Page 4 of 56
Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 25 Jul 2024, 16:23
by Leonard Hatred
"We're gonna have a British George Floyd now innit. The BLM mob are gonna be all over this. Expect a load of shoe shops to be looted as a ""protest"". This country's gone to the fucking dogs."
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 11 Jul 2025, 01:59
by Monsieur merde de cheval
twoleftfeet wrote: ↑10 Jul 2025, 22:15
He punched a 5ft 3in, 8st WPC in the face.
There is no defence for that.
Lock both the cunts up for 10 years and then deport them.
They ( boglims) have no regard for our laws or culture .
Our establishment elites bend over and take it dry because theyre shit scared of upsetting said boglims.
Same for the Black 'community '...their fish feed compared to the boglims though.
The yanks can arm themselves ...we can't.
I suggest you all start making plans ...FIGHT OR FLIGHT.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 10 Jul 2025, 22:15
by twoleftfeet
He punched a 5ft 3in, 8st WPC in the face.
There is no defence for that.
Lock both the cunts up for 10 years and then deport them.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 09 Jul 2025, 03:02
by Monsieur merde de cheval
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 21:29
Alfs wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 16:29
I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation. If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them.
I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
Behave. The Old Bill in that instance were well within their right to do what they did in the full context of what had happened and the "aggressive approach" began with the perps. The geezer who kicked mateys head in to row Z deserves a medal. In fact I hope it gave lowlife shitcunt brain damage.
They weren't aggressive enough and caused their own shit fest IMO.
DONT MESS ABOUT
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 09 Jul 2025, 02:53
by Monsieur merde de cheval
Monsieur merde de cheval" wrote: ↑09 Jul 2025, 02:42
In the England I grew up in.
1)...NEVER PLAY UP IN AN AIRPORT OR YOU WILL BE RIGHTLY SERVED UP AND LUCKY TO LIVE
2)..
the worrying thing for me is the STANDARDS of the old bill now... especially in an Airport
..ARMED old bill should be highly trained and able to deal with these two cunts double lively with no fuss .
these officers were ...NOT VERY GOOD
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 09 Jul 2025, 02:47
by Monsieur merde de cheval
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 21:19
You just know Alfs has blue hair and a nose ring.
He's certainly an artist
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 09 Jul 2025, 02:42
by Monsieur merde de cheval
In the England I grew up in.
1)...NEVER PLAY UP IN AN AIRPORT OR YOU WILL BE RIGHTLY SERVED UP AND LUCKY TO LIVE
2)..

Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 09 Jul 2025, 02:36
by Monsieur merde de cheval
Alfs wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 16:29
I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation. If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them.
I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
Stick to writing your next screenplay .
.which is worrying for a bod who knows nish about real life
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 21:33
by Mad Ferret
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 21:29
Alfs wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 16:29
I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation. If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them.
I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
The geezer who kicked mateys head in to row Z deserves a medal. In fact I hope it gave lowlife shitcunt brain damage.
He prob already had it, the inbred cսnt.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 21:29
by Massive Attack
Alfs wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 16:29
I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation. If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them.
I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
Behave. The Old Bill in that instance were well within their right to do what they did in the full context of what had happened and the "aggressive approach" began with the perps. The geezer who kicked mateys head in to row Z deserves a medal. In fact I hope it gave lowlife shitcunt brain damage.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 21:19
by Mad Ferret
You just know Alfs has blue hair and a nose ring.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 21:08
by only1billybonds
Alfs.
11 police officers turned up to arrest a young man who was protesting peacefully (his right) against the mutilation of young kids in trans clinics, that is 'poor policing'.
This is where demanding a softly softly approach by the police gets you, plod become a laughing stock.
The formation of the college of policing has got a lot to answer for, it really has made real police work almost impossible to carry out.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 20:44
by Alfs
Like I said, the cunts deserve everything coming to them, that's not the point I'm making. The WPCs nose may not have got broken if the arrest was handled differently, instead they went in very aggressively, escalating the violence. This was poor policing.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 17:25
by ,
Alfs, these two blokes had violently resisted arrest, for a damaging assault on a co religionist, and in doing so had severely hurt a female police officer. The immediate bit of footage put out showed none of the context to what had transpired earlier.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 17:08
by Eerie Decent
Im no fan of the current version of the old bill, but one of these cunts broke a woman's nose, Alfs. This is hot on the heels of the original incident.
You think the old bill's approach warranted that?
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 16:29
by Alfs
I'm aware of the incident before hand but a less aggressive approach could have diffused the situation. If they'd followed their training they would have asked to speak with them, then separated them.
I'm not defending the accused, they deserve what they get, but it was poor policing.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 15:55
by Lee Trundle
In case you didn't know, Alfs.
"Police were at the airport responding to an incident at Starbucks in which Mr Amaaz is alleged to have headbutted a man and punched him."
You're right. They should have made him a friendship bracelet and offered that to him before they kindly asked him if he would like to be arrested.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 15:52
by Lee Trundle
"They were overly aggressive from the start"
From the start? You do you know why they were having to be arrested in the first place?
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 15:48
by Alfs
Though the two accused are clearly a couple of cunts, the police handled it very badly IMO. They were overly aggressive from the start and that provoked the response that they got.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 15:38
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
, wrote: ↑07 Jul 2025, 19:57
It depends what you mean by original press coverage and how people interpreted it anyway. For me from what I read and viewed it looked like these blokes had a case to answer and that is what has transpired.
This incident is a classic example of people choosing to use an interpretation that suits their beliefs/prejudices.
What people mean by 'original press coverage' is the coverage that originally appeared in the press.
I hope this helps.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 15:37
by Mike Oxsaw
They'll be given bird and it will be a lengthy sentence in order to prove (PROVE) that two-tier policing in the UK is a myth.
There will be an instant appeal and they will be granted unconditional bail while waiting for that to work through the justice system.
However, when the case finally drops from the public eye, they'll be quietly let out on parole (to free up prison space for "proper" criminals, naturally) and asked if they'd mind wearing a tag every now and again for administration purposes.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 15:34
by SurfaceAgentX2Zero
On The Ball" wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025, 08:10
That's strange because I saw the full video on the BBC last year when it happened.
Not when they first put it up you didn't.
A somewhat disingenuous post, I feel.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 15:01
by aldgate
very selective. here's the guardian three days after the "attack"
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/art ... y-robinson
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 09:01
by Lee Trundle
I mean, it was even misreported by the usual racist MP's in the house of commons at the time as an abuse of power by the police.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 08:56
by Lee Trundle
A couple posters on here have VERY selective memories when it comes to the original reporting of this incident.
Re: Manchester Airport incident
Posted: 08 Jul 2025, 08:53
by only1billybonds
OTB.
I also saw the full video of the incident. Eventually.
The INITIAL reporting only showed footage of plod laying into the bloke on the floor.