West Ham Online

Posted: **09 Dec 2024, 09:19**

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 16:56**

Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 16:52
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 16:16
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 15:24
Let’s be clear before you post make sure you know what the fuck you are talking about.

Lol keep dancing.

id happily see ALL sexual abusers castrated. Can you say the same?

I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.

First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence.

To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.

nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.

For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.

hahaha look at you dance around it. He’s a proven sexual abuser of women, which was upheld via appeal as well.

I’m not comparing. I’m pointing your rank hypocrisy constantly bringing up grooming gangs while championing a proven sexual abuser of women.

You like the idea of castrating rapists but not sexual abusers?

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 16:52**

goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 16:16
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 15:24
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 14:11
Let’s be clear, neither is acceptable.

I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?

Let’s be clear before you post make sure you know what the fuck you are talking about.

Lol keep dancing.

id happily see ALL sexual abusers castrated. Can you say the same?

I know enough to know a kangaroo court when I see one.

First off it was a civil court not a criminal court, much easier to get a verdict. Secondly it was held in the most Democratic city in the most Democratic state in the country, with a bias Judge and Jury and a plaintiff who couldn’t remember what year the so called assault took place so Trump couldn’t even provide an alibi in his defence.

To say the whole episode was sketchy would be an understatement. Typical Democrat bullshit pulled before an election.

nothing new, we already know how dirty the Dems are.

For you to compare that to the countless number of grooming gang convictions in criminal courts all over the UK is pretty pathetic and stupid, even by your standards.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 16:16**

Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 15:24
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 14:11
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 14:09
Get back to me when you know the difference between rape and sexual abuse.

Let’s be clear, neither is acceptable.

I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?

Let’s be clear before you post make sure you know what the fuck you are talking about.

Lol keep dancing.

id happily see ALL sexual abusers castrated. Can you say the same?

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 15:24**

goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 14:11
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 14:09
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:54

Hilarious is actively supporting a proven sexual abuser of women but then making everyone one of your posts a protest about rape.

Irony is off the charts.

Get back to me when you know the difference between rape and sexual abuse.

Let’s be clear, neither is acceptable.

I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?

Let’s be clear before you post make sure you know what the fuck you are talking about.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 14:11**

Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 14:09
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:54
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:42
What’s hilarious is you not knowing the difference between rape and sexual abuse.

Hilarious is actively supporting a proven sexual abuser of women but then making everyone one of your posts a protest about rape.

Irony is off the charts.

Get back to me when you know the difference between rape and sexual abuse.

Let’s be clear, neither is acceptable.

I’d happily see both castrated. Would you?

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 14:09**

goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:54
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:42
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:40
Yeh because sexually abusing women is way more acceptable?
Hilarious that your defence is “he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abuses them”.

What’s hilarious is you not knowing the difference between rape and sexual abuse.

Hilarious is actively supporting a proven sexual abuser of women but then making everyone one of your posts a protest about rape.

Irony is off the charts.

Get back to me when you know the difference between rape and sexual abuse.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 13:54**

Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:42
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:40
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:32
I thought you said it was rape? Do you ever get anything right?

Poor Goose, so clueless.

Yeh because sexually abusing women is way more acceptable?
Hilarious that your defence is “he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abuses them”.

What’s hilarious is you not knowing the difference between rape and sexual abuse.

Hilarious is actively supporting a proven sexual abuser of women but then making everyone one of your posts a protest about rape.

Irony is off the charts.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 13:53**

Stats are not racist

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 13:47**

Here are some more stats. Note: the real number is probably a lot higher because of all the cover ups and unreported rapes that the cops hid and Gov’t officials buried because they didn’t want to lose votes.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 13:44**

Facts aren’t racist.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 13:42**

goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:40
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:32
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 08:18
Look how desperate you are to defend a proven sexual abuser of women. He lost the appeal btw.

Your double standards on this are fantastic to watch.
”castrate them” unless you worship them then it’s okay because it’s only sexual assault.

I thought you said it was rape? Do you ever get anything right?

Poor Goose, so clueless.

Yeh because sexually abusing women is way more acceptable?
Hilarious that your defence is “he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abuses them”.

What’s hilarious is you not knowing the difference between rape and sexual abuse.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 13:41**

Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:34 Stats don’t lie and they aren’t racist.

Poland has one of the lowest. Wonder why that could be?

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 13:40**

Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 13:32
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 08:18
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 02:02
One of these days you’ll get something right.

## Context of the E. Jean Carroll Case
E. Jean Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. She filed a civil lawsuit in November 2022 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed claims beyond the statute of limitations. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York’s narrow penal law definition) and defamation for calling her claims a “hoax” and “con job.” Trump was ordered to pay $2 million for battery and $3 million for defamation. A separate defamation lawsuit resulted in an $83.3 million award in January 2024. Both verdicts are under appeal.

Poor Goose

Look how desperate you are to defend a proven sexual abuser of women. He lost the appeal btw.

Your double standards on this are fantastic to watch.
”castrate them” unless you worship them then it’s okay because it’s only sexual assault.

I thought you said it was rape? Do you ever get anything right?

Poor Goose, so clueless.

Yeh because sexually abusing women is way more acceptable?
Hilarious that your defence is “he doesn’t rape women, he only sexually abuses them”.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 13:34**

Stats don’t lie and they aren’t racist.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 13:32**

goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 08:18
Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 02:02
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 00:17
So do you want rapists like Trump castrated or not?

One of these days you’ll get something right.

## Context of the E. Jean Carroll Case
E. Jean Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. She filed a civil lawsuit in November 2022 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed claims beyond the statute of limitations. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York’s narrow penal law definition) and defamation for calling her claims a “hoax” and “con job.” Trump was ordered to pay $2 million for battery and $3 million for defamation. A separate defamation lawsuit resulted in an $83.3 million award in January 2024. Both verdicts are under appeal.

Poor Goose

Look how desperate you are to defend a proven sexual abuser of women. He lost the appeal btw.

Your double standards on this are fantastic to watch.
”castrate them” unless you worship them then it’s okay because it’s only sexual assault.

I thought you said it was rape? Do you ever get anything right?

Poor Goose, so clueless.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 08:18**

Nutsin wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 02:02
goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 00:17
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:57
Go argue with someone else you bore!

So do you want rapists like Trump castrated or not?

One of these days you’ll get something right.

## Context of the E. Jean Carroll Case
E. Jean Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. She filed a civil lawsuit in November 2022 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed claims beyond the statute of limitations. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York’s narrow penal law definition) and defamation for calling her claims a “hoax” and “con job.” Trump was ordered to pay $2 million for battery and $3 million for defamation. A separate defamation lawsuit resulted in an $83.3 million award in January 2024. Both verdicts are under appeal.

Poor Goose

Look how desperate you are to defend a proven sexual abuser of women. He lost the appeal btw.

Your double standards on this are fantastic to watch.
”castrate them” unless you worship them then it’s okay because it’s only sexual assault.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 02:02**

goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 00:17
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:57
goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:27
Deranged how? You saying he’s not a rapist?

Go argue with someone else you bore!

So do you want rapists like Trump castrated or not?

One of these days you’ll get something right.

## Context of the E. Jean Carroll Case
E. Jean Carroll alleged that Trump sexually assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. She filed a civil lawsuit in November 2022 under New York’s Adult Survivors Act, which allowed claims beyond the statute of limitations. The jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse (not rape under New York’s narrow penal law definition) and defamation for calling her claims a “hoax” and “con job.” Trump was ordered to pay $2 million for battery and $3 million for defamation. A separate defamation lawsuit resulted in an $83.3 million award in January 2024. Both verdicts are under appeal.

Poor Goose

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 01:33**

goose wrote: ↑06 Jul 2025, 00:17
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:57
goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:27
Deranged how? You saying he’s not a rapist?

Go argue with someone else you bore!

So do you want rapists like Trump castrated or not?

Absolutely not, he’s making America great again and bringing Peace to the world. I know you war mongering Globalists hate him but nobody believes a word you say about anything, not even your fake lawfare bullshit.

But we all know just how gullible you are, don’t we.

Posted: **06 Jul 2025, 00:17**

Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:57
goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:27
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:25
Not salty at all, just pointing out your TDS again.

Funny how you keep trying to avoid the subject.

Deranged how? You saying he’s not a rapist?

Go argue with someone else you bore!

So do you want rapists like Trump castrated or not?

Posted: **05 Jul 2025, 22:57**

goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:27
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:25
goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:00
Now you’re just making stuff up.
You get proper salty when someone insults Trump.

Not salty at all, just pointing out your TDS again.

Funny how you keep trying to avoid the subject.

Deranged how? You saying he’s not a rapist?

Go argue with someone else you bore!

Posted: **05 Jul 2025, 22:27**

Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:25
goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:00
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:58
Oh that’s right I forgot you’re not disappointed at all the kids being abused are you. You’re only disappointed when people try to do something to stop it.

Now you’re just making stuff up.
You get proper salty when someone insults Trump.

Not salty at all, just pointing out your TDS again.

Funny how you keep trying to avoid the subject.

Deranged how? You saying he’s not a rapist?

Posted: **05 Jul 2025, 22:25**

goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 22:00
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:58
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:46
Well Trumps getting the criminals out at least. I think you should target your disappointment at Starmer don’t you?

Oh that’s right I forgot you’re not disappointed at all the kids being abused are you. You’re only disappointed when people try to do something to stop it.

Now you’re just making stuff up.
You get proper salty when someone insults Trump.

Not salty at all, just pointing out your TDS again.

Funny how you keep trying to avoid the subject.

Posted: **05 Jul 2025, 22:00**

Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:58
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:46
goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:44
It’s what happens when you vote for a proper leader and not blindly worship a rapist.

Well Trumps getting the criminals out at least. I think you should target your disappointment at Starmer don’t you?

Oh that’s right I forgot you’re not disappointed at all the kids being abused are you. You’re only disappointed when people try to do something to stop it.

Now you’re just making stuff up.
You get proper salty when someone insults Trump.

Posted: **05 Jul 2025, 21:59**

Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:46
goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:44
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:20 Not sure if true, perhaps our resident kiddy fiddling sympathizer can shed some light. But if true I like it.

It’s what happens when you vote for a proper leader and not blindly worship a rapist.

Well Trumps getting the criminals out at least. I think you should target your disappointment at Starmer don’t you?

Starmer is a terrible PM, I don’t support him and haven’t supported him in any way. But even if he was amazing, but was a proven rapist - I’d never support him.

Posted: **05 Jul 2025, 21:58**

Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:46
goose wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:44
Nutsin wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025, 21:20 Not sure if true, perhaps our resident kiddy fiddling sympathizer can shed some light. But if true I like it.

It’s what happens when you vote for a proper leader and not blindly worship a rapist.

Well Trumps getting the criminals out at least. I think you should target your disappointment at Starmer don’t you?

Oh that’s right I forgot you’re not disappointed at all the kids being abused are you. You’re only disappointed when people try to do something to stop it.

West Ham Online

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)