West Ham Online

XKhammer wrote: ↑17 Apr 2025, 18:08

Cabbige Savage" wrote: ↑17 Apr 2025, 18:00

See you on Tik Tok loser!

Picjkle has the bess tik toks abowt free EU benny fits

Bore off you unfunny troll 

Cabbige Savage" wrote: ↑17 Apr 2025, 18:00

See you on Tik Tok loser!

Picjkle has the bess tik toks abowt free EU benny fits

See you on Tik Tok loser!

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑17 Apr 2025, 11:45 'wiped out, used as a headline by most sites'

You just can't help yourself ,can you?

Anyway, I'm blocking you yet again, you long-necked, moronic, fantasist, trolling, Polish cuckold.

Ha ha ....   just couldnt handle it... and no I am not Pickle. Id suggest you keep your nose out of other peoples business in future son!

Looks like its you that are "wiped out" ... did you see what I did there!

See you on Tik Tok loser!

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑17 Apr 2025, 02:00

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 21:36

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 15:30

I can't believe you've actually quoted chronic TDS sufferers the BBC in this matter

Picking more holes in other posters comments without anything to say yourself!?

BTW another site using the "out" word. Im starting to think I was right all along even though it was a mistake!

https://www.indmoney.com/blog/us-stocks ... ear-market

You got nothing to say about that all of a sudden!?

Definitely H&P. When totally humiliated in an argument just pretends he hasn't been and tries to brazen it out.

Just because half the MSM also suffer from TDS doesn't alter the meaning of commonplace words and phrases.

Anyway, since when did you become Warren Buffet you fantasist twat? I though your conceits are that you are an expert on the ancient City of Ur and governance and the rule of law, while actually being a translator of benefits forms for vodka?

Totally humiliated you still think saying wiped out, used as a headline by most sites shows no knowledge of how markets worked inspite of their clear expertise in the finance and markets sphere. Im afraid youve still not backed that up you simpleton.

I was expecting some sort of argument but I see youve still got nothing. I suggest you pop back over to tik tok son thats about all your intellect or lack of can handle. Do come back when youve got something of importance to say. Maybe Pickle will be back then cos he/she/they are not me!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/yourmoney/a ... riffs.html

Another site for you this time the least woke and most right wing mainstream paper in the UK. Im going to be busy telling them all about your greater knowledge and how we all should bow down to you and rephrase all references to "Wiped Out" relating to your Orange faced demigod tanking the stock markets.

Enjoy your tik tok time SurfaceCleaner!!! You fuckwit!  

WHU(Exeter) wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 16:32 Everyone in the country could find somewhere where they felt threatened. Still plenty of pubs, where people would feel ill at ease if they weren't from the immediate area.

Most people don't go running to get  common sense, widely accepted and established laws changed over it though.

And as others have said "what's the threat"? Isn't one of their demands to use women's toilets? By that point they would've been in whatever place they were in for a while before? If they were going to actually get threatened it would be early doors, not when they decided to use the women's toilets?

Long haired hippies used to regularly get beaten up decades ago. They used to just crack on.

Nowadays blokes dressed as women, bleat on about threats that aren't even there.

Worlds gone bat shit crazy.


 

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 21:36

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 15:30

goose wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 08:36 Tariffs in action:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2xzn6jmzpo

bad news for Nutsin Buffet.

good summary here too:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9ljwgg9y0o

I can't believe you've actually quoted chronic TDS sufferers the BBC in this matter

Picking more holes in other posters comments without anything to say yourself!?

BTW another site using the "out" word. Im starting to think I was right all along even though it was a mistake!

https://www.indmoney.com/blog/us-stocks ... ear-market

You got nothing to say about that all of a sudden!?

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 15:30

goose wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 08:36 Tariffs in action:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2xzn6jmzpo

bad news for Nutsin Buffet.

good summary here too:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9ljwgg9y0o

I can't believe you've actually quoted chronic TDS sufferers the BBC in this matter

goose wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 08:36 Tariffs in action:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2xzn6jmzpo

bad news for Nutsin Buffet.

good summary here too:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9ljwgg9y0o

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 08:41

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 00:22 'Ok good so you now admit that Trump caused the Correction and wiped out Trillions of dollars worth of investments'

Wiped out, you said, not wiped off.

The investments aren't 'wiped out', they are now worth about what they were a year ago. You could say that trillions were wiped off the value of the entire stock market, but that means nothing. Presumably the previous year's gain were, um, 'wiped on' 

 

Oh well thanks Surface clearly a complete misunderstanding of how markets works because in one sentence I used out and another I used off. Well I need to go back to Finance school and retake all all my accounting qualifications.

Thanks for the tip genius! So just to be clear Trillions were as I said wiped out! Have a read below and jog on you dick!

https://www.marketwatch.com/livecoverag ... eUhbOGt2Wy

Ill let Market Watch know that the stock market had wiped off $9.6bn not wiped out! god what idiots!

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 15:26

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 08:41

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 00:22 'Ok good so you now admit that Trump caused the Correction and wiped out Trillions of dollars worth of investments'

Wiped out, you said, not wiped off.

The investments aren't 'wiped out', they are now worth about what they were a year ago. You could say that trillions were wiped off the value of the entire stock market, but that means nothing. Presumably the previous year's gain were, um, 'wiped on' 

 

Oh well thanks Surface clearly a complete misunderstanding of how markets works because in one sentence I used out and another I used off. Well I need to go back to Finance school and retake all all my accounting qualifications.

Thanks for the tip genius! So just to be clear Trillions were as I said wiped out! Have a read below and jog on you dick!

https://www.marketwatch.com/livecoverag ... eUhbOGt2Wy

Ill let Market Watch know that the stock market had wiped off $9.6bn not wiped out! god what idiots!

Just repeating the shit you wrote doesn't make it any better. And quoting some other cսnt that also deliberately uses the wrong word in order to over-sensationalise the position doesn't help you out either. Words have different meanings and they matter. The only other twat on here that uses his own private definitions of words at variance with general usage or their dictionary definition is H&P. But no, that couldn't possibly be, could it?

No 'investments' have  been 'wiped out'. Some investments may now only be what they were worth a year ago but, hey, 'markets can go down as well as up'. It's possible that some short-term speculators have taken a massive bath, but, a) again, hey, that's the risk you take and b) I couldn't really give a shit about them because (see a))

You claimed I didnt know how markets worked. When put on the spot you claimed it was because I said that Triilions were wiped out instead of Trillions were wiped off. Big deal you couldnt back up your claim and to trivialise it even more it turns out Stocks new outlets also use the very same word in their headlines.

Run along you simpleton - if youve got nothing to say stfu.

Go and Comment on the Joke thread leave the important chat to those that actually have something to say rather than picking tiny holes in other posters comments.

See ya numbnuts 

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 15:30

goose wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 08:36 Tariffs in action:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2xzn6jmzpo

bad news for Nutsin Buffet.

good summary here too:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9ljwgg9y0o

I can't believe you've actually quoted chronic TDS sufferers the BBC in this matter

goose wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 08:36 Tariffs in action:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2xzn6jmzpo

bad news for Nutsin Buffet.

good summary here too:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9ljwgg9y0o

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 08:41

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 00:22 'Ok good so you now admit that Trump caused the Correction and wiped out Trillions of dollars worth of investments'

Wiped out, you said, not wiped off.

The investments aren't 'wiped out', they are now worth about what they were a year ago. You could say that trillions were wiped off the value of the entire stock market, but that means nothing. Presumably the previous year's gain were, um, 'wiped on' 

 

Oh well thanks Surface clearly a complete misunderstanding of how markets works because in one sentence I used out and another I used off. Well I need to go back to Finance school and retake all all my accounting qualifications.

Thanks for the tip genius! So just to be clear Trillions were as I said wiped out! Have a read below and jog on you dick!

https://www.marketwatch.com/livecoverag ... eUhbOGt2Wy

Ill let Market Watch know that the stock market had wiped off $9.6bn not wiped out! god what idiots!

Nutsin wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 00:15

BillyJenningsBoots wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 23:33

Nutsin wrote: ↑15 Apr 2025, 15:05

Ok, so you now know what a correction is. Glad I could educate you again.

I came on here and said when I made my investment changes, It’s on the thread, so yeah, I knew it was a buying opportunity, as did plenty of others which is why it has gone back up. When idiots like you were selling I was buying…. Thanks, I appreciate it!

Oh and there wi be more volatility and we will see more corrections, that’s how it works.

And as for “no good reason” I beg to differ, Supply chain issues cause inflation and national security issues have the USA reliant on China for pharmaceuticals, Rare earths and Steel. Two good reasons right there.

Then there’s the trade deficit and loss of US jobs. Two more good reasons.

Then there’s the threat of China becoming the dominant super power as well as all of the Intellectual property and technology they blatantly steal from the USA. More good reasons.

Im sure there are others too.

Again you are showing just what a fuckwit looks like!

Oh my god Nutsack .... so now you are saying that Trumps tarrifs were added to eliviate supply chain issues that cause inflation! You think whacking on a load of extra cost to US manufacturing is going to a) smooth the supply chain and b) make those goods cheaper! Tarrifs on their own do not solve trade deficits the size of the US - jeez what an idiot!

The US cant make those components cheaper than China adding tarrifs increases the cost whether you continue to import them or if/when you eventually can make them yourself.

Oh and pricing China and Ireland out of the US pharmaceutical market is really going to help how exactly? You think the US can manufacture your drug needs overnight?

I'll say again as you are such a simpleton we all know what a correction is and as I said I didnt sell I bought the dip. So yet again you are just so full of shit! Just like your mighty leader and his gang of cons and cronies. Good luck! your country is going to hell and you and your MAGA cretins are standing cheering watching them bleed it dry. Nice work!

Billy bought the dip lol!

I think people that read this thread will quite easily see that you had no idea what a correction is.
its in plain sight.

Im starting to feel sorry for you!

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑16 Apr 2025, 00:22 'Ok good so you now admit that Trump caused the Correction and wiped out Trillions of dollars worth of investments'

Wiped out, you said, not wiped off.

The investments aren't 'wiped out', they are now worth about what they were a year ago. You could say that trillions were wiped off the value of the entire stock market, but that means nothing. Presumably the previous year's gain were, um, 'wiped on'