The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 09 Dec 2024, 09:19
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
West Ham Online
The West Ham Fan Forum | More like the terraces than the family stand!
https://forum.westhamonline.co.uk/
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Page 16 of 315
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 09:31
I'd rather have Nigel than Keir Stalin.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 09:26
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 00:36Hammer I am" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:43SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:58He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.
"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual thoughWhat the fuck are you talking about, you illiterate oaf. It's there in black and white. The actual words, not your interpretation of a TDS summary you read in the Mirror.
And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.
Afghanistan was literally a NATO operation under article 5 which is a fact.
Splitting hairs over names does not change that fact.
Might I suggest you look up "cognitive dissonance"?
You are not doing youself any favours here and you are either deluding yourself or are a total idiot if you actually believe what you have written.
Splitting hairs over names does not change that fact.
Might I suggest you look up "cognitive dissonance"?
You are not doing youself any favours here and you are either deluding yourself or are a total idiot if you actually believe what you have written.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 09:13
I see Andy Burnham has til 5pm to decide if he will put his name up for pre-selection for the Manchester seat that will have a by-election
Word is that Starmer will stack the board deciding the candidate to keep him out as he knows as an MP he’d rally support to overthrow the gibbering dismal PM when the May elections go pear shaped
Another step towards a Reform government under Nazi Nigel
Word is that Starmer will stack the board deciding the candidate to keep him out as he knows as an MP he’d rally support to overthrow the gibbering dismal PM when the May elections go pear shaped
Another step towards a Reform government under Nazi Nigel
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 08:49
How Surface thinks NATO works.
"Curses, China has attacked France"
"Well shame we can't attack them back, they're not situated in the North Atlantic, the clue is in the name you see"
*Sits back and waits for the Canary Islands to make their move on the US
What a lemon
"Curses, China has attacked France"
"Well shame we can't attack them back, they're not situated in the North Atlantic, the clue is in the name you see"
*Sits back and waits for the Canary Islands to make their move on the US
What a lemon
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 08:43
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 00:36Hammer I am" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:43SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:58He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.
"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual thoughWhat the fuck are you talking about, you illiterate oaf. It's there in black and white. The actual words, not your interpretation of a TDS summary you read in the Mirror.
And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.
"And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name."
Confidently wrong again surface, all would have gone to Afghanistan in solidarity anyway I imagine (like Aus did), but NATO members were triggered under article 5.
Confidently wrong again surface, all would have gone to Afghanistan in solidarity anyway I imagine (like Aus did), but NATO members were triggered under article 5.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 08:39
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 08:09 Donald Trump dodged the draft 5 times mostly by his father paying a doctor to say his ‘bone spurs’ made him unfit for service
Should have used early onset dementia as a more likely excuse
Where are those Epstein files by the way?
Impeach the paedo
He went on and on about those files for months, then when Trump said it's all a hoax he went a bit quiet on it all. Don't know if its true or not but there's talk of an unredacted document with talk of a 13 yead old, abortrion, and Trump. Sounds suspicially explosive but its exactly the type of thing Nutsin would believe if it came from his Q-Anon cult buddies about a dem, like pizzagate etc
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 08:28
SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 00:36Hammer I am" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:43SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:58He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.
"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual thoughWhat the fuck are you talking about, you illiterate oaf. It's there in black and white. The actual words, not your interpretation of a TDS summary you read in the Mirror.
And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.
Not sure what's going on with you, but you're making Nutsin look like a genius at this point, yes its in black and white, we can all read, Trump stating US didn't ask anything of her allies and they stood a little off the front lines.
And NATO will operate anywhere in the world if that's where the country that attacked a NATO member is situated, like AFGHANISTAN. you're going senile mate, go and have a lie down
And NATO will operate anywhere in the world if that's where the country that attacked a NATO member is situated, like AFGHANISTAN. you're going senile mate, go and have a lie down
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 08:09
Donald Trump dodged the draft 5 times mostly by his father paying a doctor to say his ‘bone spurs’ made him unfit for service
Should have used early onset dementia as a more likely excuse
Where are those Epstein files by the way?
Impeach the paedo
Should have used early onset dementia as a more likely excuse
Where are those Epstein files by the way?
Impeach the paedo
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 08:06
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:58I think we all know it happened.
Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.
But thanks for the laugh!
We? No just you.
You get presented with clear data & facts from your own government or renowned experts, your response is always ‘liberal myth’ or GCSE business studies. Although I’m reasonably certain you failed it.
You don’t have a point, you just post random links from Facebook.
Like I said, you’re 60 years old, still working and you have some desperate need for validation of your life from anonymous strangers. Your (late) midlife crisis brings me amusement every day
You get presented with clear data & facts from your own government or renowned experts, your response is always ‘liberal myth’ or GCSE business studies. Although I’m reasonably certain you failed it.
You don’t have a point, you just post random links from Facebook.
Like I said, you’re 60 years old, still working and you have some desperate need for validation of your life from anonymous strangers. Your (late) midlife crisis brings me amusement every day
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 08:01
Nutsin you actively support a proven sexual abuser of woman on here every day.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 05:39
the 'nut job in the white hoose' is just area cleaning .
Pocketing the odd b&h fag butt along the way
Pocketing the odd b&h fag butt along the way
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 05:00
Nutjob. Is there nothing the retard in the Whire House can do or say that you would criticize? Y
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 04:56
This is for Goose and all the other kiddy fiddling sympathizer who defend the grooming gangs.
Poor woman’s hurt and pain is so evident. Something she will have to carry for the rest of her life. She was 11 when they started
Poor woman’s hurt and pain is so evident. Something she will have to carry for the rest of her life. She was 11 when they started
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 03:39
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 02:22Hello Mrs. Jones" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 01:24 Nutcheese. I suppose you back the orange buffoon's comments about NATO troops in Afghanistan? What an ill-educated cսnt.Are you really that simple. ?
Yes, Jones really is that simple.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 02:59
Like his uncle in 82' flying in his Meccano chopper
Yea.. fuck off you wankers...
Yea.. fuck off you wankers...
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 02:22
Hello Mrs. Jones" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2026, 01:24 Nutcheese. I suppose you back the orange buffoon's comments about NATO troops in Afghanistan? What an ill-educated cսnt.
Are you really that simple. ?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 02:12
Harry the wimp piping up proves my point.
Absolute fraud the cսnt...two tours at bastion PLAYING SOLDIER.
two tours ...?..do fuck off..it's an INSULT to mention that fuckin minge in the same breath as the likes of PTE Chris Gray .(1 RA)..
See how the mainstream media distort fings to fit their agenda..?
Absolute fraud the cսnt...two tours at bastion PLAYING SOLDIER.
two tours ...?..do fuck off..it's an INSULT to mention that fuckin minge in the same breath as the likes of PTE Chris Gray .(1 RA)..
See how the mainstream media distort fings to fit their agenda..?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 01:56
The meltdown over Donalds comments is quite outstanding.
Even for the leftwaffe .
I served and I'm not offended in anyway whatsoever..
NO CONTEXT AS USUAL..JUST PILE ON.
he meant no disrespect to fallen British Servicemen or WRAC s..
Meanwhile the Government continue to hound veterans from the TROUBLES...and the general treatment of veterans .
NOW THAT DOES OFFEND ME
Even for the leftwaffe .
I served and I'm not offended in anyway whatsoever..
NO CONTEXT AS USUAL..JUST PILE ON.
he meant no disrespect to fallen British Servicemen or WRAC s..
Meanwhile the Government continue to hound veterans from the TROUBLES...and the general treatment of veterans .
NOW THAT DOES OFFEND ME
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 01:24
Nutcheese. I suppose you back the orange buffoon's comments about NATO troops in Afghanistan? What an ill-educated cսnt.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 00:44
MEOW!!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 00:36
Hammer I am" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 19:43SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:58zebthecat wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:30That is weapons grade straw clutching.
As others have said they were based in Helmand province which was one of the most dangerous places in Aghanistan and got blown up and attacked regularly. Special Forces fought behind the lines alongside US Special forces.
He said it, meant it and it was a pack of lies.He actually attacked the countries, not the troops. Here's the full quote. Only a Grade 1 TDS sufferer would claim he is attacking the actual soldiers.
"We’ve never needed them (Nato member countries). We have never really asked anything of them. They’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan, or this or that, and they did, they stayed a little back, a little off the front lines."Being Nutsin's little sidekick has rotted your brain, those are the points everyone has already countered. Ok perhaps you can counter in your own worlds in bold how US didn't ask for assistance by triggering article 5, and how NATO troops were hiding behind American soldiers by being posted in Helmand province etc. feel free to change the subject as usual though
What the fuck are you talking about, you illiterate oaf. It's there in black and white. The actual words, not your interpretation of a TDS summary you read in the Mirror.
And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.
And NATO doesn't operate in Asia, you utter numb-nuts. The clue is in the name.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 24 Jan 2026, 00:11
MAGFO!!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 23 Jan 2026, 22:58
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:49Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:47goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he.
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.We all know what happened, stop lying!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!Yup thought as much.
Never happened did it?
.I think we all know it happened.
Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.
But thanks for the laugh!
Amazing that you still have the Nads to come on here and talk economics when you obviously don’t understand what is happening. All you can do is read a report, without any basic understanding of what it means. A bit like a six year old.
But thanks for the laugh!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 23 Jan 2026, 22:49
Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:47goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.We all know what happened, stop lying!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!
Yup thought as much.
Never happened did it?
I’m off to bed so you’ve got all night to post it, but we both know you won’t.
You’re lost son. Is it still a midlife crisis at 60?
Never happened did it?
I’m off to bed so you’ve got all night to post it, but we both know you won’t.
You’re lost son. Is it still a midlife crisis at 60?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Posted: 23 Jan 2026, 22:47
goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:44Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 22:38It’s a fact! Stop fucking lying. It’s documented by your past posts on here. You were screaming Armageddon in a Trump Deranged frenzy. Warning everyone shit was going pear shaped.
I was the only sensible voice arguing for people to not listen to your fuckwittery and to buy the dip. Which I did and posted proof.
Turns out once again, you were fucking clueless and I was fucking correct.
As I said Pick up a book you cսnt!
You have zero credibility! You don’t know what you are talking about. Just because you can read economic data that is printed doesn’t mean you know how to interpret it.
Gotta laugh!Post it up sunshine. I’ll wait……….
I pointed to the reaction of the markets to trumps tariffs, which is why he
Not once did I tell you or anyone to buy or sell anything. But you already knew that.
Youre 60 years old and still working, and desperate for some kind of validation from complete strangers. It’s bizarre.
We all know what happened, stop lying!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!
the best part was you followed that up with Stagflation!
Priceless!