AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Iran v Israel
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Iran v Israel
Israel struck Iran last night.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑21 Jun 2025, 14:11 Get Mike ‘Terry Waite’ over to Trump Gaza to offer his words of wisdom with some Sunny Mann goggles on. Wanker
U S B 2 Bombers bombed 3 Iranian Nuclear
plants!
So US is now involved.
So US is now involved.
-
- Posts: 91
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 19 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Get Mike ‘Terry Waite’ over to Trump Gaza to offer his words of wisdom with some Sunny Mann goggles on. Wanker
-
- Posts: 77
- Location: Caribbean Island 🌞
- Old WHO Number: 265443
- Has liked: 400 times
- Been liked: 15 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Big difference though between firing indiscriminately at civilians & aimed targeting of rocket launchers cynically hidden underneath or within schools &
hospitals .
hospitals .
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3347
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 883 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 15:20 You believe everything Israel says? The very first casualty in war, is the truth.
And do you believe everything Hamas says? I have no strong opinion on it until all the facts come out, so keeping an open mind on it. Especially when it comes to Hamas more than Israel.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 984
- Has liked: 274 times
- Been liked: 422 times
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3347
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 883 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 14:32 I've got no favouritism either way in the two sides but I did find it highly ironic that when one of Iran's missiles hit an Israeli hospital they were all saying war crime, war crime and yet that's what the Israelis have been doing to the hospitals in Gaza pretty much at will.
It could well be war crimes committed. Israel claim that Hamas have military operations situated in and around a lot of hospital sites, so the evidence at some point will need to be proved by Israel.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 984
- Has liked: 274 times
- Been liked: 422 times
Re: Iran v Israel
I've got no favouritism either way in the two sides but I did find it highly ironic that when one of Iran's missiles hit an Israeli hospital they were all saying war crime, war crime and yet that's what the Israelis have been doing to the hospitals in Gaza pretty much at will.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 13:24 The thing with taking out the Iran regime is it'll severely effect and weaken all the proxy shit going on in the region as it's them that funds, arms and trains up the terrorist groups of Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas with also links to the Taliban/Al-quaeda which has been so destructive to the region for so long.
Cutting the head off the snake that's caused so much shit down the years seems too good an opportunity to turn up now, as well as fucking up their nuclear capabilites.
Now Israel has gone this far, they may as well just snuff the chief raghead and as many of his henchman as possible so the people can finally rise up.
Could be the wrong move and there's a better way of going about it all but that's the way I see it, so in for a penny..
the baby killers can't do it on their own, so they're running to trump.
melts.
melts.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3347
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 883 times
Re: Iran v Israel
The thing with taking out the Iran regime is it'll severely effect and weaken all the proxy shit going on in the region as it's them that funds, arms and trains up the terrorist groups of Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas with also links to the Taliban/Al-quaeda which has been so destructive to the region for so long.
Cutting the head off the snake that's caused so much shit down the years seems too good an opportunity to turn up now, as well as fucking up their nuclear capabilites.
Now Israel has gone this far, they may as well just snuff the chief raghead and as many of his henchman as possible so the people can finally rise up.
Could be the wrong move and there's a better way of going about it all but that's the way I see it, so in for a penny..
Cutting the head off the snake that's caused so much shit down the years seems too good an opportunity to turn up now, as well as fucking up their nuclear capabilites.
Now Israel has gone this far, they may as well just snuff the chief raghead and as many of his henchman as possible so the people can finally rise up.
Could be the wrong move and there's a better way of going about it all but that's the way I see it, so in for a penny..
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3084
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 438 times
Re: Iran v Israel
I wouldn't want to stick up for either of these sides, but I find it REALLY incredible that people are willing to throw their support behind Iran in all this, well the ones that live in the West anyway.
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 12:27 Mike - i’d like to stick those crayons in your eyes and nose and smash your head against a table you boring cսnt.
Simple rag rhetoric - why launch a nuke when you know it will be responded to and you will be wiped out - doesn't make sense.
But you rather believe the yanks who always speak the truth…. They had no luck going down holes in ‘Nam and Afghanistan so let’s see if they can take out the big Iranian hole and further destabilise the region.
why blow yourself up with a suicide vest, stop trying to apply logic to fanatics
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3957
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 393 times
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 12:27 Mike - i’d like to stick those crayons in your eyes and nose and smash your head against a table you boring cսnt.
Simple rag rhetoric - why launch a nuke when you know it will be responded to and you will be wiped out - doesn't make sense.
But you rather believe the yanks who always speak the truth…. They had no luck going down holes in ‘Nam and Afghanistan so let’s see if they can take out the big Iranian hole and further destabilise the region.
I've already pointed out that the religious rag-heads (as YOU call them) don't give a fig if them attacking Israel results in the total obliteration of their own country and society as their belief convinces them that they (but, strangely enough, not their perceived enemy) will rise, like a phoenix from the ashes, to dominate the world.
Everybody becomes a martyr for them in such a scenario.
You can't beat beliefs.
Everybody becomes a martyr for them in such a scenario.
You can't beat beliefs.
-
- Posts: 91
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 19 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Mike - i’d like to stick those crayons in your eyes and nose and smash your head against a table you boring cսnt.
Simple rag rhetoric - why launch a nuke when you know it will be responded to and you will be wiped out - doesn't make sense.
But you rather believe the yanks who always speak the truth…. They had no luck going down holes in ‘Nam and Afghanistan so let’s see if they can take out the big Iranian hole and further destabilise the region.
Simple rag rhetoric - why launch a nuke when you know it will be responded to and you will be wiped out - doesn't make sense.
But you rather believe the yanks who always speak the truth…. They had no luck going down holes in ‘Nam and Afghanistan so let’s see if they can take out the big Iranian hole and further destabilise the region.
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1312
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 75 times
- Been liked: 127 times
Re: Iran v Israel
If only there could've been an agreement in place whereas Iran was sticking to agreed upon levels, which were being ratified by the ICEA regularly.
oh...
oh...
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3957
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 393 times
Re: Iran v Israel
My understanding is that Iran already possess enough Uranium to a sufficient purity to meet it's civilian nuclear power requirements, so there is no commercial need or requirement to improve on that purity.
So why do it?
Or why be coy on whether or not you're doing it?
Given the massive oil/gas revenue Iran generates each year, spending so much on a product you don't need nor have any use for still makes no sense whatsoever.
So the question is: "Do they actually have a (planned) use for Uranium at that higher level of purity?
Even if the chance of them purifying enough to make a viable atom bomb is minuscule, it's not zero, so there IS such a possibility.
Given that is the case, then a potential impact assessment (in addition to the prior risk assessment) needs to be undertaken.
Anyone care to guess what the impact is of an atom bomb being dropped on Israel? Could fuck up your holidays in the Med for centuries to come, for one. How big a bucket of cսnt is that?
So why do it?
Or why be coy on whether or not you're doing it?
Given the massive oil/gas revenue Iran generates each year, spending so much on a product you don't need nor have any use for still makes no sense whatsoever.
So the question is: "Do they actually have a (planned) use for Uranium at that higher level of purity?
Even if the chance of them purifying enough to make a viable atom bomb is minuscule, it's not zero, so there IS such a possibility.
Given that is the case, then a potential impact assessment (in addition to the prior risk assessment) needs to be undertaken.
Anyone care to guess what the impact is of an atom bomb being dropped on Israel? Could fuck up your holidays in the Med for centuries to come, for one. How big a bucket of cսnt is that?
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1312
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 75 times
- Been liked: 127 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Faux, totally disagree with that, it’s the other way round.
There were ongoing discussions between the US and Iran to find a way to restart the JCPOA, which had been agreed years before with the US, European countries and Iran. Any negotiations like that are bound to have big sticking points but the dialogue was still ongoing.
only one country didn’t like that and here we are now.
Israel is the tail wagging the dog, and they should’ve just cut to the chase with all this and gone to war with Iran two years ago.
There were ongoing discussions between the US and Iran to find a way to restart the JCPOA, which had been agreed years before with the US, European countries and Iran. Any negotiations like that are bound to have big sticking points but the dialogue was still ongoing.
only one country didn’t like that and here we are now.
Israel is the tail wagging the dog, and they should’ve just cut to the chase with all this and gone to war with Iran two years ago.
Re: Iran v Israel
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 09:13 The Americans have wanted to take out Iran for years if not decades
Didnt want to make a first strike but think was the plan all along… get Israel to start a skirmish & then insist Iran surrender. When they don’t pile in with their bombs that can destroy Irans underground nuclear facility
Job done
All the other Arab countries are too scared to join in so that’s the end of it
Actually not a bad strategy
What could possibly go wrong with forced regime change in the Middle East?
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 06:32 Not sure why the Rags cant be allowed to develop a nuke/nuke power and others can do what they want?
Weapons of mass destruction type dribble to allow the yanks to test their big bomb maybe.
The worlds a fucking mess
You don't see any issues with the biggest supplier of state funded terrorism to have nuclear weapons?
-
- Posts: 2673
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 42 times
- Been liked: 263 times
Re: Iran v Israel
The Americans have wanted to take out Iran for years if not decades
Didnt want to make a first strike but think was the plan all along… get Israel to start a skirmish & then insist Iran surrender. When they don’t pile in with their bombs that can destroy Irans underground nuclear facility
Job done
All the other Arab countries are too scared to join in so that’s the end of it
Actually not a bad strategy
Didnt want to make a first strike but think was the plan all along… get Israel to start a skirmish & then insist Iran surrender. When they don’t pile in with their bombs that can destroy Irans underground nuclear facility
Job done
All the other Arab countries are too scared to join in so that’s the end of it
Actually not a bad strategy
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3957
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 393 times
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 06:32 Not sure why the Rags cant be allowed to develop a nuke/nuke power and others can do what they want?
Weapons of mass destruction type dribble to allow the yanks to test their big bomb maybe.
The worlds a fucking mess
Put together a list of nation states who have declared their aim is to wipe another nation state and it's people from the face of the earth.
Then give good reasons why such states should be allowed develop the technology that allows them to do so.
Illustrate your answer with diagrams if you feel it will help. The use of crayons is permitted.
Then give good reasons why such states should be allowed develop the technology that allows them to do so.
Illustrate your answer with diagrams if you feel it will help. The use of crayons is permitted.
-
- Posts: 91
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 19 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Not sure why the Rags cant be allowed to develop a nuke/nuke power and others can do what they want?
Weapons of mass destruction type dribble to allow the yanks to test their big bomb maybe.
The worlds a fucking mess
Weapons of mass destruction type dribble to allow the yanks to test their big bomb maybe.
The worlds a fucking mess
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3957
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 393 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Anybody actually believe what Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has said today?
Seems to me he's saying that he (and by default, his (HIS) people) don't want to live on a planet that has Israel as a nation state.
Sounds like he needs his bluff calling: the world seems to have ridden most of the (energy related) issues thrown up by Russia's invasion of the Ukraine, so that would suggest it can do so again.
They start targeting energy production sites in countries not involved in this skirmish and the shit really will hit the fan for them.
Seems to me he's saying that he (and by default, his (HIS) people) don't want to live on a planet that has Israel as a nation state.
Sounds like he needs his bluff calling: the world seems to have ridden most of the (energy related) issues thrown up by Russia's invasion of the Ukraine, so that would suggest it can do so again.
They start targeting energy production sites in countries not involved in this skirmish and the shit really will hit the fan for them.
-
- Posts: 91
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 19 times