West Ham Online

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxkt

He's run a car crash of an organisation that's got way out of hand with so many gaffes from the Trump splicing lies to the Deathto the IDF fiasco in the summer. Another CEO Doris also gets the boot.

 

Nothing more these days than just a Leftist propaganda machine.

Defund the BBC.

THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 12:42

XKhammer wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 12:36

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 08:52

I believe it was a full-on NAZI who said "If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself."

Nice to see that aspect of politics so admirably represented here.

Of course, if you don't want people to reasonably conclude from your posts that you are a NAZI, or a NAZI sympathiser, better to avoid using NAZI propaganda tactics, don't you think?

Self confessed  GRASS

Says the self confessed NONCE.

XKhammer wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 12:36

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 08:52

XKhammer wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 03:53

Knew you was a grass,how could you do a job like that then commit crime at the weekend???
Decades later nothing changed as still committing crime with your disability/pension fraud

I believe it was a full-on NAZI who said "If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself."

Nice to see that aspect of politics so admirably represented here.

Of course, if you don't want people to reasonably conclude from your posts that you are a NAZI, or a NAZI sympathiser, better to avoid using NAZI propaganda tactics, don't you think?

Self confessed  GRASS

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 08:52

XKhammer wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 03:53

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 16:30

The TV licence  was initially introduced as a stealth census. The argument was that every man and his dog would want a TV set for the new service, so this was a great way of putting names to addresses. The "fee" was simply a disguise for the real purpose, as the government would have funded the nascent BBC anyway.

At the time of introduction, it would be almost 100% breadwinner/head of the household (i.e. a MAN) who would apply for the licence ar the Post Office.

I did a month on the TV detector vans as part of my apprenticeship. TV detector man during the week, installer of (illegal) on-shore pirate radio transmitters all over London at the weekend.

Knew you was a grass,how could you do a job like that then commit crime at the weekend???
Decades later nothing changed as still committing crime with your disability/pension fraud

I believe it was a full-on NAZI who said "If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself."

Nice to see that aspect of politics so admirably represented here.

Of course, if you don't want people to reasonably conclude from your posts that you are a NAZI, or a NAZI sympathiser, better to avoid using NAZI propaganda tactics, don't you think?

I’m loving seeing the slow burn of Trump shitting himself over the ‘Epstein hoax’
If Clinton is guilty he can share a cell with Trump & the paedo ex Prince
Superb. Politicians & royalty in jail. BRING. IT. ON

only1billybonds wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 08:33 Hahaha. Fucking hell Sven, does your entire life revolve around hoping to see Trump suffer?
I have no idea what Trump or anyone else got up to when in Esteins company but I honestly believe that if there was any SOLID proof condemning him, the Dem media would have exposed it long before now.

only1billybonds wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 17:32 If they had a shred of decency, the BBC verify 'service' would be binned by now. 

XKhammer wrote: ↑15 Nov 2025, 03:53

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 16:30

only1billybonds wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 16:19 Totally agree with ED.

If the BBC truely believes they offer an outstanding service they should back that up by opening it up to subscription. If its that good,people will gobble it up. Comes to just shy of £15 per month, many people are paying almost a score for netflix so there's the encouragement for them. This wont happen of course as taking the license away slows that gravy train right down.

The TV licence  was initially introduced as a stealth census. The argument was that every man and his dog would want a TV set for the new service, so this was a great way of putting names to addresses. The "fee" was simply a disguise for the real purpose, as the government would have funded the nascent BBC anyway.

At the time of introduction, it would be almost 100% breadwinner/head of the household (i.e. a MAN) who would apply for the licence ar the Post Office.

I did a month on the TV detector vans as part of my apprenticeship. TV detector man during the week, installer of (illegal) on-shore pirate radio transmitters all over London at the weekend.

Knew you was a grass,how could you do a job like that then commit crime at the weekend???
Decades later nothing changed as still committing crime with your disability/pension fraud

Hahaha. Fucking hell Sven, does your entire life revolve around hoping to see Trump suffer?
I have no idea what Trump or anyone else got up to when in Esteins company but I honestly believe that if there was any SOLID proof condemning him, the Dem media would have exposed it long before now.

In hindsight I’d actually prefer to see a more restricted bbc on a subscription model
A worldwide subscription service for the full offering. Think that would be popular across Europe, America, Australia & Asia
Not sure how you restrict access to radio output but I leave that to the technical nerds
Hopefully given they would be released from the charter which requires them to cater to all audiences they can take it up market & ditch catering to morons with Eastenders
Still room for things like Traitors & obviously they have all their back catalogue of classic shows which I presume are often licenced out to UK Gold etc
Of course I would tighten up the laws of people accessing content illegally once it’s a paid service
First offence £50,000 fine & 3 years in prison. 

If we start now hopefully the first massive broadcast can be coverage of the Trump paedo trial before he gets the electric chair live from Times Square

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 16:30

only1billybonds wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 16:19 Totally agree with ED.

If the BBC truely believes they offer an outstanding service they should back that up by opening it up to subscription. If its that good,people will gobble it up. Comes to just shy of £15 per month, many people are paying almost a score for netflix so there's the encouragement for them. This wont happen of course as taking the license away slows that gravy train right down.

The TV licence  was initially introduced as a stealth census. The argument was that every man and his dog would want a TV set for the new service, so this was a great way of putting names to addresses. The "fee" was simply a disguise for the real purpose, as the government would have funded the nascent BBC anyway.

At the time of introduction, it would be almost 100% breadwinner/head of the household (i.e. a MAN) who would apply for the licence ar the Post Office.

I did a month on the TV detector vans as part of my apprenticeship. TV detector man during the week, installer of (illegal) on-shore pirate radio transmitters all over London at the weekend.

only1billybonds wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 17:32 If they had a shred of decency, the BBC verify 'service' would be binned by now. 

If they had a shred of decency, the BBC verify 'service' would be binned by now. 

I did laugh at the time their much heralded BBC Disinformation Correspondent Marianna Spring was found out to have lied on her CV.

Yes Nurse.

And is it really essential to take a team of almost 1000 'employees' to Glastonbury?

They sent their climate editor to Portugal last year during a heatwave. They flew him out there (net zero eh) so he could appear on the news to tell us it was hot!

When Mark Saggers joined them he asked how he went about claiming expenses for his oyster card. He was told to bin it and start taking cabs everywhere.

The list of examples of waste is endless, all paid for by the taxpayer.

 

A other reason I'd like to see the wretched BBC go under is the rampant nepotism. Why should dozens of beige Dimblebys and the likes of Zoe Ball be provided with a cushy gravy train just because their parents worked there? 

only1billybonds wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 16:19 Totally agree with ED.

If the BBC truely believes they offer an outstanding service they should back that up by opening it up to subscription. If its that good,people will gobble it up. Comes to just shy of £15 per month, many people are paying almost a score for netflix so there's the encouragement for them. This wont happen of course as taking the license away slows that gravy train right down.

Totally agree with ED.

If the BBC truely believes they offer an outstanding service they should back that up by opening it up to subscription. If its that good,people will gobble it up. Comes to just shy of £15 per month, many people are paying almost a score for netflix so there's the encouragement for them. This wont happen of course as taking the license away slows that gravy train right down.

License fee. = Propaganda Tax.

Nowt will change with too many piggies with their noses in the trough.! The top brass are hoping the British Plebs do what the British Plebs always do.

Moan about it.
Do little about it.
Then. Forget about it.

I can't get my head around why this is so difficult.

We're constantly told how AMAZING it is that the world has changed so dramatically, and that the old GAMMONS just need to shut up pining for the good old days and get with the times.

These same people (people like Sven) are telling us that the BBC shouldn't get with the times, and has to remain a PUBLIC service rather than a SUBSCRIPTION service like every other fucking service that exists across the world. I think that's the gist of it.

It's very simple, the BBC should stand on it's own feet, and let everyone decide if they choose to watch it or not. And all the people who love it so much, can continue to pay for it.

Get well soon my old China

In other BBC news, just seen on my LinkedIn feed a brave Beeb war correspondent reporting 'frontline' in Ukraine
Fella laying prone in rubble, deadly environment clearly

Then in the background an old lady calmly enters the frame, ambling along walking her dog!
Then other villagers moving normally

No suggestion of over dramatizing the position from me of course
Can't say the same from other posters mind - the BBC really have lost all credibility it appears

Yea ok mate tho I been off all week with a chest infection. 

Only holiday I've had this year. 

Hiya Bill
All ok mate and you?

Crassus,how are you, its been far to long.

You are sorely missed.

Massive Attack » 14 Nov 2025 13:29
Absolutely correct

'mistake'
'misjudgment
'error'

And any other phrase that implies individual error is fundamentally wrong and nothing of the sorts

It is and has been for years, institutionally absorbed in its own agenda, prosecuted by a legion of self righteous, holier than though, metrocentric shitcunts
A travesty given its historic value
Drag it out and shoot it

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑14 Nov 2025, 13:20 I don’t believe the edit changed the nature and tone of Trumps speech but the bbc should have made it clear they had bolted two parts of it together without making it clear 
That was a mistake 
And if they had done the same to anyone that would still have been a mistake … Trump , Starmer, whoever
The bbc as I have said many times need a shake up particularly in their news coverage which I believe is inferior to Channel 4 despite having much more resources
Their general behaviour is error prone & way below the standards they should reach

In regards to Trumps speech I believe he WAS inciting violence 
Understand 220 people were charged in relation to the riot at the Capitol and when cross examined they gave one answer as to why they did what they did
Cos Trump told me to
He is a ludicrous dangerous grifter & the sooner he is deposed the better