West Ham Online

Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:59 always find it strange, an apparent ex british citizen enjoying/welcoming the demise of his birth country because of some sick devotion to an orange oddball cսnt

zebthecat wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 18:30

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 01:26

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:51

fuck me, you really going to defend that cսnt over that statement, all this "what he meant was" hand wringing is sickening 

I think you have this the wrong way round. It's you that's guessing what he meant. I'm simply repeating what he actually said. Which was that Britain avoided the front line in Afghanistan. Factually true. And not a criticism of British troops.

That is weapons grade straw clutching.
As others have said they were based in Helmand province which was one of the most dangerous places in Aghanistan and got blown up and attacked regularly. Special Forces fought behind the lines alongside US Special forces. 
He said it, meant it and it was a pack of lies.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 01:26

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:51

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:16

 

British troops performed badly in both Iraq and Afghanistan, not because the troops were anything less than brave and utterly professional, but because they were criminally ill-equipped by Blair, Brown and Cameron. Furthermore the military leaders lacked the stones to admit this. This was well-documented at the time.

Trump's word are a criticism of the uselessness of their leaders and the leaders of other NATO nations and their continuing failure to properly fund the armed forces, not the troops.

fuck me, you really going to defend that cսnt over that statement, all this "what he meant was" hand wringing is sickening 

I think you have this the wrong way round. It's you that's guessing what he meant. I'm simply repeating what he actually said. Which was that Britain avoided the front line in Afghanistan. Factually true. And not a criticism of British troops.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 23:16

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: ↑22 Jan 2026, 22:21 Over 450 British, not to mention other nations, troops dying because of NATO’s  Article 5 in Afghanistan after 9/11. Yet the dementia ridden man-child appears to think that the nations that stood side by side with American troops weren’t on the ‘front line’, as the septics obviously were.
The cսnt’s fucking deluded, and I truly wish that for the memory of our, and other nations fallen, he dies a lingering death.
The cսnt has finally shown his true colour.

 

British troops performed badly in both Iraq and Afghanistan, not because the troops were anything less than brave and utterly professional, but because they were criminally ill-equipped by Blair, Brown and Cameron. Furthermore the military leaders lacked the stones to admit this. This was well-documented at the time.

Trump's word are a criticism of the uselessness of their leaders and the leaders of other NATO nations and their continuing failure to properly fund the armed forces, not the troops.

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 17:17

goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:42

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:19

 

Anon, you’re not a cat woman are you?

I bet Goose has got a cat.

nah i hate cats.

i bet you have diabetes and elasticated waitband jeans.

I had you pegged..

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 17:17

goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:42

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:19

 

Anon, you’re not a cat woman are you?

I bet Goose has got a cat.

nah i hate cats.

i bet you have diabetes and elasticated waitband jeans.

I had you pegged as owning a Ginger Cat.
You’re not embarrassed to admit it are you? I bet Anon has a couple of Cats.

goose wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:42

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:19

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:18

TDS in full effect, little quisling weasel 

 

Anon, you’re not a cat woman are you?

I bet Goose has got a cat.

nah i hate cats.

i bet you have diabetes and elasticated waitband jeans.

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:19

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:18

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:05

Just as well Trump ends wars then isn’t it?

TDS in full effect, little quisling weasel 

 

Anon, you’re not a cat woman are you?

I bet Goose has got a cat.

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 15:51 It would appear Trumps hurty words are just too much for some.
As For the Mong who thinks if NATO collapses the European Gov’ts won’t have to pay 5% of their GDP for defense any more, I ask how you gonna defend yourself from Putin?

It’s like listening to a bunch of old housewives complain.

What a bunch of mincers!

Gotta laugh!

WHU(Exeter) wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:19 You could be right about the 5% thing Nutsin, might have to raise it a lot more, if the BOSS goes full circle and starts actively supporting Putin, instead of just appeasing him.

(What is it with that relationship? I would've thought the leader of the worlds biggest stupidpower would have Putin in his pocket, rather than the other way round)

Wonder what the % of our GDP was spent towards aiding the infant nation stupidpower in Iraq and Afghanistan 

Reckon we could get a refund?

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:18

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:05

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 15:59

I'm sure a few hundred housewives have plenty to complain about considering their husbands didn't come home from a war Trump said they weren't asked for or needed in the first place 

Just as well Trump ends wars then isn’t it?

TDS in full effect, little quisling weasel 

Fauxstralian wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:16 Ends wars?
Russia / Ukraine
Israel / Palestine
Venezuela
Nigeria
Greenland (or is it Iceland?)
Iran

Peace at last! Ha ha 
All down to the Board of Peace featuring Trump Putin & Tony Blair
Irony is dead 

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 16:05

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 15:59

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 15:51 It would appear Trumps hurty words are just too much for some.
As For the Mong who thinks if NATO collapses the European Gov’ts won’t have to pay 5% of their GDP for defense any more, I ask how you gonna defend yourself from Putin?

It’s like listening to a bunch of old housewives complain.

What a bunch of mincers!

Gotta laugh!

I'm sure a few hundred housewives have plenty to complain about considering their husbands didn't come home from a war Trump said they weren't asked for or needed in the first place 

Just as well Trump ends wars then isn’t it?

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 15:59

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 15:51 It would appear Trumps hurty words are just too much for some.
As For the Mong who thinks if NATO collapses the European Gov’ts won’t have to pay 5% of their GDP for defense any more, I ask how you gonna defend yourself from Putin?

It’s like listening to a bunch of old housewives complain.

What a bunch of mincers!

Gotta laugh!

I'm sure a few hundred housewives have plenty to complain about considering their husbands didn't come home from a war Trump said they weren't asked for or needed in the first place 

Nutsin wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 15:51 It would appear Trumps hurty words are just too much for some.
As For the Mong who thinks if NATO collapses the European Gov’ts won’t have to pay 5% of their GDP for defense any more, I ask how you gonna defend yourself from Putin?

It’s like listening to a bunch of old housewives complain.

What a bunch of mincers!

Gotta laugh!

SurfaceAgentX2Zero wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 14:39

 

Surface = Lord Haw-Haw

I stand corrected. The British Army is more than generously funded and equipped and its c.35,000 front-line troops are more than adequate for all tasks that our megalomaniac leaders set them.

WHU(Exeter) wrote: ↑23 Jan 2026, 15:01

Then again he (like the leader of the Democrats also), has to appeal to core fanbase, and idiots must be a huge demographic, compared to other western democracies.