AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
OK. At the risk of being banned.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4442
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 513 times
OK. At the risk of being banned.
Free speech is above politics. If you don't understand that, you don't understand life.
Politicians hang on it's left and right coat-tails in the hope of popular traction/adoration, but it's not political.
What it is, is about a significant number of people with a controlling interest in the way the country is run (not governed) imposing their 6th form derived policies on the rest of us and denying (the people) the chance to question them.
And, don't forget that 6th formers, when they came up with all these "great" ideas to solve the world's problems still had their lives' (almost fully) financed by (the bank of) Mum & Dad / Ma & Pa / Mater & Pater / Father & Mother/ Mom & Pop. They had no practical idea of wealth creation (and fair distribution) while pontificating during their Thursday afternoon debates.
We need freedom of speech more than ever in this period of western unrest - nothing to be gained (or leaned) from cancelling those who say stuff you don't agree with.
Politicians hang on it's left and right coat-tails in the hope of popular traction/adoration, but it's not political.
What it is, is about a significant number of people with a controlling interest in the way the country is run (not governed) imposing their 6th form derived policies on the rest of us and denying (the people) the chance to question them.
And, don't forget that 6th formers, when they came up with all these "great" ideas to solve the world's problems still had their lives' (almost fully) financed by (the bank of) Mum & Dad / Ma & Pa / Mater & Pater / Father & Mother/ Mom & Pop. They had no practical idea of wealth creation (and fair distribution) while pontificating during their Thursday afternoon debates.
We need freedom of speech more than ever in this period of western unrest - nothing to be gained (or leaned) from cancelling those who say stuff you don't agree with.
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 12:26XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 12:06Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:59OK,- so your claims of what you got up to in SE Asia were honest. Glad that's 100% settled.
Again - an obvious attempt on your part to cancel any sort of debate about a stance you can't defend and get the thread locked.More lies from a proven liarSo what are you trying to prove here then? That one swallow proves a certain summer, whatever, or, as seems more obvious. one swallow, with whom you disagree, proves a certain summer?
Glad you used the word prove because as I've stated you are a liar and think its OK because its your sickening version of free speech and then you accused me trying to lock this thread plus then you added the usual hints I'm a child murdering nonce(more of your twisted view of free speech???)
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4442
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 513 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 12:06Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:59OK,- so your claims of what you got up to in SE Asia were honest. Glad that's 100% settled.
Again - an obvious attempt on your part to cancel any sort of debate about a stance you can't defend and get the thread locked.More lies from a proven liar
So what are you trying to prove here then? That one swallow proves a certain summer, whatever, or, as seems more obvious. one swallow, with whom you disagree, proves a certain summer?
-
- Posts: 3289
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 400 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
In addition the St John’s Wood church fire happened in 2023
Will see the Great Fire of London quoted soon as the work of dastardly MUSLIMS
Quite right about pub fires & flat development opportunities / insurance
Has a pub fire ever been put down to MUSLIMS outraged by alcohol consumption?
Will see the Great Fire of London quoted soon as the work of dastardly MUSLIMS
Quite right about pub fires & flat development opportunities / insurance
Has a pub fire ever been put down to MUSLIMS outraged by alcohol consumption?
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 12:01 The problem is with some of these Twitter posts is that they are often inaccurate outdated or without context and a lot of not very bright people take them literally being the gospel truth.and in some extreme cases act on them.
This kind of thing merely plays into the hands of those who want to stamp out free speech and that is why I am always slightly suspicious of their origins.
The cause of the fire in St John's wood was indeterminable due to the amount of damage so it's a bit of a mystery.
but baring in mind the time of year it happened it could of been a vagrant breaking in and starting a fire to keep warm an electrical fault, a discarded candle who knows ?
There doesn't appear to of been any definitive suspicion of arson but then some people would probably suggest a cover up without any foundation.
Pubs burn down all the time by a the way and that is very often suspicious but more likely to be an insurance job than an attack on the British way of life...although it could be argued that if said pub is then replaced with a block of flats it most certainly is.
Spot on
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:59XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:53Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:50A Very civilised and 100% mature response. No wonder immigrants will do anything to share your country.
Just can't shake that grudge off, can you?Least I'm honest unlike you a proven disinformation conspiracy theorist liarOK,- so your claims of what you got up to in SE Asia were honest. Glad that's 100% settled.
Again - an obvious attempt on your part to cancel any sort of debate about a stance you can't defend and get the thread locked.
More lies from a proven liar
-
- Posts: 830
- Old WHO Number: 304873
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 99 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
The problem is with some of these Twitter posts is that they are often inaccurate outdated or without context and a lot of not very bright people take them literally being the gospel truth.and in some extreme cases act on them.
This kind of thing merely plays into the hands of those who want to stamp out free speech and that is why I am always slightly suspicious of their origins.
The cause of the fire in St John's wood was indeterminable due to the amount of damage so it's a bit of a mystery.
but baring in mind the time of year it happened it could of been a vagrant breaking in and starting a fire to keep warm an electrical fault, a discarded candle who knows ?
There doesn't appear to of been any definitive suspicion of arson but then some people would probably suggest a cover up without any foundation.
Pubs burn down all the time by a the way and that is very often suspicious but more likely to be an insurance job than an attack on the British way of life...although it could be argued that if said pub is then replaced with a block of flats it most certainly is.
This kind of thing merely plays into the hands of those who want to stamp out free speech and that is why I am always slightly suspicious of their origins.
The cause of the fire in St John's wood was indeterminable due to the amount of damage so it's a bit of a mystery.
but baring in mind the time of year it happened it could of been a vagrant breaking in and starting a fire to keep warm an electrical fault, a discarded candle who knows ?
There doesn't appear to of been any definitive suspicion of arson but then some people would probably suggest a cover up without any foundation.
Pubs burn down all the time by a the way and that is very often suspicious but more likely to be an insurance job than an attack on the British way of life...although it could be argued that if said pub is then replaced with a block of flats it most certainly is.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4442
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 513 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:53Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:50A Very civilised and 100% mature response. No wonder immigrants will do anything to share your country.
Just can't shake that grudge off, can you?Least I'm honest unlike you a proven disinformation conspiracy theorist liar
OK,- so your claims of what you got up to in SE Asia were honest. Glad that's 100% settled.
Again - an obvious attempt on your part to cancel any sort of debate about a stance you can't defend and get the thread locked.
Again - an obvious attempt on your part to cancel any sort of debate about a stance you can't defend and get the thread locked.
Last edited by Mike Oxsaw on 01 Sep 2025, 12:01, edited 1 time in total.
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:50XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:44SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:46You don't fool anyone just by describing that cսnt as 'sickening'. You're even unconsciously defending him here.Utter bollocks l hope he has shit,piss and glass put in his food every fucking mealA Very civilised and 100% mature response. No wonder immigrants will do anything to share your country.
Just can't shake that grudge off, can you?
Least I'm honest unlike you a proven disinformation conspiracy theorist liar
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4442
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 513 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:44SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:46You don't fool anyone just by describing that cսnt as 'sickening'. You're even unconsciously defending him here.Utter bollocks l hope he has shit,piss and glass put in his food every fucking meal
A Very civilised and 100% mature response. No wonder immigrants will do anything to share your country.
Pretty obvious that you're aim is to try and get this thread locked rather than participate in reasoned debate.
Just can't shake that grudge off, can you?
Pretty obvious that you're aim is to try and get this thread locked rather than participate in reasoned debate.
Just can't shake that grudge off, can you?
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:20 I’m sure Christian churches are attacked in the world
So why not highlight them rather than LIE about churches in the UK?
I see the Neo-Nazi’s joined the anti immigration marches in Australia
They were advised to leave their jackboots & swastikas at home & blend in with the CONCERNED LOCALS
You really are a proper leftie loon which is just as bad as the conspiracy theorists right wing loons
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:55XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:43Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:27 Free speech is above politics. If you don't understand that, you don't understand life.
Politicians hang on it's left and right coat-tails in the hope of popular traction/adoration, but it's not political.
What it is, is about a significant number of people with a controlling interest in the way the country is run (not governed) imposing their 6th form derived policies on the rest of us and denying (the people) the chance to question them.
And, don't forget that 6th formers, when they came up with all these "great" ideas to solve the world's problems still had their lives' (almost fully) financed by (the bank of) Mum & Dad / Ma & Pa / Mater & Pater / Father & Mother/ Mom & Pop. They had no practical idea of wealth creation (and fair distribution) while pontificating during their Thursday afternoon debates.
We need freedom of speech more than ever in this period of western unrest - nothing to be gained (or leaned) from cancelling those who say stuff you don't agree with.Does freedom of speech include posting fake news/conspiracy theorists lies like you did over the sickening child killer in Southport?That's not an issue of free speech, that's a simple issue of information management. Had the authorities been transparent at the outset then no matter however many cսnts there are in the world, they would have had nothing to freely post that so hurts your 100% delicate feels.
You posted lies and that is indefensible
You was well wrong and never admit it...that is not free speech
Yes the authoriauthorities fucked up but don't blame them for your spreading of disinformation
You was well wrong and never admit it...that is not free speech
Yes the authoriauthorities fucked up but don't blame them for your spreading of disinformation
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4442
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 513 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
wils wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:29 I don't have a problem with posting non-football stuff (West Ham is bigger than just what goes on on the pitch and it's normal people want to read and share views of non-football things amongst their West Ham peers) and I am pretty liberal on what people should be allowed to post but I think there is another problem and that's the proliferation of posts on immigration. I myself have strong views immigration and it's a major concern for me, but a lot of these posts come across as quite obsessive and serve only to rabble rouse rather than add anything insightful to the discussion. A lot of it is Twitter posts that no one has checked or contextualised before posting. If you are care about your cause just think a little bit before posting this stuff because you just undermine yourself when half of the posts are later proved to be unfounded.
More importantly there's a politics thread and this stuff should be posted in there for those who want to engage with it.
Again, immigration, per se, is not a political issue - I've been an immigrant for the last 25 years of my life and will probably remain one until I die.
I, like I assume many others, have no problem with immigration into the UK, provided it is properly managed. That is a big - even fundamental - proviso.
People from around the world are very welcome provided they go through the correct channels - but they need to be outside UK society 100% of the time their application is being assessed. That, alone needs to be laid down as a fundamental, non-negotiable condition.
It's not rocket science and it's not even political - both Labour & the Tories before them followed exactly the same path, so it's not (caring) left vs far-right..
Tinkering around the edges is not going to help. Un-assessed illegal immigrants need to remain outside UK societies (and, preferably, the UK) until their application for asylum has been approved. This is not political - it's a clear function of the state.
And don't forget to remember from what dangerous country these people escape to arrive in the UK.
I, like I assume many others, have no problem with immigration into the UK, provided it is properly managed. That is a big - even fundamental - proviso.
People from around the world are very welcome provided they go through the correct channels - but they need to be outside UK society 100% of the time their application is being assessed. That, alone needs to be laid down as a fundamental, non-negotiable condition.
It's not rocket science and it's not even political - both Labour & the Tories before them followed exactly the same path, so it's not (caring) left vs far-right..
Tinkering around the edges is not going to help. Un-assessed illegal immigrants need to remain outside UK societies (and, preferably, the UK) until their application for asylum has been approved. This is not political - it's a clear function of the state.
And don't forget to remember from what dangerous country these people escape to arrive in the UK.
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:46XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:43Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:27 Free speech is above politics. If you don't understand that, you don't understand life.
Politicians hang on it's left and right coat-tails in the hope of popular traction/adoration, but it's not political.
What it is, is about a significant number of people with a controlling interest in the way the country is run (not governed) imposing their 6th form derived policies on the rest of us and denying (the people) the chance to question them.
And, don't forget that 6th formers, when they came up with all these "great" ideas to solve the world's problems still had their lives' (almost fully) financed by (the bank of) Mum & Dad / Ma & Pa / Mater & Pater / Father & Mother/ Mom & Pop. They had no practical idea of wealth creation (and fair distribution) while pontificating during their Thursday afternoon debates.
We need freedom of speech more than ever in this period of western unrest - nothing to be gained (or leaned) from cancelling those who say stuff you don't agree with.Does freedom of speech include posting fake news/conspiracy theorists lies like you did over the sickening child killer in Southport?You don't fool anyone just by describing that cսnt as 'sickening'. You're even unconsciously defending him here.
Utter bollocks l hope he has shit,piss and glass put in his food every fucking meal
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
I don't have a problem with posting non-football stuff (West Ham is bigger than just what goes on on the pitch and it's normal people want to read and share views of non-football things amongst their West Ham peers) and I am pretty liberal on what people should be allowed to post but I think there is another problem and that's the proliferation of posts on immigration. I myself have strong views immigration and it's a major concern for me, but a lot of these posts come across as quite obsessive and serve only to rabble rouse rather than add anything insightful to the discussion. A lot of it is Twitter posts that no one has checked or contextualised before posting. If you are care about your cause just think a little bit before posting this stuff because you just undermine yourself when half of the posts are later proved to be unfounded.
More importantly there's a politics thread and this stuff should be posted in there for those who want to engage with it.
More importantly there's a politics thread and this stuff should be posted in there for those who want to engage with it.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4442
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 513 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
BRANDED wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 11:19 The difference between free speech online and free speech down the pub is down the pub you might get banned or punched or glassed. I’m not condoning any but there is speech and raw power. In the physical space raw power is exerted all the time, much to the surprise of some who think speech is in fact separate.
So. I’m a fan of free speech but sometimes someone might smack the cսnt out of you.
Yes, free speech and the risks involved are not new - and certainly something that cannot be laid at the door of the internet and/or social media.
The bigger worry is that if you speak out in opposition to the state and it's way of doing things, certain incidents - totally accidental, of course - will start impacting your life.
If the state are so concerned that a significant portion of the public will be influenced by certain aspects of free speech, who was responsible for educating that public to that level in the first place?
The bigger worry is that if you speak out in opposition to the state and it's way of doing things, certain incidents - totally accidental, of course - will start impacting your life.
If the state are so concerned that a significant portion of the public will be influenced by certain aspects of free speech, who was responsible for educating that public to that level in the first place?
-
- Posts: 3289
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 400 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
I’m sure Christian churches are attacked in the world
So why not highlight them rather than LIE about churches in the UK?
I see the Neo-Nazi’s joined the anti immigration marches in Australia
They were advised to leave their jackboots & swastikas at home & blend in with the CONCERNED LOCALS
So why not highlight them rather than LIE about churches in the UK?
I see the Neo-Nazi’s joined the anti immigration marches in Australia
They were advised to leave their jackboots & swastikas at home & blend in with the CONCERNED LOCALS
- BRANDED
- Posts: 1789
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 83 times
- Been liked: 155 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
The difference between free speech online and free speech down the pub is down the pub you might get banned or punched or glassed. I’m not condoning any but there is speech and raw power. In the physical space raw power is exerted all the time, much to the surprise of some who think speech is in fact separate.
So. I’m a fan of free speech but sometimes someone might smack the cսnt out of you.
So. I’m a fan of free speech but sometimes someone might smack the cսnt out of you.
-
- Posts: 3289
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 400 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
I saw a link to a church in St John’s Wood that MUSLIMS were burning down
The church was damaged by a fire in 2023
No sign of MUSLIMS with torches
Churches tend to be old buildings often with a lot of wood in the structure
The links are attempts to whip up a bit of hatred by way of blatant lies
The church was damaged by a fire in 2023
No sign of MUSLIMS with torches
Churches tend to be old buildings often with a lot of wood in the structure
The links are attempts to whip up a bit of hatred by way of blatant lies
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 703
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 104 times
- Been liked: 178 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
Incidentally, whilst it's rare in the UK, Muslims are burning down and otherwise demolishing and killing the congregations of Christian churches all over the world. One a week, in fact.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4442
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 513 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:54 Is free speech posting links to people saying MUSLIMS are burning down churches over the UK?
Surely that depends entirely on whether or not Muslims are burning down churches (all over the country).
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4442
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 513 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:43Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:27 Free speech is above politics. If you don't understand that, you don't understand life.
Politicians hang on it's left and right coat-tails in the hope of popular traction/adoration, but it's not political.
What it is, is about a significant number of people with a controlling interest in the way the country is run (not governed) imposing their 6th form derived policies on the rest of us and denying (the people) the chance to question them.
And, don't forget that 6th formers, when they came up with all these "great" ideas to solve the world's problems still had their lives' (almost fully) financed by (the bank of) Mum & Dad / Ma & Pa / Mater & Pater / Father & Mother/ Mom & Pop. They had no practical idea of wealth creation (and fair distribution) while pontificating during their Thursday afternoon debates.
We need freedom of speech more than ever in this period of western unrest - nothing to be gained (or leaned) from cancelling those who say stuff you don't agree with.Does freedom of speech include posting fake news/conspiracy theorists lies like you did over the sickening child killer in Southport?
That's not an issue of free speech, that's a simple issue of information management. Had the authorities been transparent at the outset then no matter however many cսnts there are in the world, they would have had nothing to freely post that so hurts your 100% delicate feels.
-
- Posts: 3289
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 400 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
Is free speech posting links to people saying MUSLIMS are burning down churches over the UK?
- SurfaceAgentX2Zero
- Posts: 703
- Old WHO Number: 214126
- Has liked: 104 times
- Been liked: 178 times
Re: OK. At the risk of being banned.
XKhammer wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:43Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑01 Sep 2025, 10:27 Free speech is above politics. If you don't understand that, you don't understand life.
Politicians hang on it's left and right coat-tails in the hope of popular traction/adoration, but it's not political.
What it is, is about a significant number of people with a controlling interest in the way the country is run (not governed) imposing their 6th form derived policies on the rest of us and denying (the people) the chance to question them.
And, don't forget that 6th formers, when they came up with all these "great" ideas to solve the world's problems still had their lives' (almost fully) financed by (the bank of) Mum & Dad / Ma & Pa / Mater & Pater / Father & Mother/ Mom & Pop. They had no practical idea of wealth creation (and fair distribution) while pontificating during their Thursday afternoon debates.
We need freedom of speech more than ever in this period of western unrest - nothing to be gained (or leaned) from cancelling those who say stuff you don't agree with.Does freedom of speech include posting fake news/conspiracy theorists lies like you did over the sickening child killer in Southport?
You don't fool anyone just by describing that cսnt as 'sickening'. You're even unconsciously defending him here.