Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Fury v Usyk

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Phall Throw
Posts: 196
Old WHO Number: 307525

Fury v Usyk

Post Phall Throw »

Fury to win? Usyk to win? Draw? Called off at the last moment? Fixed? Not interested? May have to actually pay form this one as I can't be fucked arsing around with shit streams that buffer every 3 seconds. Fury inside 8 if he is 100% prepared Usyk on points if he has a good night Draw for the purpose of a rematch and more money could be a good punt You cunts?
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Takashi Miike »

"""U listen to commentary far too much.."" I didn't have the commentary on"
Eerie Descent
Posts: 705
Old WHO Number: 270194
Been liked: 1 time

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Eerie Descent »

"I honestly can't see the why everyone is up in arms, Taylor won 2 clear rounds in the whole fight, Catterall won 6 clear rounds, the other rounds really could have gone either way, but hardly a disgrace to give most of them to Catterall. I had it 116-112 like one judge gave it, the other judges had it 1 round different, either way he clearly won the fight. The decision in the first fight was a disgrace, this one wasn't."
TheBoleynBoy
Posts: 10
Old WHO Number: 225882

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post TheBoleynBoy »

"It was about 4-2 to Catterall in first 6 rounds, then second half fight was closer. Probably about even, 3-3 second half so yeah Catterall by 2 rounds. Catterall hurt Taylor a few times, controlled the fight in the main apart from a few rounds off."
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

Takeshi u are talking rubbish. It was 2 rounds or one round or a draw max U listen to commentary far too much..anyone who knows boxing knows that wasn't dominant. It was close.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3035
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 642 times
Been liked: 945 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Takashi Miike »

"Arum must be going senile. It was as dominant as the first fight, this time Jack landed harder/cleaner shots. taylor constantly marching forward but getting caught the whole fight, it was a perfect display of counter punching"
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 730
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 385 times
Been liked: 255 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

"goose 2:55 Same here fella, 115-113 to Catterall. Those wide margin cards were a fucking joke. Much closer. Arums rant at the end was quality, the scuzzy old cսnt."
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

Sorry boys but u can see what arum.is saying. The widenss is.bullshit. If it was given cos of 2 years ago it still makes.boxing bent. I had it level into last round.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post goose »

"Fuck sake, who let Bob have the microphone. It’s got some front criticising judge’s decisions……."
Stowie.40
Posts: 94
Old WHO Number: 305127

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Stowie.40 »

"Right man won, stupidly wide though. Someone get Bob out of there fuck sake, state of him."
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

The margin was to make Jack have faith in boxing again. Bellshill was it that wide. Fuck boxing.
Dwight Van Mann
Posts: 476
Old WHO Number: 209776
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Dwight Van Mann »

"Good fight, scoring a bit wider than it looked"
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post goose »

Richie Woodhall had it 7-5 Catterall. 117-111 is a bit mental.
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

Can't
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post goose »

Unanimous points for Catterall. Margin was a bit wide mind you.
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

"You can slag either. Both.warriors. despite Dazn fixing it for jack no matter what, Taylor made It closer than they were. Rematch for decider please."
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post goose »

Catterall by a round or two for me. Made me laugh at the bell when Taylor raised his hands and Jack looked at him and said “come off it”.
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

My man's legs have gone ?üòî
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post goose »

Big 11th round for Catterall
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

Josh will Ko him Lol PMA
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

Was it on dazn? Lol I can't bear to hear 3 voices bigging up every shot of Jack regardless.of it missing or not even if he wins.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post goose »

6-4 Catterall after 10 but he looks shattered.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 4395
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 313 times
Been liked: 714 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post goose »

6-4 Catterall after 10 but he looks shattered.
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 730
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 385 times
Been liked: 255 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Pentonville 2:23 DAZN commentary quite obvs is for Jack. Btw the judges can hear them. They influence. Didn’t appear to be the case during the first fight mate ;-)
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

They are both warriors and nobody loses really. I just hate.to hear biased chat.
Pentonville
Posts: 370
Old WHO Number: 17502
Has liked: 14 times
Been liked: 16 times

Re: Fury v Usyk

Post Pentonville »

I think alot of people listen to the commentary. Mute it and watch a fight.
Post Reply