Page 2 of 6
Iran v Israel
Posted: 13 Jun 2025, 22:26
by Collins Wong - A Free Man
Israel struck Iran last night.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 24 Jun 2025, 07:21
by Eerie Decent
zebthecat wrote: ↑22 Jun 2025, 09:24
Nobody does peace like the Donald.
Ceasefire looking likely.
Gutted?
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 24 Jun 2025, 01:37
by nychammer
if you can see the trucks on satellite surveillance you can see where they went on satellite surveillance. They didn't just disappear into thin air.
There is always the risk enough survived below ground and that in time they could get back to it, but for now all seems positive. The best hope is that the Ayatollah is sent into Martyrdom to see the 100 Virgins awaiting him and sane heads take over.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 23:57
by Massive Attack
All seems far too straightforward, especially when it comes to the middle east. Something seems off, although if that is it then Trump (and Israel) have played yet another blinder just like back in his 1st term taking out their General Soleimani.
I'm uneasy with all this uranium knocking about and the Iranian Government suspending the IAEA from future visits...
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 23:40
by Nutsin
An apparent ceasefire.
If It holds which it probably will you’ll have to give Trump a massive well done there!
world is a safer place. Gotta expect the Iranians to capitulate now on US inspections.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 23:36
by Massive Attack
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 21:50
by riosleftsock
Enriched uranium has quite a big radiation signature, it can be tracked remotely in the kind of quantities they are alleging. The only way to prevent the gamma signature escaping is with huge quantities of lead encasement which is also relatively easy to detect
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 21:29
by Mike Oxsaw
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 21:13
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 20:59
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 20:43
Been announced the Iran parliament are about to suspend the IAEA from coming in and assessing what they're doing with the uranium they've got stashed under all their Burkas. It suggests to me this situation will become untenable to the point it's now or never in putting a stop to it all. With the Israelis and the Yanks having come this far, they may as well continue to take out the regime. If they didn't want to do that then they wouldn't have collectively done what they just have.
I suspect this is more of an information management process.
They don't want the world to know the current state of their nuclear program, whether it be, as Trump claims, "totally bullseyed", or they've actually managed to squirrel away enough refined Uranium to knock up a quick bomb and fire it at...well....have a guess.
Unless there had been an equivalent of a mad sale on at DFS buying and moving furniture in Fordow, I think it's highly likely they already shifted out the shit they needed to in anticipation of any potential attack..
The Yanks would have wanted that to be the case anyways as they didn't want a nuclear leak hitting it with their bunker bombs. The sticking point now is they're going to struggle to keep surveillance on that for too long and how long it'll take them to get it up ans running again but this time with zero Watchdog overlooking it.
The Yanks are caught in a bit of a position now where they probably have to put all their chips in as the Iranians aint going to entertain any cսnt from here on in monitoring their uranium production. I think Trump knew that when they dropped the bombs on the weekend, diplomacy isn't going to be a realistic option with the ragheads closing ranks now.
You're probably right on that one.
If they ship it out in a suitcase and leave at the left luggage bureau at Tehran Central Station for someone to collect later, it'll trigger all sorts of alarms globally.
That being said, I'm not convinced that the upper echelons of the Iranian (or, indeed any) regime understand uranium beyond once having a watch with a luminous dial giving them the power to tell the time when the sundial stops working, so it may well be lying somewhere "inconspicuous" in a single use plastic carrier bag..
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 21:13
by Massive Attack
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 20:59
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 20:43
Been announced the Iran parliament are about to suspend the IAEA from coming in and assessing what they're doing with the uranium they've got stashed under all their Burkas. It suggests to me this situation will become untenable to the point it's now or never in putting a stop to it all. With the Israelis and the Yanks having come this far, they may as well continue to take out the regime. If they didn't want to do that then they wouldn't have collectively done what they just have.
I suspect this is more of an information management process.
They don't want the world to know the current state of their nuclear program, whether it be, as Trump claims, "totally bullseyed", or they've actually managed to squirrel away enough refined Uranium to knock up a quick bomb and fire it at...well....have a guess.
Unless there had been an equivalent of a mad sale on at DFS buying and moving furniture in Fordow, I think it's highly likely they already shifted out the shit they needed to in anticipation of any potential attack..
The Yanks would have wanted that to be the case anyways as they didn't want a nuclear leak hitting it with their bunker bombs. The sticking point now is they're going to struggle to keep surveillance on that for too long and how long it'll take them to get it up ans running again but this time with zero Watchdog overlooking it.
The Yanks are caught in a bit of a position now where they probably have to put all their chips in as the Iranians aint going to entertain any cսnt from here on in monitoring their uranium production. I think Trump knew that when they dropped the bombs on the weekend, diplomacy isn't going to be a realistic option with the ragheads closing ranks now.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 20:59
by Mike Oxsaw
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 20:43
Been announced the Iran parliament are about to suspend the IAEA from coming in and assessing what they're doing with the uranium they've got stashed under all their Burkas. It suggests to me this situation will become untenable to the point it's now or never in putting a stop to it all. With the Israelis and the Yanks having come this far, they may as well continue to take out the regime. If they didn't want to do that then they wouldn't have collectively done what they just have.
I suspect this is more of an information management process.
They don't want the world to know the current state of their nuclear program, whether it be, as Trump claims, "totally bullseyed", or they've actually managed to squirrel away enough refined Uranium to knock up a quick bomb and fire it at...well....have a guess.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 20:43
by Massive Attack
Been announced the Iran parliament are about to suspend the IAEA from coming in and assessing what they're doing with the uranium they've got stashed under all their Burkas. It suggests to me this situation will become untenable to the point it's now or never in putting a stop to it all. With the Israelis and the Yanks having come this far, they may as well continue to take out the regime. If they didn't want to do that then they wouldn't have collectively done what they just have.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 20:20
by Massive Attack
Sure, however unlike the US attack on Iran which was surgically targetted on solely nuclear production facilities, these ballistic missiles were heading towards a US Military base whilst also flying over another Countries civvy Air Space in doing so. Relying on a third parties defence system to take them all out was a high stakes gamble and one the US didn't resort to doing any of the like on the weekend.
The Yanks could be justified to retaliate now as an act of war and maybe what Trump and Co had banked on so to have good reason now to take out the regime. Could well be wrong but that's just my feeling on it.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 20:01
by Mike Oxsaw
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 19:33
Alfs wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 18:59
Iran warned the Yanks ahead of the attack so it's just a bit of theatre rather than a serious threat.
That's relying on every single missile being taken out before it reaches a target. No one could guarantee that so the threat is very real and risky.
But Alfs has introduced an interesting fork in the road.
All the missiles could have been unarmed duds programmed to hit "nearby sand dunes" rather than any specific target in Qatar.
Iran had to be seen to be "doing something" in retaliation to the American strike as there's nothing politicians & diplomats like more than being seen to be doing something, even if it's of no value whatsoever, rather than losing face by appearing cowed into doing nothing.
I still feel that the firebrand rhetoric is what will fuck them up though, even if they stop lobbing munitions about.
The problem is that the desire to erase Israel & it's people is so embedded into the Iranian psyche that a complete regime change is probably the only viable option, and even that is high risk...unless, perhaps, the new administration is 100% female/trans....
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 19:33
by Massive Attack
Alfs wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 18:59
Iran warned the Yanks ahead of the attack so it's just a bit of theatre rather than a serious threat.
That's relying on every single missile being taken out before it reaches a target. No one could guarantee that so the threat is very real and risky.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 19:08
by Mike Oxsaw
Alfs wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 18:59
Iran warned the Yanks ahead of the attack so it's just a bit of theatre rather than a serious threat.
Could be (far) more than an ounce of sense in that.
Trouble is, with the vitriolic rhetoric that announced the attack, the Iranian regime are leaving themselves with fewer and fewer get-out options.
Oh, and Russia denouncing an attack in a foreign sovereign state raised a wry smile in Oxsaw Towers.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 18:59
by Alfs
Iran warned the Yanks ahead of the attack so it's just a bit of theatre rather than a serious threat.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 18:22
by Massive Attack
A sign of Irans regime getting desperate by resorting to 'fuck it' tactics. They are playing in to Trump's hands so to give him good reason to finish the job and Trump coming out as the good guy defending others, as well as Yank bases in the process.
I feel like this will escalate quickly to a point of no return and maybe the attacks on ending Irans regime won't drag on, whilst also paving the way for an uprising. Rip that plaster off boys
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 18:12
by Mike Oxsaw
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 18:06
Irans just sent missiles hurtling towards a US base in Qatar.
Time to crack on and finish the job now by bunker busting Khameneis mountain gaff..
Not content with having a Muslim v Jews/Christians dust-up, Iran now wants to also make it a Muslim v Muslim bundle.
Makes no sense pissing Qatar off given that they've been host to many of the top Hamas hierarchy down the years.
*Note to Mossad: make sure that you leave no more than 3 (THREE) horses living in Iran, just in case, like.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 18:06
by Massive Attack
Irans just sent missiles hurtling towards a US base in Qatar and Iraq.
Time to crack on and finish the job now by bunker busting Khameneis mountain gaff..
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 14:59
by XKhammer
Islam is like the weather....its either Shite or Sunni
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 14:56
by OK_Guy
Swiss. wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 13:07
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 03:35
If I was Donald Id blow all the a..r..a.b.s and s nack bars into the eternal realm of noncery
No wonder Hollywood love the cunts
So you think Iran is full of Arab terrorists?
Iran is Persian and not Arab, the attack on the church was by ISIS (they kill Christians for fun & virgins), I daresay it has nothing to do with Iran, more a warning to Syria which had large ISIS encampments.
The whole region could go up Shia v Sunni, btw ISIS is Sunni.
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 14:03
by Mike Oxsaw
Swiss. wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 13:07
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 03:35
If I was Donald Id blow all the a..r..a.b.s and s nack bars into the eternal realm of noncery
No wonder Hollywood love the cunts
So you think Iran is full of Arab terrorists?
So, is it 100% acceptable for their nation to want to wipe Israel off the map if the population is not Arabic?
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 13:07
by Swiss.
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑23 Jun 2025, 03:35
If I was Donald Id blow all the a..r..a.b.s and s nack bars into the eternal realm of noncery
No wonder Hollywood love the cunts
So you think Iran is full of Arab terrorists?
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 04:45
by Mike Oxsaw
I see that the sponsored reprisals have already started:
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c307n9p43z9o
Allah, him great, innit!!?
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 03:35
by Monsieur merde de cheval
If I was Donald Id blow all the a..r..a.b.s and s nack bars into the eternal realm of noncery
No wonder Hollywood love the cunts
Re: Iran v Israel
Posted: 23 Jun 2025, 03:29
by Monsieur merde de cheval
Collins Wong - A Free Man" wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 13:36
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 13:24
The thing with taking out the Iran regime is it'll severely effect and weaken all the proxy shit going on in the region as it's them that funds, arms and trains up the terrorist groups of Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas with also links to the Taliban/Al-quaeda which has been so destructive to the region for so long.
Cutting the head off the snake that's caused so much shit down the years seems too good an opportunity to turn up now, as well as fucking up their nuclear capabilites.
Now Israel has gone this far, they may as well just snuff the chief raghead and as many of his henchman as possible so the people can finally rise up.
Could be the wrong move and there's a better way of going about it all but that's the way I see it, so in for a penny..
the baby killers can't do it on their own, so they're running to trump.
.your opinion is "enlightening"
