrating!
Why don't you apply for Steitden's job instead of posting bollocks and getting yourself all excited from a pub on a Friday afternoon and be our saviour. Bless.
Sorry Manny, Have the Orelly men arrived yet?
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 3121
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 124 times
- Been liked: 739 times
Re: Potter Out
He has been very cautious with bringing players back after injury. Todibo hasn't done the full 90 yet has he?
I'm torn. I want to see Fullkrug start on Sunday because he's clearly the best striker at the club and we are better with him for a number of reasons with and without the ball, but what's the point if he's likely to get injured again? We all saw what happened against Villa. Especially in a match with such a low likely return. I would rather see him get at Southampton and spurs if it came down to it.
Ferguson can do one though. Bloke has brought nothing whatsoever to the table since he's been here. Looked utterly piss poor every time when he's come on. Don't care if he doesn't get another minute. We're almost better off playing the extra midfielder than him. Something odd going on with that bloke.
I'm torn. I want to see Fullkrug start on Sunday because he's clearly the best striker at the club and we are better with him for a number of reasons with and without the ball, but what's the point if he's likely to get injured again? We all saw what happened against Villa. Especially in a match with such a low likely return. I would rather see him get at Southampton and spurs if it came down to it.
Ferguson can do one though. Bloke has brought nothing whatsoever to the table since he's been here. Looked utterly piss poor every time when he's come on. Don't care if he doesn't get another minute. We're almost better off playing the extra midfielder than him. Something odd going on with that bloke.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 137 times
- Been liked: 438 times
Re: Potter Out
LeroysBoots wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 15:35 His comment today that Fullkrug will be assessed, fuck off you miserable twat. He is again setting us up to play a containing game with no focal point in attack. I'm sick to death of him wedging people in positions alien to them
Yep, he has been saying this same thing in his pre match pressers for weeks now, about Ferguson too. I'm beginning to really dislike this limp wristed cսnt. You can just imagine him going home after training and doing the washing up and peeling the potato's.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 137 times
- Been liked: 438 times
Re: Potter Out
eusebiovic wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 16:57 Just imagine if we were a properly run club with genuine ambition and shrewd acquisition in the transfer market.
This summer we could get free of charge
Jonathan Tah (Leverkusen)
Tyrick Mitchell (Palace)
Angel Gomes (Lille)
Jonathan David (Lille)
Then you could probably sign Delap from Ipswich or Cherki from Lyon or Etikte from Frankfurt - players we were constantly linked with at a cheaper price for the best part of two fuckin' years.
Still, I'm enjoying a nice pint in The Blue Maid on Borough High Street so it could be worse.
Yea, all the ''properly run clubs with genuine ambition'' are going to snap up all of them players, it's so frustrating!
Why don't you apply for Steitden's job instead of posting bollocks and getting yourself all excited from a pub on a Friday afternoon and be our saviour. Bless.
Why don't you apply for Steitden's job instead of posting bollocks and getting yourself all excited from a pub on a Friday afternoon and be our saviour. Bless.
-
- Posts: 353
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 662 times
- Been liked: 123 times
Re: Potter Out
Just imagine if we were a properly run club with genuine ambition and shrewd acquisition in the transfer market.
This summer we could get free of charge
Jonathan Tah (Leverkusen)
Tyrick Mitchell (Palace)
Angel Gomes (Lille)
Jonathan David (Lille)
Then you could probably sign Delap from Ipswich or Cherki from Lyon or Etikte from Frankfurt - players we were constantly linked with at a cheaper price for the best part of two fuckin' years.
Still, I'm enjoying a nice pint in The Blue Maid on Borough High Street so it could be worse.
This summer we could get free of charge
Jonathan Tah (Leverkusen)
Tyrick Mitchell (Palace)
Angel Gomes (Lille)
Jonathan David (Lille)
Then you could probably sign Delap from Ipswich or Cherki from Lyon or Etikte from Frankfurt - players we were constantly linked with at a cheaper price for the best part of two fuckin' years.
Still, I'm enjoying a nice pint in The Blue Maid on Borough High Street so it could be worse.
-
- Posts: 347
- Has liked: 39 times
- Been liked: 148 times
Re: Potter Out
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 14:47 I was watching a documentary about Jurgen Klopps last season at Liverpool and it showed how his career started as a player etc etc but what was interesting was that he joined mid season and the results were indifferent and the supporters were calling for his head but he was given time to mould the side into HIS side and he got rid of a lot of the Brendan Rogers players.
We need to give Potter time.
Ridiculous comparison really. The season Klopp took over they showed a clear improvement as a team and in their style of play. They might have only climbed a couple of positions up the table, but he also got them to the finals of the League cup and Europe League. If Scouse fans wanted rid it's probably because the arrogant pricks thought they should be winning everything, despite only finishing 6th-8th every season but one during the 6 years before Klopp came on board, and only being cup finalists one year out of the previous 8.
We, on the other hand, have not improved at all really. We've actually gone down the table, winning less, scoring less. A bit more pressing; a lot more defending; a lot less shots on goal; slower, drearier football...
We, on the other hand, have not improved at all really. We've actually gone down the table, winning less, scoring less. A bit more pressing; a lot more defending; a lot less shots on goal; slower, drearier football...
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4473
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 517 times
Re: Potter Out
LeroysBoots wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 15:35 His comment today that Fullkrug will be assessed, fuck off you miserable twat. He is again setting us up to play a containing game with no focal point in attack. I'm sick to death of him wedging people in positions alien to them
..."wedging people in positions alien to them ".
Hasn't every manager since we were saved from certain administration done exactly that?
There's a common management level thread running through that time-line but I just can't put my finger on it.
Hasn't every manager since we were saved from certain administration done exactly that?
There's a common management level thread running through that time-line but I just can't put my finger on it.