AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
No to Digital ID
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 1778
- Old WHO Number: 14557
- Has liked: 343 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 14:44He'll still double down on it (and has probably already put spoken agreements in place as to who will build the system), because he won't go anywhere near addressing the core issue.
It'll be like giving a first class passenger on the Titanic a tea cup and asking them to bale the ship out.
I can truly understand your fear of ID cards as you live mainly in Thailand and still claim benefits here which your not entitled to so they will stop you committing fraud
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4676
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 31 times
- Been liked: 570 times
Re: No to Digital ID
yngwies Cat" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 14:58 Our arses are owned by tech millionaires, not sure the fuss about an iD surely the same as just having passport, NI number, birth cert and all that
Tech millionaires only want to monetise, not control you and your every move/thought.
-
- Posts: 443
- Old WHO Number: 17468
- Has liked: 125 times
- Been liked: 100 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Our arses are owned by tech millionaires, not sure the fuss about an iD surely the same as just having passport, NI number, birth cert and all that
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4676
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 31 times
- Been liked: 570 times
Re: No to Digital ID
It'll be like giving a first class passenger on the Titanic a tea cup and asking them to bale the ship out.
Re: No to Digital ID
Let’s tell the truth a lot of us on here the old bill knew everything
there is no change just it’s formal
there is no change just it’s formal
Re: No to Digital ID
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 12:36Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 11:33OK, we all get how much you need (NEED) the government/state/authorities to be acting in your best interests (probably on account that you try and give the impression that you're a model citizen without an extreme view in your repertoire), but that ain't the case - never was and certainly never will be.
We also get how your immediate response is to go for the poster when you don't/won't/can't understand the contents of a post (made by people you already feel should be silenced/cancelled/punished/put down). Your posting history is very clear on that point.
Still, you probably feel that if the government says the only use for these Starmercards is to prevent illegal working (it won't) then that is the truth because it's a government claim, in the same way you feel that giving your money freely to Sullivan is not supporting Sullivan.
Carry on, sunshine. You'll never make the Edinburgh Fringe, but you are certainly amusing.he's a fucking imbecile, his kind facilitate tyranny
Can understand your anger being a hermit with herpes must be a very sore point
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3359
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 765 times
- Been liked: 1145 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 11:33XKhammer wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 11:17Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:48Australia does, indeed have the right idea. Talking about this a while ago to a couple of Aussies I drink with when back in Thailand.
They say that they've also got a Plan B for those that get through and end up on the mainland - stick them in self-contained settlements at least 2-300km from the nearest urban development and let it be known that the intervening land is populated by crocodiles and aboriginals, and that the aboriginals are cannibalistic hunters.
No need for any form of (expensive) security - the fear of getting hunted down and eaten should they try to make their way back to civilisation keeps them in place until they're called in for processing.Plan B is fairytale you just made up,you clearly are insane,but then again all trannies areOK, we all get how much you need (NEED) the government/state/authorities to be acting in your best interests (probably on account that you try and give the impression that you're a model citizen without an extreme view in your repertoire), but that ain't the case - never was and certainly never will be.
We also get how your immediate response is to go for the poster when you don't/won't/can't understand the contents of a post (made by people you already feel should be silenced/cancelled/punished/put down). Your posting history is very clear on that point.
Still, you probably feel that if the government says the only use for these Starmercards is to prevent illegal working (it won't) then that is the truth because it's a government claim, in the same way you feel that giving your money freely to Sullivan is not supporting Sullivan.
Carry on, sunshine. You'll never make the Edinburgh Fringe, but you are certainly amusing.
he's a fucking imbecile, his kind facilitate tyranny
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4676
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 31 times
- Been liked: 570 times
Re: No to Digital ID
XKhammer wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 11:17Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:48Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:35 Australia has the right idea, no one let in on the mainland and all processing done on a remote island, we should do the same here, Gruinard Island sounds ideal to me?Australia does, indeed have the right idea. Talking about this a while ago to a couple of Aussies I drink with when back in Thailand.
They say that they've also got a Plan B for those that get through and end up on the mainland - stick them in self-contained settlements at least 2-300km from the nearest urban development and let it be known that the intervening land is populated by crocodiles and aboriginals, and that the aboriginals are cannibalistic hunters.
No need for any form of (expensive) security - the fear of getting hunted down and eaten should they try to make their way back to civilisation keeps them in place until they're called in for processing.Plan B is fairytale you just made up,you clearly are insane,but then again all trannies are
OK, we all get how much you need (NEED) the government/state/authorities to be acting in your best interests (probably on account that you try and give the impression that you're a model citizen without an extreme view in your repertoire), but that ain't the case - never was and certainly never will be.
We also get how your immediate response is to go for the poster when you don't/won't/can't understand the contents of a post (made by people you already feel should be silenced/cancelled/punished/put down). Your posting history is very clear on that point.
Still, you probably feel that if the government says the only use for these Starmercards is to prevent illegal working (it won't) then that is the truth because it's a government claim, in the same way you feel that giving your money freely to Sullivan is not supporting Sullivan.
Carry on, sunshine. You'll never make the Edinburgh Fringe, but you are certainly amusing.
We also get how your immediate response is to go for the poster when you don't/won't/can't understand the contents of a post (made by people you already feel should be silenced/cancelled/punished/put down). Your posting history is very clear on that point.
Still, you probably feel that if the government says the only use for these Starmercards is to prevent illegal working (it won't) then that is the truth because it's a government claim, in the same way you feel that giving your money freely to Sullivan is not supporting Sullivan.
Carry on, sunshine. You'll never make the Edinburgh Fringe, but you are certainly amusing.
Re: No to Digital ID
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:48Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:35 Australia has the right idea, no one let in on the mainland and all processing done on a remote island, we should do the same here, Gruinard Island sounds ideal to me?Australia does, indeed have the right idea. Talking about this a while ago to a couple of Aussies I drink with when back in Thailand.
They say that they've also got a Plan B for those that get through and end up on the mainland - stick them in self-contained settlements at least 2-300km from the nearest urban development and let it be known that the intervening land is populated by crocodiles and aboriginals, and that the aboriginals are cannibalistic hunters.
No need for any form of (expensive) security - the fear of getting hunted down and eaten should they try to make their way back to civilisation keeps them in place until they're called in for processing.
Plan B is fairytale you just made up,you clearly are insane,but then again all trannies are
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4676
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 31 times
- Been liked: 570 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:35 Australia has the right idea, no one let in on the mainland and all processing done on a remote island, we should do the same here, Gruinard Island sounds ideal to me?
Australia does, indeed have the right idea. Talking about this a while ago to a couple of Aussies I drink with when back in Thailand.
They say that they've also got a Plan B for those that get through and end up on the mainland - stick them in self-contained settlements at least 2-300km from the nearest urban development and let it be known that the intervening land is populated by crocodiles and aboriginals, and that the aboriginals are cannibalistic hunters.
No need for any form of (expensive) security - the fear of getting hunted down and eaten should they try to make their way back to civilisation keeps them in place until they're called in for processing.
They say that they've also got a Plan B for those that get through and end up on the mainland - stick them in self-contained settlements at least 2-300km from the nearest urban development and let it be known that the intervening land is populated by crocodiles and aboriginals, and that the aboriginals are cannibalistic hunters.
No need for any form of (expensive) security - the fear of getting hunted down and eaten should they try to make their way back to civilisation keeps them in place until they're called in for processing.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1511
- Has liked: 374 times
- Been liked: 609 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Australia has the right idea, no one let in on the mainland and all processing done on a remote island, we should do the same here, Gruinard Island sounds ideal to me?
-
- Posts: 1920
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 170 times
- Been liked: 362 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Thin end of the wedge if Labour get this through, I may not live in the UK anymore but this just looks like an excuse to get more control over the population and all that bollocks about stopping illegals is nonsense
they haven’t been able to stop them so far or even put much effort into doing so, what fool would trust them on this idea?
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4676
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 31 times
- Been liked: 570 times
Re: No to Digital ID
only1billybonds wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:11 Stopping illegal working is a fucking cover story.
I've been saying for ages that a surefire way to stop the illegals is to stop making it so attractive to come here. I dont so much blame the arrivals, more the politicians who do everything other than give them blow jobs on red carpets when the get here. State that they'll receive no benefits, be housed in warehouse type facilities in the middle of nowhere and they'll kip on camp beds. We'd see a drastic reduction almost overnight.
I'd go even further than that as a deterrent; as soon as they arrive, have them run past the nit nurse on their way to Brize Norton and put on the first available flight out.
Do it under the full glare (and obviously ensuing contempt) of the left-leaning mainstream media.
The details will work their way back through the chain to donor countries soon enough and those desperate to leave their country of birth will have to find the money tree they feel they're entitled to harvest elsewhere.
No issue with managed & controlled immigration whatsoever.
Do it under the full glare (and obviously ensuing contempt) of the left-leaning mainstream media.
The details will work their way back through the chain to donor countries soon enough and those desperate to leave their country of birth will have to find the money tree they feel they're entitled to harvest elsewhere.
No issue with managed & controlled immigration whatsoever.
Re: No to Digital ID
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:07mentally ill? a wrongun that's taken untold poisonous jabs so he can continue his fiddling trips to asia. you need putting down you cսnt
Why are so scared of vaccines?Why are you such a social outcast?Are you suffering from herpes?
The hapless hermit with herpes on his helmet
You worried the ID cards will reveal to the world you have an incurable sexual incurable disease?No wonder you've a hermit
The hapless hermit with herpes on his helmet
You worried the ID cards will reveal to the world you have an incurable sexual incurable disease?No wonder you've a hermit
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3359
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 765 times
- Been liked: 1145 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Nutsin wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:10 I’m starting to feel sorry for you lot!
Labour has turned out to be everything we knew they would be, a disaster.
What a nightmare!
Just imagine how exciting it’s gonna be when they introduce digital currency?
You better fall in line or they’ll flag your digital identity as a racist or an enemy of the state.
The darkest of times!
feel sorry for the thick cunts like the upminster duracell, who'll obey any order from authority. I won't comply with anything proposed by these criminal fucks
-
- Posts: 2225
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 490 times
- Been liked: 743 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Stopping illegal working is a fucking cover story.
I've been saying for ages that a surefire way to stop the illegals is to stop making it so attractive to come here. I dont so much blame the arrivals, more the politicians who do everything other than give them blow jobs on red carpets when the get here. State that they'll receive no benefits, be housed in warehouse type facilities in the middle of nowhere and they'll kip on camp beds. We'd see a drastic reduction almost overnight.
I've been saying for ages that a surefire way to stop the illegals is to stop making it so attractive to come here. I dont so much blame the arrivals, more the politicians who do everything other than give them blow jobs on red carpets when the get here. State that they'll receive no benefits, be housed in warehouse type facilities in the middle of nowhere and they'll kip on camp beds. We'd see a drastic reduction almost overnight.
Re: No to Digital ID
I’m starting to feel sorry for you lot!
Labour has turned out to be everything we knew they would be, a disaster.
What a nightmare!
Just imagine how exciting it’s gonna be when they introduce digital currency?
You better fall in line or they’ll flag your digital identity as a racist or an enemy of the state.
The darkest of times!
Labour has turned out to be everything we knew they would be, a disaster.
What a nightmare!
Just imagine how exciting it’s gonna be when they introduce digital currency?
You better fall in line or they’ll flag your digital identity as a racist or an enemy of the state.
The darkest of times!
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3359
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 765 times
- Been liked: 1145 times
Re: No to Digital ID
mentally ill? a wrongun that's taken untold poisonous jabs so he can continue his fiddling trips to asia. you need putting down you cսnt
Re: No to Digital ID
I’ve signed the petition and I remember signing something similar some twenty years ago, I think, when the likes of David Davies was very much against it.
To the gullible the introduction of the compulsory ID verification facility would see the gradual and eventually complete elimination of people working illegally in the UK.
There are already Laws here though sufficient to prevent illegal working with the onus being on the employer to check whether or not an employee is sound. A thorough check of Nail bars, kitchens of, mostly, ethnic restaurants and such as the host of food delivery motorcyclists buzzing our streets would reveal a myriad of illegal workers.
To me this ID system represents and infringement of my personal liberty, my right to go about my day to day life unhindered whilst pursuing activities deemed not illegal. The storing of all this data safely too is another one of my concerns. Also it is concerning that when these IDs are faked, and they will be, the hapless employer will no doubt be brought to boot for not checking thoroughly enough.
To the gullible the introduction of the compulsory ID verification facility would see the gradual and eventually complete elimination of people working illegally in the UK.
There are already Laws here though sufficient to prevent illegal working with the onus being on the employer to check whether or not an employee is sound. A thorough check of Nail bars, kitchens of, mostly, ethnic restaurants and such as the host of food delivery motorcyclists buzzing our streets would reveal a myriad of illegal workers.
To me this ID system represents and infringement of my personal liberty, my right to go about my day to day life unhindered whilst pursuing activities deemed not illegal. The storing of all this data safely too is another one of my concerns. Also it is concerning that when these IDs are faked, and they will be, the hapless employer will no doubt be brought to boot for not checking thoroughly enough.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3359
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 765 times
- Been liked: 1145 times
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4676
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 31 times
- Been liked: 570 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 08:06 The Digital ID will be required to prove your right to work
You won’t be required to produce it in the street or use to verify your identity in any other website etc.
You can continue to provide your utility bills or passport for those purposes
Presume every employer will be asked to confirm they have sighted the ID
Social media already has all that information & that Zuckerberg bloke with the Harpo Marx hairstyle has already handed that to Trump so he can get you sacked if you were mean about that Christian nut Charles Kirk
The actual digital ID, whether it's an app or a physical piece of plastic is not the real issue here - that's just a shiny bauble to distract the minnows of the world.
The big problem is the data(base) which it needs in order to function. It will be fucking huge! We're talking thousands and thousands of Terabits here, a tad more than is available on your shiny new look-at-me smartphone.
Nowhere in Europe has the capacity to store and manage that amount of data, securely or otherwise. To function it will need to be stored in the USA on a server farm/data centre owned and managed by one of the big, US government licenced IT service companies.
That will mean that, whilst there, it is not covered (except by lip-service) under the UK Data Protection Act. And this means that a UK government department can query that database by proxy through a US based operative - just for testing purposes, like....
The big problem is the data(base) which it needs in order to function. It will be fucking huge! We're talking thousands and thousands of Terabits here, a tad more than is available on your shiny new look-at-me smartphone.
Nowhere in Europe has the capacity to store and manage that amount of data, securely or otherwise. To function it will need to be stored in the USA on a server farm/data centre owned and managed by one of the big, US government licenced IT service companies.
That will mean that, whilst there, it is not covered (except by lip-service) under the UK Data Protection Act. And this means that a UK government department can query that database by proxy through a US based operative - just for testing purposes, like....
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3719
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 713 times
Re: No to Digital ID
You've got to be a right DIVVY to think that they won't be able to get around this and work for UBER and JUST EAT.
Thanks for stepping up to the plate, Sven.
Thanks for stepping up to the plate, Sven.