Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Ron Greenwood and England

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
zico
Posts: 4322
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 392 times
Been liked: 216 times

Ron Greenwood and England

Post zico »

One for the older amongst us I suspect.  I was listening to a rather frank interview with Steven Gerrard about his time with England and he was rather honest about why England's so called Golden Generation failed.  "Egotistical Losers" was the expression he used to describe the clear cliques between Man United, Liverpool and Chelsea players, whose main focus was clearly on domestic and European success with their Clubs and this created a lack of bonding within the squad.  Nothing we haven't heard before but it certainly wasn't just a case of Sven trying to find a way to accomodate all of Gerrard, Lampard, Beckham, Scholes, Carrick, Rooney, Owen and Defoe!

It however got me thinking about Ron Greenwood's time with England.  I am reading Martin Peters Autobiography at the moment and like Bobby Moore, once again a player who whilst not having the warmest personal relationship with Greenwood, he cites him as "the" coach who made him the player he was and had the greatest of respect for the innovative training and coaching methods based on Ron's admiration for the European and certainly Hungarian football of the time.  This as we all know was the "West Ham Way" under Ron with the focus on passing, flair, technique, exploitation of space and entertaining attacking football.  Wonderful to watch when it came off but probably not the best way to try and win a Championship over 42 games as West Ham's League form generally proved.

This leads up to my point.  I was very young when Ron managed England and my hazy memories are limited to Trevor Brooking's goal that lodged in the stanchion, ironically against Hungary, and a last throw of the dice bringing a not 100% fit Keegan and Brooking on against Spain in the 1982 World Cup which saw England eliminated without losing a game.  I have no memories though of England being knocked out in the Group Stage of UEFA Euro 1980.

His record certainly isn't a disaster, and I recall that at one point he stated that he was going to resign but the players persuaded him otherwise so he clearly had their support, but my memories of his England teams aren't those of a free flowing attacking outfit that excited like his West Ham sides did, but rather a fairly dull England team that failed to impress for years during the 70's and 80's.  Like other England managers I think he generally ignored the likes of Alan Hudson, Stan Bowles and Frank Worthington who on first glance you would think that they were the perfect fit for a flair Greenwood team, although maybe Greenwood favoured flair with discipline.  I also wonder whether his defensive minded number two in Don Howe maybe stopped Ron from taking the shackles off and going for it rather than being the "safe pair of hands" the FA clearly preferred ahead of Brian Clough.

So in a nutshell, I am just wondering why Ron's England teams aren't remembered fondly playing wise as much as his innovative West Ham teams were, or do many of us just wear a pair of claret and blue specs with regard to his tenure at Upton Park?   
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3371
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 772 times
Been liked: 1159 times

Re: Ron Greenwood and England

Post Takashi Miike »

the mismanagement/exclusion of le tissier by successive england managers is the biggest advert for how backward our coaching philosophy was/is. a talent that good should have been a key part of the england set up, instead treated like shit but at least we can celebrate jordan henderson's 86 caps, not a single one memorable
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1334
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 308 times
Been liked: 456 times

Re: Ron Greenwood and England

Post southbankbornnbred »

Takashi Miike" wrote: 10 Oct 2025, 10:13 never forgave him for taking the arsenal sex case over dev in 82
Yep, not taking Dev was a disaster. 100% should have been England's left-winger from 1980 through to his bad injury. How he picked Rix above Dev is beyond me - and he should have known better.
RBshorty
Posts: 980
Old WHO Number: 211268
Has liked: 84 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Ron Greenwood and England

Post RBshorty »

The International game and the FA are about one thing only. Feeding the pigs. And no fucker is coming between them. And sticking their heads in the trough.
zico
Posts: 4322
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 392 times
Been liked: 216 times

Re: Ron Greenwood and England

Post zico »

Yes I meant to say "like the England teams of the 70's", I know he came in late in the decade.  Good point about Hoddle and that's the perfect example really, the perfect style of Ron player but in Spain I think he went with Bryan Robson and Ray Wilkins in a 442.  
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3371
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 772 times
Been liked: 1159 times

Re: Ron Greenwood and England

Post Takashi Miike »

never forgave him for taking the arsenal sex case over dev in 82
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1334
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 308 times
Been liked: 456 times

Re: Ron Greenwood and England

Post southbankbornnbred »

He wasn't England manager for most of the 70s, fella.

He took over at short notice from Don Revie, who resigned and left the team in the stink. England were already struggling to qualify for the 78 world cup at that point.

Ron hadn't been a manager for a few years, so he took a while to find his feet with England after Revie. Hence, 1980 was a bit of a non-event. But he at least got them to qualify after two missed World Cups.

1982 started brightly with the big win over France (eventual semi-finalists). But it faded away. Keegan and Brooking being injured was not ideal. And, as with other England managers, a reluctance to build a side around Hoddle's incredible vision left us lacking creativity.

If Greenwood had got the job when Revie got it (although you can see why Revie got it) things might have been different. I think we'd have qualified for '78 for starters.
Post Reply