AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Steidten Out
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 4858
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 2769 times
- Been liked: 1362 times
Steidten Out
I want this costly clueless conniving cսnt gone. We have suffered persistent injuries to expensive key signings this season, as well as others who just don't cut it against Premier League opposition, or have suspect temperaments/injury records previously known and they're all his picks. He clearly doesn't do his due diligence well enough as one of the stories of the season has been us suffering injuries to key new signings..
Fullkrug £27M - Suspect Injury History
Todibo £34M (if avoid relegation) - Suspect Injury History/Suspect attitude problems at Barcelona
Mavropanos £19M - Just utter dogshit (and ironically probably now out injured as well due to concussion for 10 days like Fabianski)
Alvarez £35M - Nowhere near good enough for the money we spent on him looking lost and slow as arseholes against Premier League opposition
Kudus is just about the only costly signing that's come off that's genuine quality, although even he now has suspect temperament issues when getting himself a 5 match ban for fighting an entire Spurs Team in front of everyone. So fuck knows what he's also like behind the scenes..
Just sick of the persistent injuries to key players that has derailed our season and continues to do so on tonights evidence with Fullcrock, as well as all the unsettling bollocks behind the scenes. There's no smoke without fire and I now make that not 1 but 2 Managers in quick succession that allegedly told him to stay away from the Training Ground. It makes me wonder whether he is our Club Mole all along who has persistently leaked things out to the Media from either within the Dressing Room/Snaps with managers behind another managers back that then coincidentally get leaked at just the right time? A manager who was humiliated in the media for taking at least 2 Training sessions and possibly a 3rd on the last day he eventually got sacked and the whole thing was handled terribly which again points to Steidten and his breakdown in his 2nd relationship with a manager. And he's supposed to work with them, not against them!
On the radio yesterday when discussing Steidten someone mentioned how odd they thought it was to see him down by the players tunnel/dressing room area as well as doing interviews with TNT during the Chelsea loss earlier in the season and they thought good Technical Directors aren't seen front and centre as much as this one always appears to be. He's certainly got an impressive holiday snap collection he leaks to the media as soon as he takes them.
The longer this season has panned out the more and more I've thought something just doesn't sit right at the Club and I genuinely think he has been at the heart of a lot of our issues. I suppose that's why it's now been known his position is under review and they're already on to him, hence why Potter swerved the Steidten question possibly knowing something we don't about him.
Or does anyone still believe he's the right man to guide our Club making such big decisions within it?
Fullkrug £27M - Suspect Injury History
Todibo £34M (if avoid relegation) - Suspect Injury History/Suspect attitude problems at Barcelona
Mavropanos £19M - Just utter dogshit (and ironically probably now out injured as well due to concussion for 10 days like Fabianski)
Alvarez £35M - Nowhere near good enough for the money we spent on him looking lost and slow as arseholes against Premier League opposition
Kudus is just about the only costly signing that's come off that's genuine quality, although even he now has suspect temperament issues when getting himself a 5 match ban for fighting an entire Spurs Team in front of everyone. So fuck knows what he's also like behind the scenes..
Just sick of the persistent injuries to key players that has derailed our season and continues to do so on tonights evidence with Fullcrock, as well as all the unsettling bollocks behind the scenes. There's no smoke without fire and I now make that not 1 but 2 Managers in quick succession that allegedly told him to stay away from the Training Ground. It makes me wonder whether he is our Club Mole all along who has persistently leaked things out to the Media from either within the Dressing Room/Snaps with managers behind another managers back that then coincidentally get leaked at just the right time? A manager who was humiliated in the media for taking at least 2 Training sessions and possibly a 3rd on the last day he eventually got sacked and the whole thing was handled terribly which again points to Steidten and his breakdown in his 2nd relationship with a manager. And he's supposed to work with them, not against them!
On the radio yesterday when discussing Steidten someone mentioned how odd they thought it was to see him down by the players tunnel/dressing room area as well as doing interviews with TNT during the Chelsea loss earlier in the season and they thought good Technical Directors aren't seen front and centre as much as this one always appears to be. He's certainly got an impressive holiday snap collection he leaks to the media as soon as he takes them.
The longer this season has panned out the more and more I've thought something just doesn't sit right at the Club and I genuinely think he has been at the heart of a lot of our issues. I suppose that's why it's now been known his position is under review and they're already on to him, hence why Potter swerved the Steidten question possibly knowing something we don't about him.
Or does anyone still believe he's the right man to guide our Club making such big decisions within it?
Last edited by Massive Attack on 10 Jan 2025, 23:15, edited 1 time in total.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 4858
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 2769 times
- Been liked: 1362 times
Re: Steidten Out
I wasn't guessing, I checked out his injury history at the time to double check as I knew he had a past of injuries and wondered just how bad it was and it didn't read well to me. When I coupled that knowledge with his age I wanted us to fuck the idea right off paying £27M+ for him.
Duran I was fully on board for but definitely not the carthorse and been consistent with that all season long how stupid the Club could be to make such a bad gamble, especially as Sullvian has a long track record of bringing in expensive sicknote Strikers. I couldn't believe he agreed to sign it off but really I shouldn't as his decision making can be so awful at times.
Duran I was fully on board for but definitely not the carthorse and been consistent with that all season long how stupid the Club could be to make such a bad gamble, especially as Sullvian has a long track record of bringing in expensive sicknote Strikers. I couldn't believe he agreed to sign it off but really I shouldn't as his decision making can be so awful at times.
Re: Steidten Out
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 10:55 No revisionism, I was banging on about Fullkrug being a waste of money from the start. Can remember Alfs and I were 2 who would say we shouldn't have done it.
The point is though you were guessing. It wasn't like signing someone who was just coming back from an ACL. He'd had pretty much 3 seasons of minor injuries that took games here and there. Not big iniuries. Much like Antonio in the last few years of his career after an early.career punctuated by massive lost game time. Well done you guessed right....but you didn't KNOW. Did you review his medical report. Nope...you guessed. Well done. Was Ings an injury nightmare...similar profiles I suspect I jury wise. What about Antonio pre-car crash? I won an 4-fold ACCA last week. Did I know? Nope...was an educated guess thatost weeks I get wrong.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 4858
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 2769 times
- Been liked: 1362 times
Re: Steidten Out
No revisionism, I was banging on about Fullkrug being a waste of money from the start. Can remember Alfs and I were 2 who would say we shouldn't have done it.
-
- Posts: 815
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 96 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: Steidten Out
stubbo wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 10:30Massive Attack" wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 08:55Gank wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 08:42 I’m still completely undecided on this. I was happy with all of the signings at the time but agree that in hindsight, a lot of it was wasted money that could have been used better. How much of it is bad luck or could have been identified with better diligence is difficult to ascertain.Bad injury record is clear about Fullkrug and I called it out at the time that I was uncomfortable with him signing with such history as well as his age for a whopping £27.5M. My fears came to fruition sadly.
Todibo is also known to have suspect attitude and injury concerns in the past and this is only research done on the net, not the channels to information they'll have to hand (or should know) a lot better than what we can find out.
Mavropanos has long been known to be a dud since Wenger launched him out the Club, yet we drop £19M big ones on him, when he's worth less than half that.
Guilherme, did he really see enough of him or sign him for big money for a 17/18yo based in part on impulsiveness due to the fact he played alongside megastar Endrick and Co and possibly got carried away? It feels that way to me looking at it now.
Alvarez discipline record shouldn't have been a surprise either having got himself booked a whopping 16 times and sent off the season before we signed him for Ajax alone.
His due diligence came across as poor and now we have an expensively assembled mish mash of players which has exacerbated our problems, not improved them. He generally overpays far too much for what he gets and that's probably why the 'fixer' gets deals done quicker than others. Not good enough I'm afraid and it's right the Club fuck him off before he does anymore costly damage.A little bit of revisionist insight here.
1. Everyone was fawning over Alvarez in his first season. People were saying Steidten "shouldn't get the credit because he only closed the deal, Mark Noble identified him". And Moyes signed him...per his contract and ownership on signings whilst he was in charge.
2. Fullkrug is very easy to call after the event. Very Captain Hindsight. If he'd matched his injury status of the previous 3 years, MA would being called out as a know-nothing cսnt who couldn't read the trend change. He's a very good player and will score goals if he regains his fitness. He doesn't rely on pace, and could yet turn out a success for us.
3. Mavropanos was signed under Moyes. And we all know who made signing decisions under Moyes....Moyes. it was written into his contract directly. He was a David Moyes signing....at best Steidten brought his availability to his attention and brokered a deal, and he was signed as a backup centre back (for which he is more than a suitable candidate in our squad). But make no mistakes Moyes signed him, Sullivan signed off the financials. And in that first season for Moyes in a different style of defending be performed very very well....our best CB that season despite being bought as backup.
4. Guilherme remains well thought of outside of West Ham circles. He retains a value at where we signed him on Transfermarkt. Know one will know if he's a good signing for two or three years and to judge the player right now is grossly unfair. He's in the first team squad, getting first team minutes and is 18. If he was English he'd be being lauded as having a break through season, just like Orford and Scarles are being. Will you be castigating Casey in the same way if he's not selected today and we play others out of position to cover him instead?
5. Todibo was wanted by Man Utd (weren't allowed to sign him), Juventus, and is still a young player. He had some of the most impressive progressive defender stats in Europe and was lauded by all and sundry as a huge coup when we signed him. He may still turn out awesome, and his injury now is symptomatic of Lopetegui playing him against the advice of the Club's medical staff, per Roshane Thomas. Full Captain Hindsight mode on this guy told.
Great post.
I’m tired of all this revisionist nonsense.
Coming from all these YT bloggers and stuff. It’s all bs.
I’m tired of all this revisionist nonsense.
Coming from all these YT bloggers and stuff. It’s all bs.
-
- Posts: 3301
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 56 times
- Been liked: 402 times
Re: Steidten Out
Suspect we may not see Fullkrug again
Especially if we buy in this window
All the 30+ strikers need to go in the summer
Seems pretty obvious that Steidten will be off soon
Had his ups & downs but obviously Sullivan wants all the blame for mistakes on someone else
Especially if we buy in this window
All the 30+ strikers need to go in the summer
Seems pretty obvious that Steidten will be off soon
Had his ups & downs but obviously Sullivan wants all the blame for mistakes on someone else
Re: Steidten Out
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 08:55Gank wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 08:42 I’m still completely undecided on this. I was happy with all of the signings at the time but agree that in hindsight, a lot of it was wasted money that could have been used better. How much of it is bad luck or could have been identified with better diligence is difficult to ascertain.Bad injury record is clear about Fullkrug and I called it out at the time that I was uncomfortable with him signing with such history as well as his age for a whopping £27.5M. My fears came to fruition sadly.
Todibo is also known to have suspect attitude and injury concerns in the past and this is only research done on the net, not the channels to information they'll have to hand (or should know) a lot better than what we can find out.
Mavropanos has long been known to be a dud since Wenger launched him out the Club, yet we drop £19M big ones on him, when he's worth less than half that.
Guilherme, did he really see enough of him or sign him for big money for a 17/18yo based in part on impulsiveness due to the fact he played alongside megastar Endrick and Co and possibly got carried away? It feels that way to me looking at it now.
Alvarez discipline record shouldn't have been a surprise either having got himself booked a whopping 16 times and sent off the season before we signed him for Ajax alone.
His due diligence came across as poor and now we have an expensively assembled mish mash of players which has exacerbated our problems, not improved them. He generally overpays far too much for what he gets and that's probably why the 'fixer' gets deals done quicker than others. Not good enough I'm afraid and it's right the Club fuck him off before he does anymore costly damage.
A little bit of revisionist insight here.
1. Everyone was fawning over Alvarez in his first season. People were saying Steidten "shouldn't get the credit because he only closed the deal, Mark Noble identified him". And Moyes signed him...per his contract and ownership on signings whilst he was in charge.
2. Fullkrug is very easy to call after the event. Very Captain Hindsight. If he'd matched his injury status of the previous 3 years, MA would being called out as a know-nothing cսnt who couldn't read the trend change. He's a very good player and will score goals if he regains his fitness. He doesn't rely on pace, and could yet turn out a success for us.
3. Mavropanos was signed under Moyes. And we all know who made signing decisions under Moyes....Moyes. it was written into his contract directly. He was a David Moyes signing....at best Steidten brought his availability to his attention and brokered a deal, and he was signed as a backup centre back (for which he is more than a suitable candidate in our squad). But make no mistakes Moyes signed him, Sullivan signed off the financials. And in that first season for Moyes in a different style of defending be performed very very well....our best CB that season despite being bought as backup.
4. Guilherme remains well thought of outside of West Ham circles. He retains a value at where we signed him on Transfermarkt. Know one will know if he's a good signing for two or three years and to judge the player right now is grossly unfair. He's in the first team squad, getting first team minutes and is 18. If he was English he'd be being lauded as having a break through season, just like Orford and Scarles are being. Will you be castigating Casey in the same way if he's not selected today and we play others out of position to cover him instead?
5. Todibo was wanted by Man Utd (weren't allowed to sign him), Juventus, and is still a young player. He had some of the most impressive progressive defender stats in Europe and was lauded by all and sundry as a huge coup when we signed him. He may still turn out awesome, and his injury now is symptomatic of Lopetegui playing him against the advice of the Club's medical staff, per Roshane Thomas. Full Captain Hindsight mode on this guy told.
1. Everyone was fawning over Alvarez in his first season. People were saying Steidten "shouldn't get the credit because he only closed the deal, Mark Noble identified him". And Moyes signed him...per his contract and ownership on signings whilst he was in charge.
2. Fullkrug is very easy to call after the event. Very Captain Hindsight. If he'd matched his injury status of the previous 3 years, MA would being called out as a know-nothing cսnt who couldn't read the trend change. He's a very good player and will score goals if he regains his fitness. He doesn't rely on pace, and could yet turn out a success for us.
3. Mavropanos was signed under Moyes. And we all know who made signing decisions under Moyes....Moyes. it was written into his contract directly. He was a David Moyes signing....at best Steidten brought his availability to his attention and brokered a deal, and he was signed as a backup centre back (for which he is more than a suitable candidate in our squad). But make no mistakes Moyes signed him, Sullivan signed off the financials. And in that first season for Moyes in a different style of defending be performed very very well....our best CB that season despite being bought as backup.
4. Guilherme remains well thought of outside of West Ham circles. He retains a value at where we signed him on Transfermarkt. Know one will know if he's a good signing for two or three years and to judge the player right now is grossly unfair. He's in the first team squad, getting first team minutes and is 18. If he was English he'd be being lauded as having a break through season, just like Orford and Scarles are being. Will you be castigating Casey in the same way if he's not selected today and we play others out of position to cover him instead?
5. Todibo was wanted by Man Utd (weren't allowed to sign him), Juventus, and is still a young player. He had some of the most impressive progressive defender stats in Europe and was lauded by all and sundry as a huge coup when we signed him. He may still turn out awesome, and his injury now is symptomatic of Lopetegui playing him against the advice of the Club's medical staff, per Roshane Thomas. Full Captain Hindsight mode on this guy told.
-
- Posts: 815
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 96 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: Steidten Out
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 08:55Gank wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 08:42 I’m still completely undecided on this. I was happy with all of the signings at the time but agree that in hindsight, a lot of it was wasted money that could have been used better. How much of it is bad luck or could have been identified with better diligence is difficult to ascertain.Bad injury record is clear about Fullkrug and I called it out at the time that I was uncomfortable with him signing with such history as well as his age for a whopping £27.5M. My fears came to fruition sadly.
Todibo is also known to have suspect attitude and injury concerns in the past and this is only research done on the net, not the channels to information they'll have to hand (or should know) a lot better than what we can find out.
Mavropanos has long been known to be a dud since Wenger launched him out the Club, yet we drop £19M big ones on him, when he's worth less than half that.
Guilherme, did he really see enough of him or sign him for big money for a 17/18yo based in part on impulsiveness due to the fact he played alongside megastar Endrick and Co and possibly got carried away? It feels that way to me looking at it now.
Alvarez discipline record shouldn't have been a surprise either having got himself booked a whopping 16 times and sent off the season before we signed him for Ajax alone.
His due diligence came across as poor and now we have an expensively assembled mish mash of players which has exacerbated our problems, not improved them. He generally overpays far too much for what he gets and that's probably why the 'fixer' gets deals done quicker than others. Not good enough I'm afraid and it's right the Club fuck him off before he does anymore costly damage.
Really dont agree. I think a bad workman blames his tools.
Fullkrug hasn't been injured seriously since 2021.
He was going to share striker duty with Antonio anyway.
It wasnt that much money for a German International no.9 striker.
Lewandoski is 36.. Kane is 31 as well. The reason I wouldn't have bought Fulkrug was pace, nothing else. Hindsight is 20/20, had he not got injured on international duty we wouldn't be talking about this. Its a silly conversation.
The reality is, West Ham want players to take them to the next level but dont want to pay out for them. So they take punts on "fixer uppers". When we buy championship talent people say they aren't ready or not good enough (Flyn Downes, Benrahma, Summerville etc) to start in the 1st team. We dont produce any academy players good enough either. So what do you buy? The foreign players with potential like Caicedo or Cuccerrela we dont want to develop as we dont have the time (i.e. Guilherme).
So when we take a punt and it goes wrong everyone moans.
Liverpool paid nearly 85m for Nunez, Someone we wanted as well, but he is barely 1 in 4 for one of the most creative teams in the world. Shit happens. Thats the legendary FSG scouting network there. This is football. Its not an exact or always obvious science.
But anyway, they say history is written by the victors.. Sullivan definitely "won" again here.
Fullkrug hasn't been injured seriously since 2021.
He was going to share striker duty with Antonio anyway.
It wasnt that much money for a German International no.9 striker.
Lewandoski is 36.. Kane is 31 as well. The reason I wouldn't have bought Fulkrug was pace, nothing else. Hindsight is 20/20, had he not got injured on international duty we wouldn't be talking about this. Its a silly conversation.
The reality is, West Ham want players to take them to the next level but dont want to pay out for them. So they take punts on "fixer uppers". When we buy championship talent people say they aren't ready or not good enough (Flyn Downes, Benrahma, Summerville etc) to start in the 1st team. We dont produce any academy players good enough either. So what do you buy? The foreign players with potential like Caicedo or Cuccerrela we dont want to develop as we dont have the time (i.e. Guilherme).
So when we take a punt and it goes wrong everyone moans.
Liverpool paid nearly 85m for Nunez, Someone we wanted as well, but he is barely 1 in 4 for one of the most creative teams in the world. Shit happens. Thats the legendary FSG scouting network there. This is football. Its not an exact or always obvious science.
But anyway, they say history is written by the victors.. Sullivan definitely "won" again here.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 4858
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 2769 times
- Been liked: 1362 times
Re: Steidten Out
Gank wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 08:42 I’m still completely undecided on this. I was happy with all of the signings at the time but agree that in hindsight, a lot of it was wasted money that could have been used better. How much of it is bad luck or could have been identified with better diligence is difficult to ascertain.
Bad injury record is clear about Fullkrug and I called it out at the time that I was uncomfortable with him signing with such history as well as his age for a whopping £27.5M. My fears came to fruition sadly.
Todibo is also known to have suspect attitude and injury concerns in the past and this is only research done on the net, not the channels to information they'll have to hand (or should know) a lot better than what we can find out.
Mavropanos has long been known to be a dud since Wenger launched him out the Club, yet we drop £19M big ones on him, when he's worth less than half that.
Guilherme, did he really see enough of him or sign him for big money for a 17/18yo based in part on impulsiveness due to the fact he played alongside megastar Endrick and Co and possibly got carried away? It feels that way to me looking at it now.
Alvarez discipline record shouldn't have been a surprise either having got himself booked a whopping 16 times and sent off the season before we signed him for Ajax alone.
His due diligence came across as poor and now we have an expensively assembled mish mash of players which has exacerbated our problems, not improved them. He generally overpays far too much for what he gets and that's probably why the 'fixer' gets deals done quicker than others. Not good enough I'm afraid and it's right the Club fuck him off before he does anymore costly damage.
Todibo is also known to have suspect attitude and injury concerns in the past and this is only research done on the net, not the channels to information they'll have to hand (or should know) a lot better than what we can find out.
Mavropanos has long been known to be a dud since Wenger launched him out the Club, yet we drop £19M big ones on him, when he's worth less than half that.
Guilherme, did he really see enough of him or sign him for big money for a 17/18yo based in part on impulsiveness due to the fact he played alongside megastar Endrick and Co and possibly got carried away? It feels that way to me looking at it now.
Alvarez discipline record shouldn't have been a surprise either having got himself booked a whopping 16 times and sent off the season before we signed him for Ajax alone.
His due diligence came across as poor and now we have an expensively assembled mish mash of players which has exacerbated our problems, not improved them. He generally overpays far too much for what he gets and that's probably why the 'fixer' gets deals done quicker than others. Not good enough I'm afraid and it's right the Club fuck him off before he does anymore costly damage.
Re: Steidten Out
I’m still completely undecided on this. I was happy with all of the signings at the time but agree that in hindsight, a lot of it was wasted money that could have been used better. How much of it is bad luck or could have been identified with better diligence is difficult to ascertain.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 4858
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 2769 times
- Been liked: 1362 times
Re: Steidten Out
The wisdom to concentrate £107.4M (effectively just over the cost of Rice) of our transfer budgets in recent times is a sackable offence alone:
Mavropanos - £19M
Fullkrug - £27.5M
Guilherme - £25.5M
Alvarez - £35.4M
It feels like the modern day transfer version of Rio Ferdinand by wasting incredible funds (relative speaking) from 1 huge sale on a bunch of either unfit, untried, overaged, ill disciplined or just generally poor expensive quality signings. That lot alone is a sackable offence before we chuck in the Training Ground restrictions from 2 successive managers. And all within the space of a couple of seasons. There's also question marks over other signings like Todibo as well which also looks questionable based on attitude, fitness and ability for the price.
Good riddance Tim nice but Dim.
Mavropanos - £19M
Fullkrug - £27.5M
Guilherme - £25.5M
Alvarez - £35.4M
It feels like the modern day transfer version of Rio Ferdinand by wasting incredible funds (relative speaking) from 1 huge sale on a bunch of either unfit, untried, overaged, ill disciplined or just generally poor expensive quality signings. That lot alone is a sackable offence before we chuck in the Training Ground restrictions from 2 successive managers. And all within the space of a couple of seasons. There's also question marks over other signings like Todibo as well which also looks questionable based on attitude, fitness and ability for the price.
Good riddance Tim nice but Dim.
Re: Steidten Out
Keep dreaming" wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 07:32 The German has caused an incredible amount of frustration during his time in East London, having fallen out with David Moyes before playing a key role in Julen Lopetegui’s sacking.
Mission accomplished, consider the job well done!
This is clear narrative. He didn't so much as "fall out" with Moyes as they were not synergistic. He'd been instructed to find Moyes replacement which Moyes didn't like. Ironic really given Moyes was also courting West Ham whilst Bilic was in post.
As for the falling out with Lopetegui...he was just way ahead of the curve on the blinking cսnt. Warned against him, knew he was a footballing wrongun, called it early, and was reassuring players he'd be got rid of and to outlast him.
The "falls out with managers" stuff is Sullivan propaganda and spin. In both circumstances there were clear conflicts of interests, and if he'd had licence to do his job properly he'd have been selecting the managers he would work with (Hurzeler, Amorim) not suffering the fools that Sullivan wanted (Moyes, Lopetegui).
I hope he tells Sullivan to stick any NDA and his side of the story comes out properly. Suspect it won't look good for our pint sized dictator and (alledged) sex-pest in Chief.
As for the falling out with Lopetegui...he was just way ahead of the curve on the blinking cսnt. Warned against him, knew he was a footballing wrongun, called it early, and was reassuring players he'd be got rid of and to outlast him.
The "falls out with managers" stuff is Sullivan propaganda and spin. In both circumstances there were clear conflicts of interests, and if he'd had licence to do his job properly he'd have been selecting the managers he would work with (Hurzeler, Amorim) not suffering the fools that Sullivan wanted (Moyes, Lopetegui).
I hope he tells Sullivan to stick any NDA and his side of the story comes out properly. Suspect it won't look good for our pint sized dictator and (alledged) sex-pest in Chief.
Re: Steidten Out
Sydney_Iron wrote: ↑25 Jan 2025, 04:26 Several YouTube channels saying he's got the tin tack? Didn't open them (or post link) as often it's a load of waffle before you get to any substance and then its often click bait and the "rumor" is
Maybe he's gone, maybe not, maybe sacked, maybe walked as far as i can see.
All in all a big disappointment gone or not, think most of us saw him as a big part of a better future after Moyes went, but has come up short especially with his transfer business.
Ex has confirmed that he's gone in all but announcement. Apparently they're finalising the terms of departure so can't announce it until that is completed, but it's decision made.
His brother also leaving, but Hahn staying.
His brother also leaving, but Hahn staying.
- Keep dreaming
- Posts: 1385
- Location: here and there, mostly here
- Old WHO Number: 225644
- Has liked: 478 times
- Been liked: 230 times
Re: Steidten Out
The German has caused an incredible amount of frustration during his time in East London, having fallen out with David Moyes before playing a key role in Julen Lopetegui’s sacking.
Mission accomplished, consider the job well done!
Mission accomplished, consider the job well done!
Re: Steidten Out
Sir Alf" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 23:05 Alvarez starting to look half decent again under Potter. He was misused under Lopetegui imo and asked to cover the ground which he’s not suited to. He is better in a screening role for the defence and more positionally fixed ( anchored ) not trying to be like Rice because he’s simply not fast enough to do it, loses possession, fails to press and easily bypassed.
Not fast enough, as you say.
Doesn't get up and down, doesn't pick a pass, doesn't have a shot on him, not particularly good in the air. One goal for us so, despite that finish being very calm and assured, doesn't score (or really get in positions to score).
Anyhow, this isn't really about Alvarez. I want my pearl diver to find pearls, not stuff floating on the top of the water.
Doesn't get up and down, doesn't pick a pass, doesn't have a shot on him, not particularly good in the air. One goal for us so, despite that finish being very calm and assured, doesn't score (or really get in positions to score).
Anyhow, this isn't really about Alvarez. I want my pearl diver to find pearls, not stuff floating on the top of the water.
-
- Posts: 1854
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 160 times
- Been liked: 329 times
Re: Steidten Out
Several YouTube channels saying he's got the tin tack? Didn't open them (or post link) as often it's a load of waffle before you get to any substance and then its often click bait and the "rumor" is 
Maybe he's gone, maybe not, maybe sacked, maybe walked as far as i can see.
All in all a big disappointment gone or not, think most of us saw him as a big part of a better future after Moyes went, but has come up short especially with his transfer business.
Maybe he's gone, maybe not, maybe sacked, maybe walked as far as i can see.
All in all a big disappointment gone or not, think most of us saw him as a big part of a better future after Moyes went, but has come up short especially with his transfer business.
Re: Steidten Out
Sir Alf" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 23:05 Alvarez starting to look half decent again under Potter. He was misused under Lopetegui imo and asked to cover the ground which he’s not suited to. He is better in a screening role for the defence and more positionally fixed ( anchored ) not trying to be like Rice because he’s simply not fast enough to do it, loses possession, fails to press and easily bypassed.
Yep, I think every single West Ham fan, and most other fans too, thought he was an excellent signing when we got him. I certainly did. He went downhill fast but at the time we got him, he was both in demand and playing well, he continued to play well for us and then the many changes we encountered clearly affected his form.
id put Alvarez down as a massive plus for Steidten. He’s done well his entire professional career and it’s only now after a quick succession of three managers that he is suddenly behind the pace.
id put Alvarez down as a massive plus for Steidten. He’s done well his entire professional career and it’s only now after a quick succession of three managers that he is suddenly behind the pace.
Re: Steidten Out
Alvarez starting to look half decent again under Potter. He was misused under Lopetegui imo and asked to cover the ground which he’s not suited to. He is better in a screening role for the defence and more positionally fixed ( anchored ) not trying to be like Rice because he’s simply not fast enough to do it, loses possession, fails to press and easily bypassed.
-
- Posts: 815
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 96 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: Steidten Out
onsideman wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 22:03threesixty wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 21:43onsideman wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 21:20I'm calling bullshit on that. Even if the players he eventually got were second or third choices, they were still on his list... that means Mavropanos was on a list. Guilherme was on a list. Alvarez was on a list... and judging by the third goal we conceded at Forest, for example, Todibo is hardly the second coming.
I do believe he didn't want Lopetegui (I mean who would) but perhaps he should have been a bit more principled instead of hanging around and giving his brother a jobWhy do we insist on digging out the players rather than the managers?
can’t you see that invariably these players end up doing well in other setups?
even saying Alvarez is a bad buy ignores how good he was for Moyes. Or how good Aguerd is in Spain at the moment.
our managers are trash and we need someone above the managers that knows football enough to challenge the managers. Sullivan doesn’t know football well enough and hasn’t the time to do that.
That’s the whole point of Tim or any DOF.
to say to the manager like Moyes .. “why do you continue to play in such a negative way that is nothing to do with how our youth plays?”
Tim is gone because we’ve had 2 ego centric managers that were chosen or kept on by Sullivan who don’t coach the players they have properly and eventually concede lots of goals and have crap league positions.
and I think Tim told them about themselves and they didn’t like it and it looked bad on the guy that hired them (Sullivan). So he’s gone.
If he went because of a punt on a young Brazilian or an injured international striker then most of the league would lose their jobs. Look at Nunez at Liverpool if you want disappointments.. this is what football is. No one gets it 100% right.
what surprised me is Tim was showing Potter around the club on video. So something probably came to a head very recently.You really think Alvarez was *good* under Moyes? 11 bookings, half a dozen games missed through suspension? I think some people have forgotten what a good player looks like. For £35m I want a bit more.
The point was that for a long time when Alvarez played under Moyes we didnt lose those games. When he wasn't available we lost the games. So he was instrumental to our teams performance at one point.
We were all singing Alvarez's praises back then. Now he's a shit buy? Please.. You're saying because he gets yellows a lot Tim shouldnt have bought him? Maybe, he had a lot of cards at Ajax but West Ham is a club that cant get a player with perfect everything. We dont spend as much and we aren't popular enough to attract that. Something has to give, yellows is reasonable.
He is also the Mexican Captain. 5 trophies, 3 in Europe I think. Thats why he was 35m. He's not shit, slow maybe. But his managers haven't been great.
We were all singing Alvarez's praises back then. Now he's a shit buy? Please.. You're saying because he gets yellows a lot Tim shouldnt have bought him? Maybe, he had a lot of cards at Ajax but West Ham is a club that cant get a player with perfect everything. We dont spend as much and we aren't popular enough to attract that. Something has to give, yellows is reasonable.
He is also the Mexican Captain. 5 trophies, 3 in Europe I think. Thats why he was 35m. He's not shit, slow maybe. But his managers haven't been great.
Re: Steidten Out
RBshorty wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 22:05 Kretinski no doubt has told Sullivan he will get a buyer for the club and Stadium. For a price of everyone’s liking. Steidten was window dressing. Let’s see how things pan out in the coming months. If this Amazon deal doesn’t come to anything. We are going to be lumbered with Sullivan. And the long term outcome on that. Is shit.
I’ll respectfully disagree. Kretinsky is an investor and that’s as far as it goes. He could easily buy the club himself and sell the entire thing if he wanted to.
Amazon may well be the hook for an American buyer, but not at the near £1bn Sullivan is asking. Or Amazon is just a sponsorship deal and naming rights that we will likely see very little of. Time will tell.
Amazon may well be the hook for an American buyer, but not at the near £1bn Sullivan is asking. Or Amazon is just a sponsorship deal and naming rights that we will likely see very little of. Time will tell.
Re: Steidten Out
Kretinski no doubt has told Sullivan he will get a buyer for the club and Stadium. For a price of everyone’s liking. Steidten was window dressing. Let’s see how things pan out in the coming months. If this Amazon deal doesn’t come to anything. We are going to be lumbered with Sullivan. And the long term outcome on that. Is shit.
Re: Steidten Out
threesixty wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 21:43onsideman wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 21:20Sir Alf" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 20:49 Apparently source close to Steidten has said he inly got 2 of his first choices in all the time he was at West Ham.
“He wanted Kudus and Todibo, that’s it. Everyone else was second or third choice. It was Tim who wanted Jhon Duran initially, and he pushed hard to get Fofana from Monaco. He was never listened to on replacing Moyes or Lopetegui.”I'm calling bullshit on that. Even if the players he eventually got were second or third choices, they were still on his list... that means Mavropanos was on a list. Guilherme was on a list. Alvarez was on a list... and judging by the third goal we conceded at Forest, for example, Todibo is hardly the second coming.
I do believe he didn't want Lopetegui (I mean who would) but perhaps he should have been a bit more principled instead of hanging around and giving his brother a jobWhy do we insist on digging out the players rather than the managers?
can’t you see that invariably these players end up doing well in other setups?
even saying Alvarez is a bad buy ignores how good he was for Moyes. Or how good Aguerd is in Spain at the moment.
our managers are trash and we need someone above the managers that knows football enough to challenge the managers. Sullivan doesn’t know football well enough and hasn’t the time to do that.
That’s the whole point of Tim or any DOF.
to say to the manager like Moyes .. “why do you continue to play in such a negative way that is nothing to do with how our youth plays?”
Tim is gone because we’ve had 2 ego centric managers that were chosen or kept on by Sullivan who don’t coach the players they have properly and eventually concede lots of goals and have crap league positions.
and I think Tim told them about themselves and they didn’t like it and it looked bad on the guy that hired them (Sullivan). So he’s gone.
If he went because of a punt on a young Brazilian or an injured international striker then most of the league would lose their jobs. Look at Nunez at Liverpool if you want disappointments.. this is what football is. No one gets it 100% right.
what surprised me is Tim was showing Potter around the club on video. So something probably came to a head very recently.
You really think Alvarez was *good* under Moyes? 11 bookings, half a dozen games missed through suspension? I think some people have forgotten what a good player looks like. For £35m I want a bit more.
Re: Steidten Out
RBshorty wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 21:41 People weren’t lining up to put a couple of hundred million into us. I would think a few conditions had to be given by our Glorious Leader.? Any interview is just PR bullshit.( I can’t for the life of me. Imagine Sullivan going for that.!) And relegation would lead to the club arsehole falling out. Certainly at the board level. And of course Sullivan hasn’t got a history of that. And certainly none of spunking hundreds of millions on Mate Rate transfers.
Relegation has zero impact on the Royal Mail deal. The guy has investments in the dirtiest energy sector around and nobody cares.
Relegation probably harms Sullivan more than DK, so why would he be “hiding” anything from the board that’s getting the club relegated? Sullivan has proven himself adept at building a stable PL club - hence why DK invested.
btw Kretinsky invested in the club around 2 years before Steidten joined, so his investment clearly didn’t come with that particular ‘condition’.
Relegation probably harms Sullivan more than DK, so why would he be “hiding” anything from the board that’s getting the club relegated? Sullivan has proven himself adept at building a stable PL club - hence why DK invested.
btw Kretinsky invested in the club around 2 years before Steidten joined, so his investment clearly didn’t come with that particular ‘condition’.
-
- Posts: 815
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 96 times
- Been liked: 201 times
Re: Steidten Out
onsideman wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 21:20Sir Alf" wrote: ↑24 Jan 2025, 20:49 Apparently source close to Steidten has said he inly got 2 of his first choices in all the time he was at West Ham.
“He wanted Kudus and Todibo, that’s it. Everyone else was second or third choice. It was Tim who wanted Jhon Duran initially, and he pushed hard to get Fofana from Monaco. He was never listened to on replacing Moyes or Lopetegui.”I'm calling bullshit on that. Even if the players he eventually got were second or third choices, they were still on his list... that means Mavropanos was on a list. Guilherme was on a list. Alvarez was on a list... and judging by the third goal we conceded at Forest, for example, Todibo is hardly the second coming.
I do believe he didn't want Lopetegui (I mean who would) but perhaps he should have been a bit more principled instead of hanging around and giving his brother a job
Why do we insist on digging out the players rather than the managers?
can’t you see that invariably these players end up doing well in other setups?
even saying Alvarez is a bad buy ignores how good he was for Moyes. Or how good Aguerd is in Spain at the moment.
our managers are trash and we need someone above the managers that knows football enough to challenge the managers. Sullivan doesn’t know football well enough and hasn’t the time to do that.
That’s the whole point of Tim or any DOF.
to say to the manager like Moyes .. “why do you continue to play in such a negative way that is nothing to do with how our youth plays?”
Tim is gone because we’ve had 2 ego centric managers that were chosen or kept on by Sullivan who don’t coach the players they have properly and eventually concede lots of goals and have crap league positions.
and I think Tim told them about themselves and they didn’t like it and it looked bad on the guy that hired them (Sullivan). So he’s gone.
If he went because of a punt on a young Brazilian or an injured international striker then most of the league would lose their jobs. Look at Nunez at Liverpool if you want disappointments.. this is what football is. No one gets it 100% right.
what surprised me is Tim was showing Potter around the club on video. So something probably came to a head very recently.
can’t you see that invariably these players end up doing well in other setups?
even saying Alvarez is a bad buy ignores how good he was for Moyes. Or how good Aguerd is in Spain at the moment.
our managers are trash and we need someone above the managers that knows football enough to challenge the managers. Sullivan doesn’t know football well enough and hasn’t the time to do that.
That’s the whole point of Tim or any DOF.
to say to the manager like Moyes .. “why do you continue to play in such a negative way that is nothing to do with how our youth plays?”
Tim is gone because we’ve had 2 ego centric managers that were chosen or kept on by Sullivan who don’t coach the players they have properly and eventually concede lots of goals and have crap league positions.
and I think Tim told them about themselves and they didn’t like it and it looked bad on the guy that hired them (Sullivan). So he’s gone.
If he went because of a punt on a young Brazilian or an injured international striker then most of the league would lose their jobs. Look at Nunez at Liverpool if you want disappointments.. this is what football is. No one gets it 100% right.
what surprised me is Tim was showing Potter around the club on video. So something probably came to a head very recently.
Re: Steidten Out
People weren’t lining up to put a couple of hundred million into us. I would think a few conditions had to be given by our Glorious Leader.? Any interview is just PR bullshit.( I can’t for the life of me. Imagine Sullivan going for that.!) And relegation would lead to the club arsehole falling out. Certainly at the board level. And of course Sullivan hasn’t got a history of that. And certainly none of spunking hundreds of millions on Mate Rate transfers.