AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Huw Edwards
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Huw Edwards
The convicted sex offender is in court for sentencing this morning. I would be amazed if he gets bird.
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 426
- Has liked: 254 times
- Been liked: 102 times
Re: Huw Edwards
Ah, you're still hanging onto your impossible fantasy that people should be sent to prison for sex offending they do in the future. You really can't stop making an arse of yourself with your insane babblings.
-
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Re: Huw Edwards
, wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 16:52 Coyi, you wrote “Pay paedos thousands of pounds to access indecent images of children = suspended sentence.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.”
Surely if anything is two tier it is you, coyi, in the way you post because nobody has been jailed for protesting. You know this full well because lots of people protested within the confines of what is deemed legal. Its the people who went beyond legal protest that are being brought to justice.
I think you know full well that 'what is deemed legal' is at the behest of those in authority and that is where the issue lies.
It seems those in authority think it's ok for powerful members of the elite to pay paedophiles for graphic images of children being abused and NOT jail them. While others (plebs) get locked up for tweets and Facebook comments.
Modern society is truly insane.
It seems those in authority think it's ok for powerful members of the elite to pay paedophiles for graphic images of children being abused and NOT jail them. While others (plebs) get locked up for tweets and Facebook comments.
Modern society is truly insane.
Re: Huw Edwards
this is what she posted you melt:
“It’s absolutely ridiculous. Don’t protect the mosques. Blow the mosque up with the adults in it.”
“It’s absolutely ridiculous. Don’t protect the mosques. Blow the mosque up with the adults in it.”
Re: Huw Edwards
yeh its great he's behind bars AFTER he was released early to make room for the old woman (the woman you called a terrorist lol) who posted on Facebook.
i bet the woman who was sexually assaulted is thrilled.
i bet the woman who was sexually assaulted is thrilled.
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 426
- Has liked: 254 times
- Been liked: 102 times
Re: Huw Edwards
Ah, so desperate you're making stuff up now, I see, when I said the sex offender was behind bars, where he belongs.
- One Sunny Day
- Posts: 426
- Has liked: 254 times
- Been liked: 102 times
Re: Huw Edwards
goose will be delighted. He doesn't think people should go to prison for breaking the law, if it's on the internet.
Re: Huw Edwards
Coyi, you wrote “Pay paedos thousands of pounds to access indecent images of children = suspended sentence.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.”
Surely if anything is two tier it is you, coyi, in the way you post because nobody has been jailed for protesting. You know this full well because lots of people protested within the confines of what is deemed legal. Its the people who went beyond legal protest that are being brought to justice.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.”
Surely if anything is two tier it is you, coyi, in the way you post because nobody has been jailed for protesting. You know this full well because lots of people protested within the confines of what is deemed legal. Its the people who went beyond legal protest that are being brought to justice.
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 1231
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 217 times
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3086
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Huw Edwards
He paid for 41 images of children, some between 7 and 9 years old, showing penetration, and didn't get put away.
Compared to 3 years someone got for a tweet.
It's so bonkers I don't think even comma could defend it.
Compared to 3 years someone got for a tweet.
It's so bonkers I don't think even comma could defend it.
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 138 times
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Huw Edwards
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 13:49 I knew he would get off with a suspended sentence. So obvious.
Pay paedos thousands of pounds to access indecent images of children = suspended sentence.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.
You were right, but he didn't get off because he has a few quid and is a newsreader, the judge wouldn't give a fuck about that, if anything he would make an example of the cսnt. It just seems this type of offence isn't treated seriously in the UK.
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 998
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 398 times
- Been liked: 397 times
-
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Re: Huw Edwards
I knew he would get off with a suspended sentence. So obvious.
Pay paedos thousands of pounds to access indecent images of children = suspended sentence.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.
Pay paedos thousands of pounds to access indecent images of children = suspended sentence.
Protest against rampant, uncontrolled migration = fast-tracked custodial sentences all round.
Two tier British justice for all to see.
-
- Posts: 2676
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 42 times
- Been liked: 263 times
Re: Huw Edwards
I see the CPS representative on the bbc website says that this sends a clear message that we will bring offenders to justice
Yeah , a 6 month suspended sentence will have all his fellow Welsh paedos quaking in their boots
Yeah , a 6 month suspended sentence will have all his fellow Welsh paedos quaking in their boots
-
- Posts: 435
- Old WHO Number: 10197
- Has liked: 11 times
- Been liked: 13 times
Re: Huw Edwards
I can see there being a huge outcry over this and Starmer will question the sentence, there will be a review, he'll get a custodial sentence and the judge will turn out to be a bit, you know, dodgy !
- MaryMillingtonsGhost
- Posts: 730
- Old WHO Number: 300173
- Has liked: 385 times
- Been liked: 255 times
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3035
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 642 times
- Been liked: 945 times
Re: Huw Edwards
of course it's a light touch sentence, they have similar habits to the deviant welsh cսnt
- Manuel
- Posts: 4111
- Location: The Very Far East
- Old WHO Number: 300109
- Has liked: 138 times
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Huw Edwards
Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 11:08Manuel wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 09:58Come On You Irons" wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 09:56Because of his high status, his fame, his wealth and the 'contrition' he has shown (after getting caught, charged and convicted, that is).Since when has that mattered in the UK? I mean about his wealth/fame. Bigger people that him have got bird. Anyway, I just read that if Edwards does get sentenced to prison, the maximum he could get from the magistrates' court is 12 months, so a load of bollocks anyway.The BBC just reported that the maximum sentence is up to 10 years, so I'm not sure where you got 12 months from.
BBC: "...while the maximum sentence is 10 years, for the category of offending - making of indecent images - the range is up to three years. The significant aggravating factor is that the images were moving images".What could the sentence be?published at 08:14 British Summer Time08:14 BSTHelena WilkinsonIf Edwards does get sentenced to prison, the maximum he could get from the magistrates' court is 12 months.As we just reported, that's the total sentence magistrates can hand down to an offender for more than one offence.