AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
New Kits
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 4858
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 2769 times
- Been liked: 1362 times
Re: New Kits
Tomshardware wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025, 09:03 12 million a year is neither here nor there in terms of a premier league finances. The club would have got far more respect from fans if they had put the Bobby Moore charity on the shirts.
As a fan, I'd agree. But then you waive your right to moan about any wages or fees that £12million might have covered. So actually, I'd say that this is not only a good deal but factoring in the possibility of being relegated, whilst showing a concerning lack of ambition, shows a foresight in business matters that we rarely see from this board.
Re: New Kits
Huffers wrote: ↑29 Jun 2025, 05:33 Barcelona never had a sponsor on their shirt and the fans were not accepting of the idea of having one.
Eventually they put unicef on there to make it look like they were doing a good thing and no fans can argue with it.
Then of course, once fans were used to a logo on their shirts, an actual sponsor can be brought in.
If I were you, Huffers, I'd keep away from discussions about shirts. You're a disgrace to the club.
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 838
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 259 times
- Been liked: 124 times
Re: New Kits
12 million a year is neither here nor there in terms of a premier league finances. The club would have got far more respect from fans if they had put the Bobby Moore charity on the shirts.
-
- Posts: 50
- Location: Gravesend
- Old WHO Number: 17848
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 3 times
- Contact:
Re: New Kits
Barcelona never had a sponsor on their shirt and the fans were not accepting of the idea of having one.
Eventually they put unicef on there to make it look like they were doing a good thing and no fans can argue with it.
Then of course, once fans were used to a logo on their shirts, an actual sponsor can be brought in.
Eventually they put unicef on there to make it look like they were doing a good thing and no fans can argue with it.
Then of course, once fans were used to a logo on their shirts, an actual sponsor can be brought in.
-
- Posts: 1630
- Has liked: 1099 times
- Been liked: 543 times
Re: New Kits
Gank wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 19:20On The Ball" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 17:23 NO, these aren't the kits - this is someone doing a mock-up based on third-hand descriptions so don't take them as gospel.
That said - they're not far off. The ecru one is incredibly popular and one that's long been demanded to return. The home is obviously awful and lacks blue, but the entire kit was previously completely claret - so be grateful that that got changed.
The Club were excited that Betway was ending a year before the ban as it got them out ahead of the rest of the pack in the hunt for a non-gambling sponsor. So presumably Boyle have offered a lot more than anyone else to lose that advantage.....It's £12.5million for this season, ending if we stay up. If we go down it's a further two years at £9.2million with a severance clause if we go straight back up
There's no betting firm ban in the Championship.
Excellent point about the championship
-
- Posts: 1630
- Has liked: 1099 times
- Been liked: 543 times
Re: New Kits
stubbo-admin wrote: ↑27 Jun 2025, 19:09 Newsflash...it's not Kappa....but in my opinion they look shite.
Anyway, supposedly these are very very close to what the actual kits look like.
Mock up kits are accurate.jpeg
Hate the claret socks. Looks like a Burnley kit.
I like the away shirt.
WHU at home should always be white shorts and white socks imo...but each to their own
WHU at home should always be white shorts and white socks imo...but each to their own
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1347
- Has liked: 338 times
- Been liked: 550 times
Re: New Kits
Charities don't pay I mean I dunno how Barcelona went for years using UNICEF as their shirt sponsor?
Re: New Kits
On The Ball" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 17:23 NO, these aren't the kits - this is someone doing a mock-up based on third-hand descriptions so don't take them as gospel.
That said - they're not far off. The ecru one is incredibly popular and one that's long been demanded to return. The home is obviously awful and lacks blue, but the entire kit was previously completely claret - so be grateful that that got changed.
The Club were excited that Betway was ending a year before the ban as it got them out ahead of the rest of the pack in the hunt for a non-gambling sponsor. So presumably Boyle have offered a lot more than anyone else to lose that advantage.....
It's £12.5million for this season, ending if we stay up. If we go down it's a further two years at £9.2million with a severance clause if we go straight back up
There's no betting firm ban in the Championship.
There's no betting firm ban in the Championship.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4463
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 515 times
Re: New Kits
Tomshardware wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 16:53El Scorchio" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 10:21Mex Martillo" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 06:39 I thought the idea was not to be sponsored by a betting company? Isn't there a ban probably coming in?
Not a lot of blue in that shirt.This is the last year I think. Betway expired so we just signed for one season with Boylesports IIRCShame the club didn't do something decent like offer a charity to have their logo on the shirt for a year.
Tiny Wanker Appreciated Talents Society would be the only charity Sullivan would support.
-
- Posts: 427
- Old WHO Number: 14382
- Has liked: 150 times
- Been liked: 41 times
Re: New Kits
TomshardwareShame the club didn't do something decent like offer a charity to have their logo on the shirt for a year.
Everybody point at Toms and laugh!
Charity? THEM?!? Dream on
Charity? THEM?!? Dream on

-
- Posts: 427
- Old WHO Number: 14382
- Has liked: 150 times
- Been liked: 41 times
Re: New Kits
NO, these aren't the kits - this is someone doing a mock-up based on third-hand descriptions so don't take them as gospel.
That said - they're not far off. The ecru one is incredibly popular and one that's long been demanded to return. The home is obviously awful and lacks blue, but the entire kit was previously completely claret - so be grateful that that got changed.
The Club were excited that Betway was ending a year before the ban as it got them out ahead of the rest of the pack in the hunt for a non-gambling sponsor. So presumably Boyle have offered a lot more than anyone else to lose that advantage.....
That said - they're not far off. The ecru one is incredibly popular and one that's long been demanded to return. The home is obviously awful and lacks blue, but the entire kit was previously completely claret - so be grateful that that got changed.
The Club were excited that Betway was ending a year before the ban as it got them out ahead of the rest of the pack in the hunt for a non-gambling sponsor. So presumably Boyle have offered a lot more than anyone else to lose that advantage.....
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 838
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 259 times
- Been liked: 124 times
Re: New Kits
El Scorchio" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 10:21Mex Martillo" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 06:39 I thought the idea was not to be sponsored by a betting company? Isn't there a ban probably coming in?
Not a lot of blue in that shirt.This is the last year I think. Betway expired so we just signed for one season with Boylesports IIRC
Shame the club didn't do something decent like offer a charity to have their logo on the shirt for a year.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 3117
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 124 times
- Been liked: 739 times
Re: New Kits
Mex Martillo" wrote: ↑28 Jun 2025, 06:39 I thought the idea was not to be sponsored by a betting company? Isn't there a ban probably coming in?
Not a lot of blue in that shirt.
This is the last year I think. Betway expired so we just signed for one season with Boylesports IIRC
- Keep dreaming
- Posts: 1385
- Location: here and there, mostly here
- Old WHO Number: 225644
- Has liked: 478 times
- Been liked: 230 times
Re: New Kits
If we strengthen our squad, plays well with energy and entertainment, and maybe win something - i would love this kit.
Re: New Kits
I don’t mind the away. I liked the 90’s ecru kit.
The home is awful. It’s very simple to just keep it claret, blue sleeves, white shorts and socks.
I used to like when we alternated light blue, white, navy away kits.
The home is awful. It’s very simple to just keep it claret, blue sleeves, white shorts and socks.
I used to like when we alternated light blue, white, navy away kits.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4463
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 515 times
Re: New Kits
Is the general edict from the club "Make us look as 2-bob as you can, in any way you can"?
- Mex Martillo
- Posts: 1595
- Location: Catalonia
- Old WHO Number: 11796
- Has liked: 187 times
- Been liked: 204 times
Re: New Kits
I thought the idea was not to be sponsored by a betting company? Isn't there a ban probably coming in?
Not a lot of blue in that shirt.
Not a lot of blue in that shirt.
-
- Posts: 1854
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 160 times
- Been liked: 329 times
Re: New Kits
I dont mind the home kit, well apart from "Boyle Sport" written on it
who the fuck are they?
The away kit though, WTF is that load of old shit? looks a right dogs dinner with them socks an all
The away kit though, WTF is that load of old shit? looks a right dogs dinner with them socks an all
-
- Posts: 104
- Old WHO Number: 210470
- Has liked: 14 times
- Been liked: 38 times
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 1621
- Has liked: 168 times
- Been liked: 273 times