Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Hello Mrs. Jones
Posts: 296
Old WHO Number: 224273
Has liked: 18 times
Been liked: 33 times

Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Hello Mrs. Jones »

Apparently Spurs want to get shot. Worth a punt?
ludo21
Posts: 561
Old WHO Number: 240355
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post ludo21 »

If the price is right I wouldn't say no... certainly better than what we have. Wonder if they would consider a swap with Ings...
Eastside surge
Posts: 107
Old WHO Number: 213924
Has liked: 39 times
Been liked: 13 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Eastside surge »

Looks a great player...............Once in every eight to ten weeks
User avatar
ray winstone
Posts: 475
Location: Utopia
Old WHO Number: 33640
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 37 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post ray winstone »

"Russ of the BML 2:13 Wed Nov 29 FYI, I also happen to think Moyes is a useless cսnt, my point was that people posting on an internet forum have no say in his tenure, spouting the same old bollocks, week after week isn't going to make an iota of difference in the same way me slagging the Tories off won't get them out of Downing Street, but I live in hope on both counts. HTH. :0)"
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4397
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post goose »

nothing to do with losing 20 league games last season no?
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Come On You Irons »

"ray winstone 1:31 Wed Nov 29 Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o? Come On You Irons 12:44 Wed Nov 29 A lot of threads on here are 'pathetic', Moyes Out for example, as if a club would get rid of a manager that has provided stability and a trophy just because of a few disgruntled fans on a football forum think he's a useless cսnt. ___ I agree, which is why I posted on the Moyes Out thread yesterday that I believe the mods should lock it."
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 2306
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 58 times
Been liked: 408 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post El Scorchio »

The bloke seems a total cսnt but I can see him playing like Arnie for us. Won‚Äôt be worth what spurs are going to want for him though. Levy is a massive cսnt but he‚Äôs a magician at getting incredible prices for their cast offs.
Russ of the BML
Posts: 1059
Old WHO Number: 14551
Has liked: 329 times
Been liked: 343 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Russ of the BML »

"ray winstone 1:31 Wed Nov 29 You don't go to games do you? As i would suggest there's more than just ""a few disgruntled fans on a football forum"" that think Moyes is a useless cսnt."
User avatar
ray winstone
Posts: 475
Location: Utopia
Old WHO Number: 33640
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 37 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post ray winstone »

"Come On You Irons 12:44 Wed Nov 29 A lot of threads on here are 'pathetic', Moyes Out for example, as if a club would get rid of a manager that has provided stability and a trophy just because of a few disgruntled fans on a football forum think he's a useless cսnt. We all have our opinions, and isn't that the beauty of these forums? Whether our opinion counts is another thing...."
Come On You Irons
Posts: 675
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 20 times
Been liked: 73 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Come On You Irons »

These threads are pathetic. Supporters have zero say in signings so it's a totally futile exercise debating whether we should or shouldn't sign X player until we are strongly linked with them.
User avatar
ray winstone
Posts: 475
Location: Utopia
Old WHO Number: 33640
Has liked: 31 times
Been liked: 37 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post ray winstone »

"That dude Openda up front for Leipzig last night looked a bit decent, fast, slick control and good finisher, 23 years old, probably wouldn't come cheap though...."
Eerie Descent
Posts: 705
Old WHO Number: 270194
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Eerie Descent »

"Admittedly I don't watch loads of football where West Ham ain't involved anymore really, but on the odd few occasions I've watched him, I've never understood why he's rated. Decent enough if like Northern Spurs you're desperate for us to remain an average shithouse boring cսnt hoofball team, but if we want to properly progress we need much better."
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3089
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 442 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Lee Trundle »

"Thoroughly dislikeable, and has been a complete FLOP. I wouldn't risk a lot of money on him if we are interested."
Northern Sold
Posts: 1110
Old WHO Number: 21756

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Northern Sold »

Yeah fair point Sidey...
Side of Ham
Posts: 1481
Old WHO Number: 215633

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Side of Ham »

We don't get decent deals from Tottenham.....in fairness they get great money for their stars or their dross.....
Northern Sold
Posts: 1110
Old WHO Number: 21756

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Northern Sold »

Too be fair when he was with the Mersey Blue noses thought he looked good... double digits goals last 4 seasons with them 2018-19 - 14 Goals 2019-20 - 15 Goals 2020-21 - 13 Goals 2021-22 - 11 Goals Oh granted he's been proper shite at the Bagels.... however a deffo upgrade on Ings... and fuck knows what Antonio has got to laugh about the fucking buffoon ... oh and whacked in 20 for Brazil... if the deal was half decent then it would not be the worse
Side of Ham
Posts: 1481
Old WHO Number: 215633

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Side of Ham »

Forget that he’s shit…..Tottenham would make sure we are well out of pocket in any permutation of a deal…..
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 752
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 9 times
Been liked: 66 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Gary Strodders shank »

Will they take Danny Ings in part exchange ?
Moncurs Putting Iron
Posts: 629
Old WHO Number: 210923
Has liked: 48 times
Been liked: 39 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Moncurs Putting Iron »

Mrs Jones would like you to stop addressing her as it's clear you are quite mad.
Nagel
Posts: 482
Old WHO Number: 11802

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Nagel »

"I could see Moyes liking the idea a lot. Richarlison has pace, strength, aerial ability, good work rate. He likes cutting in from the flank so could create overloads on the left with his Brazilian compadres Emerson and Paqueta, providing space for Kudus and Bowen to bang the goals in. The fact that he can't find the back of the net and seems to have serious mental problems is a bit of an issue obviously. Would hate for us to buy him but a loan move until Moyes leaves in the summer would probably work out okay for all parties. I dread what kind of striker Moyes would waste money on in January otherwise."
Fauxstralian
Posts: 2682
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 42 times
Been liked: 268 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Fauxstralian »

One of the few transfer decisions Everton got right as they got immersed in their financial meltdown resulting in a well deserved points deduction Looked good for Watford who sold him at good price and was so-so for Everton who managed to get their money back from Tottenham. Has been resolutely mediocre and ineffective there. Antonio mocked him on his podcast for the number of times he scored and took his shirt off only to be offside or VAR denied Seems Richarlison got the hump with him Richarlison doesnt seem the brightest. Whenever I see him I get the impression his head is solid mahogany
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Manuel »

And here we have the worst thread of 2023.
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 138 times
Been liked: 439 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Manuel »

And here we have the worst thread of 2023.
pdbis
Posts: 170
Old WHO Number: 212174

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post pdbis »

we haven't got the money even if interested and he is out injured for a while anyway.
The Fonz
Posts: 363
Old WHO Number: 224414

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post The Fonz »

"Moody fucker and probably would see us as being below him. However, I think there is a player in there and he would be a good fit for us. It would also be nice to have Brazil's number 9!"
Texas Iron
Posts: 2028
Old WHO Number: 10221
Has liked: 118 times
Been liked: 40 times

Re: Richarlson sim ou n?£o?

Post Texas Iron »

You must be joking… We need A STRIKER…F F S… He can’t score…just whines…
Post Reply