West Ham Online

nerd2 wrote: ↑27 Sep 2025, 08:02 So your details are here and every social media platform known to man ,they probably even know what time you wank and on what site. You have bank cards with your money info all over the world and your phone is spewing your information everywhere. You already have a passport ,driving licence and medical record and you NI number is everywhere . You allow amazon ,eBay , porn hub,Spotify, paypal to have your details and access to your accounts. Yet this is invasion of privacy , you gave upto the billionaires but not the government so very bizarre when you want to make it difficult for people to come here and work illegally. Not sure what you actually want . Even your car monitors your travel these days and where you going through maps or sat nav. Try getting in a city centre bar without id then have to give up your biometrics as they take pics . We are already well past this. Unless your hiding something.

riosleftsock wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025, 19:15 Sign and share

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/730194

 

XKhammer wrote: ↑27 Sep 2025, 01:53

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 16:30

XKhammer wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 16:08

I can truly understand your fear of ID cards as you live mainly in Thailand and still claim benefits here which your not entitled to so they will stop you committing fraud

Ohh! That reminds me!

Hello joyo's mate (sic) at the department of works and pensions looking in on this site! Sorry for ignoring you! Very rude of me.

How's the case going?

Which one?

The one he's possessed about on here.

Apparently he's got a bee in his bonnet over several people remembering what he posted (as FACT) back in the .com days and cant own it/let it go, so he's throwing about tantrums, innuendos and hints in the hope that someone else will teach them a lesson for his self-generated embarrassment and he can claim he's not a grass.

I wish you luck in your quest - I'm the one who wrote to you a couple of years back and said that I don't have any need for the pension, remember? You replied and said I'd best take it anyway as it was a legal entitlement of mine.

FMOB???
You seem worried Oxbore you could lose the mud hut in the poverty stricken village near the Cambodian border 

XKhammer wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 09:40

Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 09:38

What you worried about you're a hermit and mentally ill and off the map

Nutsin wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:10 I’m starting to feel sorry for you lot!

Labour has turned out to be everything we knew they would be, a disaster.


What a nightmare!

Just imagine how exciting it’s gonna be when they introduce digital currency?


You better fall in line or they’ll flag your digital identity as a racist or an enemy of the state.


The darkest of times!




 

, wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:03 I’ve signed the petition and I remember signing something similar some twenty years ago, I think, when the likes of David Davies was very much against it.

To the gullible the introduction of the compulsory ID verification facility would see the gradual and eventually complete elimination of people working illegally in the UK.

There are already Laws here though sufficient to prevent illegal working with the onus being on the employer to check whether or not an employee is sound. A thorough check of Nail bars, kitchens of, mostly, ethnic restaurants and such as the host of food delivery motorcyclists buzzing our streets would reveal a myriad of illegal workers. 

To me this ID system represents and infringement of my personal liberty, my right to go about my day to day life unhindered whilst pursuing activities deemed not illegal. The storing of all this data safely too is another one of my concerns. Also it is concerning that when these IDs are faked, and they will be, the hapless employer will no doubt be brought to boot for not checking thoroughly enough.

riosleftsock wrote: ↑25 Sep 2025, 19:15 Sign and share

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/730194

 

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 16:30

XKhammer wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 16:08

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 14:44

 

He'll still double down on it (and has probably already put spoken agreements in place as to who will build the system), because he won't go anywhere near addressing the core issue.

It'll be like giving a first class passenger on the Titanic a tea cup and asking them to bale the ship out.

I can truly understand your fear of ID cards as you live mainly in Thailand and still claim benefits here which your not entitled to so they will stop you committing fraud

Ohh! That reminds me!

Hello joyo's mate (sic) at the department of works and pensions looking in on this site! Sorry for ignoring you! Very rude of me.

How's the case going?

Which one?

The one he's possessed about on here.

Apparently he's got a bee in his bonnet over several people remembering what he posted (as FACT) back in the .com days and cant own it/let it go, so he's throwing about tantrums, innuendos and hints in the hope that someone else will teach them a lesson for his self-generated embarrassment and he can claim he's not a grass.

I wish you luck in your quest - I'm the one who wrote to you a couple of years back and said that I don't have any need for the pension, remember? You replied and said I'd best take it anyway as it was a legal entitlement of mine.

XKhammer wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 16:08

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 14:44

Alfs wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 14:34 Nearly a million signatures already.  Starmer misjudged public opinion on this one.  Time for him to do a Graham Potter.

 

He'll still double down on it (and has probably already put spoken agreements in place as to who will build the system), because he won't go anywhere near addressing the core issue.

It'll be like giving a first class passenger on the Titanic a tea cup and asking them to bale the ship out.

I can truly understand your fear of ID cards as you live mainly in Thailand and still claim benefits here which your not entitled to so they will stop you committing fraud

Ohh! That reminds me!

Hello joyo's mate (sic) at the department of works and pensions looking in on this site! Sorry for ignoring you! Very rude of me.

How's the case going?

Which one?

The one he's possessed about on here.

Apparently he's got a bee in his bonnet over several people remembering what he posted (as FACT) back in the .com days and cant own it/let it go, so he's throwing about tantrums, innuendos and hints in the hope that someone else will teach them a lesson for his self-generated embarrassment and he can claim he's not a grass.

I wish you luck in your quest - I'm the one who wrote to you a couple of years back and said that I don't have any need for the pension, remember? You replied and said I'd best take it anyway as it was a legal entitlement of mine.

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 14:44

Alfs wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 14:34 Nearly a million signatures already.  Starmer misjudged public opinion on this one.  Time for him to do a Graham Potter.

 

He'll still double down on it (and has probably already put spoken agreements in place as to who will build the system), because he won't go anywhere near addressing the core issue.

It'll be like giving a first class passenger on the Titanic a tea cup and asking them to bale the ship out.

yngwies Cat" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 14:58 Our arses are owned by tech millionaires, not sure the fuss about an iD surely the same as just having passport, NI number, birth cert and all that 

Alfs wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 14:34 Nearly a million signatures already.  Starmer misjudged public opinion on this one.  Time for him to do a Graham Potter.

Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 12:36

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 11:33

XKhammer wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 11:17

Plan B is fairytale you just made up,you clearly are insane,but then again all trannies are 

OK, we all get how much you need (NEED) the government/state/authorities to be acting in your best interests (probably on account that you try and give the impression that you're a model citizen without an extreme view in your repertoire), but that ain't the case - never was and certainly never will be.

We also get how your immediate response is to go for the poster when you don't/won't/can't understand the contents of a post (made by people you already feel should be silenced/cancelled/punished/put down). Your posting history is very clear on that point.

Still, you probably feel that if the government says the only use for these Starmercards is to prevent illegal working (it won't) then that is the truth because it's a government claim, in the same way you feel that giving your money freely to Sullivan is not supporting Sullivan.

Carry on, sunshine. You'll never make the Edinburgh Fringe, but you are certainly amusing.

he's a fucking imbecile, his kind facilitate tyranny

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 11:33

XKhammer wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 11:17

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:48

Australia does, indeed have the right idea. Talking about this a while ago to a couple of Aussies I drink with when back in Thailand.

They say that they've also got a Plan B for those that get through and end up on the mainland - stick them in self-contained settlements at least 2-300km from the nearest urban development and let it be known that the intervening land is populated by crocodiles and aboriginals, and that the aboriginals are cannibalistic hunters.

No need for any form of (expensive) security - the fear of getting hunted down and eaten should they try to make their way back to civilisation keeps them in place until they're called in for processing.

Plan B is fairytale you just made up,you clearly are insane,but then again all trannies are 

OK, we all get how much you need (NEED) the government/state/authorities to be acting in your best interests (probably on account that you try and give the impression that you're a model citizen without an extreme view in your repertoire), but that ain't the case - never was and certainly never will be.

We also get how your immediate response is to go for the poster when you don't/won't/can't understand the contents of a post (made by people you already feel should be silenced/cancelled/punished/put down). Your posting history is very clear on that point.

Still, you probably feel that if the government says the only use for these Starmercards is to prevent illegal working (it won't) then that is the truth because it's a government claim, in the same way you feel that giving your money freely to Sullivan is not supporting Sullivan.

Carry on, sunshine. You'll never make the Edinburgh Fringe, but you are certainly amusing.

XKhammer wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 11:17

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:48

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:35 Australia has the right idea, no one let in on the mainland and all processing done on a remote island, we should do the same here, Gruinard Island sounds ideal to me?

Australia does, indeed have the right idea. Talking about this a while ago to a couple of Aussies I drink with when back in Thailand.

They say that they've also got a Plan B for those that get through and end up on the mainland - stick them in self-contained settlements at least 2-300km from the nearest urban development and let it be known that the intervening land is populated by crocodiles and aboriginals, and that the aboriginals are cannibalistic hunters.

No need for any form of (expensive) security - the fear of getting hunted down and eaten should they try to make their way back to civilisation keeps them in place until they're called in for processing.

Plan B is fairytale you just made up,you clearly are insane,but then again all trannies are 

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:48

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:35 Australia has the right idea, no one let in on the mainland and all processing done on a remote island, we should do the same here, Gruinard Island sounds ideal to me?

Australia does, indeed have the right idea. Talking about this a while ago to a couple of Aussies I drink with when back in Thailand.

They say that they've also got a Plan B for those that get through and end up on the mainland - stick them in self-contained settlements at least 2-300km from the nearest urban development and let it be known that the intervening land is populated by crocodiles and aboriginals, and that the aboriginals are cannibalistic hunters.

No need for any form of (expensive) security - the fear of getting hunted down and eaten should they try to make their way back to civilisation keeps them in place until they're called in for processing.

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑26 Sep 2025, 10:35 Australia has the right idea, no one let in on the mainland and all processing done on a remote island, we should do the same here, Gruinard Island sounds ideal to me?