...and going on your register involves a criminal record.
I guess that makes you James Saville.
ThickClit you are so dense that you don't even know what a DBS check is,you have to pay for it and its done by in my case the Metropolitan Police
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek help
Disclosure and Barring service, costs about 20, practically everyone does them now as a liability issue. It doesn't make you or you job on the bins seem important.
Oh dear ThickClit you truly are making yourself look fucking a liar and thick as shit
My DBS is enhanced and costs £78.50,bit more than you're super duper 007 James Bent clearance that the Met Plod can't excess for a score lol
Keep this up as its hilarious...you need back up mate,maybe David Icke the sailor boy,the gutless Eyetie shitbag or the sad old creepy trannie raspberry Oxbore
Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender
...and going on your register involves a criminal record.
I guess that makes you James Saville.
ThickClit you are so dense that you don't even know what a DBS check is,you have to pay for it and its done by in my case the Metropolitan Police
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek help
Disclosure and Barring service, costs about 20, practically everyone does them now as a liability issue. It doesn't make you or you job on the bins seem important.
And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.
Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.
Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender
...and going on your register involves a criminal record.
I guess that makes you James Saville.
ThickClit you are so dense that you don't even know what a DBS check is,you have to pay for it and its done by in my case the Metropolitan Police
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek help
I'm DBS checked every 3 years moron by Met plod,bet you're not
And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.
Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.
Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender
...and going on your register involves a criminal record.
As you're already on a few "registers" you've no ID left to surrender.
I'm DBS checked every 3 years moron by Met plod,bet you're not
And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.
Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.
Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore
When people want some background on how governments and organisations, (plan to) use information it makes perfect sense to discuss the subject with people who have (had) a significant role working/studying such areas.
When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.
Bet you sweep the Trannies off their feet
You care to stop infesting every post you respond to with your favourite hobby?
We all get it - you're absolutely besotted with ladyboys. It couldn't be clearer.
only1billybonds wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 22:05
=12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"
Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore
When people want some background on how governments and organisations, (plan to) use information it makes perfect sense to discuss the subject with people who have (had) a significant role working/studying such areas.
When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.
only1billybonds wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 22:05
=12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"
Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore
When people want some background on how governments and organisations, (plan to) use information it makes perfect sense to discuss the subject with people who have (had) a significant role working/studying such areas.
When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.
Re: No to Digital ID
Posted: 03 Oct 2025, 23:30
by XKhammer
only1billybonds wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 22:05
=12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"
Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore
Re: No to Digital ID
Posted: 03 Oct 2025, 23:21
by XKhammer
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 21:59
There's also 1.2billion people there, compared to 70mil here.
Considering the UK tops the charts for that sort of arrest by absolutely mental numbers, you could just use any other country you fancy, where you won't be able to use that argument.
Anyway, going by the rate we are with all that shit, we very much are going the way of China. That was the point.
If we are going the way of China there won't be as many doing bird as you stated
Seriously don't get your point ..you think its better in China what you say online or we are stricter?
Been to China twice and its very restricted to what you can access online...couldn't access BBC...well that's a bonus point l suppose for the cufflinks
XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 17:15
We ain't China ffs!
Don't understand stand the paranoia about this
How many people are in prison for saying words on the internet in China?
I'll give you a clue - it's a fuck ton less than here. And there's a fuck ton more people over there an all.
I'm sure that will be a comfort for the million or so Uigurs in internment camps.
Lol ...fair point
Re: No to Digital ID
Posted: 03 Oct 2025, 22:05
by only1billybonds
=12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"
Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.
Re: No to Digital ID
Posted: 03 Oct 2025, 21:59
by Eerie Decent
There's also 1.2billion people there, compared to 70mil here.
Considering the UK tops the charts for that sort of arrest by absolutely mental numbers, you could just use any other country you fancy, where you won't be able to use that argument.
Anyway, going by the rate we are with all that shit, we very much are going the way of China. That was the point.
Re: No to Digital ID
Posted: 03 Oct 2025, 19:38
by zebthecat
You have a point ED.
There is a reason why not many Chinese poeple are arrested for posting stuff on the internet as they know that their governnment area monitoring everything they do online as a matter of course. They are also limited to only Chinese government approved or owned sites.