Page 3 of 4
Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 09:33
by Come On You Irons
The convicted sex offender is in court for sentencing this morning. I would be amazed if he gets bird.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:13
by One Sunny Day
goose wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 17:03
yeh its great he's behind bars AFTER he was released early to make room for the old woman (the woman you called a terrorist lol) who posted on Facebook.
i bet the woman who was sexually assaulted is thrilled.
Ah, you're still hanging onto your impossible fantasy that people should be sent to prison for sex offending they do in the future. You really can't stop making an arse of yourself with your insane babblings.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:12
by ,
Goose why do you make light of someone inciting to kill by calling it scary words?
We could be mistaken into thinking that you have sympathy with her racist views.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:06
by Come On You Irons
, wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 16:52
Coyi, you wrote “Pay paedos thousands of pounds to access indecent images of children = suspended sentence.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.”
Surely if anything is two tier it is you, coyi, in the way you post because nobody has been jailed for protesting. You know this full well because lots of people protested within the confines of what is deemed legal. Its the people who went beyond legal protest that are being brought to justice.
I think you know full well that 'what is deemed legal' is at the behest of those in authority and that is where the issue lies.
It seems those in authority think it's ok for powerful members of the elite to pay paedophiles for graphic images of children being abused and NOT jail them. While others (plebs) get locked up for tweets and Facebook comments.
Modern society is truly insane.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:05
by goose
, wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 17:02
Goose, why are you being a spin doctor for a racist by using the term scary words instead of posting what the racist actually said?
this is what she posted you melt:
“It’s absolutely ridiculous. Don’t protect the mosques. Blow the mosque up with the adults in it.”
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:03
by goose
yeh its great he's behind bars AFTER he was released early to make room for the old woman (the woman you called a terrorist lol) who posted on Facebook.
i bet the woman who was sexually assaulted is thrilled.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 17:02
by ,
Goose, why are you being a spin doctor for a racist by using the term scary words instead of posting what the racist actually said?
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 16:59
by One Sunny Day
goose wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 16:56
OSD will be delighted that another sex pest is still on the streets while middle aged woman are locked up for posting scary words.
Ah, so desperate you're making stuff up now, I see, when I said the sex offender was behind bars, where he belongs.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 16:56
by goose
OSD will be delighted that another sex pest is still on the streets while middle aged woman are locked up for posting scary words.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 16:54
by One Sunny Day
goose will be delighted. He doesn't think people should go to prison for breaking the law, if it's on the internet.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 16:52
by ,
Coyi, you wrote “Pay paedos thousands of pounds to access indecent images of children = suspended sentence.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.”
Surely if anything is two tier it is you, coyi, in the way you post because nobody has been jailed for protesting. You know this full well because lots of people protested within the confines of what is deemed legal. Its the people who went beyond legal protest that are being brought to justice.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 16:42
by ,
Edward’s got off lightly especially as the content comprised moving images as well as stills.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 16:31
by Mad Ferret
Nonce cսnt. Hope he tops himself.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 16:29
by Lee Trundle
He paid for 41 images of children, some between 7 and 9 years old, showing penetration, and didn't get put away.
Compared to 3 years someone got for a tweet.
It's so bonkers I don't think even comma could defend it.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 15:53
by Manuel
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 13:49
I knew he would get off with a suspended sentence. So obvious.
Pay paedos thousands of pounds to access indecent images of children = suspended sentence.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.
You were right, but he didn't get off because he has a few quid and is a newsreader, the judge wouldn't give a fuck about that, if anything he would make an example of the cսnt. It just seems this type of offence isn't treated seriously in the UK.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 15:08
by BRANDED
Must have some absolute dirt on some important people.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 14:40
by goose
maybe if Huw had posted some mean words on Facebook he'd be more likely to see the inside of a prison?
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 14:30
by Nurse Ratched
Is this what 'they' usually get for a first offence of this nature?
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 14:26
by claypole
Disgusting sentence.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 13:49
by Come On You Irons
I knew he would get off with a suspended sentence. So obvious.
Pay paedos thousands of pounds to access indecent images of children = suspended sentence.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 13:46
by Fauxstralian
I see the CPS representative on the bbc website says that this sends a clear message that we will bring offenders to justice
Yeah , a 6 month suspended sentence will have all his fellow Welsh paedos quaking in their boots
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 13:39
by goose
sparred jail because he has a 'mental disorder' and would be vulnerable in prison.
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 13:08
by LeroysBoots
I can see there being a huge outcry over this and Starmer will question the sentence, there will be a review, he'll get a custodial sentence and the judge will turn out to be a bit, you know, dodgy !
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 13:06
by MaryMillingtonsGhost
Six months suspended for the deviant cսnt.
What a fucking joke!
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 11:41
by Takashi Miike
of course it's a light touch sentence, they have similar habits to the deviant welsh cսnt
Re: Huw Edwards
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 11:31
by Manuel
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 11:08
Manuel wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 09:58
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 09:56
Because of his high status, his fame, his wealth and the 'contrition' he has shown (after getting caught, charged and convicted, that is).
Since when has that mattered in the UK? I mean about his wealth/fame. Bigger people that him have got bird. Anyway, I just read that if Edwards does get sentenced to prison, the maximum he could get from the magistrates' court is 12 months, so a load of bollocks anyway.
The BBC just reported that the maximum sentence is up to 10 years, so I'm not sure where you got 12 months from.
BBC: "...while the maximum sentence is 10 years, for the category of offending - making of indecent images - the range is up to three years. The significant aggravating factor is that the images were moving images".What could the sentence be?published at 08:14 British Summer Time08:14 BST
Helena WilkinsonIf Edwards does get sentenced to prison, the maximum he could get from the magistrates' court is 12 months.As we just reported, that's the total sentence magistrates can hand down to an offender for more than one offence.