West Ham Online

zebthecat wrote: ↑30 May 2025, 13:52 It is not wrong - it is UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) and that is used on most servers.

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑30 May 2025, 11:47

wils wrote: ↑30 May 2025, 11:11 Summoned to court to defend himself against a rape charge and he chose to dress like this.

It looks like he attacked himself in the back of the car on the way there.

wils wrote: ↑30 May 2025, 11:11 Summoned to court to defend himself against a rape charge and he chose to dress like this.

wils wrote: ↑30 May 2025, 11:11 Summoned to court to defend himself against a rape charge and he chose to dress like this.


 

XKhammer wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 13:55

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑10 Apr 2025, 09:28 Not defending him or stabbing him repeatedly with a pitchfork here, but if a woman freely consents to do something when pissed which she would never do when sober, who is responsible?

I'm not saying (any of) these women were under the influence at the time either, before you start turning your pitchforks on me - even if some of the alleged abuse occurred in the workplace, alcohol ot other substances could be involved.

I've often woken up next to a "fuck!-did-I-drink-that-much-last-night?" minger, accepted I got it wrong and we went our separate ways. I've no doubt several women felt the same way waking up next to me over the years.

Non-consensual sex IS wrong (and illegal) in most of the west (although there are a few imported cultures within which a marriage is regarded as blanket consent); the issue is, "When does initial, freely given consent become non-consent?".

I've often woken up next to a "fuck!-did-I-drink-that-much-last-night?" minger, accepted I got it wrong and we went our separate ways. I've no doubt several women felt the same way waking up next to me over the years.

Thought you only went with brasses
Are you really that minging that they have to be pissed to go with you 

Manuel wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 10:21

Bungo wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 10:02

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 03:28

So he's banged to tights in your world ?
I skimmed  over your perfectly constructed bollocks with APLOMB..

That's OK. There are many shorter and simpler posts available which I am sure will be much more to your taste.

I wouldn't bother replying to this weird cսnt, he spams up every thread with pointless drivel. Probably a smack head.

Hammer I am" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 20:58

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 18:30

Her final words are "I'm so disappointed". Not really most people's choice of words if they've just been raped, is
it?

Perhaps he was rubbish?

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 18:30

Her final words are "I'm so disappointed". Not really most people's choice of words if they've just been raped, is
it?

Alfs wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 17:24

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 14:48

In the end that text is basically listening in on the middle of a conversation without knowing what's gone on before or after. You can read whatever you want into that text, and there really isn't any evidence for what you read into it. 

What?!  It's pretty obvious to me what went on.  She said no, he ignored her protestation and fucked her without a condom.

Alfs wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 17:24

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 14:48

In the end that text is basically listening in on the middle of a conversation without knowing what's gone on before or after. You can read whatever you want into that text, and there really isn't any evidence for what you read into it. 

What?!  It's pretty obvious to me what went on.  She said no, he ignored her protestation and fucked her without a condom.

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 14:48

In the end that text is basically listening in on the middle of a conversation without knowing what's gone on before or after. You can read whatever you want into that text, and there really isn't any evidence for what you read into it. 

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 13:41

I would agree if it wasn't for her saying 'the last time" so the no condom thing related to that, the rest wold imply it happened again.in  a different case entirely 

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑10 Apr 2025, 09:28 Not defending him or stabbing him repeatedly with a pitchfork here, but if a woman freely consents to do something when pissed which she would never do when sober, who is responsible?

I'm not saying (any of) these women were under the influence at the time either, before you start turning your pitchforks on me - even if some of the alleged abuse occurred in the workplace, alcohol ot other substances could be involved.

I've often woken up next to a "fuck!-did-I-drink-that-much-last-night?" minger, accepted I got it wrong and we went our separate ways. I've no doubt several women felt the same way waking up next to me over the years.

Non-consensual sex IS wrong (and illegal) in most of the west (although there are a few imported cultures within which a marriage is regarded as blanket consent); the issue is, "When does initial, freely given consent become non-consent?".

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑10 Apr 2025, 15:40

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑09 Apr 2025, 20:25 I assume that anyone defending him hasn't read the public record texts where a clearly upset woman tells him he want too far, he scared her, and when a woman says no it means no, his response was to apologise and make it up to her with "love and kindness"

What you wrote, and the part of that tweet that was visible made it look really bad. Then I clicked the link and read the whole thing, where it's clear that she's not talking about him forcing himself on her. It reads like she consented to sex but that she wanted him to use a condom and he didn't. So she was (rightly) scared of catching a STD.

Bungo wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 10:02

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 03:28

Bungo wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 11:13 The key common element to all of these types of story whether it be alleged criminal activity or even ‘just’ being a sex pest, is coercion.

The story over and over again is of the powerful ‘star’ who uses their position to manipulate those less powerful 

So he's banged to tights in your world ?
I skimmed  over your perfectly constructed bollocks with APLOMB..

That's OK. There are many shorter and simpler posts available which I am sure will be much more to your taste.

Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑12 Apr 2025, 03:28

Bungo wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 11:13 The key common element to all of these types of story whether it be alleged criminal activity or even ‘just’ being a sex pest, is coercion.

The story over and over again is of the powerful ‘star’ who uses their position to manipulate those less powerful 

So he's banged to tights in your world ?
I skimmed  over your perfectly constructed bollocks with APLOMB..

Bungo wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 11:13 The key common element to all of these types of story whether it be alleged criminal activity or even ‘just’ being a sex pest, is coercion.

The story over and over again is of the powerful ‘star’ who uses their position to manipulate those less powerful who are often rightly worried about how standing-up for themselves will affect both their current and future employment.

Few are permanently employed, most going from one freelance job to another, without any of the HR protections that permanent employment affords. This is clearly why it takes so long for many of the allegations to emerge. How the victims behave in these circumstances should really not be judged as if they had truly free and logical choice as their decisions are influenced by factors other than simple right or wrong.

Any consent given should only be viewed as real consent if not given under coercion.

Bungo wrote: ↑11 Apr 2025, 11:13 The key common element to all of these types of story whether it be alleged criminal activity or even ‘just’ being a sex pest, is coercion.

The story over and over again is of the powerful ‘star’ who uses their position to manipulate those less powerful who are often rightly worried about how standing-up for themselves will affect both their current and future employment.

Few are permanently employed, most going from one freelance job to another, without any of the HR protections that permanent employment affords. This is clearly why it takes so long for many of the allegations to emerge. How the victims behave in these circumstances should really not be judged as if they had truly free and logical choice as their decisions are influenced by factors other than simple right or wrong.

Any consent given should only be viewed as real consent if not given under coercion.